Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Saturday, September 30, 2006
Robert Novak :: Townhall.com Columnist
Partisan ex-president
by Robert Novak
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


WASHINGTON -- More than just assailing the ABC and FOX networks, Bill Clinton is taking an unusually partisan stance for a former president with a fund-raising attack on the Republican "right-wing."

In a letter seeking $35 to $50 contributions to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Clinton charged that Republicans in Congress "exploit wedge issues that divide America, foster fear and promote insecurity." He concluded: "The right-wing will be coming after our candidates a lot harder than they've been coming after me."

The other living ex-presidents -- Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush -- have engaged in partisan activity but used less strident rhetoric than Clinton.

DEMOCRATIC DISCORD

Rep. Rahm Emanuel, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) chairman, is unhappy with the lack of support from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) under Chairman Howard Dean for seizing control of the House of Representatives in this year's elections.

Dean pledged just $2.4 million for 2006 House races, about one-tenth of what the DNC has given the DCCC in past campaigns. The Republican National Committee is expected by Election Day to spend at least $2.4 million in each of some 20 competitive House districts.

Dean defends de-emphasis on congressional races. "For the first time in decades," he said in a Sept. 19 e-mail to supporters, "we Democrats have a true 50-state operation on the ground." Dean attached a news report about his decision to organize precincts in heavily Republican Mississippi, though none of the state's four House districts nor the Senate race is competitive this year, and state offices will not be on the ballot until 2007.

GWB FOR JOE

George W. Bush moved a step closer to Democratic Sen. Joseph Lieberman's re-election bid in Connecticut as an independent candidate when Tom Kuhn, the president's college roommate and close friend, co-sponsored a Lieberman fund-raising luncheon Thursday in downtown Washington.

Kuhn, president of the Edison Electric Institute, raised more than $100,000 for Bush in the 2000 and 2004 presidential campaigns. Also among the Lieberman event's sponsors was Rick Shelby, a longtime Republican operative who currently is executive vice president of the American Gas Association.

The luncheon's sponsors pressed fellow Republican lobbyists to pay a minimum of $1,000 a ticket. Lieberman has announced he will stay in the Democratic caucus if re-elected. But Republicans backing him against antiwar candidate Ned Lamont, the Democratic nominee, hope for a change of heart by Lieberman.

SENATE'S SHORT WORKWEEK

Sen. Arlen Specter, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, last Monday delivered an unusually candid assessment of the Senate's notoriously light work schedule.

In a National Press Club luncheon speech, Specter noted it was "very hard to convene a Monday morning hearing" because of extended weekends. He continued: "We've fallen into a routine . . . of starting our workweek Tuesday at 2:15 after we finish our caucus luncheons, and people start to get edgy and heading for the airports early on Thursday. So we might increase the workweek by 50 percent, say, to three days."

Realizing it was highly unusual for a senior senator to talk so frankly of the chamber's work habits, Specter quickly added with a smile: "By the way, that's off the record." The speech was broadcast live on C-SPAN.

BOXING FOR THE GOP

In the late rush for 2006 campaign contributions, the Republican National Committee (RNC) is requesting big bucks to attend undefeated Nikolai ("Giant Russian") Valuev's World Boxing Association heavyweight championship title defense against New York's Monte ("Two Gunz") Barrett in Chicago next Saturday night.

A new $50,000 member of the RNC's Regents will receive four tickets to the fight at the Allstate Arena. A $25,000 member of Team 100 will get two tickets, and a $15,000 Eagle will be given one ticket.

The contributors also are invited to a pre-fight "VIP reception" featuring boxing promoter Don King, who in 2004 emerged as a strong supporter of George W. Bush.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Robert Novak (1931-2009) was a syndicated columnist and editor of the Evans-Novak Political Report.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Is it just me...
...or does Bob Novak look a lot like one of the old men in the balcony on the Muppet Show? No disrespect, but I'm just pointing something out!

Now that I have your attention, I want to invite you all to my blog. I have some new stuff you might like!

Flagwaver

I'm a fan of Novak, but that was one of the funniest lines I've seen this entire week (and given Slick Willie's hissyfit, this has been a good week for one-liners).

Okay, you've earned it. I'll check out your blog.

unusually partisan
Being attacked by Bob Novak over being "unusually partisan" is like being attacked by Ken Mehlman or David Dreier for being "extremely gay".

flagwaver
he does look like them now that you mention it but he is nowhere near as funny.

not that anyone is.

Well, maybe the chef.

Ok, the babies.

how about the whole show?

THAT was television

anybody out there ever see Ernie Kovacs live in the early 60s. The Nairobi Trio? See a movie called 'My Favorite Year'?

it's called talent

Congressional leadership? Is there any?
September 29, 2005


Dear Speaker Hastert,

The lack of action on “Keep Our Promise To America's Military Retirees Act” (HR 602/S407) supporting WWII/Korea era military retirees, is a travesty, a sham, and violation of trust.

Politicians are clearly focused on nothing but themselves...greed is the name of the game which is why I am now an Independent and no longer a Republican.

I, as well as thousands of other military retirees/veterans are doing all we can to encourage all voters to vote for the opponent of every incumbent. You and others that are currently in office have lost the trust of America, disgraced yourself and our nation.

It has been reported on the military email circuit that you shun citizens just because they are not from your district, even though you act for all Americans as Speaker of the House of Representatives...if this is accurate, it is more than reprehensible.

For me to see what is happening to America and know what is going on in Washington and then think of the time I spent in a fox-hole nearly losing my life, defending our way of life, makes me wonder what my sacrifice was for?

You tell me Mr. Speaker.


Harry G. Riley, COL, USA, Ret

Vote the incumbents out in November, 2006...not a single serving politician should be reelected. Vote for anyone but a serving politician.

Take a look at http://www.destinpasslive.com and http://www.presidentbushblog.

Harry, Join the ranks ...
... of folks at the end of every Congress who didn't get what they wanted. Don't take it out on just poor Denny, Senator Frist and the White house probably deserve a larger share of the blame for screwing things up.

Oh, and if you didn't know, Hastert has to get reelected just like everyone else or he isn't Speaker any more. To do that he must spend time with the folks in his district ... they're called voters.

Clinton's continuing comical lies
I get a chuckle out of ex-President Bubba lamenting the evil Republican's use of "wedge issues". How disruptive for him that many have decided that there are issues right up there on a par with how much cash politicians promise them! What's really funny is that the whole reason for the continuation of the Democrat party is their own "wedge issue"- namely that of stealing the goods of those who have them, and re-distributing them amongst the faithful party backers who vote them into power. What a crew- they thoroughly deserve Clinton. Just keep him and his ilk away from the rest of us and our possessions- as well as our female family members. His current spasms about his "terrorism" record are ridiculous, and should prove humiliating to him, but he's well beyond feeling that. His ego and self worship know no bounds. Anyone who would actually vote for this character's wife for president- and put the two of them back into national power- should start thinking about getting treatment for serious lapses from reality.

Carter & Bush
Jimmy Carter is an un-Amercian loser who is even worse that Billy Bob in his attacks on Amercia. Both should be deported.

Bush supporting Lieberman. No big deal since they are both big government, big spending and illegal loving democrats.

Flagwaver
You are right, he does. I'm sort of surprised you noticed. Guess i'm going to have to readjust my predjudices. I thought we all looked alike to you. 8-D.

Incumbents...
Harry

I have believed like you in most cases re:incumbents -- i.e. two terms is a good stopping point or like Amednment XXII, two and one-half terms minus one day.

I have voted against incumbents seeking more than two terms in every primary for decades. I would have trouble voting for someone of a different Party in a general election but would consider a newcomer Independent.

I still believe we should be able to choose whether an incumbent should be "eligible" to run for re-election at the beginning of every election cycle -- simply a "YES" or "NO" vote. In Tennessee, we only have that choice for the Supreme Court members (an initially appointive office), but believe it should apply to all elective offices as well. I am convinced such a procedure would give the office back to the people instead of the career politician.

Barring that, I have suggested that ballots should provide an additional block for "NONE" as an alternative to the block for a write in candidate. Even if the "NONE" votes did nothing other than show displeasure, it might be enough to shake some things up in the political process.

In any event, I would not vote for Joe Lieberman or his Democrat opponent if I lived in Connecticut, nor would I vote for Lowell Weickert if he was the ONLY candidate.

Obviously, it will be up to "the People" to make the cannges to uost legislators because it is painfully clear that they won't change a system if it means they can't STAY in that office.

Liberals and wedgies
Give all liberals a wedgie when you see them for all the trouble they cause. Clinton looked like a baffoon on national news. The most watched news channel at that. Where could we start with wedge issues? The Pledge of Allegience, In God We Trust on currency, The crosses in San Diego, the 9th circuit court, non-support for troops, national security, gay marriage, child molesters, judges who let out child molesters, the list could go on forever. Degrading the Bill of Rights & the Second Amendment, everything we stand for basically they are against. Look at the 109th Congress now achieving historic status as a do nothing, get nothing done Congress largely due to Democratic feet dragging and wedge driving. Just look at how long it took to confirm two highly qualified judges to the Supreme Court, far longer than it took to confirm the obviously far left judges that were confirmed during Clinton's reign with republican Congress. It wastes America's time and money and the democrats are good at it. They want to have a socialist country when we've fought wars against that very thing. That is the biggest wedge of all.

oops
Don't know what happened to the last paragraph of my post it should have read:

Obviously, it will be up to "the People" to make the changes because it is painfully clear that incumbents won't change a system if it means they can't STAY in that office.

Is it me,
or does Slick's stature seem to be shrinking? Not that he had much of one to begin with.

And, Flag, you're right. I will now forever see Novak's picture framed with a balcony. We need to find his buddy. Who looks like the other old man on the balcony?

To everyone: Do take a bit of time to check out Flagwaver's blog. He's got a variety of well thought out posts. There's something there for everyone.

More Slickie Boy
"...Clinton charged that Republicans in Congress 'exploit wedge issues that divide America, foster fear and promote insecurity.'"

Pointing out to the voters the differences in what the two parties believe is now "explointing wedge issues" to those whose platform lacks any substance that will resonate with the voters.

Just as slick with the tongue as ever.

Term Limits
It's pretty clear that what Congress needs over-all are Term Limits. That should be paramount in the constituents correspondence with Congress. Pass a term limit on representatives and senators. They spend all their time bickering and working on campaigns for re-election. Also fat cats like Kennedy become entrenched and just sit there wasting time blowing hot air opposing anything that is common sense and good for the country. One way to reform government for the good of the people is to impose term limits.

Again with...
... the support for Liberalman! This time from Bush himself!

These Republicans are stupider than a bag of hair, if they think they're doing anything but aiming at their own foot. And hitting themselves in the head while they're doing it.

Man, they DESERVE to lose.

Col. Riley
Amen to your assessment. I only had three stripes, and I'll follow YOU into this political fray--

Another Hannity?
Hey, NECONSERVATIVE:

I find it amusing and dangerous that people like you blame ALL matters on "Democrats" or "Liberals", or ANYONE ELSE with a viewpoint that differs from yours. Last time I checked, the House and Senate were both comprised of "Republicans (Conservatives?) in the MAJORITY". Talk about "degrading the Bill of Rights"? This Congress has shown the world that we really ARE "ugly Americans", as they have always called us. Think, if you're able---

Clinton & the Democrats
Yes, everyone in the Republican Party is coming after the records of the Democrats but they haven't forgotten Bill either. Especially his failure to go after Bin Laden and folks to tried to take down the towers in 1993. Let us not also forget Branch Dravidian! His AG botched that one!

Yes, we do exploit certain issuis but then the Democrats keep lying and frightening the elders about Social Security. The Republicans want to improve and "safeguard" Social Security so it will be around for a long time.

Cynewulf
As soon as i lose the rest of my teeth, i will. At least i hope i will look that good.

Term Limits
The old debate about terms limits is back again.

We already have term limits. It's called "the vote". If the people don't want the incumbent, they merely vote for someone else. There doesn't have to be a LAW passed to implement this voter-driven term limitation. It's completely voluntary and completely effective (except when you get a candidate like Al Gore who files a lawsuit to change the outcome of an election).

People keep bringing up the likes of Ted Kennedy and his seemingly endless tenure in the US Senate. Well, folks, talk to the people in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Apparently, to their detriment, they WANT Kennedy in the Senate.

MA voters
Count me out of the "keep TK in office" constituents!!! But what can we do????? I have NEVER voted for the man and never will! The old Fitzgerald/Kennedy political "machine" is still alive and kicking in Boston. Most of the rest of the state (commonwealth) residents are not fans of his! But we don't stand a chance against the "gimme" crowd in Boston!

DavidMac
Establishing voting rules that lead to maximum effective legislation is an ongoing process. Only about 1/12 of the people who vote today were considered responsible enough to vote when the constitution was first adopted. I think there is a definite danger to career pols. Because of seniority power and disbursement of govt funds, all too many voters vote against the good of the country at the federal level. Not only would i like to see term limits break the power of incumbents, but i favor 2 years of voluntary govt service (a la Starship Troopers) prior to extension of the voting privilege, and restriction of voting privileges to civil servants and those on welfare.

Cape Conservative . . .
I know there are conservatives in the Bay State.

I managed an office in Houston in the early 1990's, with the parent company in Braintree. One of their minions came to visit and I asked her why they kept re-electing Kerry and Kennedy to the US Senate. She shrugged and said, "I don't know." That tells me all I need to know about the voters in Massachusetts.

New York is another, typical, example. The NYC-Albany region is solid liberal Democrat, while upstate voters tend toward a more conservative point of view. Upstate New Yorkers, as a general rule, don't like Hillary.

I've travelled throughout the US and Canada and most people are conservative. The rabid, in-your-face liberals are few, but very vocal; the MSM likes them for sound-bites.

The unfortunate truth is that most people are like the Bay Stater who visited me in Houston. They just shrug and say "I don't know."

Pistol
I agree with the "Starship Troopers" idea of government service.

Robert Heinlein's original novel was actually controversial because it set forth a novel idea that citizenship was a privilege, not a right. The publisher actuallly redacted some of his novel after the first edition because of the socialists' criticisms.

In Heinlein's future, people could earn citizenship by serving in the military. Heinlein himself was a US naval officer and engineer in the 1930's but received a medical discharge.

Currently, I see a problem with a blanket "throw the bums out!" policy. We have some good people throughout the various governments and they shouldn't be fired simply for longevity. Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater.

Also, we need the old "grey-haired" captains. The US Army of old didn't require promotion to a certain rank by a certain length of service. We had the old 20-year corporals and buck sergeants who didn't aspire to any higher rank, but they did know their stuff AT THE LEVEL THEY WERE SERVING. We need that continuity in government.


I'm able Bucky
You said "talk about the Bill of Rights being degraded" and then you didn't give an example. How about the BCRA that Feingold dreamed up with liberal McCain, a direct undermining of the 1st amendment. also the 14th and the 9th. And as far as the majority in Congress, they don't have enough to overcome the constant onslaught of filibusters put on by the likes Of Kennedy and Kerry, Clinton and all the other liberal time wasters. So the burden rests mostly on liberal shoulders for wasting time and money.

Who deserves what?
The Republicans deserve to lose, but the Democrats don't deserve to win. The people will get the government they deserve. Having said that, I beleive that if the Republicans win, things will not get any better,but they won't get worse. If the Democrats win, not just the country, but the world will go to h3ll.

DavidMac
Good points all. Wouldn't it be nice if we could find a way to keep all the stuff that works and chuck the chaff? How about after 2 terms you need 60% to be re-elected?
I was in from 1953 to 1956. I agree that those old corporals and sergeants were invaluable. I could not quite understand such capable people being unambitious, but later in my career the same judgement was leveled against me. We all have our priorities and fears.
Heinlein wrote some interesting stuff. He and A E Van Vogt turned me on to Sci Fi. I understand Heinlein was also a first class fencer. His books showed a love for the sword. Never runs out of ammo, and the closer you get to a swordsman, the more trouble you are in.

Incumbents
Col Riley,

I understand your sentiment, but have you considered what the consequences would be if all incumbents were defeated?

I've got a few decades of observing politicians of both parties and their attitude towards vets, active military and retired military.

My guess is we would get a totally new bunch of people who shaft us some more and won't respect us in the morning.

Clyde9

Clyde9
The re-election rate is over 90%. Discussions of the 535 (?) seat house with everyone up for re-election stipulate only about 20 seats are in contention. That's an automatic re-elect rate over 95%. With a 4 term limit about 25% turn over every 2 years would be expected. Too much for you?

The Senate Workweek
Here is a funny piece on the Senate workweek:

"Specter Proposes Longer Senate Workweek, Kennedy to Filibuster"

http://www.rightlinx.com/?p=296


I'm a bit late in the day...
..but can someone tell me why ex-presidents, lately, are even allowed on a stage...let alone have a say in current politics? I am, and have been, amused by these two idiots...seems they had their shot and LOST...what gives with them constantly giving their opinion? And what galls me, also, are the morons whom listen to them. They say it is simply etiquette to shut up when your term is over...appears to me what these two losers have done could be closer to TREASON than just bad manners.

Workweek
It sounds like the Merry Old Land of Oz - "We get up at 12 and go to work at one! Take an hour for lunch and then at 2 we're done! Jolly old fun!" Unfortunately, our tax money pays for their "jolly old fun".

Yes Miss Mellie,
Its called the 24 hour news cycle! For CNN, and the rest of the alphabet, there is a constant need for the next crisis, political sound bite/ talking point/ disaster/ fashion faux pas, or whatever, . . its a ravenous monster that must be fed! No wonder ratings are down! Nobody watches, anymore, . . we find out about it here, . . and its usually already de-bunked or fortified by the time we see it!

Or am I the only one who has never actually seen Chris Wallace on television?

partisan ex-president
Whenever Bubba wags that long, bony finger at us, it's the same as Pinnocheo's nose growing longer - a dead giveaway that he's lying.

Bill Clinton-Narcissist/Sociopath/Psycho
Mr. Clinton's accusations bear the fingerprints of his anti-social personality defect!

His staements claiming that Republicans..."exploit wedge issues that divide America, foster fear and promote insecurity" are best judged by psychiatrists, such as Dr. H. Cleckley, Professor of Psychiatry, Georgia College of Medicine, in his text on Pschopaths, "The Mask Of Sanity".

I quote Dr. Cleckley "....poor judgement and bizarre conduct...are notoriously typical of the psycopath pure and simple".

"To my experience a favored technique of Narcissists is to debilitate your identity by leveling false accusations and/or questioning your honesty, fidelity, trustworthiness, your 'true modivations', your 'real' character, your sanity and judgement."

Further, psycopaths, having only a single, self-centered mentality, are incapable of imagining the motives or thought processes of a normal person. They frequently assign actions to others which, in reality, reflect their personal mentalities!

Bill Clinton is acussing the Republicans of his personal political tactics----because he can't do otherwise. He accuses others of tactics straight out of the Democrat playbook----No solutions---only false accusations and character assasinations!

Bill clinton--Poster Child For Mental Disorder!

A Royal Hosing
I agree with most of Col. Riley says. The Democrats and Republicans in the Administration, House And Senate, continue to swindle Military Retirees, Spouses, and widows out of their promised benefits. These benefits and more specifically, promised FREE HEALTHCARE BENEFITS, was actually a contract between the Government, and the Military Retiree who served 20 years or more in the military. The benefit promised would come due upon completion of the committment and actual retirement. The agreement was put into effect and the Congress for over 50 years funded the Military Retiree Healthcare System. However, in 1995 the Clinton Administration reneged on the contract and left military retirees over 65 to medicare and without any opportunity to purchase supplemental insurance in the unlikely event, that they could afford it with their pittance of retired pay. This had a devastating financial hardship on those few who risked their life, blood, and left body parts upon the battlefield fighting for the freedom of this country.

When campaigning for President in the year 2000, Candidate Bush stated "Promises made to Veterans past and present will be promises kept."

The courts confirmed that indeed the promise was made to military retirees, but that they had no jurisdiction to rule for Military Retirees. They further suggested congress through their legislation could remedy the problem.

Congress has responded over serveral years with House and Senate bills to do that. Each time the bills get bottled up in the various committees and never make it to the two floors for an "Up Or Down Vote."

Pending in the Senate is S 407 and in the house HR 602, both with the title "Keep The Promise To The Military Retiree Act." HR 602 has 259 cosponsers , more than enough to pass the bill, but the Leadership will not allow the bill to come to the floor for an up or down vote. The Senate bill is experiencing the same treatment.

We know the Senate is capable of marking up a bill in one day, much less two years. They demonstrated that with the amnesty bill for illegal aliens, giving them among other things, free healthcare, in which they did not earn. Yet, shamefully they refuse to act on the respectively bills that would remove the injustice to Military Retirees.

So you can see why Military Retirees feel the way they do about the present politicians.


HARRY RILEY
SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME HOW
COL. RILEY'S COMMENTS RELATES TO
THE GREAT NOVAK'S COLUMN .

STAN
AMEN AND AMEN AND AMEN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.