Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, April 14, 2008
Robert Novak :: Townhall.com Columnist
Hillary's Strategist
by Robert Novak
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


WASHINGTON -- Immediately after Mark Penn resigned as Hillary Clinton's chief strategist a week ago, he was on the phone with at least two prominent Democrats to assure them that nothing had changed. He said that -- though lacking a title now -- he still was polling and crafting her message, adding that he had just participated in a top-level conference call. De facto retention of Penn signified a desire to defeat Barack Obama at any cost.

One day later, word was spread in Democratic circles that Geoff Garin, hired as a pollster by Sen. Clinton last month, had supplanted Penn as chief strategist. An experienced political practitioner renowned for ethical standards more than imagination or daring, Garin in charge reassured the party faithful. It was interpreted as ruling out an eleventh-hour assault on Obama that would have less chance of nominating Clinton than wrecking the party.

Is Penn deceiving friends about his real status just to save face? Or is Garin merely a figurehead to take the heat off Clinton while she still relies on the contentious Penn?

Neither proposition is wholly true. Garin values his reputation too much to take a sham job lacking in authority. Penn's firm (Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates) continues to poll for Clinton, adding to the enormous debt the candidate owes it. Penn remains seated at the table but is not chairing the meetings.

As it enters its probable final days, Clinton's campaign appears as dysfunctional as it was last year when her nomination seemed inevitable. Penn's strategic decisions are blamed by Clinton's friends and foes for her fall, but that was not the reason given for his resignation. It was the discovery by outraged union leaders that Penn was helping the Colombian government seek congressional approval of the free trade agreement, which is opposed by labor and Clinton. That enabled Penn's exit without admitting his strategic errors.

Whatever was the real reason for sacking Penn, Democrats who are interested in preventing the struggle for the nomination from destroying the party sighed in relief. Garin looks to a post-Hillary political life and does not want to be seen conducting a berserk attack with little chances for success. In contrast, Penn might be willing to fly a kamikaze mission in what is likely to be his last political campaign. Thus, it is critical that Penn still plays a major role in the campaign.

Penn's business conglomerate remains entwined in Clinton's campaign. Three weeks ago, the campaign hired as chief operating officer Howard Paster, who heads the London-based global advertising giant WPP. Penn is CEO of the public relations and lobbying company Burson-Marsteller Worldwide, which is owned by WPP. Penn and Paster won the admiration and devotion of the Clintons by running Bill Clinton's 1996 presidential campaign.

Beyond loyalty, Penn is welded to the 2008 Clinton campaign by financial ties. A source who has had close connections with Penn got word to me that he believes the Clinton campaign is $10 million in debt to Penn, Schoen & Berland, which is owned by Burson-Marsteller. The campaign's March report to the Federal Election Commission recorded indebtedness to the company of nearly $2.5 million (with its expenses for the month listed at $3.1 million).

My sources suggest that Clinton's full indebtedness may be revealed only gradually. This money link helps explain why Penn is still around after organized labor demanded his scalp last summer and he is blamed inside the campaign for failing to perceive the public's demand for "change."

Just how much money Clinton owes Penn can cause major difficulties in the future. If not repaid promptly, would it constitute an illegal financial contribution? Because the British WPP owns Burson-Marsteller, would that debt constitute an illegal foreign contribution?

Over the last week, I talked to 10 superdelegates (including two U.S. senators) who are committed to Clinton. Each claimed he would stick with her, but none could see how she could be nominated. In such a frame of mind, they would prefer a Geoff Garin-style soft landing to conclude the campaign. With Mark Penn still around, they could get a far more dramatic endgame.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Robert Novak (1931-2009) was a syndicated columnist and editor of the Evans-Novak Political Report.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Don't blame Penn
Does it make sense to keep Penn on the sidelines with no authority just an advisor if he was to blame for the status of Hillary's campaign. Let's not forget who the boss is. Where the buck stops, and who has the final word. No one's going to blame Hillary, so who else must fall on their sword for Hillary Clinton. Penn didn't resigned because he wore two hats. If it didn't bother Hillary before, it's not going to bother her now. Which is why Penn is still around. No, Penn was blamed for not being able to "humanize" Hillary early in the race. Thats the reason Penn is gone. Hillary even gave it shot, when caught in the sniper tape lie, she said it shows she's "human". A poor attempt, but an attempt all the same. Powers was correct, Hillary will do anything to win, even if it means letting Penn fly that Kamikaze mission to save her campaign. Rest in peace Penn.

To Err Is Human-To Lie Is Hillary
First of Mark Penn resigning as strategist and all round Hillary humanizer is partly to deflect the Bosnian swiftboating drive-by "incident" or "Error on her part and partly of what may constitute as an inherent conflict of interest in his dealings with the Columbian government.
So, labor gets ticked off about the Free Trade Agreement, c'mon, Penn is a multi-tasker he's a ball juggler/strategist for hire, that's his job, it's what he does best and the Columbian Government is "paying good money", can't say that for the Hillary campaign, they owe him money and then the 100 million in assets story comes out, what is Marky Mark to think?
Yeah he'll call a couple a superdelegates to straighten things out, but that's it, no pay me, no worky.

swear off the neocon brew, please Johnny
I suppose with the Democratic faithful it does not matter, but Obama's doublewammy blunders in the past few months will come back to haunt him in the general election:

1. His association with Wright.

2. His remarks about how small town America clings to its guns and religion as a way to cope with economic uncertainty. Elitist and condescending? For sure!

If Penn's replacement by Garin is an admission by the Hillary camp that it won't use a scorched earth policy against Obama, I guess Obama will be the Democrat party nominee.

And I still think he is a damaged candidate.

Hillary's high negatives, and recent disclosures of her problems with the truth, also make her a damaged candidate.

Now if only Johnny McCain can swear off the toxic neocon brew, it could be a time for cautious optimism.

But I fear Johnny may swig on the same neocon slop that so damaged Bush.

And that would be a tragedy.


Jerabaubble
Do you have a point, or are you just venting?

One More, Novak
There may be another reason for keeping Penn around. Tis possible that he is just one more source for funneling a portion of the hard earned money back to the Klintoons.

qretske
I am trying to steer Johnny away from the odious, dank, impenetrable neocon fog that so enveloped the brains of the Bush administration.

I am trying to lead Johnny into the light.

To vent in defense of our Beloved Republic is no vice.

And the Republic has suffered enough in the last seven years.

Jerababble
OK, venting. Got it!

Penn Didn't Leave sad to say
Again another spin from the Clintons. Penn didn't leave! I am not sure that the Clintons have a full grasp of the English language. Resigned usually means, Leave, not be back, go somewhere else, not be used for anything anymore in any capacity etc.
It isn't lying it is telling a fuller truth. It is talking out your imaginations. It is dressing a skeleton with stuff, just so you don't see the skeleton. It is saying just about anything and doing the opposite. It is building the fantasy that Bill complained about someone else doing. They are masters of fantasy. I sure do hope they spin themselves out of this countries political scene forever.

the clinton's
the only reason the missus clinton had to fess up concerning bosnia was she got caught in the lie and there was no body to throw under the clinton bus. The usual clinton device has been to always sacrifice others to make sure the clinton's stayed above the fray. As long as penn serves a useful purpose he will remain on board, Clinton loyalty is a one way street.

ex-Wyomingite
Could be.

It is not for nothing Bill Clinton won the presidency twice. He does have a politically fine-tuned ear, although of late he has sung some discordant notes.

The party is smitten by Obama.

It is incredible that so many of the party's honchos have endorsed Obama, not Hillary.

There must have been alot of bad-blood between the Clintonistas and the Democratic national leaders. for years.

Bill Clinton has told his party if Obama is the nominee, the party loses.

The problem is that the Democrat party at the national level is controlled by interest groups, be they trial attorneys, NEA and other big unions, black and hispanic rights groups, all of whom continue to push the party ever leftward.

What you say about Hillary is true. She was always more ideological than her husband, and she is more liberal than he.

Given the incompetence of Bush administration, it should be a shoo-in for the Democrats.

But it is not.

That in itself has to be seen as a miracle.

jerabaub
The only incompetence I can find on Bush is his naivete dealing with liberals and the media. You people have been trashing this guy on everything up or down that you've lost all credibility. You couldn't trust a liberal before you sure can't trust them now. They and the media have pushed their economy scares, Watergate/Vietnam resurrection, racism, and corruption on GOP/Bush to the point of praying to the liberal god of propaganda to convince the clinging idiots referred to by Obama to vote dim.

Houston you've got a problem. Congress is held in less regard than Bush especially the dims who've tried to surrender since taking office and these loser senators of which three are shirking their duty and been running for president for two years. And JFK/MLK lite is not the answer. He's put down white/poor people (middle class) to the point the he doesn't stand a chance in Hades of getting elected. That leaves you with Hi-liar-y and most people including Obamites can't stand her.

We independents will push our reps and conservative senators to stall any McCain lib moves and keep the war on terror focused beyond the anti-Americans undermining and hopefully Hollywood and the media will move to Canada.
And in the process maybe get this bunch to cut the money until there are results. To everything they touch. How is that for a platform?

indyconantidem
The Iraq venture has not gone well, notwithstanding the recent surge that has rescued over four years of failed administration war strategy.

The border is still not secure, more than six years after 9/11...altho I do concede the 9/11 hijackers entered the U.S. with visas. They did not sneak across the border. Still, one would think in a post 9/11 world, some thought would be given to securing our border. Bush himself declared a couple of years back that Americans who opposed his immigration plan were "bigots". McCain is every bit as bad as Bush is on the border.

The largest deficits in the history of the United States occurred in G.W. Bush administration.

The dollar has plummeted to historic lows under the Bush administration.

Bush approval rating among Americans is at about 28%.

More than 2 out of 3 Americans now believe the Iraq war was not worth the cost.

If you view the above as reflecting a great and successful presidency, fine.

I am not a liberal. I am a disgusted conservative.

On McCain, I have problems too. I fear he will be too much like Bush on swigging the toxic neocon swill. I like the fact McCain is a hawk, but hope he has sense enough to steer clear of the neocons(spilling our blood to democratize the muslim world is a bad idea). McCain buys into the global warming hype, and that is most worrisome.

I agree on Obama. He is unelectable. The Wright matter, along with his elitist and condescending remarks about Americans who cling to guns and religion, demonstrates he is out of touch with mainstream America.

Hillary is dishonest, has always been so, and while not quite as far to the left as Obama, she is still a leftist who would do harm to our Republic.

I am probably voting for McCain. Of the three, he will do the least damage.

indyconantidim
American history shows that the US electorate does not like giving one party total power in DC (i.e. House, Senate and POTUS).

For the dhimmis, this year should have been a walk in - they have the advantages of an unpopular president, a cooperative media, funding, House/Senate majorities, candidates with unique demographics, etc. - just about everything they could ask for. But at this point, it looks like anything but.

Consider their behavior: they act like a pack of pirates killing each other over who gets to rape the female captives first with no regard for the defenses. Madam klintoon, in the event her nomination seems increasingly less likely, gratefully, appears determined to see that Oblamaman doesn't win either.

This behavior, coupled with the public's above tendency to check and balance one party's power bodes well for McLaim - and ill for the dhimmis. And if this should prove to be the case, we may, as you say, have a chance to check McLaim's liberal tendencies via our congressional reps.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.