Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, December 07, 2006
Ross Mackenzie :: Townhall.com Columnist
Reflections on the prospect - reality? - of a third great awakening
by Ross Mackenzie
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


This is huge. The nation may be in the midst of a third Great Awakening.

The Washington Post gave its Dec. 4 Page One lead-story position to a deepening split in the Episcopal Church. Two Fairfax parishes with 3,000 members between them — Truro Church and The Falls Church — will vote next week whether to remain in the Episcopal Church U.S.A. Other Virginia churches have held similar votes — or soon will.

At issue is the deepest sort of human emotion and inquiry (what is my faith, my church?), the disposition of $25 million in church property (who owns it, diocese or parishioners?), and considerable history. Both churches date from the 1700s; George Washington, for Heaven’s sake, was an early Falls Church vestryman. Three other northern Virginia churches have departed the 111-diocese ECUSA and the 193-parish Diocese of Virginia, the country’s largest.

What is happening in Virginia, arguably the U.S. episcopate’s ground zero, is a reflection of widening chasms in Protestantism nationwide. With parishioners turning off or departing the pews for sleep, golf, or Sunday-morning TV, U.S. Episcopal membership long has been stagnant at about 2.2 million — if not actually in decline. Rising numbers of Episcopal churches, weary of hierarchical arrogance and inflexibility, are affiliating with other federations or dissolving and starting anew. An entire California diocese — San Joaquin — soon may be the first to pull up its tent stakes and move on.

In turn, this developing schism in American Episcopalianism reflects what is happening in mainstream Protestant denominations across the landscape. As with Episcopalians, so with Baptists, Methodists, Lutherans, Presbyterians, etc.: All have their anger and fractious controversies about scripture, doctrine, liturgy, hymnals and ordination. Congregationalists et al have resolved their disputes in gadarene plunges over the edge.

Those looking superficially at these fights — and they are fights — too often see them in political terms (the religious left, the Christian right). Political sentiment is a concomitant part of it, but hardly the whole part. These days dominant issues among Episcopalians are scripture and whether practicing homosexuals should be elevated to the bishopric. With their 2.2-million denomination getting knuckle-rappings from its parent 77-million Worldwide Anglican Communion, many Episcopalians quizzical about their church justifiably wonder whether they are leaving it or it is leaving them.

The Episcopal conflagration in Virginia (and elsewhere) hotted up with (a) the election of a practicing homosexual as bishop of New Hampshire, and — by a supposedly chastened national hierarchy — (b) the subsequent election of a presiding (national) bishop (perhaps incidentally a pilot and an expert in northeast Pacific octopus and squid) who supports homosexual ordination.

Little wonder at the staggering numbers of new-church communicants. Protestant mainline churches clearly are a large part of the sending end of the (receiving-end) megachurch evangelical phenomenon. And the new evangelism, symbolized by more elemental faith generally and megachurches specifically, suggests a third Great Awakening is at hand.

The first occurred over a quarter-century — beginning about 1730 — in New England, the Middle Colonies, and the South. Heavily anti-Anglican (Church of England), it splintered Protestant denominations and democratized American religious practice. New churches were formed, and new colleges — Princeton, Columbia, Brown, Rutgers, Dartmouth. The Great Awakening reached one of its highest peaks in, yes, Virginia.

The second began in the late 1700s and projected well into the 1800s. Largely an orthodox reaction against supercilious (and secularizing) Protestant hierarchs, it, too, splintered many churches and led to the establishment of new ones in the westward expansion. It was zealous, simplifying, evangelistic, abolitionist, and helped produce what historian Allen Guelzo terms America’s “redeemer president”: Abraham Lincoln.

In their “Great Republic,” Harvard historian Bernard Bailyn and five others write:

“The Second Great Awakening . . . did not simply intensify the religious feeling of existing church members; more important, it mobilized unprecedented numbers of hitherto unchurched people into religious communion. But popularizing religion as never before . . . this great revival marked the beginning of the republicanizing and nationalizing of American religion. Thousands upon thousands of ordinary people found in evangelical religion new sources of order and community.”

That may confirm how big — how huge — the Protestant schisms to which we now are witness may be, with the Episcopal schism perhaps the most consequential. Do the Episcopal hierarchs and their counterparts in other denominations know not what they do? Their actions may well have precipitated a third Great Awakening that will reshape the nation’s Protestant landscape.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Ross Mackenzie lives with his wife and Labrador retriever in the woods west of Richmond, Virginia. They have two grown sons, both Naval officers.

Be the first to read Ross Mackenzie's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

If you just want to do
whatever you want, and tolerate any radial idea that comes down the pike, what do you need religion for? People want their religion to mean something, to set limits on behavior, to clearly demark right and wrong. People look to religion like teenagers look to parents. When anything goes, respect goes first.

Stop by my blog and check it out. Some good articles there. Stop by and comment, tell me how to make it better, leave an idea for an article. What have you got to lose? Just click my name and you're there.

Johnathan Edwards
saw the Great Awakenings (and contributed to them) and was thrilled, and disappointed, at how they came and, in one case, went, and all the false Christians they brought with them.

This sadness, perhaps, motivated him to author The Religious Affections - a large book detailing exactly how we can know whether we are Christians or not.

A Christian's life has three components, perhaps coincidentally: Mind, Heart, and Action.

Mind. The Christian is devoted in his thoughts to the knowing of God and to understanding Him and His Word. He believes the Bible deeply and takes up all the knowledge he can, ever learning. He systematically, logically, and dispassionately uses scripture to interpret scripture so that his knowledge slowly and continually grows. He evaluates himself and his actions based on the critical and logical application of the principles in the Word that he has learned. Because of the Holy Spirit living within him, he is able to understand scripture in a way he never could before he was a Christian, as the Holy Spirit causes him not only to be able to understand scripture, but also to believe it.

Heart. The Christian lives not only mentally, but emotionally. Because of the Holy Spirit dwelling within him, he has a new sense, like sight, of the impossibly deep, vast, and overwhelming beauty of God as revealed by His Son. This sense, this awe, this love, is at its core not based on anything that he believes God has done for him, but rather, in its essence, on the beauty of God for Who He Is. This sight of beauty, this love, this heart of praise stems not from what the Christian has received from God (though he also loves God for that as well), but from seeing, however dimly, God's glory revealed in a way that he never could see before he was saved. Any man can love anyone who he believes has helped him, but the Christian has a unique sight of the invisible God's beauty that non-Christians simply cannot possess. It is something elevated far above what any unsaved person can have by merely reading the Bible.

Action. The Christian lives out his faith. He evidences an improvement in his character as a result of his new heart. This is the outer fruit that we all can see in a person that identifies them. Does he love the body? We know because he serves us. Does he love Christ? We know because he obeys Him.

With all three, persevering to the end of your life, you have assurance that you are His.

For there are falsifications of all these things.

I can believe a false doctrine and think it true, because my mind has never been illuminated by the Holy Spirit to understand the truth, and then to believe it. Do I impose my own worldy views on scripture that have mankind in the center of the universe with God orbiting around it, or do I have God in the center and all things flowing from Him and to Him and for Him?

I can think I love Christ and see His beauty, but really I have deceived myself into thinking that Christ has done such and such thing for me, and that therefore Christ is nice because He has helped me, and therefore I call Him beautiful, because He is believed to be nice to me. But the worst of sinners love such as aid them. What inspires the awe and the trembling in you? Is it only that Christ has helped you? Or is it that Christ is majestic beyond all compare, and that this Beautiful One loves Himself more than anyone else, and that it is good and right that it be so, for He is above all lovely and worthy of love? Is it good in your sight, and does it make your heart leap with joy to know that He seeks the Father's will always and carries it out completely, even when that means casting millions of souls into hell and bringing on disaster and calamity to all life?

And much more can be said of love. Do I love God's people, knowing that He loves them and that they are the princes and princesses of the eternal age to come? Do I love them because, as the body of Christ, and being conformed to His likeness, they are a piece or pieces of Christ's own glory, and that therefore it is true that what I do to them I do to Him? Do I enjoy them, spending time with them, as the disciples enjoyed drinking and eating with Jesus?

I can even deceive myself into thinking that my actions are jobs I do to earn God's favor. Or I can be grieving to throw the money into the plate, or to go to church. I can have a ministry, even be a deacon or an elder or a pastor, and perform my service as a chore, rather than as an act of worshiping the Only God.

Test yourselves. It is a sin indeed to doubt that Christ has paid for the sins of His chosen people. But it is no sin to wonder if you are one of them - you are exhorted to do this, to have this doubt. Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling to know whether or not you are truly His.

That's a summary of The Religious Affections. No one I know who's read it came out of it feeling good about themselves. But we are challenged.

Ask Him for the real life, ask Him to show you His glory and to let you see it and be glad.

You're just noticing this now?
Billy Sunday and Billy Graham and Chuck Smith -- to name a few.

It was happening all through the last century. It's the reason that church attendance is nil in Europe, and switching in the US from old denominations to evangelical churches. It is the cause of American exceptionalism.

But in the very shadow of Sanai, they groveled before a golden calf.

Heritage is no guarentee of virtue.

Hmm. I wonder if there's something people who know how to pray, might do.


J
http://forgottenprophets.blogspot.com/


Dennis Bennett
Was part of God's ongoing hand stretched out to mainline denominations, Episcopal specifically. The Charismatic renewal, the rise of the Full Gospel Businessmen Fellowship International, and Women's Aglow sustainted membership in mainline churches for several decades. As these "clergy" dominated movements have waned and the seminaries have become dominated by the apostate, two choices remain: split and reform, or bail out and head for any Bible believing church close by.

Some very good postings!!
As a Charismatic Christian who is deeply devoted to Israel--"God's Chosen people", I find it hard to reconcile the fact that over 60% of American churches buy into the blasphemous cry of "Replacement Theology" wherein it is believed that God has given up on His people, and replaced them with the church.
As 'Profblog' rightly states, Dennis Bennett had a tremendous effect on the church--- his was a most meaningful find. Those of us who label ourselves as "Charismatic" wonder where we would have stood, had not God raised up Dennis Bennett, His faithful servant. Dennis is residing in the wonderful presence of our Lord and we are saying--"Even so, come Lord Jesus".

We are all priests of Jesus
Every believer has the right to go to their pastor or church hierarchy with Bible in hand and demand that the word of God be taught and lived by within their local church and, by extenstion, their denomination. This is why you see the reformation of the Southern Baptist Convention moving toward more conservative beliefs (and consequently the loss of some more liberal churches). Baptist churches are driven by the congregation. The pastor is there to guide us and teach us, but if we disagree with him, we can argue from the Bible and either change his theology (I've seen it happen) or ask him to resign. When our delegates go to regional and national business meetings, we are sending representatives from individual churches to tell these associated bodies what we believe the Bible says. It's not perfect, because people are not perfect, but it sure works better than a bunch of elitists who don't even believe the Bible trying to tell their members (who sometimes have actually read the Book for themselves) what to believe.

Fashion of thought among elites changes, but the Bible endures and that's why we can trust it far above any group of human beings, no matter how well educated or progressive thinking them believe themselves to be. In God's eyes, we're all equally able to understand His heart and His words.

A New Awakening?
Dear Ross, As a Catholic who has many evangelical friends, I have come to have a profound respect for those who truly believe in our Savior, Jesus Christ, and live a life of Christian action. Christian action is key to a Christian life.
That being said I have no respect for anyone who plays liberal with the Bible and the teachings of Christ. The Bible is not liberal, and it teaches us that fornication and homosexulaity is an "abomination" to our Heavenly Father. That one sins when one takes advantage of another human being from a position of power or politics.
The ten commandments are the rules of life and actually not that difficult to follow if one wishes a positive relationship with The Father.
One should always bear in mind each waking moment that our time here on earth is but a blink of time and when we pass on, that judgement awaits us all.
It is not my place to judge anyone except myself, however, we will all face the Son in judgement and it is best to fear the Lord as it is to love him and all his creatures.
Regards, Dennis

Mr. Mackenzie
"Great Awakenings" occur only on the catalyst of an awareness of the need for personal repentance due to the conviction of sin; NEVER on the awareness of a need for a change of church affiliation.

You are quite wrong and, I believe, whistling past the graveyard.

The problem with the organized denominations is not sexually confused clergy; it is a secularized congregation which has wanted a clergy class which would not require them to be any less worldly in the first place.

The chickens have simply come home to roost.

Believe me, when and if, in God's mercy, we are allowed another Great Awakening, there will be no doubt about it.


Jack H
"I have need to remind you, though once you knew this, that after God delivered the children of Israel out of slavery in the land of Egypt, He then destroyed all of them who did not believe."
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.