Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, November 05, 2006
Ruben  Navarrette Jr.,  :: Townhall.com Columnist
Outswifted by himself
by Ruben Navarrette Jr.,
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


What's worse, being stuck in Iraq or stuck on stupid?

We may have just witnessed the end of what was expected to be John Kerry's encore bid for the White House. Chances are the former Swift boat captain will not be reporting for duty as the Democratic nominee in two years. And for that, the country can be grateful.

How could someone with a fairly decent education who is speaking to students about the importance of education wind up saying something that sounded so uneducated?

What John Kerry said on Monday about how young people either ``study hard ... and make an effort to be smart'' or they ``get stuck in Iraq'' was totally lame -- and his excuses for why he said it were even lamer. Shelled by criticism from the right, the Massachusetts senator at first defiantly refused to apologize, insisting that it was the Bush administration that owed the country an apology for having a ``broken policy'' in Iraq and arguing that what he really meant was to insult Bush for not doing his homework when it comes to the war.

But none of that rang true. And when the criticism became bipartisan to the point where Democratic candidates started distancing themselves from him, Kerry tried to atone for a ``poorly stated joke'' with a poorly worded statement. In it, he expressed ``regret that my words were misinterpreted to wrongly imply anything negative about those in uniform'' and apologized ``to any service member, family member or American who was offended.''

That's terribly weak. Why do career politicians, on the rare occasions when they do apologize, always make it sound as if what they're sorry about is that someone took offense -- not that they said or did anything offensive? Career politicians such as Kerry have also perfected the knack of taking what could have been a one-day story and turning it into a three-part miniseries.

Instead of immediately admitting a mistake and begging for forgiveness, many of them go from insulting an individual or -- in Kerry's case, the U.S. military -- to insulting the rest of us by feeding up whoppers about what they really said, or what they really meant when they said what they said.

The initial infraction may get the headlines. But in the end it's the far-fetched excuses that do the most damage.

Kerry came across as an elitist snob. OK, maybe that's not a news flash. Still, for someone who tried to milk his stint in Vietnam and medals for all they were worth in the 2004 presidential campaign, it was stunning to hear Kerry dis the military as a second-choice career path for those who haven't made ``an effort to be smart.''

But, if you get past the part about the military, there was something valuable in Kerry's remarks. At the core, he was talking about something young people need to hear a lot more about: How people make choices as they go through life, and how those choices sometimes have dire consequences. His sermon was about personal responsibility and how we shape our own destinies. He was reminding a generation that is in danger of getting sucked into the new American creed of blaming others for your woes that there is no point in seeing yourself at the mercy of powerful and sinister forces beyond your control. And, however clumsily, he issued a blunt warning that those who don't dig into their studies may wind up with fewer options in life.

It reminds me of when anti-immigrant activists go around arguing that unskilled immigrants depress wages for high school dropouts, then they jump to the conclusion that the answer is to limit immigration. When the real moral to the story is this: Don't drop out of school unless you want to suffer the humiliation of competing with -- and possibly losing a job to -- a low-skilled immigrant with a sixth-grade education who can't even speak English.

Success starts with accepting personal responsibility and taking ownership of one's life and making good choices. That's what Kerry was really trying to convey. Granted, he made a mess of it with his ``joke'' about Iraq. But that doesn't change the fact that this is exactly the right message for these times and this generation. And delivering it requires no apology.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Ruben Navarrette Jr. is a columnist and editorial board member of The San Diego Union-Tribune.

Be the first to read Ruben Navarrette's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Fair enough Paulie...
...but whether he skulks away to bloviate again tomorrow or next week, he will still be a clueless buffoon when he does it. Personally, I think the more he crashes about in the political china shop, the better Republican prospects look in 2008. I say keep him out there, feeling full of himself and pontificating endlessly in that excrutiatingly Lerch-like manner.

SandMan: focus on Kerry
I'm a little late to the party; I spent entirely too much time catching up with Stewie.

But do let me throw in my bon mots:

I believe that my brethren were villifying Navarrette for, among other things, attempting to get the great unwashed (that's us) to look up instead of down re: the honorable Sen. Kerry. If only we can be distracted by the shiny object, then perhaps Lurch can skulk away and pontificate another day.

And, by the way, what the he11 is this guy doing on TH anyway? Who's next, Al Franken?

BlueBustard: Thank you
Thank you for being embarrassed for me. I appreciate it. That saves me from wasting time doing it for myself, if I felt so inclined.

Which I don't.



But thanks anyway. I'll keep you in mind if I ever leave the house after forgetting to zip my fly or something. "It's BlueBustard's fly!"

in defense of Navarrette
I am no defender of illegal immigration (as I assume Navarrette is) but he makes a valid point concerning the need to aquire marketable skills. In order to enjoy an elevated standard of living, one must either possess an advanced set of marketable skills, or be able to force the market to pay you in excess of your market value for your labor. If an uneducated and unskilled laborer in Malaysia (or wherever) can do for $1 an hour what another demands $10 to perform, why should the consumer be forced to pay it? To the extent that consumers are forced to do it through trade and other restrictions, they are in effect being forced to subsidize the inefficiency of others.

Thanks
Thank you jerubaal, and its nice to know someone understands my screenname.
BrianR, I understand common sense isn't so common anymore. It has been replaced with PCness, but I am more of a traditionalist anyway, so thank you for letting me be a Moroon too.

Competition for jobs
Navarrette:

"It reminds me of when anti-immigrant activists go around arguing that unskilled immigrants depress wages for high school dropouts, then they jump to the conclusion that the answer is to limit immigration. When the real moral to the story is this: Don't drop out of school unless you want to suffer the humiliation of competing with -- and possibly losing a job to -- a low-skilled immigrant with a sixth-grade education who can't even speak English."

This is where this 'pundit' shows his hand - and his limp logic. The fact is that many of these jobs are entry level type employments that non college types typically fill - or even college types between studies. Legal American citizens shouldn't have to compete with illegals for them because they and their parents paid the entry level as citizens to qualify for them.

And everyone who has even taken a first year economics course realizes that the more people that want a limited good, the price will be bid up and the more people that are available for a given job, the wage is depressed because of the willingness of more toaccept it for a reduced wage.

Inherent in this piece is a veiled contempt for the native employee - that he will not accept certain types of work because it is beneath him. The fact is that a native worker has to get a certain wage in order to cover his costs - that illegals almost routinely avoid because of their fraudulent participation. In return, many unscrupulous employers are complicit accomplices in this fraud because his costs will be lower.

Americans generally have always felt that work is ennobling, despite the left's best efforts to make them state dependents, and have viewed one job as a stepping stone to a better type of employment. When illegals flood the job market, they deprive Americans of these entry level positions at acceptable market wages.

Jr., here, will next be spouting Marx's surplus-value and alienation theories of production. TH, I say get rid of him - he's a socialist propagandist.

Imagine my surprise
In the not too distant past I sparred frequently, via e-mail with Mr. Navarette. His column appeared in the supposedly conservative Dallas Morning News. Imagine my surprise at finding him on Townhall.

A Bunch Of Abject Morons YOU ALL ARE!!
After reading your moronic carping, I had to re-read the article. Obviously some of you didn't even read it properly ONE TIME.

Then I had to re-read some of your comments. Then I commpared them back to the article.

YOU commentors are the idiots.

Damn near all of you. I'm embarrassed for you.

Here's some more Stewie
My favorite thing he ever did was kill the mysterious man in white that he thought was coming to put him back in the womb on his birthday.

"I want to get the he ll out of here"

Stewie "Oh I'm sorry, we're fresh out of that, all we have left here is untimely death!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqICPaYovj8

Illegal Immigrants?
Nancy Pelosi hires nothing but Illegals to work her NON UNION vinyards in N. CA
This is why she does not want to stop illegals.

And the SEVERAL hispanic citizens I know are more ticked off at these Illegals than we are.
They say the Illegals work for nothing and people want to hire them for nothing too.

BrianR
You've gotta watch it. The best part is at the end, where stewie destroys a diverse family's happiness.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Okzm8A5wR24

buck
You're entirely too clever. They're both funniest when NOT trying to tell a joke!

Learn about Stewie Griffin here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Okzm8A5wR24

P.S.
Thanks for slaying all the firstborn.

Apollyon
You're already in. Anyone whose screenname means "The Destroyer" is more than welcome.

Just a thought...but...
Ya' know...has anyone thought about this....? The media and the libs are forever telling us how unsmoothe George Bush is, and how he lacks the ability to be glib and flubs his words..all of which shows a lack of intelligence and on and on an on.
So...how come the same rules don't apply to the other end of the horse? HMMMMN?!? It really is sad, in a way, to see the end of this putz...I was looking forward to the battle between 'the horse's face' and 'the pigs rear.' Oh well, there will be other side shows to pop up.

buck, Appollyon
Buck: LOL. But who's Stewie Griffin?

Appollyon: Exercise common sense, and you're automatically enrolled.

group of Moroons
and how, pray tell, do I get myself into this group of Moroons, as Bugs would say. It looks to me like good company with inciteful dialog.

BrianR
One glaring fact the socialistic libs keep illustrating:

That the biological impossibility is actual fact, there more horses asses than horses.

I don't know which is funnier, Kerry trying to tell a joke or Stewie Griffin trying to tell a joke.

JimP: The difference between you and me
I DID realize the libs have as many horses asses as they do and you so ably symbolize.

Townhall Downhill?
This columnist is sometimes carried in my Ohio newspaper. It's occasionally interesting to read his column and see what his opinion is since it's from a different perspective, although I usually don't agree with him. I don't consider him a conservative and, as others have stated in their posts, wonder why he and some other non-conservative columnists are included on Townhall. There are other sites I can go to if I want a wide range of columnists' views. However, the truly conservative columnists on Townhall have a wide range of topics, insights, and perspectives to suit me without the need to diversify to a broader spectrum. I've been reading Townhall since Katrina made the news last year and, for the most part, believe the changes that were made to the site in July are not what I'd consider improvements. The site has a lot more "stuff" and the homepage is a lot busier looking, but it mostly just makes it more time-consuming to locate items I'm interested in reading. The only real benefit I've seen is The Funnies.

He knows this!
"I keep hearing that Hispanic American citizens do not want the lawbreaking illegal aliens any more than do the rest of us. But that is not what I keep reading in columns by Hispanic sur-name columnists...."


Mr. Navorette knows this, and to his credit, has actually written about it, but still managed to push the fact to his agenda. This is, of course, everyone that is not Hispanic is hateful and racist. The first time I read such an admission was after I fired of an angry email to him regarding a column he published that offered figures I accused him of pulling out of thin air. I pointed him to a couple left wing web sites that also did some polling as I knew he would not believe me.

In my work, I have taken actual polls of legal Hispanics, (those who immigrated legally, or are second or better generation Hispanics.

Over three polls, all told me they have suffered some level of prejudice and persecution as a result of illegal aliens.

Consistently, over 75% of legal Hispanics were against illegal immigration.

Selective Application
Mr. Navarrette has certainly raised Orwellian doublespeak to an art form.

It would be instructive for him to visit the following website: immigrationshumancost.org. But this assumes that objectivity and reality would be able to persuade someone so completely doctrinaire.


"Study Hard, Do Your Homework..
..Or you might end up in the Barrio..."

I keep hearing that Hispanic American citizens do not want the lawbreaking illegal aliens any more than do the rest of us. But that is not what I keep reading in columns by Hispanic sur-name columnists....

Travis
like most Americans, I don't live in border states and wouldn't know what illegals (or legals for that matter)doing custodial, work make.

My point to my relative was if it is so great that Americans have to envy the wage--WHATEVER it is, then what's keeping Americans from taking the job?

The answer of course isn't the pay; it's the connotation that maids and janitors are not positions of value or respect...it is a position that "anybody" can do.

Thus, since the money is NOT the issue, the solution isn't to pay workers more...the "solution" is to give the custodial worker it's "due" as valued, contributing members of the work force.

In fact, when you (and people like Kerry) insist that these workers NEED government help, you perpetuate the idea that these people cannot feed and care for their families on their own no matter how hard they work.

I am sorry but THAT (and Kerry's implication about the military) IS insulting. If I was in either field, I would find it highly insulting AND ignorant.

jerubaal
I have heard a pun is the lowest form of humor, so i am trying to elevate myself enough to rise and master the type. Any higher form is obviously hopeless.

JimP
Can I be in your asses list? I'm not stupid enough to be in Snotonmyscreen's and I'm feeling left out.

Actually, I'm probably stupid enough. I just haven't gotten my message out.

BrianR re: GO USA
Did he write another completely incoherent post?

He seems to do that very frequently, like two for two already that I've seen. In the first one, which was not at all comprehensible, was titled "Raising Minimum Sanity". And made no sense whatsoever. I don't mean like high taxes to boost the economy type of making no sense. I mean you can't even understand him nonsense.

Pistol
"Your cool pun got a rise out of me."

Were you also being punny there?

Navarette the Scribe
"mp writes: Sunday, November, 05, 2006 11:37 AM
Kerry & Illegal immigration?
How does this writer go from one to the other?
Answer: Very skillfully!! Navarette has mastered the art of transitioning from one subject to another, without missing a beat. This guy would make a sharp politician, someone that Kerry, Kennedy, et al,would certainly envy.

I Have Had More Than One Complaint About
Mr. Navorette. Mostly the problem I have with him is total distortion of facts and that he tends to make things up when he has nothing to back up his opinion!

I have had the ignoble pleasure of discussing this with Navorette, but each time he resorts to name calling and accusations rather than addressing the facts.

Ruben Navarrete
I forgot to mention that Navarette's column also appears on the editorial page of the Ausin American-Statesman, our hometown version of The Washington Post or The New York Times.
That's journalism's contribution to "Keeping Austin Weird".

Outswifted by himself
Huh?
"A relative living in California complained about what she assumed was an illegal (Mexican) getting $15 an hour for cleaning homes while she worked in an office for $12 an hour. Now, my first reaction to this was...well go work as a maid if you want the money maids makes."

Maids must really be in great demand in California(aka Lalaland), to command such a high salary. Not so with many other workers out there, specially those illegals toiling away in some of the garment-making plants(aka sweatshops), or the farm workers trudging from dawn to dark at back-breaking labor(remember Cesar Chavez and the United Farmworkers Union?).
And why do those folks work at those low-paying jobs, often under deplorable conditions? Because , since those workers are illegals and will work for cheap pay, long hours, and deplorable conditions, that's what the employers hire....slave-like labor, because those employers are to cheap to pay local folks a livable wage and decent working conditions.
Here in Austin, illegals are swarming in, literally overwhelming our schools and health systems, while employers get rich on cheap labor.
By the way, the likes of Kerry and Teddy-bear Kennedy are against any meaningful form of immigration reform.
And here I thought all these Demoncrats were supposed to be champions of the working class, the folks most negatively impacted by the swarms of illegals!!!




Kerry is a good representative
of today's Democrat party. Remember that on November 7th. They consider themselves too 'elite' to even think about supporting the guys who're protecting their freedom. Condescending Kerry leads the way.

hmmmmm
Hosecuervo, there is a difference between misspeaking and uttering a total gaffe. Kerry did the latter, while Bush often does the former. I actually find Bush's mistakes to be quite endearing, and I think many regular Americans do also. He comes across as a sincere speaker rather than as an automaton like Kerry comes across. Bush is a decent and honorable man, I thank God he became president rather than Kerry who is nothing more than an opportunistic politician.

"We"
"We?" Who is "we," sucker? There is you; then there is us.

Huh?
A relative living in California complained about what she assumed was an illegal (Mexican) getting $15 an hour for cleaning homes while she worked in an office for $12 an hour. Now, my first reaction to this was...well go work as a maid if you want the money maids makes.

So I can get the idea that victimization is bad for everyone...even Conservatives and I even get the idea about giving yourself all kinds of options so you won't have to "envy" the illegal worker who is doing work that you consider beneath yourself.

But what I don't get is why this has anything to do with Kerry's obvious put down for our professional fighting force.

Fact is that there IS a class system in every society--and in America, this class system is based on money and title. In Kerry's view, the military is not EQUAL to those at the bottom of the rung...maids, janitors, and fruit pickers...the military IS the bottom rung.

I am sorry but for the guy who wants to be the Commander and Chief and a leader of the party who wants to be in charge of funding the troops...to express such a low opinion is unconscionable--and as unforgivable as treason.

And for those who ask...no I am NOT questioning Kerry's patriotism...from his calling his Vietnam Vet brothers in battle baby killers, to the charge he leveled against the military last year...I already KNOW how much he loves, supports, and defends this nation.

Ruben outs himself as liberal
I have read several of this guys columns and each one he has managed to work in his pro illegal slant. As far as I am concerned I am going to just automatically vote him a one on any column he writes now and in the future untl TH drops him.

Probably the best way to handle this
Joker would be to vote the one box and not post a responce.
Negative comments seem to encourge him.
I'm not going to give Navarrette the satisfaction anymore.

Go USA: Whaaaatttt?
Your post made absoluetly no sense whatsoever, and I read it three times (woe unto me).

What, exactly, are you trying to say? Other than the one line of standard "GOPers are devils" malarkey, you wrote absolutely imcomprehensible gibberish.

This writer...
...seriously needs some instruction on critical thinking. Kerry personally is, and is representative of, the party of dependency and blaming others. Personal responsibility of an anathema of the left's political philosophy of socialism. To support personal responsibility is heresy to a Democrat. Kerry's message was his usual in regard to the military: hostile.

Mr. Navarrette put the most beneficial (and outrageous) spin on Kerry's behalf by reinforcing Kerry's message that going into the military is the result of poor life choices. Amazing.



Stucky's Predictions
If you do study and do your homework, you will find the truth about who is stuck and where. GOP does not want anyone to know this however. You know everything's fine, stay the course, mission accomplished.

GOP is bad for Morality, bad for national Security and bad for the Environment.

The liberal stick will reverse now and in 08 Mr. Stucky who declared that 'we are in the last throes of...bullll.

Navarrette,
"But, if you get past the part about the military, there was something valuable in Kerry's remarks. At the core, he was talking about something young people need to hear a lot more about: How people make choices as they go through life, and how those choices sometimes have dire consequences. His sermon was about personal responsibility and how we shape our own destinies. He was reminding a generation that is in danger of getting sucked into the new American creed of blaming others for your woes that there is no point in seeing yourself at the mercy of powerful and sinister forces beyond your control. And, however clumsily, he issued a blunt warning that those who don't dig into their studies may wind up with fewer options in life."

No. This is what you wanted to get out of it. And that's fine. Nothing wrong with that. But to impute that thinking to Kerry? Everything the guy believes, has said, and has voted for goes against this.

Another Chirp from the Unpure

OrlandoRob and Gordon: Good posts. Neither do I read Navarette as attempting to vindicate Kerry, but rather just pointing out that there was more to the speech that might be worth considering.

But now that I also have revealed myself as too unpure of thought for this sacred conservative site, I'll submit my post and crawl off in shame.

mp
Please note: The writer did not use the term "Illegal." That, in itself, should tell you something about his philosophy.

Pistol: HEY!
I resemble that!

Watch it, bub!

Your post to snot was a crack up. ROTFLMAO.

Now we all have a new A-list to which we can aspire: snotscreen's Dirty Dozen.

Jer and all
Heh heh heh

One TEENY little check mark.

Democracy in action!

Raidencraig
Please cease those compliments to Brian. He's conceited enough already.

Snot
I am hurt and insulted by being left out. Please advise how abusive i must be to earn your disapproval.

Unbelievable.
Once again, I ask, why is Townhall keeping this MEChA moron on the website? Jack Kemp, Jacob Sullum, and Linda Chavez are bad enough. And now we have to put up with Navarrette too? Wasn't this supposed to be a conservative website? At least Kemp, Sullum, and Chavez (as much as I despise them) can write a column *once in a while* that doesn't set my teeth a'-grindin'.

Townhall, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?

Pistol
Yeah, one check basically is absolute zero.

Sawdust
Your cool pun got a rise out of me. :o)

Wow!
We really grinded down this guy's vote tally didn't we?

I helped.

Raidencraig: Thank you, sir
Watch out what you write. Snotscreen may lump you in with the rest of us morons.

snotscreen:
"Oh, I just figured it out. Yeah, it's the State Asylum team: BrianR, Goshawk, uwcharlie, Lydia. Achilles will be very comfortable here."

Why, snotscreen, how delightfully condescending of you! I am, indeed, very comfortable here, but now that you've opened my eyes to my intellectual failings by being so, in your post which was almost incomprehensibly worded -- due I'm sure to my woeful inability to penetrate the complex and intricate musings of your own superior mind -- I'll have to reassess that comfort and see if Sesame Street may be more attuned to my educational level.

In the meantime, please understand if I decide to just soldier on anyway. I'm sometimes stubborn that way; one of my many failings, I'm sure.

Kerry & Illegal immigration?
How does this writer go from one to the other?

OrlandoRob and Gordon
If Kerry was truly interested in giving the students an inspirational speech he would not have used the opportunity to take a jab at us vets, or the President. Kerry, along with the Klintons an Bore, have a long record of despising the military and the Republicans in general. I have no interest whatever in hearing anything they have to say. The same applies with Liberals that post here.

Good lessons taught
Up to the gratuitous Iraq reference, Kerry was giving good, standard-issue career advice to his college student audience – advice all conservatives could profit from hearing. Ruben didn’t make the point, but could have that we should listen to an intelligent opponent because they may say something useful – a nugget inside a pitch with a flawed conclusion.

Kerry’s fundamental problem that causes him difficulty is that he rejects this, and sees [fill in the blank] as the incarnation of evil. This plays into a point Ruben made about converting a one-day story into a mini-series. Think how easy it would have been if Kerry had only treated it as a misstatement/embarrassment/apology story that same day. For Kerry, an appropriate apology was inconceivable, and such advice from his staff would have been rejected.

These lessons apply to conservatives and business life as well.

Not so fast
Many people's comments here seem to act as if the article writer, Navarette, has vindicated Kerry. It's no argument that Kerry has now politically buried himself and that he's a jerk. Everyone now knows that by his actions. What IS interesting is how bad he was at delivering a good message because he's such a jerk. I think that Navarette has tried to take a non-biased approach to actually getting to what happened that day and not going along with the normal media blitz about it.

It's a bit refreshing to see someone actually listened to the rest of the speech and comment on it for validity, even if the speaker is arrogant and I don't like him.

Think about how much more widely received truth would be accepted by people who don't normally read conservative media if they actually saw someone really do their homework like this all the time.

I am no Kerry supporter and I'm confidant he's going down in flames due to his comments and lack of apology, but I support the columnist's approach on this one, sorry...

Pistol
You have a good point about voting on the column. So if thats the case I will now vote "one." Yes your right about the difference's in speakers. Yet I've never heard Bush say "It's not what I meant." But when Kerry, or any Liberal exposes themselves through their own words. The Liberals pour out of the woodwork like cockroaches in defense and proceed to tell us lowly unlearned folks what he meant.

And for a columnist like Navarrette to explain to us all what we missed. i.e. His true and Great meaning was. Is repugnant!

The only joke here is Kerry and those who rush to support him!

Dave got it wrong
The budget deficit went down under Clinton (not the only thing to go down during the Clinton years) mainly because he cut defense spending. We never had a budget surplus as Slick claimed, the national debt rose every year (not the only thing to rise during the Clinton years). Bush has spent way too much, one of his greatest disappointments. But you have to give the guy credit for doing his best to defeat the Islamofascists, a job which ol' Slick avoided like the plague. And a job we hired him to do, by the way.

So let me get this straight
Kerry made a major gaffe in expressing his contempt for the military, and then compounded it with a weak "apology" to the "morons" in the general population, who were too stupid to get the joke. From this, according to Ruben, we are supposed to learn that while education is good, massive immigration of unskilled workers to this country is great.

Colleges and universities please take note: You'll have to start requiring Logic 101 for all jounalism majors, if this is the sort of pap they'll be producing without it.

Funny Stuff, and Kind of Tragic Too.
Yeah, I too was a little surprised to read an article like this, on the Ohio State Buckeye website. Like, who are these fans of other teams?

They most all sound like folks from French university teams, or the Land of Oz university teams.

Or maybe I got onto the wrong website. What I read here doesn't sound like Americans of any State.

Oh, I just figured it out. Yeah, it's the State Asylum team: BrianR, Goshawk, uwcharlie, Lydia. Achilles will be very comfortable here.

Yet, I still always vote Republican -- have since 1960.

Goshawk
Don't know for sure, but i don't think zero votes are counted. I'm following BrianR's advice and voting 1 check. This is probably the lowest mark taken into the average, and if it isn't, it doesn't help much.
Hosecuervo
The difference between Bush's gaffes and Kerry's latest, is that Kerry's "mispoke" comes across as a Freudian slip, revealing his true attitude towards our military and supporting many previous actions, which he is trying to repudiate. The incidents where Bush mangled something come across as (pick one) honest mistakes, confusion, limited speaking/speech powers, reading difficulty/ dyslexia with his script. Not to his credit perhaps, but not revealing something he wants to hide.

Ruben - please present your green card.
Someone needs to call INS on this guy and ship him and all 312 family members crowding into his apartment back to Durango where they belong. Then again, TH only has to pay him .02 per word and if they had to pay american pundit rates, well - could they afford the Coulters of the world? Hmmmm. Dilemma.


Kerry
Thank Goodness we are once again saved from the likes of Kerry. He would be a disaster for this Country. I think he can write of ever being President. Hillary must really be celebrating.

He Nailed It
This guy, that some call a dufus, a jerk, a liberal, nailed it: "Don't drop out of school unless you want to suffer the humiliation of competing with -- and possibly losing a job to -- a low-skilled immigrant with a sixth-grade education who can't even speak English."

But people would rather insult the writer than address what he wrote. Reason: they can't present an argument against what he wrote because what he wrote is right on!

"Success starts with accepting personal responsibility and taking ownership of one's life and making good choices." This is certainly not a liberal statement.

Let't take responsibility. Was Saddam in Iraq for so long because of liberals? Who was commander in chief when we abandoned Iraq back in 1991 when we had the opportunity to take him out but walked away? But we blame the liberals.

Under which administrations did the budget deficits skyrocket? And under which administrations was it reduced? But we blame the liberals.

We blame the liberals for everything.

I'm with BrianR and Goshawk
As we get closer to this election, it is clear that several columnists appearing regularly in Townhall are at best weak conservatives and at worst, closet liberals. Navarrette and Bruce Bartlett are two, there are at least 2-3 others. We do not expect columnists to spout the conservative line blindly - when mistakes are made, they need to be pointed out, and they are, but when you read a column that dumbly takes the liberal or Democrat line the way a liberal would, I agree there should be a way to vote the idiots off the island. At this time, we should be reading nothing but "red meat" columns backing the conservative cause and blasting the libs without let up.

How Very Like a Liberal
How very like a liberal as Hosekuervo takes the occasion where BrianR and others point out that Navarrette clearly twisted a weak comdemnation of Kerry into an appeal to going soft on illegals and then Hosekuervo can't hide his liberal colors by taking the occasion to insult George W. Bush. Hosekuervo unbelieveably would have rather had traitor Kerry as president, which shows his powers of judgement. Kerry would have been a disaster as president. In fact, doesn't the judgement of the American people in 2000 and 2004 come through loud and clear when we all realize, even the liberals, that Algore and Kerry as the heads of state would be embarrassments beyond reason. Whatever libs say about Bush, they realize he has led the nation forcefully and bravely in its defense over terrorism and presided over the recovery of the economy and the lowest unemployment in years.

Better than Bush but...
Kerry would have made a much better president than Bush but still falls way below the standards we should demand for our leader. His comments were incredibly stupid and he is done as far as a national office goes. And rightly so. But if you want to judge a person based on what he misspeaks, Bush would have been lynched for some of the stupid comments he has made. Granted, the bar is lower with W - We have all come to expect him to make a fool of himself on a regular basis and to overlook it. But wouldn't be great if we could find an intelligent leader who could actually bring us together? I hope that when this election is over, we will be able to put our differences aside and elect a real leader? But has Rove and Co. poisoned things beyond repair??

BrianR and the above.
I don't recall having read any of his stuff. But after reading this I can see he's not worth reading again.

I don't know how the voting system works on TH. But as far as I'm concerned Navarrette deserves no vote at all.

Ruben? Here?
What, are you kidding me? This jerk is the last person I would expect here at Townhall. Well, maybe except Al Sharpton.

This jerk doesn't belong here.
He cleans up John Kerry's unforgivable insult to our troops and twists the insult into a "positive" message. Kerry honestly expressed his contempt for the military. Ever since then Democrats have been trying to spin away his idiotic remarks.

Now here comes Ruben. I noticed that Ruben refers to immigration. Not illegal immigration. This guy is no good. I don't know why Town Hall has him on this site. It seems that Town Hall is evolving just like Fox News. You can't trust conservative icons, or conservative news outlets. I really hate that.

As far as Naverrette is concerned, I spit on that clown.

Dang it.
That posted before I was done writing it. I got carried away with the "enter" key on my PC.

ANYWAY, I am voting this turkey one star on the column rating, and urge all others to do the same. Maybe TH will dump his column.

I KNEW it!
This dufus started out on a good tack, but knowing Navarrette, I knew he'd somehow work it around to his support for illegal aliens.

I CAN'T STAND THIS GUY!!!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.