Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Saturday, December 08, 2007
Robert Novak :: Townhall.com Columnist
Blocked Vatican Envoy
by Robert Novak
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


WASHINGTON -- President Bush's nomination of Harvard Law School professor Mary Ann Glendon as U.S. ambassador to the Vatican is being held up in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, raising the possibility that the post may be vacant when Pope Benedict XVI visits the United States in April.

The selection of anti-abortion advocate Glendon is opposed by Catholics for a Free Choice. No official holds on her confirmation have been filed, but failure to schedule a hearing blocks her confirmation. She is caught up in blanket Democratic opposition to Bush's final nominees.

Business tycoon Francis Rooney, current ambassador to the Holy See, has resigned and is expected to be gone by the time of the pope's American visit.

IRS DEMAND

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has informed Congress it must actually pass alternative minimum tax (AMT) relief, not just promise help, for taxpayers to receive refunds next year.

On Oct. 30, chairmen and ranking minority members of the House Ways and Means and Senate Finance committees wrote Acting IRS Commissioner Linda Stiff that "we want to assure you that legislative relief is forthcoming so that no new taxpayers will be subject to the AMT for taxable year 2007." On the next day, Stiff responded that their assurance was not sufficient for the IRS to recalibrate computers. "We must ensure that our systems are prepared to process returns under the law as it exists now," she said.

This correspondence became known last week with Congress still having failed to "patch" the AMT. Refunds to income tax payers may be delayed 10 weeks.

SENATORIAL DISCOURTESY

Moderate Republican Sen. Arlen Specter, who normally promotes bipartisan amity, was furious Wednesday when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid declined to come to the Senate floor to answer Specter's charge that Reid had violated Senate rules in calling Republican colleagues "puppets."

"I have had my staff advise [Reid's] staff," Specter told the Senate, "that I intended to make some comments about him so that he would be notified and come to the floor. . . . His office is right adjacent to the floor. He is a minute or two away."

In decrying the Senate's year-end logjam, Reid on Tuesday declared on the floor: "President Bush is the man that's pulling the strings on the Republican puppets he has here." Specter responded, "I wonder if [Reid's] up to the job."

A WIN FOR MITCH

The election of Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee as Republican Conference chairman, third-ranking in the Senate GOP hierarchy, boosted Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell's authority.

McConnell was embarrassed last year when his choice, Alexander, was defeated by one vote for Republican whip by Sen. Trent Lott. When Lott last month announced his resignation from the Senate, Sen. Jon Kyl became the unopposed candidate for whip and left open his previous position as Conference chairman. Alexander beat conservative-backed Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina by two-to-one in the closed-door vote of Republican senators.

Burr's chance depended on a three-way contest among him, Alexander and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas, but Hutchison dropped out. She contemplates running for governor of Texas in 2010, and colleagues believe she did not want to risk losing a party leadership race.

UNPATRIOTIC DEAN?

When Democratic National Chairman Howard Dean addressed the winter dinner of the Washington Gridiron Club, he did not declare the support for U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan that is expected from politicians speaking to the journalists' organization.

Satirical Gridiron speeches often conclude with patriotic rhetoric. Republican National Chairman Mike Duncan, Dean's counterpart addressing last Saturday night's dinner, wound up his speech by commending troops in the field.

In contrast to anti-Vietnam War politicians a generation ago, most Democratic critics of President Bush's Iraq war policy go out of their way to praise the soldiers while condemning the policymakers. Dean did not follow that line in his Gridiron speech.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Robert Novak (1931-2009) was a syndicated columnist and editor of the Evans-Novak Political Report.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Why are Catholics
so antagonistic to their church's magesterium?

Are people really...
...interrested in what Dean has to say? The man is a complete non-entity.

And Willey Victor 32: Are you off your meds or something?

Good question indeed!
"Why are Catholics so antagonistic to their church's magesterium?"

ROTFLMAO! :-D

my two cents
You cannot be a Catholic and be pro-choice - the term "catholics for a free choice" is a contradiction in terms and any Catholic who supports abortion is a catholic in name only and his or her soul is in mortal danger.

Life begins at conception, and the Church's position on abortion is basically simple - nowhere, ever under any circumstances.

The statement about Professor Glendon - "She is caught up in blanket democratic opposition to Bush's final nominees" is an interesting one, but not surprising - the dems will do anything necessary in order to make President Bush look bad. If it hurts the country along the way that seems to be acceptable to them, but I would hope that people are smart enough to see through them.

FYI - I am a practicing Catholic.

Catholics are not
antagonistic to the Magisterium. Only people who think there are loopholes in Catholicism are kicking and screaming out there. Catholics for Abortion/Birth Control is like Bankers for Embezzlement.


abortion
i agree you can/t be a good catholic and be for abortion that nuts i was a democrat but they have become the party of death. kill all unborns next will be the old and disabled. dan anderson

McConnell makes light of war dead
"UNPATRIOTIC DEAN?"

http://www.vetvoice.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=221

Come on Novack you note "slights" to Republicans while Bush vetos all in sight. But Reid was completely wrong to call Republican Senators "puppets." Puppets imply no free will. Sheep is a much better description for Republican Senators they have free will but won't use it. Meanwhile, the Republicians continue to disrespect the troops over and over....

UncleMax & Audi
You said it better than I could. Thanks for setting the record straight.

Dean
Failed to praise the troops. Kind of a big oversight. On the other hand, many of the dems only praise the troops to try to cover all bases. It's an afterthought-- "oh yeah, and I support the troops". Empty. Just as well he left it out, as it's a lie anyway.

For SunThe1
Of course, that means that Canada is probably 43% CINO (nominal Catholic) and 2% Catholic.

The idea that Catholics can be "pro-choice" (meaning "pro-abortion", never meaning choose another alternative) gained fillip from the 1987 Parliament vote resulting in the removal of ALL abortion laws in Canada (easily 45% of the MP's who voted for this were CINO's, including then-PM Mulroney).

For Willy Victor: not most Catholics, only the CINO's in US and Canada, are hostile to Vatican.

Robert Novak
Thank you for another fact-filled column.

And about Senator Reid -- Since the Democrats elected him as their leader, I think he represents them well -- totally seperated from reality and eager to disparage everyone but those who blindly follow what they say.

I agree with Sen Spector
in saying about Sen Reid, "Perhaps he is over his head." I honestly believe that is true. He has been very inept and has not acted as a strong leader. Calling the republicans "puppets" is characteristic in resorting to name calling. Certainly not a statesman.

loco: As much as it annoys me....

because Specter is an idiot, he is correct about Reid. (Even a broken clock is right twice a day!)

And then there is Biden, who just flat out called Pres. Bush a liar! (But Biden has never been a class act!)

And these dumbo, liberal idiots wonder why we call them "unpatriotic?"

Every few days they give us yet another reason to do so!





SunThe1
"Failed to praise the troops. Kind of a big oversight. On the other hand, many of the dems only praise the troops to try to cover all bases. It's an afterthought-- "oh yeah, and I support the troops". Empty. Just as well he left it out, as it's a lie anyway. "

Your wrong completely. The good news is the troops and their families know it. You fundamentalist conservatives can now longer hide behind yello ribbions: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=a9eBP4 ZM28G8&refer=home

No comments about McConnell? I thought not...

halD: NOT true! And you know it!


"The good news is the troops and their families know it."

It's obvious to the troops and any rational, reasonable person that between the MSM and the dumbo/liberals give them no credit and the only thing they want is for them to come home.

Even you say the same thing... and you wonder why the TH posters call you hal doofus? You shouldn't wonder!



Hal
Your article does not in any way negate what I said. I have no doubt that there are many many military families who are democrats.
That wasn't my point.
My point was about the way the democratic leadership has behaved for the last several years. I believe they have been obstructive to the mission of the troops in Iraq. Threatening to call it quits prematurely nullifies their sacrifice to date. Threatening to withhold funding (unless it has billions in earmarks for them included) is not what I'd call supportive. They have consistently sent the message to the rest of the world that they don't support the mission--how does that help the guys and gals who are there trying to do the mission?
I could go on. The bottom line is that your article is just a red herring.

"Confirmed Catholics"
Catholics for Free Choice is a very impressive organization, but it is not Catholic. Inspection of its Masthead quickly reveals a myriad of PhD's and accomplished members of the healthcare industry, but none are from schools, hospitals or public institutions recognized as Roman Catholic. Prominently displayed Garrett Evangelical Seminary appears to be ecumenical Methodist located in Evanston Illinois near Loyola University and Stitch School of Medicine, DePaul University, Barat College in Lake Forest, Mundelein, Marquette, and the University of Notre Dame but none of these places of higher education are represented. The charity got a gold star award from one of those numerous "award givers" so in lieu of substance this group got an award, but it is not Catholic from a Roman Catholic perspective.

The word "Catholic" defined as "universal" can be construed in many directions and there are still remnants of the Protestant Reformation six hundred years ago that continue to identify themselves as being Catholic without allegiance to the Pope in Rome, but to impregnate a seed of conflicting thought into the world of Roman Catholic thinking without being a member of the family is sheer dishonesty.

Sacramental "Confirmed Catholics" may privately disagree with Church guidelines but nevertheless in public before others defend the Pope, the Church and all its teachings, to which I find no evidence from "Catholics for Free Choice"; ergo, they do not speak nor represent those aligned with the process directed by the Vatican Papacy, so therefore be it so made clear their supposed representations of Roman Catholics in the United States of America are mute.


Musings from agnostic
If people: (1) who do not thing Jesus Christ is God are saying they are Christians; and, (2)who want the U.S. government to be involved in every aspect of every American's life are saying they are Republicans. [Indeed some (alsmost all) are running to be the Republican nominee for president of the USA];


then I understand the concern with people who are pro-life wanting to be considered Catholics.

Christian, Republican, Catholic - apparently interesting labels - but with no apparently meaning.

It sort of like Open Admissions.


Go figure.


Catholics for Free Choice are a lot...
like saying that party of the SEDITIOUS & SLEAZY (a.k.a. dim-witted Dems) are worth listening to...

Dean's Oversight
I cant believe that Dean was so insensitive. The Syrian, Iranian, Hezbollah, Hamas and Al Qaeda troops that he and the other Democrats support must have been devastated. I guess he was distracted by the Bush Administration's looney scheme to send someone who opposes abortion to represent us at the Vatican. Better to nominate a pro-abortion transvestite in a nun's habit; I guess we'll have to wait for a Dem victory in November for that one.
The Mitch McConnell story is just too upsetting because it reminds us that we're losing Trent Lott, a man recently quoted expressing the opinion that human beings were as intelligent as goats (although possibly not in his case). We'll miss him.

SunThe1
"My point was about the way the democratic leadership has behaved for the last several years. I believe they have been obstructive to the mission of the troops in Iraq. Threatening to call it quits prematurely nullifies their sacrifice to date."

The Democratic leadership has behaved superbly. The only people standing for the troops is the Democratic Party. Bush is destroying our military by repeatedly keeping them in combat and training with no relief. Anyone who worries about national security knows the US military is not being maintained. F-15 fighters are grounded yet again because literally the wings are faslling off the aircraft. Bush is following fundamentalist conservatives principals of using resources and not replacing them or replacing them with an inferior substitute. Your comment about sacrifice proves you know nothing about a professional military. Sacrifice is made with the commitment. All we ask is do not sell us cheaply. Lebanon, Somalia, Vietnam, Korea and literally hundreds of other locations witnessed military sacrifices none were ever nullified all were laid at the nation's altar. If I sound angry about this I am. No military death, whether on a battlefield or in a training accident, is "worth" more than any other. Do not dare sir ever claim to honor our fallen with more soldiers blood - that truly dishonors us all.

Anne
"It's obvious to the troops and any rational, reasonable person that between the MSM and the dumbo/liberals give them no credit and the only thing they want is for them to come home.

Even you say the same thing... and you wonder why the TH posters call you hal doofus? You shouldn't wonder! "

On no Anne read the poll. They realise Bush is incompetent. I have been telling you for nearly a year it was happening now the press is saying it. Do they want to come home? Heck yes but that aside they know Bush is a failure

SunThe1
"Threatening to withhold funding (unless it has billions in earmarks for them included) is not what I'd call supportive. They have consistently sent the message to the rest of the world that they don't support the mission--how does that help the guys and gals who are there trying to do the mission?"

Nonsense complete nonsense! First point what you call "earmarks' just like the last bill contain funding for military healthcare etc. Second the earmarks are FAR less than any recent Republican passed budget and their sponsor is identified. Third, ask any wounded soldier or veteran if care for children or disaster relief should be provided and the answer would be yes. The Bush regime operated without congressionaloversight for far too long. The real bottomline is the Bush Regime budget underfunds the military and veterans and social programs. We are at war and we are tearing both the military and society apart -- don't blame the Democrats.

"I could go on. The bottom line is that your article is just a red herring"

And if a Democrat said it?

hal doofus: Wrong! Always wrong!

You have no idea what you're talking about... as usual.

We on TH know that you "make up" most of what you post, and then back it up with ridiculous liberal bias, including your own far fetched writings on huff&puff.

You should be embarrassed!




Anne
Now what did I make up? Want more links? Wanty links for "They asked for it" McConnell? What would you like

hal
Your article was a red herring to the point, which was about democratic leadership's support of the troops, not how many military families (according to your article) are democrats.
Even if a democrat said it.

Hal, PS
So
-Earmarks are ok because the repubs had them.
-Earmarks = disaster relief
-Military families agree with earmarks because they agree with disaster relief.

Astounding logic there.

Sorry dude, earmarks are not all about disaster relief. Earmarks are heinous no matter who's attaching them. Attaching them to a funding appropriation for our military during a war is balckmail, and it's immoral.

Hal is desperate
The tone of Hal's comments is a tone of desperation. The man knows history will prove him and the libs/lefties wrong and tht tone shows in his posts. Why does he bother to post? Time on his hands? With the whiney tone is just doesn't help his cause.

Absolutely amazing
Appointing a pro-abortion person to the Vatican would be like appointing a modern day Nazi to the Embassy of Israel.

It only shows the Democrats' absolute disregard for anyone's beliefs regarding when life begins, even the Pope's. Their audacity never ceases to amaze me.

SunThe1
"-Earmarks are ok because the repubs had them."

See here is your problem I do not and I never did think earmarks were bad. They may have been abused but they are not bad at all and as an example I offered the R abuse of them. As long as it is clear who is asking and who is getting I have little problem with them

"-Earmarks = disaster relief"

yes and military healthcare, military equipment, community investment projects all those things and more

"-Military families agree with earmarks because they agree with disaster relief."

Nope, military need earmarks because the Bush Regime has left them hanging and earmarks are used for enhanced equipment, healthcare, support facilities, etc

" Earmarks are heinous no matter who's attaching them. Attaching them to a funding appropriation for our military during a war is balckmail, and it's immoral. "

UTTER NONSENSE! I simply do not know how to break it to you. We have a constitutional government. There is supposed to be tension, oversight and compromise between branches. We are not a dictatorship. The country and the military NEED this oversight, demand it even. Immoral? I do not think so but your comments are definitely anti US Constitution. Congress gave Bush nearly everything he asked for plus some. I hope they just stand fast and then it is Bush's decision....

Luis
"The tone of Hal's comments is a tone of desperation. The man knows history will prove him and the libs/lefties wrong and tht tone shows in his posts. Why does he bother to post? Time on his hands? With the whiney tone is just doesn't help his cause. "

Please go on believing that right thru November please....

Now what about McConnell comments?


bridget
"It only shows the Democrats' absolute disregard for anyone's beliefs regarding when life begins, even the Pope's. Their audacity never ceases to amaze me. "

Does this mean that we should only send a Muslim to Arab countries or a Jew to Israel? Where does this lead.

JAMES, Catholics for Free Choice ...
... should be renamed CINO (Catholics In Name Only) for Free Choice, because their Executive Director is a CINO, and no one who follows Church teaching could belong in good conscience. The ultra-liberal Ford Foundation funds the organization and pulls the strings.

Giving CFC (really the Ford Foundation) a say in the confirmation of our Ambassador to the Vatican is like giving CAIR a say in the confirmation of our Ambassador to Israel.

Hal we speak different languages I guess
Honestly, you're coming from left field if you equate a disdain for earmarks with wanting a dictatorship.
Quite the contrary, I think we'd be better off if each request for funding were voted on by its own merits. Instead, ten bridges to nowhere and a hippie museum are funded because they're hidden in an bill that's needed to fund our soldiers.
You tell me how disliking that is somehow unconstitutional.

FOUNDATION'S SPECIAL TAX STATUS
QUESTION: Are Foundations such as FORD tax exempt, tax immune, or tax sensitive if the foundation participates in associated government affairs. Clearly they march with billions of dollars and stomp over the little guys who try to resist but are orgs like the Ford Foundation tax sensitive; ergo, do they have vulnerable constraints to retain their special status??

WRITER DOES NOT KNOW THE ANSWER!!!!!

Hal Dona- ho
Hal is full of cow poo!!

SunThe1: Exactly right!

"... each request for funding were voted on by its own merits."

When you're spending "other peoples' money" you OWE at least that much to those whose money you're spending.

End of discussion!!!!!








SunThe1: The problem is, dumbocrats

think that our earned money is actually their money, so they can take whatever they want, and do whatever they want with it... and there need not be any accountability!

Sounds just a tad socialistic, doesn't it????









SOCIALIZED BIRTH CONTROL
Socialized birth control is a modern form of eugenics racial segregation and population control of races and social organisms considered of lesser value then to the product of European origin; ergo, Ford Foundation level racism is a new way for the Ford Family to associate with Nazi based social causes.

Anne
I must admit, it boggles my mind.

SunThe1: Actually, when you stop and

think about it, it shouldn't...

These are the same people who think it's perfectly okay for the government to know everything there is to know about every resident, and dictate our health care...

While, they are also the same people who go ca-razy over the notion of Voter ID and/or National ID cards because they're too intrusive.. (???) (And they forget that we already have soc. sec. cards! Ha Ha!)

But, you are right, their lack of reasoning does, in fact, boggle the mind! The fact that they think in circles should come as no surprise!

:-)




Anne and SunThe1
Do you really think Republicans hands are clean when it comes to tossing taxpayer money into the shredder?
Think again, and again, and again.
The Wool and Mohair Loss Program
The Special Apple Program
The top four or five congressional districts that received funds under these ridiculous programs are represented by Republicans.
Ten million 10,000,000.00 cool ones wasted, and that isn't all of it.
http://www.fedspending.org/faads/faads.php?&sortby=r&record _num=all&detail=-1&datype=T&reptype=a&database=faads&cfda_p rogram_num=10.WML
http://www.fedspending.org/faads/faads.php?&sortby=r&record _num=all&detail=-1&datype=T&reptype=a&database=faads&cfda_p rogram_num=10.075
Have you had your "Special" apple today?

anne
Well the voter ID cards would stop all those dead people from voting, and they mostly vote D.
So that one has a logic to it.
:-)

johnf: No one said all the Republicans

are saints...

But on their very worst day, they couldn't hold a candle to the dumbo/libs.

Watched C-Span lately since the dumbocrats are the majority?


By all means, do!







SunThe1: Dead people and ILLEGAL ALIENS!
Amazing, isn't it?



Their worst day has lasted eleven years
Increases to non-defense discretionary spending exploded under the Republican congressional majority.The Republicans would win the spending award, hands down. Look at those figures for the period 1994-2005.

johnf: Don't know where you're getting

your information, but you need to learn how to do some research.

Nice try, but no even close! LOL





Johnf is correct
For any doubters, just link to the following analysis:

http://www.house.gov/hensarling/rsc/doc/FederalSpending--He ritage2005.pdf

And this is from the very conservative Heritage Foundation.


camagnolo and Anne
campagnolo - Thanks for providing a link to that info.
Anne - Past performance is a good, if not the best, indicator of future behavior.

johnf: Exactly! "Past performance...

is a good, if not the best, indicator of future behavior."

As I said, "... on their very worst day, they [Republicans] couldn't hold a candle to the dumbo/libs."





Anne
I'm sorry you're having such a difficult time getting your arms around these facts.

johnf: You're a condescending fool!

But, we see a lot of liberal idiots around here just like you....

No big deal! You and your ilk are a dime a dozen!





Anne
Your attacks don't hurt me at all, but it's obvious the truth really stings you quite a bit.
Goodnight.

johnf: Ha! Not even close!
.

Anne
What is it about the truth backed up by data from an organization known for having conservative viewpoints can you not grasp? You obviously did not bother to read the Heritage Foundation report. Instead you spew your anti-American hate speech. Typical of the 22% of our citizens who are still blindly loyal to Bush.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.