Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, September 28, 2006
Roger Schlesinger :: Townhall.com Columnist
Words today don't always have a meaning
by Roger Schlesinger
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Advertising is my avocation and therefore I am very attentive to almost all advertising. Too many words are heard on the air that in my opinion haven't any meaning and simply desensitize our minds. The words “we are number one”, “a name you can trust”, “simply the best”, “preferred by more (you fill in the blanks)” and “brewed to perfection” are just phrases that add nothing to the qualifications of the product or service, and are meant to convey an image that cannot be proven. What is "the best", "trust" or “perfection”? These are meaningless examples of a company's attempt to persuade you, and they are considered harmless. That isn't necessarily true in the mortgage business, and thus this article.

An example of what I am talking about that can be harmful is the following: "It's a no brainer, we can either save you money or we can't". Simple words that generally don't mean a thing because of the manipulation of the meaning of the word “save”. Save, to me, means that the transaction will result in my spending less dollars for the loan than I would have spent if I didn't take it at all. Lowering your payment on a 30-year fixed loan that you have paid on for 2.5 years might easily cost you more if you take another 30-year loan and start over, even if the payment is slightly lower.

I hear the head of a men's clothing company state that he "guarantees we will love the clothes" we buy from his company.

What does that mean? How do we measure it and what is the significance of his guarantee? Again, this is trivial, but it sets a pattern that gets us lulled into accepting hollow words, and worse, expecting something that won't be there.

When lenders advertise rates, they get away with all kinds of what most people would call "smoke and mirrors". Instead of advertising a rate that is under the market and stating it will cost one point (one percent of the loan, which is used to buy down the rate), they will smile and tell you the APR instead. They will not advertise a rate of 5.75% with a cost of one point, they will say 5.75% with an APR of 5.99%. Did you know that meant you were going to have to pay a point? Probably not. Not only is it not illegal, it is mandatory to state an APR when using an interest rate in an advertisement. But why not state the obvious: it will cost you a point. It is just part of the culture to use words that are meaningless.

How many times have you heard a car dealer advertise they are the largest dealer in the country? I am sure if one traveled through each of our states they would hear this claim 10 or 15 times. The answer most people would give is: Who cares, it is just a car company and it hasn't hurt anyone. Is this more conditioning for your mind? The other day I saw a real estate company with a sign that says no one sells more than they do. Really! Again, in basketball parlance, no harm, nor foul.

A national lending company, one who is a household name, is now stating they guarantee to have the lowest fixed rates in the country. They don't, and in fact they have some of the highest fixed rates I have seen. Does their guarantee stop you from shopping and seeing if it is true? I would hope so, but in many cases I doubt it.

So a few thousand people overpay for a home mortgage. Caveat Emptor.

Maybe I am just an idealist who believes that words should have meaning and not be used frivolously to the detriment of people. Maybe people should listen with full attention to the words they hear and question them. Maybe it is time to fight back and actually hold people responsible for what they say. Could our world work without subterfuge? Could business survive without slight of hand? I say a resounding yes.

Let me tell you that most people say they don't have the time to listen with both ears, study the subject, or understand the consequences – that they just try to get by without too much damage to themselves and their finances. In my industry, the mortgage business, that attitude can be very hazardous to your wealth, especially if you don't ask questions prior to accepting the loan. I really believe we are allowing ourselves to believe words, not actions, and we are the ones who pay the consequences, not the ones who give the message.

All of this can lead to another problem: A customer develops an unrealistic expectation based on years of hearing information that was meant to mislead, and ridicules a company who is actually trying to lead you on a straight and narrow path. When a lender advertises a rate, unless they specify, they are advertising conforming rates, which currently have a maximum loan amount of $417,000 and are owner occupied properties. Loans that are smaller than $175,000 usually have higher rates, as do loans over the conforming limit. Investment properties, and in some cases second homes, also have higher rates. Borrowers who don't fit the exact mold (and there are many other requirements for each loan) can easily feel they have been taken advantage of when receiving a different rate quote. Is it lack of understanding or too many meaningless advertisements that is the problem?

The confusion is not limited to the mortgage industry. I knew a business manager who informed a client that incorporation would save the client a lot of taxes. The client followed the advice and incorporated. When the business manager, a CPA, told the client at the end of the year to zero out the corporation and take a salary and pay tax on the salary, the client objected saying they were told that incorporation meant they didn't have to pay taxes. It took very little time for the client to leave the services of the business manager. Why? Probably a combination of a lot of things, including all the verbal waste on the air waves that helps portray nonexistent scenarios.

I really feel you can't change the world, so you just have to try to change yourself. At least in that way, the world will start to change one person at a time. Whatever you do, don't become complacent. Listen and react. Even if you only point out the incongruities to one person, it's a start.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Roger Schlesinger's Mortgage Minute is heard on hundreds of radio stations and daily on the Hugh Hewitt radio show and Michael Medved shows. Roger interacts with his hosts and explores the complicated financial markets in order to enlighten his listeners and direct them along their own unique road to financial freedom.

Be the first to read Roger Schlesinger's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

New and Improved
How can a thing be both "new" and "improved"? You can't improve something that has previously not existed, can you? And besides, 90% of those things the advertising claim are "improved" are in fact NOT improved. They are only changed. Before Microsoft Office was "improved", it had an option for left-handed people to point the little arrow in the other direction which is much easier for a left handed person to follow. "Improvements" took it away.

Ditto for "New Classic". A classic is something that has been around for a long time and that people have continued to buy in defiance of all that is "new". The words are mutually exclusive.

The big annoyance (well, besides CNN claiming to be "the most trusted name in news" which should include the words "if you are a Liberal Democrat who Hates George Bush") in the contest for language that means nothing, is "for your convenience." Every time I see that phrase I know that it means "for OUR convenience." For example, the bank branch that used to be on the first floor of the high-rise I lived in was moved to a location a subway-stop away, and the hours were changed from 8-4 to 10-4. "For your convenience" said the sign. The big-box grocery store that sits on a city block in a neighobourhood where nearly everyone walks, carrying their groceries in those 'bundle buggie' carts, was "improved for your convenience" by making it virtually impossible for people on foot to negotiate the sidewalk (which is also blocked for the convenience of people using the subway stop, by the way) and the front door is so configured that traffic can barely move in one direction, far less in two. The only really convenient way into the store is through the huge underground parking lot, which is not only not convenient, it is dangerous.

Likely the main reason that language has ceased to have any meaning is that the vocabulary of today is still geared to the 14 year olds whose vocabulary consists of "so I'm like what EVER!", and articles, the words f*** and s***, and "uh huh", is designed BOT to communicate.

New and Improved
How can a thing be both "new" and "improved"? You can't improve something that has previously not existed, can you? And besides, 90% of those things the advertising claim are "improved" are in fact NOT improved. They are only changed. Before Microsoft Office was "improved", it had an option for left-handed people to point the little arrow in the other direction which is much easier for a left handed person to follow. "Improvements" took it away.

Ditto for "New Classic". A classic is something that has been around for a long time and that people have continued to buy in defiance of all that is "new". The words are mutually exclusive.

The big annoyance (well, besides CNN claiming to be "the most trusted name in news" which should include the words "if you are a Liberal Democrat who Hates George Bush") in the contest for language that means nothing, is "for your convenience." Every time I see that phrase I know that it means "for OUR convenience." For example, the bank branch that used to be on the first floor of the high-rise I lived in was moved to a location a subway-stop away, and the hours were changed from 8-4 to 10-4. "For your convenience" said the sign. The big-box grocery store that sits on a city block in a neighobourhood where nearly everyone walks, carrying their groceries in those 'bundle buggie' carts, was "improved for your convenience" by making it virtually impossible for people on foot to negotiate the sidewalk (which is also blocked for the convenience of people using the subway stop, by the way) and the front door is so configured that traffic can barely move in one direction, far less in two. The only really convenient way into the store is through the huge underground parking lot, which is not only not convenient, it is dangerous.

Likely the main reason that language has ceased to have any meaning is that the vocabulary of today is still geared to the 14 year olds whose vocabulary of "so I'm like what EVER!", and articles, the words f*** and s***, and "uh huh", is designed NOT to communicate.

Words
Right on, Canada. A common misuse of words in advertising is use of a comparative without a referene. Better!!! More!!! Better than what? More than what?

Language follows the money. 14 year olds have lots of money to spend and they are in those years of extreme sensitivity to outside influence. Its not just peer pressure, its cool culture pressure from many sources. So a lot of advertising and entertainment is irksome, being aimed at 14 year olds. Actually, i remember reading some scholarly study which proclaimed advertising was aimed at 12 year old comprehension and sophistication. Apparently folks who mature past that point aren't much afected by advertising. You gotta go hunting where the ducks are.

"House" or "Bank"
Oh, I get it. It's kind of like that guy I hear on the radio that tells people they can get out of debt and have cash reserves by using their house as a bank. The last time I checked, my house didn't look anything like a bank. There were no teller windows and the furniture was not quite as nice either.

The only way to get out of debt is to pay it. You can't get out of debt by borrowing money. All you are doing is moving the debt around. You might save some by reducing the interest; but you're not getting out of debt until you pay it. Also, why would someone want to put their largest asset in jepardy by dumping unsecured debt into it? Why put your largest asset at greater risk? Sounds to me like the "house" just became a "dump."

Serious implications
Caveat Emptor is fine when one is discussing a product or service where we have often have a broad market with several choices.

Yet since the 1960 election, when Joe Kennedy, Sr. told people "We are going to sell John to the public as if he were soap flakes", the same advertizing and mal-use of words and phrasing is integral to our political system.

What makes things worse is that we have no real unbiased source of the truth. The news media, especially the national dailies and broadcast TV networks, are liberal and Democrat. While there are reporters that strive for fairness many are in a intellectual trap. They start out going to left wing colleges and then live within a system and daily culture that is left of center. Everyone they know is liberal or leftist so the individual believes those around them are the mainstream.

So when a word is misused or re-defined in political terms the average citizen may have a hard time determining that.

words
ask your doctor
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.