Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, March 01, 2009
Salena Zito :: Townhall.com Columnist
This way out
by Salena Zito
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


It’s role-reversal time.

After a 16-year drought, Democrats have restored confidence among their elected officials and supporters with the swearing-in of President Barack Obama.

Gone are all traces of Battered Democrat Syndrome, the affliction caused by years of running and losing (or, worse, winning the popular vote but still losing the election).

Democrat strategist Jason Ralston of RalstonLapp said it was sort of like thinking you resemble George Clooney and learning that people see you as George Costanza. “The way out … is to change the way people perceive you,” he said.

Republicans now face a perception problem. Fair or not, they need to debunk a lot of “Costanza” images – that they are the party of old white guys, of over-the-top religious zealots, of failed Bush policies.

Consultant Dan Fee knows how Republicans feel. He went to Tennessee in 1994 to work for the Democratic Party; when he got there, Democrats controlled both of the state’s U.S. Senate seats, the governor’s office, the state House and the congressional delegation. By the time he left a couple years later, Republicans controlled it all.

Fee recalls being “constantly concerned as to whether you hit bottom yet.”

He had the misfortune to begin his Democrat-operative career the same year as Newt Gingrich’s Republican Revolution, when “You never knew where your footing should be. … By 2001 we were questioning whether we would ever become a majority party again.”

The only hope gleaned from 2000’s presidential race was that Al Gore lost the Electoral College but did win the popular vote.

“We just needed to figure out how to use that and what it meant going forward,” Fee said. Democrats didn’t have a Newt to lead the way; instead, “George Bush post-2004 did it for us.”

And, he added, they had Howard Dean, who “understood it was not about getting to 270 (electoral votes), it was about getting to all 50 states.”

The GOP needs one of two things now – for another Newt Gingrich to emerge, or for Obama to become the equivalent of George Bush post-2004.

Governor Mark Sanford, R-South Carolina, is not looking for Obama failures to resurrect the GOP. He is looking towards good policies.

“There is always a lot more soul-searching in defeat than in victory,” he explains.

Sanford recognizes that Republicans in Congress have little opportunity to advance policy, so that will be the job of GOP governors and state legislators.

Any political party can recreate its image while out of power – just ask Democrats. All it needs is the humiliation and division that come from defeat, which begins the painful process of evaluating core principals and creating an agenda that appeals to a winning coalition of voters.

After the 2004 election, the GOP was at its peak: George Bush had painted John Kerry and Democrats as too liberal; Republicans controlled Congress.

Corruption involving lobbyists, budget earmarks and spending set the stage for a complete collapse by highlighting the GOP’s inability to govern based on core principles of not just cutting taxes but cutting spending as well.

Republicans need 100 faces of reform. Looking to one new leader is not the solution. Governors, senators, congressmen, national party chairman Michael Steele – all need to become the face of a party that points to Nancy Pelosi as Congress’s real agenda-setter.

The best approach for this “out” party begins with championing government ethics. “Much of the unwieldy expansion of government Obama wants will fail,” says political scientist Robert Maranto, “and Republicans have an important role in pointing that out.”

Culture-war issues – such as Obama-appointed judges who threaten to eliminate federal funding of private universities that refuse to perform gay marriages in their chapels – are another way to separate conservatism from Democrats, Maranto says.

“The same sort of thing with the supposed Freedom of Choice (and no freedom of conscience) Act, as well as ‘card-check,’ ” he adds.

Then there is humor: “Tea parties” inspired by CNBC’s Rick Santelli are growing across the country – and helping Republicans. So would “pork watches” and related gimmicks similar to Gov. Sanford’s famously bringing a pig to his state legislature when it proposed a huge budget.

Sanford declined to do that last week in Washington while he attended the annual meeting of the nation’s governors.

“I thought about it, for about a minute,” he said. Instead, he concentrated on going through the fine print of the Obama stimulus package.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Salena Zito is a political analyst, reporter and columnist.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
ElkoMike-NV
My last posting on a similar opic got edited by the Wrb, BUT HERE GOES::We all need to pay CLOSE ATTENTION TO UR neighbor CA.. Mr OB has an even worse scenario in store for all of us!!
There's not enough money in the WORLD to begin to implement the WELFARE STATE He/his *Cronies* have under way, much less sustain it!!! I am very fortunate in that I OWN (don't owe a dime)a
Medium size farm, equipment, etc and 2 other properties, so I can/will survive..CALL UR REPS NOW, Scream and Holler til U get results!! Cheers!!

a few disagreements
1)Zito posits that Democrats have restored confidence in their leaders. It's really much more that those in power in the GOP have been so bad and backed a horrible President that a shift was natural.
2) It's not about policy, it's about Constitutional fidelity. Policy is another way of saying innovation without the process of Amendments. At the Federal level we need those who realize that we have gone far beyond the limits of Article 1, Section 8.
A BTW here, I find that many who are regarded as conservatives, or labels themselves as such are from it. Really how is it that someone like Mike Huckabee is speaking at CPAC, and look at the straw poll taken where Romney received the highest percentage of votes. Are you kidding me? And what are John Boehner and Mitch McConnell doing there? If there was any Constitutional understanding Ron Paul (who admittedly I know only a little of) would have been the biggest vote getter. Oh heck, let me go further here, knowing I'll probably be despised, but the big Conservative hero, Reagan, HE WAS A LIBERAL. The man pushed Social Security, welfare, and healthcare. He gave amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants, and yet he's lauded as "Conservative". I know he "said" a lot of conservative things, but actions are louder than words. The Republican Party is not conservative and never has been.

reply to lilly #9
Real conservatives are opposed to the very idea of public education. Most of them really don't know when public education was first started in this country. And they don't care. They just want it destroyed.

By the way, that conservative phrase "government schools," which is intended to cement in the minds of conservatives the idea that public schools are like the state-run schools of the old Soviet Union, was invented by Milton Friedman, no friend of anything public.

Cultural issues
Actually, eliminating federal funding of private universities would be a good idea. The federal government has no business and no Constitutional authorization for paying for such things. Incidentally, neither does Congress have Constitutional authorization to fund state universities.

cont'
I mean, don't you "clean jeans religious right absolutists" really have a single NORMAL PERSON to run ?
Mcshame was percieved as a lecherous money grubbing gold digger like Kerry, with his superrich trophy wife...
JUST HOW SICK ARE YOU REPUBLICANS.... ?
Now, think about WHY ... Palin was so enormously, overwhelmingly, popular...
A mommie, with a nice looking hubby, a family, and she shopped at Walmart...no divorces, no sex scandals, no big deep endless pockets like mcshame, kerry, bush... IN OTHER WORDS A SOMEWHAT NORMAL, MORAL PERSON, THAT THE AVERAGE CITIZEN CAN AT LEAST HAVE A SHRED OF FAITH IN - THAT WHEN THE MONEY JAR IS SITTING BROKEN OPEN ON THE FLOOR IN THE SECRET LOCATION - SHE WILL ACTUALLY PICK IT UP, PUT IT BACK IN A JAR OFF HER OWN SHELF, AND LEAVE IT WHERE IT BELONGS, BECUASE SHE'S A DECENT PERSON - LIKE MOST OF THE REST OF US !
Get it right next time republicans - GET IT RIGHT!
Guess what - it won't be a filthy rich, multiple divorcee, with an endless DC crime record untouched and unconvicted under their belt...
It would be some NORMAL PERSON - I however doubt the republikooks can control their own lib swerved consulting stupidity machine - other than by nominating the very next in the pecking order....gosh who is the next in the pecking order - which failed moron from this past election will they run in the next one ?

Palin
Cresen7 is exactly correct, and the only thing that prevented a severe spanking was the Palin pick, that the fumbling idiotic gang of 14 traitor/campaign Feingold lib slush fund McCain, the fool "torture doesn't work" halfwit or more libtard old goat, deranged JERK, by his own, pathetic, left wing visage, HAD TO HAVE, to even begin to save face.
Ron Paul (CONSERVATIVE)*clue* had a following, even on the Foxnews debate votes, but the idi0t republicans took libs advice.
Duncan Hunter was ignored. Trophy wives, sick divorce records, half hearted, don't wanna run but were coerced into it ruled.
The republicans would have EASILY won with Palin at the presidential pick from the word go, but can the insane media controlled republican machine of "polling consultants" ruled. The same old, tired, graven image, the republo neo-kook " SENOIRITY RULES " kicked in - so the old goat traitor McShame was "inline", it was "his turn" as the Bush son left, formerly replacing Daddy, with the same " seniority rules ".
Then, in a twist of failure - mcshame happened to be born outside the USA, and the raging whorehouse question of legality for Obama, still entirely unanswered, sqweaked out a win, too....
All I have to do is figure out whom is "next in line" in the old goat pecking order of the republo kook machine, and I would then already know the next nominee for 2012.
Anyone want to tell me whom to expect ?
( I guess I could also look for the most leftward, hated, traitorous, dem helpful, lib leaning republican the news on the national scene just can't get enough of, and I'll also have the next "republikook" leadership pick. )

dealing with reality
I hope Zito is right that the GOP refrain from pinning its hopes on Obama's screw-ups, and focus instead, as Mark Sanford says, on promoting "good policies".

Agree with Zito that the salvation and resurrection of the GOP, if it is to come at all, is more likely to come from its governors than from its U.S. House members.

Reason for that GOP governors are attuned to the electorate at large within their states, while GOP house members, due to gerrymandered districts, have the luxury of representing a distilled and purified electorate that may not be reflective of the nation, or even in tune with their own state.

Democrat Governors and House members also experience this same phenomenon.

Governors are more likely to deal with reality.

Sanford may posture and grandstand that he'll refuse some Stimulus funds, but at the end of the day, the state legislature in South Carolina in its collective wisdom is not likely to turn down "free money" in this financially strapped environment of state budget shortfalls.

elko.mike
Very Well Said.

I might add that it is nothing else than the "pursuit of happiness" that is the "American Dream" which we hear so much about. The American dream is not merely to be able to own a home, or any other tangible value. The American dream is to be able, each of us, to pursue happiness as we define it.

For me, happiness includes being able to spend 20 minutes under a hot shower. For some one else it might include flying cross the country in a private jet, or driving a muscle car with a 400 cubic inch engine. It is in this since that I bristle at the Global Warming control freaks telling me that I should restrain my pursuit of happiness to meet their concerns for saving the planet.

Okay. Got that off my chest. Feel better now.

Opps..
Sorry for the double post..don't know why that happens sometimes. If anyone can tell me how to avoid doing that, I would be most grateful.

Dukas and baseballdoc
I could be wrong, but I believe that the young man actually said, "Protect Liberty" rather than respect the Constitution. And in my opinion he was correct in doing so.

The Preamble declares the purpose of the Constitution to be to "...secure the blessings of Liberty.." Yet, the eighteenth Amendment put the Constitution in conflict with that stated purpose. If it is ever ratified, the Equal Rights Amendment will do the same.

Conservatives ought always to defend Liberty-- even if that sometimes puts us at odds with the Constitution.

Dukas and baseballdoc
I could be wrong, but I believe that the young man actually said, "Protect Liberty" rather than respect the Constitution. And in my opinion he was correct in doing so.

The Preamble declares the purpose of the Constitution to be to "...secure the blessings of Liberty.." Yet, the eighteenth Amendment put the Constitution in conflict with that stated purpose. If it is ever ratified, the Equal Rights Amendment will do the same.

Conservatives ought always to defend Liberty-- even if that sometimes puts us at odds with the Constitution.


To roadmaster
Re "After 50 years of gubmint run schools etc". It's 2009. Fifty years ago it was 1959. Who do you think ran the public schools before 1959, if not the government? In fact, as our states became states, one by one as they ratified the laws by which that state would be run, they included mandatory free public education. The original reason was "Biblical literacy"---so that people would be able to read the Bible, although the obvious value of having citizens who could read, write, and compute was also acknowledged.

How's this?
...1. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILTY

...2. RESPECT FOR LIFE

...3. LIBERITY = smaller FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

...4. RESPECT THE CONSTITUTION

Conservatives are Right
(pun intended) on the issues.

Our Declaration of Independence sets out the relationship between God, man, and government. Thomas Jefferson wrote those magnificent words "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

It starts with God. Liberals want it to be a secular society. That's not what the Founding Fathers said.

Life: Conservatives are obviously on the right side of this one. Among liberal positions are abortion on demand, infanticide, Terry Schiavo, and no physician assisted suicide.

Liberty: The Framers knew the tendency of government to accumulate power and become oppressive. They created a limited government model for America so that we could maintain our freedom. Conservatives want the liberty promised by the Constitution.

Pursuit of Happiness: The key word is pursuit. The Founding Fathers believed we were all created equal and therefore our opportunities should be equal. Liberals believe in equality of outcome. To achieve their goal they believe in the heavy hand of government.

There you have it. Conservatives are right on the issues.

rdk
"WELL MEANING...effort"?!! I'm all for civility, but "WELL MEANING"?

If the Left so loves socialism, can't they go to one of the many other countries that already have it? Take their friends, take their families, make themselves new, more perfect communities in, say, France. Why must they ruin the incredible successful experiment that is America?

Obama appears to be seeking ultimate power by following Alinsky's Rules for Radicals but I can see no way in which this could reasonably be called "well meaning."

RDK, Yes Indeed
We also have the best product: liberty is better than government, no matter how well intentioned, that is oppressive.

We have message work. Conservatives know we can't just say no. Also Conservatives must be be sure our message is positive and right on first principles.

Americans revere the Constitution though after year of posting to TH I realize that most don't know what it says. They revere it still.

Among its key principles are limited government with the Federal government having enumerated powers. It takes more effort to explain why it is better for everyone if they work out their own problems rather than having a Messiah solve them for you.

That being said, one thing we have to do is stop talking about cutting taxes. We know taxes are essential to government and that limited government is essential to a strong society. So let's go back to the Constitution and offer Constitutional, limited government -- low taxes and prosperity will follow.

Road to recovery
It will take the nation and particularly the Republican Party some considerable time to recover from the damage done by Bush. What CPAC recently demonstrated is that the road to recovery has begun. The immediate task at hand is to inhibit Obama's well meaning but misguided effort at creating Democratic Socialism out of the USA Republic.

dukas, let me suggest
we substitute liberty for smaller Federal Government.

As you know the Founding Fathers were believed that liberty was the way to prosperity. They gave us limited government to help us maintain our liberty.


Pattiotism
The Republican President (Bush 43) and the Republican Congress were not patriotic in that they didn't behave as I think Republicans should-cut spending, cut corruption and misbehavior, communicate better with the public, combat Democratic propaganda, enforce the law (illegals)-I could add more. In their defense, having the MSM all for the liberals and the economic downturn (caused, in my view, by Democrat sponsored action about loans to unqualified borrowers) made it almost impossible for even a conservative Republican to win (and McCain surely was not one).
I am sorry to see the U.S. do poorly-as I think it will with Obama's program-but perhaps the Republicans will have learned something. Once a government program gets going, though, it is almost impossible to get rid of it. Look how long it took with Spanish-American War telephone tax.
Donald W. Bales

Bush' *failed policies* produced
five years of a DOW reaching 15000

five years of the lowest unemployment stats ever (4.36 once)

five years of near 0 interest and 0 inflation

the deposition of a tyrannical monster in the MidEast and replacement of him with the FIRST Muslim-Arab democracy

Bush was never responsible for Freddie Mac (1938), Fannie Mae (1968), or the CRAs (1978 anda 1992) that mandate banks MAKE BAD LOANs in the name of *diversity* and *nondiscrimination.*

Bush tried in 2003 to address those bad bank laws, canvassed the country in 2004 trying to talk up Soc. Sec. problems, and also in 2005, Bush, with McCain in the Senate, tried to restructure Freddie and Fannie--and were vehemently opposed by BARNEY THE FRANKLESS, CHRIS THE UNARTFUL DODGER, OBAMA THE DELUSIONAL MESSIAH, CLINTON THE LADY MACBETH, CHUCK THE I LOVE NEW YORK TAXES SCHUMER, AND CHUCK I DON'T PAY MY OWN TAXES RANGEL.

Those nitwits are now in charge.

Anyone who voted for any of them is probably about to get what they deserve.

Thanks.
...1. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILTY

...2. RESPECT FOR LIFE

...3. SMALLER FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

...4. RESPECT THE CONSTITUTION

Cannot be any simpler.


Side note!
Mark Sanford is MY Governor--and I have met him and looked in his eyes. He is a brilliant, sincere man who is absolutely committed to doing the best thing for ALL the people of SC.
He WILL read the entire "porkulous" bill, and reject anything that takes away from State programs that are already working well--and also reject anything that keeps ties to the Feds overseeing how the State does things. I'd love to see him do a "Soverignity Declaration"
for SC, as 11 other States have done--to keep State's rights with the States--as the Constitution has specified. The Porkulous Bill tries to take most of these away.
Jim DeMint is another Rebel Rouser that I support fully--keep an eye on both, they have an excellent grasp of what BO is trying to do to this country--and neither one likes it a bit!

Roadmaster: Love the way you think!
HOWEVER--why are you all just hunkering down and preparing to take 4 years of this??
WRITE SCOTUS--every week--and DEMAND that, as our Public Servants, they actually HEAR at least one of the myrid suits about the "natural-born citizen" issue!
BO held a closed door meeting with 8 of SCOTUS right after taking office (totally illegally) while 3 of these suits were before them!
No question that he TOLD them to refuse to hear ANY of these suits--because BO KNOWS he's not really eligible to be POTUS. (he practiced Constitutional law--remember?)
WHEN we finally force SCOTUS to actually depose witnesses, examine evidence, and question defendants; despite the fact that they certainly don't want to--they will be forced to conclude that he is NOT eligible to be POTUS.
They have to VOTE, and write their HISTORICAL opinion which sets precedent--after ANY rule. NO WONDER that they prefer to not hear any of these suits!
Their job is to interpret Constitutional Law--not change it--and they know what they will have to conclude after hearing one of these.
WRITE SCOTUS--WHEN they hear one of these suits; BO will be out, along with his whole thieving cabinet AND all the bills he's signed into law (including HR1) and we can start over with a much cleaner slate and LOTS of good lessons learned!
I believe we've learned enough from these 6 weeks to last us through a valid rebuilding of this country--WITHOUT government interference in state and local programs that are working.
For a format as to how to write them and where to send the letters: http://www.obamacrimes.com
Good luck!

Pessimist
'"Much of the unwieldy expansion of government Obama wants will fail“..."and Republicans have an important role in pointing that out.”'

We've been pointing our butts off to no avail. And there's more coming. With 75 percent of Americans thinking he walks on water, we're going to spend ourselves into oblivion....or the laps of the Chinese.

GOP EMERGENCE
Values need to appeal to people. Clearly expressed values, sorely lacking with tongue-tied Bush. I do not agree we need to appeal, or target, minorities, as that means offering them programs that could never match the cradle-to-grave comfort of the left. Another problem is the perception that Wall Street is right wing Republican. perhaps some were, but it doesn't matter, as perception is everything. When they tanked, the party tanked. Most Americans are not sophisticated, but they are plain and simple and not easily fooled. If Obama's spend all the money programs work, he will be in power forever. If not, one term.

Stink
This whole BO stink that has crept into this country is a bigger joke than al gore and john kerry. People are already smelling the bad odor, they made their choice now they pay the consequences and it is going to get worse not better as long as the people who voted for the stink cannot admit they were wrong about the demo party. What goes round comes round, you get what you deserve. It is very sad for the younger generation.

DUKAS NY

...1. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILTY

...2. RESPECT FOR LIFE

...3. SMALLER FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

...4. RESPECT THE CONSTITUTION

.....COLOSSUS

GW BECAME A DEMOCRAT

.....GW turned into LBJ ...stubbornly sticking with an unpopular war while recklessly spending on domestic programs ...

.....OBAMBI became the new FDR to GW's Hoover ...If Conservatives stray from their principles, they will lose every time .....COLOSSUS

CPAC Revelations
This was a great meeting, but one issue not addressed: The dearth of minority participation. Agree with Crescen7 - Conservatives must develop their own media channels. There is no hope of winning over MSM.

Whoa.
There is a war going on between policy and principle. You can have policies with no principles, but principles define policy. Our principles have taken a mudslide; Arnold ends up begging yet treats it as a joke.
Now Obama and friends who have strong principles based on Saul Alinsky’s world view.
He gathers to his side those who have no principles at all.
And every single one of our principles should be as important as the rest. What does that 14yr old kid say, there’s only 4.
1.) ?
2.) ?
3.) ?
4.) ?
Do you know?

IGNORANT voters,
prefer full on liberal, not liberal lite. And thanks to 50 years of gubmint run schools, THEY ARE REALLY IGNORANT!!! Not stupid but clueless about who we are and how we got here. Got this little gem of a video in my email this AM: http://www.wimp.com/thegovernment/


When weepublicans forgot their conservative values and became the "me-too" party, the gimme voters, grabby babies and greedy pigs figured out there was more goodies in the dhimmicrat's bag.

Now we have the black Santa Claus, the annointed One, Lord Obama, unencumbered by opposition nor good sense, careening down the track towards TOTAL power. Oligarchy here we come.

Look forward to Obama's Brown Shirts to begin breaking up Tea Partys. Like Hitler, the black Jesus needs to create chaos in order to become supreme leader.

Welcome to the new banana republic, the USSA!

Not Really . . .
The Democrats didn't re-invent themselves. They took power because Republicans failed to support and defend the Conservative values on which they were elected.

Democrats used a single personality and a lying media to win the Presidency. The Republicans have no chance of duplicating that effort.

Democrats used the same lying media to fan the flames of a non-controversy called "maccaca", and a no-sex "sex scandel" to demoralize Conservative voters in mid term congressional elections. Over spending by Republicans did the rest.

Both the good and bad of the Republican Party is that we don't vote for failure or incompetence (at least not always), while the Dem faithful ALWAYS vote for THEIR GUY no matter what.

Republicans can't just re-brand - they have to walk the walk - or they'll continue losing.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.