Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Roger Schlesinger :: Townhall.com Columnist
WHAT IS A.P.R.?
by Roger Schlesinger
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

To me an A.P.R. means Another Problem for Roger. It is the government's attempt to have the mortgage industry explain their entire operational slate in one simple manner. This is impossible and thus helps render this as useful as teaching David Letterman manners (seems like it could work, but it doesn't). I contend that if the selective memory borrowers or liars, who swore with a straight face they never understood the 1% option ARM (Adjusted Rate Mortgage) and therefore aren't responsible for the results, I can't imagine what they could do with a seven year ARM at the start of the first or second variable period. As my baseball coach used to say, "as sure as God made little green apples," we will be hearing from the same folks who had an option ARM (see above) who refinanced to a short term fixed ARM swearing someday, to anyone in Congress that would listen, that they expected the rate to go down after the fixed period because the A.P.R. was lower than the fixed rate portion of the loan. Who is to blame for that little bit of chicanery?

The answer to that question is the government. The A.P.R. idea was started for cars which are generally financed three to five years. If you could look at the Annual Percentage Rate, you quite possibly would pick the lowest interest offer instead of trying to figure it out for yourself. Hint: The government doesn't think you are very smart. As my mother would have said to that, "likewise, I'm sure." What works for automobiles, although we aren't that positive as all the American car manufacturers are bankrupt (except Ford), doesn't come close to working for the mortgage or home finance industry. We finance homes for 1 year up to 40 or 50 years and during that time, the rate can change 100 times. Put that in a formula and let the people use it!

The problem lies in many areas, but for a variable, especially a short term fixed ARM, it is truly misleading. Right now, when we have short term ARMs in the 4% and 5% range, one would think they could get a fairly good reading. Generally, short term and long term rates work on an almost flat interest rate curve, however, it is currently very steep. The one year LIBOR rate is 1.6%. Most variable rate mortgages, but not all, are tied to this index because it is international. After the fixed period, the mortgage loan becomes an adjustable which can adjust one or two times a year in most cases. There is a margin, short for profit margin, that the lender adds to the index rate for your interest rate. Most margins are in the 2% range, so if we use 2.5% and add it to the 1.6%, the new interest rate, if the loan was adjusting today, would be 4.1%. We cannot predict where this is going, we must use today's reset interest rate for the rest of the term of the loan. If you had a 5 year fixed loan and it amortized for 30 years, you would have 25 years of a variable loan left. If your initial rate was 5.1% fixed for 5 years and the adjustment rate is 4.1% as I stated above, the A.P.R. for the entire 30 year loan, setting closing costs aside for this example, is 4.26% (5 years @ 5.1% and 25 years at 4.1%). Confusion by the borrowers is expected and is definitely there to be seen by anyone with 20/400 vision or better!

The most practical use for the A.P.R. in home financing is determining how large the closing costs are, including the points being charged on a fixed rate loan. Many lenders advertise their rates and follow them with an A.P.R. but fail to tell the borrower how many points, if any, are being charged. You can tell because the spread between a fixed interest rate and an A.P.R. is usually about .1% to .125%. When points are added, the A.P.R. can get as high as .2% or more on a conforming loan.

Another problem that arises in using the A.P.R. for guidance when looking for a mortgage is that not everyone measures it the same way. I have seen brokers include property taxes when figuring the cost of the loan and I am sure that prepaid interest has shown up at times. The whole thing is an exercise in nonsense. If you are going to get a 5% rate, your payments will be figured at 5% even though the A.P.R. is 5.126%. What did you gain by knowing the A.P.R was 5.126%? Many people generally tell me their A.P.R. and can't remember their actual rate.

In the mortgage industry, whenever you apply for a loan you get a Truth in Lending Statement and a Good Faith Estimate of Costs. With the new rules in the industry, your final costs have to mirror this Good Faith Estimate of Costs, and being that is what everyone is concerned about, why must we bother with the A.P.R.? I believe it is another one of the "sacred cows " I have talked about in earlier articles that are there because no one knows who set them up, and everyone is afraid to stop sending this out for fear of the unknown. Realize the government sets these rules up. Government is the owner of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, never hesitate to talk about an interest rate without an A.P.R. In December of last year they said interest rates on home mortgages have to come down into the 4% range. Where was their A.P.R.? In loan modification, you have hear the President talk about 2% for those who could only make the payments work at that interest rate. What A.P.R., please? I guess what is good for us isn't important to them. What a surprise!

As we have seen in so many other examples, the government makes rules, sometimes laws, and never worries about the consequences. As an example I certainly can bring up the A.P.R. on a short term fixed variable loan as I did above. Do you think those who we know will be screaming when their adjustment turns out to be higher than the fixed rate, when the A.P.R. was lower, have anything to gripe about? I am not a big fan of gripers or griping itself, but this time they just may have a point.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Roger Schlesinger's Mortgage Minute is heard on hundreds of radio stations and daily on the Hugh Hewitt radio show and Michael Medved shows. Roger interacts with his hosts and explores the complicated financial markets in order to enlighten his listeners and direct them along their own unique road to financial freedom.

Be the first to read Roger Schlesinger's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

APR
is an attempt to make the true costs of loans understandable. The reason this is required is that lenders increase profits by front-loading many costs into a loan, including discount points, and then try to claim an interest rate which does not include these costs. The problem with APR, is that it is figured based on the assumption that the loan will not be refinanced, or that you sell, so the upfront costs are assumed amortized over 15 or 30 years (typical loan term). that makes it look "cheap" to pay all these upfront lender fees which of course are great for the lenders/brokers. If the APR were figured on the typical 5-7 year life of a loan, they would look much more expensive (which they are) compared with just paying straight interest on the amount borrowed.

zapdoodat

Good post thanks,

Yes as you can see when Bush's decisions followed the Liberal philosphy of government intervention, he lost popularity with conservatives. Bush even stated "this goes against his conservative values". Indeed it did go against conservative values.

What is hard to square is the lack of integrity among Liberals.

Bush would do the same things as Clinton and Liberals would be mad at Bush only.

Obama is now doing the same things as Bush and Lbierals are still mad at Bush and overjoyed with Obama.

So clearly there is a "dis-connect" among Liberals who decide if they like a President based upon what the Liberal media tells them they should like.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.