Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Robert Knight :: Townhall.com Columnist
Oscar's A Grouch This Year
by Robert Knight
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Well, the critics got their way.

They made sure the Oscars flopped.

And they polished their credentials as being hipper than the average American by virtue of the average American shunning theaters that played the critics’ favorite films.

With the notable exception of Juno ($130 million), the lone box office hit in the bunch of Best Picture nominees, the artsy, depressing films gave theater owners more gray hairs. It’s hard to sell popcorn to make the rent when there are only a handful of people sitting there getting depressed or cringing during the sadistic blood-letting.

But there were some interesting moments at the Oscars. Taxi to the Dark Side, a military-torture film, beat out Sicko, the Michael Moore paen to the joys of socialized medicine, for Best Documentary. This allowed film maker Alex Gibney to uphold the Oscar tradition of someone making a jackass of himself by slamming America’s military. You know, the same military that is protecting his freedom to be a jackass in front of millions of people.

As Hollywood Reporter’s Steven Zeitchik put it, Gibney “gave one of the shortest but most politically spirited speeches of the night, saying that his wife was hoping he’d make a romantic comedy, but ‘after Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and extraordinary rendition, that was certainly not possible.’”

No. The simple joys of life such as romantic comedies must take a back seat to Gibney’s duty to cast America in the worst possible light.  Someone has to do it at the Oscars. It’s unclear how Gibney’s brief moment of glory was received by the TV audience.  Out there in theater land, his film pulled in a whopping $13,000 in 2007 and another $92,000 after being nominated in January. But actress Julie Christie was undoubtedly all aglow at the awards ceremony. She and writer/director Paul Haggis (Crash) were sporting orange lapel ribbons, the latest in protest wear. Also spotted were orange bracelets, inscribed with “Torture+Silence=Complicity.” The orange is for the orange jumpsuits worn by terrorists at Guantanamo and are a reminder that America’s fifth column wants Guantanamo closed. After all, 9/11 was back in 2001, and there’s nobody out there now who wants to kill us. Is there?

As for the TV audience, there were 32 million viewers who sat through the Oscar show on Sunday night – the lowest rated Oscar show since 1974, and the lowest percentage (18.7 rating) since the show’s inception in 1953.

Most of them were probably looking on with the same fascination you might have while watching your weird Uncle Cosmo carry on at the church picnic—“Look! He’s in a world of his own! Isn’t that cute?”

The lack of traditional, crowd-pleasing films and big stars this year was enough to make you yearn for 2005 and the critical darling, Brokeback Mountain. Well, maybe not. Besides, if you craved gay propaganda, the winner of this year’s Best Documentary Short was Freeheld, a lesbian polemic for gay “marriage.”

Let’s go back instead to 2004, when The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King racked up $377 million domestically and a total of $1.1 billion worldwide and then took Best Picture, Best Director and 9 other Academy Awards. That year, the Oscars snared 43.5 million viewers.

Apart from Juno, the only other hit film to win this year was the Best Animated Feature Oscar for Ratatouille, the story of a Parisian rodent who happens to be the best chef in Paris. The lovable rat racked up $206 million domestically and another $414 million worldwide for a total of $620 million.

One other bright spot at the Oscars was the utter collapse of last year’s crop of anti-American, anti-war films. They failed at the box office, they failed with critics, and they failed at the Oscars. We’re talking here about the Brian de Palma stinker Redacted ($65,000 domestic, $433,000 foreign); Rendition ($9.7 million domestic, $13 million foreign) and the Redford-Streep-Cruise flop Lions for Lambs ($15 million domestic, $42 million foreign). The only film of this type that did well with critics was In the Valley of Elah, which still bombed at the box office. ($6.7 million domestic, $17 million foreign).

The films that made people feel entertained and upbeat – Spider-Man 3, Shrek the Third, Transformers, and Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End, all made more than $300 million domestically but were virtually absent at the Academy Awards. Even Alvin and the Chipmunks made over $200 million.

As for the dark, depressing films that the critics love? They took the Taxi to the Dark Side.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Robert Knight is a Senior Writer/Correspondent for Coral Ridge Ministries and a Senior Fellow for the American Civil Rights Union.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

feel-good movies... yeah
McDonald's made a lot of money last year, and I don't see them getting any awards for their burgers. I'll take the better cuisine at a lesser known restaurant.

Ford made a lot of money on the Focus. A really good car for the money, so it deserves its sales fame. Their sales were duly noted, bit I don't think they would win an engineering or design award.

A movie that shows truth and moves you. If you are a Con, then you have to hate that and find some vague reasons to justify your hate. Please go watch your upbeat feel-good films and leave the award decisions to the others.

THE PUBLIC MAKES THE FINAL DECISION
That is why all these the-military-is-a-bunch-of-psycho-killers 'films' disappered from the theatres faster than a fart in the wind.
You don't have to be a 'con' just to make that happen.
No, people from both sides of the aisle have to be inthemajority to do that.
'Awards decisions'?
A bunch of adults who play make believe kissing each others a@@. The chapstick must have flowed as freely as the champagne.

missed it
Oh shoot was it on last sunday!? I watched men in Black opposite it.

Not this time

Usually I recommend films to my friends with a disclaimer "Regardless of Oscars it took, it's really a good movie."

Not this time.

Both "There will be blood" and "No country for old men" are extremely good movies. OK, we can discuss "No country.." but "There will be blood" is absolutely fabulous. It's a story of self made man that succeeds against all odds and on his own. Shouldn't conservatives love that?

Oh, wait, there's that killing of the priest (who totally deserves it)at the end. Is that what turned you off?

Depressing? Hardly. It's called "Reality" and I can only suggest that Mr. Knight leaves Disneyland he lives in ASAP.

It's not a popularity test, now, is it?
Boo hoo. The most popular films didn't win this year. So what? First of all, NCFOM will STILL make more money than you'll ever see. And since when does "best" equal "most popular?"

Stick to your crappy "Veggie Tales."

Bob Knight Oscar Column #15
I don't know why Knight does this year after year. He quotes box office takes while the rest of us note that the oscars have never been about awarding the most popular.

Get real libs
This year's crop of bad liberal propaganda was worse than the usual crop of bad liberal propaganda. If this year's films were cars they would be akin to a Kia Rio; both unpopular and terribly made.

Hollywood is getting to be a really pathetic liberal echo chamber. So much so that these people think that the public actually wants to go watch anti-American films that have no basis in reality while at the same time thinking, like Igor above, that it really IS reality. Unbelievable.

The orange jump suit protest is a great example of how detached from reality Hollywood types are. Now they are actually siding with terrorists. These people are so dim that they don't even realize that one of the primary reasons that Islamists think we are the "great Satan" is because of Hollywood's degeneracy.

Idiots.

No, the awards have never been
about rewarding the most popular films- the box office takes care of that. It is interesting to note, however, what the industry elites think makes a great film as opposed to what the people paying their bills do.

But the two aren't usually so nearly mutually exclusive. The most popular film of all time- as measured by theater seats sold, not inflated box office take- is counted as arguably the best film of all time. The second most popular film of all time set a record for the number of Oscar wins, if I'm not mistaken.

Oscar winners?
More like Oscar WHINERS.

A few leftard whiners here, probably from the Industry in the bleeding heart of commiefornia aka mexican-occupied territory.

Is REALITY the litmus for entertainment? Why not gargle with thumbtacks? Aren't THEY a part of this hardcore REALITY the "artistic" fools so desperately try to front?

Hollywood product is 99% manure anyhow. A few anti-war vanity schm*cks making a buck on the side (yeah, exactly ONE dollar) is hardly what anyone would call shaking things up.

It's also interesting that the Islamists
have never attacked the source of their number one complaint about the "corruption" of American culture spreading to their shores.

Wait, Alvin And The Chipmunks Should ...
Wait, Alvin And The Chipmunks Should Get An Oscar? For what, making jokes about chipmunk feces or something? At least "The Adventures Of Rock And Bullwinkle" was a better movie than these Scooby-Garfield-Alvin jokes that keep coming out.
Look, there are two types of family films: ones that don't treat audiences like idiots and have respect for them, like Ratatouille; then, there are the Scooby-Garfield-Alvin dreck that comes out every year insulting the audiences' intelligence by giving them what the studio heads think they want: poop jokes and various instruments being thrown at a man's groin.
Please, this is not some leftist plot being created by writers; It's an idiocy plot being created by airhead movie executives who want to milk every dollar and cent out of rehashed cliche-ridden films that insult the audiences' intelligence.
Besides, I'm still ticked off that Transformers didn't win for best visual effects or sound editing. Why does the Academy have such prejudice againsts giant robots that like to shoot lasers and missles at each other?

the last laugh
tgwWhale's Second Law is: "The judgment of history is second only to the judgment of eternity." That is, history gets the last laugh. Think: we judge Shakespeare as great literature not because some critic liked "Hamlet" in when it was written around 1600, but because people have performed and enjoyed it ever since -- even to this day.

Do you really think that anyone will be watching the crud they gave Oscars to this year even a year from now, much less 50 years from now? "The Wizard of Oz" is still on TV every year and people still watch it (or it wouldn't be on every year). That marks it as a great movie (not that it is one of my favorites -- it isn't).

You libs can gloat over the fact that a bunch of libs awarded stupid awards to a bunch of cruddy lib movies; but history will get the last laugh -- and the crud will be long forgotten while the world still watches the truly great movies.

Southern California Free-Trade Agreement
Since not one over-paid, spoiled, recently out of rehab member of our own film star cadre made the cut; let's rewrite Oscar as an acronym:

Outsourced
Screen Actors
Critics
And
Red-Carpet
Showoffs

Deviations, er, variations encouraged.

inthemajority
Perhaps, just perhaps, we do not like these films because they suck. A possibility?

Frankly, if it were just conservatives who were avoiding these terrible films, they would do better at the box office. I don't care for Michael Moore's films, but at least I can admit that they guy has a huge audience and is very good at what he does.

As for sad films, or dark films, I see them if they are good films. Schindlers List was hardly a "feel good" movie, but many of us "cons" were glad we saw it.

I guess what I am saying is, try not to pigeon hole conservatives. We are a far more diverse bunch than you seem to think.

SamSamson999- in case you didn't know
Most movies LOSE money.

Even more do not get made.

It is the blockbusters that the elites turn up their noses at that pay for the hoity toity boring films that no normal people want to see.

The sign of a truly GREAT film is that it has all the elements that people learn in film school... AND it is ENTERTAINING!

You keep hearing the judges on American Idol talking about contestants who have "the X Factor," but did you know that there are movies that have "the X Factor" as well?

The more that Hollywood turns their noses up at the majority of Americans and their values, the more they are limiting themselves, and the less likely they are to produce either a good movie, OR a hit.

Will they reap the Whirlwind?
Latebloomer,

When MS-13 helps some jihadi smuggle a small tactical nuke (say 30 kilotons) over the border into the U.S. maybe we'll get lucky and it'll go off in San Fran or Hollyweird. Think THAT will wake up the libs? No. They'll immediately start crackpot anti-conservative conspiracy theories and base films on them and blame Dubya.

-Ray

inthemajority
People like you just crack me up. Hollywood produces crap, foists it on people like you who think crap wrapped up in tinsel is "art" (much like Andres Serrano's "P*ss Christ") and then they get together to congratulate themselves with endless awards, all the while laughing at people like you who are so easily duped.

sheeha writes
missed it
Oh shoot was it on last sunday!? I watched men in Black opposite it.

I watched Richard Mackowitz in Future Weapons and Weaponology on the Military Channel. Who decides what movies get nominated anyway? The reason people in this country like sports is because there is none of this subjective nonsense. At the end of the contest the best team or player wins period. Movies used to be an escape from the hum drum of everyday life now they celebrate it.

Best Movie
I took Movies and filmmaking in HS and was taught that a movie is suppose to do somthing. Make you laugh, cry, get angry, be happy. Using that as a criteria the movie which did what is was suppose to do better than any other movie was: "Envelope Please" Monty Python and the Holy Grail! I laughed all the way through that movie from beginning to end. Second best was Animal House. I'm sure all the libs would love to take away my movie passes but isn't it what each of us see that is important? I would love to see a movie about an Isreali family who goes through a palistainian rocket attack or a movie based on Bridgette Gabriel's book "Because They Hate". Of course they wouldn't win any awards but they would show the other side of the issue that Hollywood refuses to show.

Roadkill58: Who decides?
The people who decide are members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.

The nominations are made by members in the same field as the category of the nomination. Effects artist nominate the Special Effects category, Musicians nominate best score, actors nominate actors, etc.

Then the entire Academy votes for all categories.

If you want to get into the Academy, you have to work in the industry, with a certain number of film credits. You also need a sponser who will bring you before the board.

As the Left have grabbed power in Hollywood, it has become harder and harder for a conservative to become a member. However, if you want a voice in these matters, you have to join.

Academy honors the best not the worst
It sounds like you want the Academy to honor only films that "teenyboppers" go to see, after all they make up most of the people that actually visit a movie theater, as opposed to the rest of us who watch movies via Netflix or Blockbuster. I thank Hollywood for still making movies for an adult audience that won't be big money makers. As for making movies that hold up the bad side of America, that is a time honored tradition, going back to the "Grapes of Wrath". I hate to break it to you but America is not perfect - we have many problems that need to be addressed. Great countries just like great companies are always examining how they can get better. George W. Bush has not appealed to our better natures the last seven years so we have even more challenging issues now. America is too great a country to worry about filmmakers who ask us - is this what we are really all about? If you want repression, there are lot's of middle eastern countries to choose to live in.

bobzmchsel
Gosh, I was wondering. But you cleared it all up. It's George Bush's fault.
Thanks.


(Now I'm not even sure what the issue is here...are we not going to movies, or not going to the right movies, or not watching hollywood congratulate itself, or what? No matter, we know whose fault it is anyway.

Academy Narcissism
I quit watching the Academy Awards show years ago. I get no pleasure out of watching a bunch of narcissists congratulating themselves over movies that the rest of us lacking in socially redeeming value. If the Academy were about movies that left a profound impact on the audience rather than on the performers it would be worth watching. They can have their Awards ceremony. They can ooh and ah over their "wonderful" work. But don't expect me to watch. I learned a long time ago that what resonates with Hollywood is not what resonates with me.

spot on
Bob_C. They make depressing and unpopular stuff and then give out awards within their circle. Sounds like the modern art crowd and New poets.

I thought art was supposed to evoke NOT provoke? Why don't the "artists" try to do that for a change instead of yell through their little megaphones?

A critic's "Circle"?
Is it just me or is the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences little more the the largest and most prestigious circle jerk in America?

-Ray
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.