Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
Ruben  Navarrette Jr.,  :: Townhall.com Columnist
Dems Flip Flop on Iraq
by Ruben Navarrette Jr.,
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

Democrats in Congress bristle when Republicans accuse them of wanting to "cut and run" in Iraq. But here at home, in terms of the politics of the war, that's exactly what they're doing.

Democrats have decided that the Iraq conflict is one ugly baby, and they're right about that. But from their rhetoric and short memories, you'd never know they were directly involved in its conception.

That became evident when Rep. Susan Davis, D-Calif., a member of the House Armed Services Committee, sat down for a meeting with the editorial board of The San Diego Union-Tribune. When asked what might happen in Iraq if Democrats reclaimed the House of Representatives next month, and possibly the White House in 2008, Davis tried to temper expectations by blaming Republicans for botching the war effort.

"Well," she said, "you know, it's always difficult to clean up someone else's mess."

Let's recap. A majority of Democrats in Congress voted to give President Bush the authority to go to war in Iraq in 2002, and then voted -- more than once -- to continue to fund the effort. Some Democrats even hit the talk shows early on and made the case that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, or that a war in Iraq figured into the war on terror. And in the 2004 Democratic primary, the most outspoken critic of the war -- former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean -- was treated by several of his opponents as some crazy uncle who didn't understand the stakes in Iraq or the weight of decisions that had to be made by Democratic members of Congress.

Members such as Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass. After Kerry became their presidential nominee, Democrats put on quite a show at their national convention, where -- despite the anti-war leanings of delegates -- one speaker after another talked tough, saluted the flag and promised to hunt down terrorists wherever they were.

And now, Democrats want to turn on a dime and pretend as if the Iraq War is someone else's mess. With Iraq embroiled in civil war and U.S. troops overstaying their welcome, it's a mess all right. But let's be clear: It's a mess that Democrats helped make.

What's unclear is where they intend to go from here if they get the chance to lead the country. Many opponents of the war take it as a given that if the Democrats take the White House, an immediate pullout of U.S. troops would commence. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Ruben Navarrette Jr. is a columnist and editorial board member of The San Diego Union-Tribune.

Be the first to read Ruben Navarrette's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

That Is
Left Angle, assuming you are intelligent enough to realize that ANY future President, of EITHER political party, no matter what their rhetoric and posturing or how liberal and anti-war they are, would send U.S. forces to war in the Middle East if any of the following things happened:

1) Israel was attacked by the military of Iran/Syria (or both) and in danger of being taken over

2) the Saudi Royal Family was deposed by extremists

3) Iran decided to cut off the Staits of Hormuz (read about what happened in 1988), that is 40% of the world's daily oil needs.

4) Iran invades Iraq, much larger version of the 1990/91 Gulf Crisis in Kuwait

So yeah, oil is kind of important, and so is regional stability in the Middle East, of which a strong, capable, and West friendly Iraq government will play a major role. If you don't understand that, I'd love to see what the Democrat solution would be to lines of cars at gas stations with no oil and empty store shelves because the truckers don't have enough fuel to run the distribution supply chains. Oh yeah, and the inevitable violence that would ensue.

Left Angle
You say:

"why is that? because they think the iraqi people are bunch of wimps, p**ssies and punks."

And you prove by your own statements of why we should pull out and let them protect themselves that you believe the same thing about U.S. soldiers, otherwise why else should we pull out?

The cowards are the Democrats who want this nation to put its tail between its legs and go home to hide under the bed. If this war is too much for you people to take, you are never going to be able to handle the much more difficult wars this country will inevitably be forced to fight against much more sophisticated and treacherous enemies.

I'll be completely honest with why I believe the U.S. military has to remain in Iraq, and why it is very likely that it will remain so for all of our lifetimes, even under Democrat Administrations. I know you won't like this answer, but it is the truth. We have to have a willing ally and a strategic base of military operations in the region to be able to stabilize and/or fight against the terrorist groups in the Middle East, act as a counterpower to the Syrians and Iran, and Iraq is the key location to establish this. It's a desert, and doesn't have the cold weather and mountainous terrain that Afghanistan does.

I'm sure that sounds shocking to you, but imagine in a strategic military sense what would happen if a more serious regional war breaks out in the Middle East and the U.S. military had to rely solely on naval deployment of forces and a few small air bases in Kuwait. At that point, with the U.S. military options completely limited, even if we had a President like Dennis Kucinich or Howard Dean, he would be wishing he hadn't cut and run and had a base of operations with a U.S. friendly Iraq government.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.