Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Robert Knight :: Townhall.com Columnist
Bill Buckley Made It Okay To Be a Conservative
by Robert Knight
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


William F. Buckley connected the dots for me back when I was a liberal college student trying to make sense of things.

Punch drunk from the Vietnam War and the excesses of the drug-addled Sixties and Seventies, America had thrown itself on the couch and seemed to be having a nervous breakdown. Like a patient doctor, Bill Buckley gently and relentlessly helped talk the  nation back to sanity with his many TV appearances and prolific writing.

He played a key role in paving the way for the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, which was startling evidence of America’s return to health.

Like many, I owe him a personal debt for his instrumental role in what the Left would call “raising my consciousness.”  I was a conservative as a kid, but fell under the sway of liberal profs and the New Age culture.  But Buckley was a key force in pulling me back to reality. 

At times, he seemed to be the only sane voice on television, especially on his Firing Line program on PBS, and he had no problem being identified as a “conservative.”  

He was so boldly unapologetic about the labeling that I began to identify as a conservative, too. I cheered as he skewered his opponents with good humor and ginormous vocabulary (yes, it’s an official word, now). 

When a conservative neighbor learned that I was open to views other than the liberal mush on TV and on college campuses, he gave me a huge stack of National Reviews. It was a light clicking on in a dark room. “Yes!” “Yes!” I’d say to no one in particular while reading Buckley’s essays.

I met the great man at a gathering of conservatives and libertarians in Orange County, California in the late 1980s.  I had just been demoted and disciplined at the Los Angeles Times for writing a piece for National Review about California Chief Justice Rose Bird and why she and two liberal justices were going to be defeated in the next election (which they were).  Bird was a close friend of my editor, who was somewhat  to the left of  Trotsky.  I doubt she would even have used National Review to paper a birdcage, and she told me as much.  None of Buckley’s many books were on her bookshelves amid the Nation and Mother Jones magazines.    

Anyway, I shook Mr. Buckley’s hand and told him that he had cost me a job. He was genuinely horrified, and I explained the situation. He kept shaking his head and saying “No!” and “Terrible!” as his handlers swept him off to his next encounter. It was one of the few times I recall seeing him at a loss for words.

The next time I saw him it was as part of his team on a Firing Line segment that we taped at Bard College in upstate New York. The topic was: “Resolved: The ACLU Is Full of Baloney.”  Defending the ACLU were Ira Glasser, Nadine Strossen, Barry Lynn and Bard College President Leon Botstein, who responded to two leftwing demonstrators by withdrawing from the rest of the debate to show how a liberal gentleman responds to disruptors (he lets them win).

Mr. Buckley’s team, which argued for the affirmative, consisted of Catholic League President Bill Donohue, University of Texas professor Lino Graglia, and me. Longtime Buckley sparring partner Michael Kinsley moderated, and did a good job other than granting the protesters time to read their ridiculous list of demands. Buckley looked on in great amusement as Kinsley dealt with the two young ladies, who kept standing up and chanting, “Students of color have no voice!”

In his opening salvo, Mr. Buckley spoke for all of us when he summarized the problem with the ACLU:

“With its $35 million budget, its 60 full-time attorneys, 600 yearly lawsuits, its 2,000 legal volunteers, it is everywhere. The school that said that boys couldn’t come in wearing sagging trousers that revealed their underwear faced a lawsuit from the ACLU….Babies can’t be tested for HIV, the Los Angeles high school that denied to a 14-year-old girl the right to decorate her clothes with condom packages ran into the ACLU. Boy Scouts aren’t allowed to bar homosexual scoutmasters, high schools don’t have the right to test athletes for illegal drug use, we must repeal the ban against women in military combat. It reels the mind.…The ostensible aims of the ACLU are admirable. It is a national pity that it has now become, to use Sunday-suited language, a bunch of baloney. Now, my friend Ira Glasser will don his alchemical gloves and do his best. Here is ireful Ira. Watch out for him. Thank you.”

Matter of fact. No malice. On the money. Grounded in example. With warmth and devastating logic. Even at liberal Bard College, Bill Buckley probably made some converts.

He’ll be missed more than he could have known.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Robert Knight is a Senior Writer/Correspondent for Coral Ridge Ministries and a Senior Fellow for the American Civil Rights Union.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

The Loss Of A Fine Man And Journalist
I remember reading and enjoying articles by William F. Buckley Jr and watching his TV show during the late 1980's. He was a fine man and a conservative political and social commentator and pundit. And no matter how much you might have disagreed with his ideas and agendas, you always felted compelled to read his articles and listen to him. May he rest in peace.
mscsrrr.com

Couldn't agree with you more
As I consider myself to be a moderate, I didn't always agree with Mr. Buckley's point of view. I did, however, always enjoy the opportunity to read his work and listen to him speak. Today's so-called pundits couldn't carry this man's athletic supporter and our political discourse suffers for it. For that reason, Mr. Buckley's words and thoughts will live on long after the Coulters, Frankens, Limbaughs, and Olbermanns of the world are forgotten. RIP, Mr. Buckley.

You always knew what you'd get with BB
I loved when he came out and denounced the Iraq war, saying that if he had only known then what he knew now....

Problem is, many astute people knew then what some of the rest of you are finally catching up to.

LeftRudyRight:

Buckley's denouncement of the Iraq War was not good thing for his reputation or conservatism.

Quite the opposite, it was an example of his lost connection with sources of accurate information and his weakened connection with conservatism. No better proof of the wrongness of his position on Iraq exists than your applause of it.

Buckley was once the godfather of conservatism and National Review was once at its vanguard. Rush Limbaugh replaced Buckley about the time Buckley retired. And National Review has slipped behind Human Events and Townhall.com. In fact, I no longer consider National Review to be a conservative publication/website.

No one can deny that conservatism as much to William F. Buckley, Jr. as any individual. But the twilight years of his life show that anyone can slip into liberalism if they lose touch with the facts and truth.

Once in a while, even the Great El Rushbo will slip when he speaks on a topic of which he is misinformed or ill-informed. For instance, Rush routinely disparages all use of Ritalin and the very existence of ADD/ADHD.

Though there is probably an issue with overuse and misuse of medications and an attempt by militant feminist to turn boys into girls, Rush's position is grossly in error on this topic.

In his prime, William F. Buckley was spot on with every topic. Near the end of his life he became increasinlgy errant on many topics because he had lost his connection with sources of facts and true information.

It is a lesson for all of us.

Buckley...
"Buckley's denouncement of the Iraq War was not good thing for his reputation or conservatism."

That's a matter of opinion. The Iraq war is a waste. It will come to nothing, because nothing will in fact change there. Having a military presence there won't change what these people believe. Buckley was a compromiser, but being a conservative, it's easy to compromise, in fact. Look at many conservatives today supporting what used to be identified as liberal Republicans. Conservatives have no real cohesive philosophy - just a mixture of religion and a general respect for past traditions they think proper. Buckley let his magazine be taken over by neo-cons, that was his major compromise. He was effectively that himself at the end. I didn't care for him, for his attacks on Ayn Rand, but that's another story.

newparty
I think that your post should be directed to Beastie Boy. I said nothing of Mr. Buckley's position on Iraq. I do however take issue with your assertion that he somehow lost touch or slipped toward liberalism towards the end. I can understand if you have principled differences with Mr. Buckley on his feelings about Iraq, but I don't see how he became 'increasingly errant on many topics.' Again, I don't pretend to be a conservative, I am a moderate, but what I saw of Mr. Buckley was unwavering commitment to the principles that he held dear. Conservative, moderates, and liberals respected him for it and that is why I believe that his legacy as a political commentator is such as it is.

No Cohesive Philosophy?
Rick, this is a wrong statement. Conservatives have a very cohesive philosophy, and it works when applied. Indeed, as Rush said today, the philosophy of Conservatism is diminished by the term "Conservatism" in many ways.

I'm a conservative because I look at things that work and favor those over things that do not. Socialism, either partially or totally, does not work toward the freedom and prosperity of ordinary people, and works toward the consolidation of power in the hands of the elite few. I believe in free markets and the results of free capitalism because it works. I believe in the goodness of Judeo-Christian ethic because nobody has ever come up with anything better, and because this ethic is the foundation for Western culture, thought, and the very principles of liberty that we enjoy in this country today, not to mention the foundation of scientific progress.

Liberalism is at odds philosophically with all of that because it seeks only to empower the elite. It is an immoral philosophy that preaches class envy to justify organized government theft of private property.

No cohesive philosophy? You should look at what the Left espouses and what they do, rather than pretty euphemisms.

Well said, Wayfinder!
"Liberalism...is an immoral philosophy that preaches class envy to justify organized government theft of private property."

Or, as WFB might have said, "Socialism is the opiate of the intelligentsia".

May the blessings of God be upon you, Bill!

Buckley and the Imperial Invasion of
Iraq:

newparty: "Buckley's denouncement of the Iraq War was not good thing for his reputation or conservatism."

On the contrary. Ronald Reagan once said that "[d]emocracies don't start wars." He firmly believed in being a well-armed dove (according to aide Mark Holtzman) who only fought wars in self-defense, as did Abe "Spotty" Lincoln. Even Barry Goldwater said that you shouldn't do wars half-way.

History will quite accurately record that this multi-trillion-dollar boondoggle will mark the end of the American empire and its status as a hyper-power.

The neo-cons are not conservatives, in any way, shape, or form.

The Conservatives, "Uncle Argyle".
I have always considered the film, "BRAVEHEART", to be the allegory of America's postwar conservative movement. The uninitiated will always assume William Wallace to be Ronald Reagan, but no, the real Braveheart of the modern conservative narrative is Barry Goldwater. Reagan? His character and accomplishment is best represented by the once and future king, Robert de Bruce. So where is William F. Buckley Jr. in all this? His likeness is represented by the boy Wallace's scholarly, "Uncle Argyle". Braveheart's learned uncle who taught Wallace to think and speak Latin, before he taught him the sword. Bill Buckley, as well, compelled conservatives to ponder intellectually their thoughts and actions and in doing so, restrained the sword. Now the Berlin Wall is gone and the Russian people have some chance at freedom. So now, we Conservatives can express a suitable goodbye by: "...saying goodbye in [our] own way. Playing outlawed tunes on outlawed pipes." Rest in peace, "Uncle" Bill. You taught us a lot.

You're wrong, RickV404...
...Conservatives do not become "Liberal", as you state, but evolve or devolve, depending on one's point of view, into libertarians with a small "l". So went Barry Goldwater. So went Bill Buckley. However, do not mistake libertarians for the left's anarchy. The two are not comparable or compatible. Anarchists are a mindless mob that eventually devolve into monarchy. libertarians are a group of thoughtful individuals who make republics. In that, there is the difference between your side and mine. Your side confers "rights" upon government, my side recognizes rights only among individuals. That's the "cohesive philosophy" of conservatives. The parasites are merely "factions" seeking a ride.

W.F.B. R.I.P.
Could you please donate your spine to the republican party,we are in dire need of a new one. Mr.Buckley will never die because he is and was the cause of the conservative movement.
Ann Coulter is the one that will keep you up to date on the liberal side of life as they know it
now that Mr. Buckley has written his last verse
on liberalism (is that a word )?

Newparty
I think you got that right!

I infrequently (VERY infrequently) read the National Review, but I delighted in watching Mr. Buckley on TV. Truman was known as "Give 'em hell, Harry", so I guess Buckley was "Blow away their BS, Bill". At least I used to cheer him to blow away their . . . you get the picture.

He was instrumental in switching from a life-time Democrat to Republican (guess I was always "conservative" but just never realized it.

I was watching the CNN(?) interview when he denounced the Iraqi war. I was shocked!!! As the interview progressed, I began to wonder if he was slipping into senility because what he was saying sounded like a combination of HRC-BO. I changed stations when his "liberal" comments became intolerable.

Of course, I won't forget his "slip", but I will remember him for the life-long voice and champion of consevatiosm.

Conservative; what's the alternative?
Buckley made it clear that the alternative to conservatism was unthinkable for thinking people.

The prospect of a thinking person finding themselves on the opposing side from Buckley was even more unthinkable. But fools rush in...

Rest in Peace, Bill Buckley. You were truly a great man.

A Man for the Ages
I was, and am, a subscriber to National Review for decades. His contributions to the Conservative movement are priceless. Fortunately, he had one of the best educations that money could buy, thanks to his father's success in the oil business.

His debating style was very similar to the British at their elite colleges. One wonders why the Ivy League colleges in this country do not very often produce similar polished, erudite debaters. A devout Catholic he had a WASP education and his life story reflected his religious upbringing.

It was difficult reading anything Buckley wrote. Latin phrases kept you running to the dictionary or the Internet, and often his phraseology required going over his sentences two or three times to determine their meaning.

He challenged Yale University and he challenged American thinkers and he created a conservative revolution. Many of the active conservative leaders today owe their careers to Buckley's life work.

The sad remainder from our grief at his demise is that our country unfortunately seems to foster so few people with his intellect and personal charisma, and that's a profound loss to the Republic.




@Wayfinder and Bucko
Wayfinder, at first, I thought your post might have been subtle sarcasm. After all, you failed to state a cohesive philosophy; you merely said that you are in favor of "the results of free capitalism because it works," and the enemy of your philosophy is bad, bad. However, I think you were actually serious.

Bucko, here is the "evolution or devolution" of a very famous conservative, President Bush, at the U.N. HQ in October: Everyone "has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food and clothing and housing and medical care." The American government has a duty to provide for those needs, whether in America or anywhere else on the planet. The U.N. Declaration of Human Rights is "landmark achievement in the history of human liberty."

mad dog liberal
when i attended UNM, i brainwashed myself into a bleeding heart liberal.

when i started a family, i brainwashed myself into a non-partisan conservative.

winnie churchill said kinda: 'an 18 year old who is not a liberal has not HEART. a 30 year old who is not a conservative has no BRAIN.'

hasta,
Harvey (jarvey)
Lancaster, Mexifornia
dial 1 for english

you know
like you know, when i watched buck on t.v. i got lost in some of the, like you know, words he used.
i remember when ronnie r. was, like, on his program before his election to republican god, was also stumped at one of bucks words.
at least ronnie asked, what does that word mean?
like, ron was a regular guy and buck told him and 99.9% of his viewers also in the dark the words meaning.
like you know, i don't like remember what the work was since like when would i use a $5 word when you know, i usually only put in 2 cents worth.

like adios,
Harvey
dial 1 for english

What happend to conservative debate?
Ann Coulter is a bomb thrower a provocateur who attacks PEOPLE not the issues.

William F. Buckley debated and argued the argument not the person. Look at O'Reilly and Limbaugh yelling and telling people shut up, "cut his mic" or calling people Nazis, is what conservatives have become. SAD AND Pathetic.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.