Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Ryan Zempel :: Townhall.com Columnist
Vote for Cultural Change
by Ryan Zempel
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Would you care to cast a vote regarding what you'd like the culture to be like? You can do so this weekend. And every weekend thereafter.

It'll only cost you the price of a movie ticket.

Every weekend the entertainment industry focuses its attention on one place -- the box office. And every weekend, the success or failure of any movie opening that weekend communicates to the entertainment industry what it is that the public wants to see.

Saw opened well? Then we shouldn’t be surprised to see Saw II and Saw III at the box office. Jonah: A VeggieTales Movie tanked at the box office? It’s no wonder we haven’t seen Bob and Larry on the silver screen since.

So what are we to do? Decry those degenerates who enjoy blood and gore? That may make us feel better, but it wouldn’t accomplish anything.

Instead, we should opt for a much more enjoyable and constructive alternative -- let's all go to the movies!

Judicious movie attendance can send a loud and clear message to Hollywood. Far too often, conservatives sit on the sidelines, waiting to be assured regarding the political and moral purity of a movie before even approaching the theater a few weeks after the movie opens. That's a few weeks too late.

According to Jonathan Bock, president and founder of Grace Hill Media, “Opening weekend is the barometer by which Hollywood measures success. If a film earns a lot of money in its first three days, nothing else matters. It’s a hit, and the industry will immediately scramble to make more films like it.”

In Hollywood, the amount of money a film makes is the bottom line. They don’t care about the values of conservatives unless those values are having a direct impact on their bottom line. One can argue that Hollywood would be doing much better if they weren’t offending our values, but they won’t understand that until they see movies that share our values raking in the cash at the box office.

So where do we begin?

Well, thanks to Walden Media, conservatives have an ever-increasing number of opportunities to vote for cultural change. Education-oriented Walden is committed to bringing award-winning children's literature to the silver screen and has already treated us to Because of Winn-Dixie, Holes, I Am David, Charlotte's Web, and The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe.

This past weekend Walden released Bridge to Terabithia, which landed in second place at the box office, letting Walden know that their strategy is sound and sending a message to the rest of Hollywood (wouldn't you like to inspire some copycats?) that this is just the sort of family-friendly entertainment we're looking for.

Of course, the desire for family-friendly entertainment is a message Hollywood has probably already pretty well-ingested (although it never hurts to remind them that quality movies like Bridge to Terabithia are preferable to some of the dreck that passes for kids’ movies these days).

However, when it comes to movies that adults enjoy, Hollywood could stand to become a bit more educated. And this upcoming weekend, thanks once again to Walden, provides a perfect opportunity.

This Friday, Walden's Bristol Bay Productions comes out with an incredible offering -- Amazing Grace, the story of William Wilberforce and his fight against the slave trade. Like the classic Chariots of Fire and the more recent Luther (a box-office disappointment), Amazing Grace offers an inspiring portrayal of a man who impacted history by living out his faith. I don’t know about you, but this is just the sort of inspirational faith story I’d like to see more of.

I’ve already had a chance to see Amazing Grace and I can attest to its excellence – artistically, morally, and inspirationally. I plan to see it again – this Friday – and I plan to invite a number of other people to see it with me. You should do the same.

Amazing Grace itself is a lesson in the cultural change we need to be effecting. As Wilberforce’s friend William Pitt the Younger tells him, “we’re too young to realize that certain things are impossible.” Like Pitt and Wilberforce, we should be undaunted by the task of changing the culture to better reflect our values. And we can do so, quite simply, by watching this movie this weekend.

Significantly, Bristol Bay has already announced plans to follow Amazing Grace with a film adaptation of "The Screwtape Letters" by C.S. Lewis. Their plans will doubtless be affected by the success -- or failure -- of Amazing Grace.

It's time to get out there and vote.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Ryan Zempel is the Chief Creative Officer of RegenerateCulture.com which is dedicated to sparking a reformation of arts and entertainment.

Be the first to read Ryan Zempel’s column.
Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
Sign up today
Going so well...
And then you brought up "Amazing Grace".

Nope, I won't be going to see any more revisionist "historical" films. And nobody else in the modern America will go see historically accurate films, since such films (if ever produced) would offend the brainwashed masses of the past 3 generations. I won't go see "300" for the same reason.


jdw
All history is revision.
Now in some sectors "revisionism" is a dirty word.
For instance, the right (a little to general but I'll go with it) has
been against adding "cultural" or identity history of various groups,
see African American, women, etc. And often against attempts to
tell history "from the bottom up"
This should be debated. Always keep in mind this
HISTORY CHANGES THE PAST STAYS THE SAME.

Now, when it comes to Holocaust revisionism (a better term is
Holocaust denial) we truly have evil afoot. That said, good
well researched histories of the Holocaust will indeed revise
past histories of the Holocaust.

Now, when it comes to films, we are dealing with a different
animal. First it is always from the point of view of the director
(and writers), and he has to tell the story in less than 3 hours to
be commercially successful. So, often decisions have to be made
to make things like composite characters (several people in one
character), changing language to get a rating you desire - pg /
pg13, etc. And most importantly what to include and exclude.

All that said, do you know something about _Amazing Grace_ we
don't know? What liberties have they taken?
And are there movies you think that get history correct?


(btw, I don't think the 300 is going to try to get it correct. It will
be a purposeful historical fiction meant to entertain. Like the
Patriot and a host of other movies.)

Sorry, we don't movie
My wife and I see almost no movies in theaters. If we want to see something, we wait until it comes out on DVD. We find the movie-going public obnoxious and potentially dangerous.

P.S.--to the poster above, what's wrong with Amazing Grace? It was one we were planning on waiting for.

This movie also looks good...
The Astronaut Farmer (PG) looks like a fun, inspiring movie about an individual working hard toward a dream, with the support of his family, against the hidebound bureaucracy that fears individual initiative.

I don't know where you're from, but I have found most moviegoers to be civil. We don't go often because of the cost, but when one looks really good, we'll catch a matinee.

The Astronaut Farmer we want to see especially, since my husband would *love* to go into space. I really like the positive family aspects the story seems to have (from the trailers and description). I think we've lost a lot of that pioneering spirit from our culture, and subsumed it into risky but ultimately pointless recreational activities.

I hate opening weekends
Too many people in the theater. I will often take a few hours leave time in the afternoon of the following week to go see a matinee screening, but I will avoid opening weekend. Sorry if that doesn't vote correctly, but it's a personal choice.

JDW, what's revisionistic about Amazing Grace? I haven't seen it yet, but what I've read sounds like it's pretty true to what Wilberforce did. If you're going to make a forceful comment about that, you should perhaps back it up with some examples. Since you haven't seen it yet yourself, I'm not sure how you could make that statement. Would you care to back it up?

reviews
metacritic has given it a "generally favorable review"
http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/amazinggrace?q=amazing%20grace

I'm not sure it is based on Adam Hochschild's
_Bury the Chains: Prophets and Rebels in the Fight to Free an
Empire's Slaves_ ,but I recommend it highly:
http://www.metacritic.com/books/authors/hochschildadam/burythechains?q=bury%20the%20chains

My wife and I are looking forward to seeing it tomorrow.

As it is
What Ryan is advocating is happening. We can not steer culture by buying morality. If we did not raise our children we must live with them when they become adults.

everyonesfacts
I hate to destroy your post-modern, relativist, Stanley Fish-inspired "deconstruction" of history, but there is a huge difference between "revisionism" as presenting previously unstudied apects of a subject, and revisionism as outright lies. Sorry to tell you, but there are objective facts out there, and, even when we don't know them, there are theories which are far more likely true than others.

So, for example, the thesis of "Gun, Germs, and Steel", controvertial as it is, is far more plausible and acceptable as revision, than, say, the thesis of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail", which (despite Hollywood's fascination in this incarnation and the more recent "DaVinci Code" incarnation) has been torn to shreds by every serious historian who bothered to examine it.

So, don't say that "all history is revisionism". History is an attempt to approach the truth, as much as that is possible, while much of "revisionism" is a conscious or unconscious attempt to distort or ignore the historical record.

Astronaut Farmer
The movie seemed harmless fun until I heard the mandatory anti-Bush line in the advertisement. Honestly, I don't mind politcal perspectives, even extreme ones, and some of my favorite films have political slants 180 degrees opposite my own, but does every film have to have a facile "Chimpy McBushitler is soooooo DUMM! Look, he couldn't find the WMDs!" joke in it? It is getting as bad as the irritating and ubiquitous "peanut" jokes about Carter were in the 70's.

My Mistake
I have bene informed, Chimpy McBushitler is an outdated term. He is now "Chimperor McBushitler The Decider". It is still "Darth Cheney" as far as I know, though I am sure someone can correct me on that too.

There's a better idea
Not long ago, I purhcased the DVD "Adventures in Babysitting" based on a number of reviews. It sounded good, but it had some fairly rough language that passed the PG-13 rating somehow.


Churches should start making family movies and showing them in their facilities. They have the capital and ready-made auditoriums. When Hollywood sees how many patrons are sucked away by that, they'll change.

andrews
You wrote:
"So, don't say that "all history is revisionism". History is an attempt to approach the truth, as much as that is possible, while much of "revisionism" is a conscious or unconscious attempt to distort or ignore the historical record."

I think we are agreed, except for one point. Reread my original post,
especially about the Holocaust. Nothing I said disagrees with your post,
except that "all history is revisionism."

If your not going to revise another history why write at all?
Just have a footnote - See _Guns, Germs, and Steel_

An Even Better Idea
A certain Neil Postman wrote that "the problem is not WHAT we watch---the problem is THAT we watch." The modern media is, in and of itself, the problem. Television and movies are both passive media, no thought or action required.

The solution is simple: get active. Vote with your mind as well as your money. Don't go to the theaters, turn off the television set. Take up a hobby. Read. Or even---gasp !--do something with your family.

Do that, and the Hollow-wood producers (along with their un-indicted co-conspirators in the marketing industry) become screamingly irrelevant.

Your servant,

Lord Karth

Everyonesfacts
You may write to add to rather than revise current historical theory, but that was not my point.

When the original post used the phrase "revisionism" it was obviously used to desribe a highly politicized, agenda-driven approach less concerned with truth than with grinding certain political axes. Your response seemed to say "well, all history is".

If that was your contention, that all history is inherently biased, then I do take exception. There is such a thing as putting aside one's own preconceptions and approach a mater honestly. The fact that many academics argue otherwise gives me little hope for academia, but it does not convince me otherwise.

As a matter of fact, my current beliefs are evidence of this. I was a rabid leftists for a large portion of my youth, and, though as partisan as anyone else, I managed to put aside my biases and rationally assess my beliefs at the time.

On the other hand, if you not making the argument that all history is but a catalog of historians' biases, then your initial post is somewhat misleading.

Everyonesfacts
And, as a contra to your Guns Germs and Steel reference, see "Carnage and Culture" which makes a very traditionalist argument against the thesis proposed in "Guns, Germs, and Steel", making it useful as an historical argument, but not something one would call revisionism.

I was unclear
I think I may have been unclear.

Not all history is revision. Often it is filling in balnks or clarifying previously undefined positions.

For example, "The Golden Bough" contains almost no original research. (It seems the footnotes and bibliography are longer than the text in some chapters.) However, it does prevent a novel conclusion by using previous work. However, it does this (in general, with some exceptions), not by overturning the theses of these older works, but by applying their data to new matters, those to which it had not previously been applied.

I could probably think of more examples, but that one was on the bookshelf in front of me, so it was the easiest to use.

In short, my point is that much of history is not so much overturning accepted work, but filling in the rather massive blank spots left in our current understanding of the past.

(The following is even less supported than the rest of my opinion, so take it is pure "opinion" with little mroe than my feelings to back it up)

Unfortunately, those who throw stones at the accepted works tend to get a lot more press, but usually our understanding is much better served by a horde of small, humble contributions than by one dramatic iconoclastic work.

history is constructed
Andrews, glad you checked back in.

But sad to say, I think your notion of history is wrong.
"If that was your contention, that all history is inherently biased, then I do take exception."

All history is biased (has a point of view).
Biased does not mean false.

"There is such a thing as putting aside one's own preconceptions and approach a mater honestly. The fact that many academics argue otherwise gives me little hope for academia, but it does not convince me otherwise."

No, what you say is impossible. It is the duty of the historian
to be as objective as possible. Historians do this while at the
same time knowing this is impossible. But the attempt needs
to be made.

"Not all history is revision. Often it is filling in balnks or clarifying previously undefined positions."

That is revision. Revision can be a supplement. Like all new
editions to a book are a revision. A filling in the blanks would
be a revision of world history, would it not?
Not the best source, but the best source to prove that history
is constructed (and therefore biased) and revised is Wikipedia
and Wiktionary:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revision
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/revision
"As a matter of fact, my current beliefs are evidence of this. I was a rabid leftists for a large portion of my youth, and, though as partisan as anyone else, I managed to put aside my biases and rationally assess my beliefs at the time."

That you think your current beliefs are not biased and
"rational" proves my point. What is rational to you might
not be rational to me, which does not mean either of our
rationales are incorrect.

You might agree with the ruling of the FL legislature that
asked teachers to not teach history as constructed. That
this is impossible makes the law futile.

See here for comments on the law:
http://www.ednews.org/community/showthread.php?t=90

A shorter contra to Guns, Germs, and Steel is J.R McNeil's
(son of Bill McNeil, possibly, rather probably the greatest living
historian) review:
http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/ht/34.2/mcneill.html

I recommend it
Just got back from the film.

It seemed historically accurate.
I'm not so sure about the personal conversations between
Wilberforce and Pitt, et. al. but the movie was likable even
inspirational. Not a movie that has to be seen on the big
screen, but I enjoyed it and my wife learned a lot from it.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.