Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Sunday, November 18, 2007
Robert Bluey :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Inspirational Life of Clarence Thomas
by Robert Bluey
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you personally know a young voter who has been sucked into Obamamania?


Ask Clarence Thomas what he enjoys doing and he’ll tell you about driving his RV across America or cheering for his beloved Nebraska Cornhuskers. That hardly sounds like the life of a U.S. Supreme Court justice, but in the case of Thomas, he wouldn’t have it any other way.

With his new memoir, “My Grandfather’s Son,” topping the New York Times best-seller list, Thomas has had the opportunity to connect with “real” Americans -- ordinary citizens who, he says, embody the true spirit of our great nation. His book tour has taken him from the East Coast to the Midwest and will reach Southern California next month.

Along the way, I’ve been fortunate to hear him speak twice -- once at a private dinner for bloggers and again last week at an event sponsored by The Heritage Foundation. I left both events feeling inspired and energized by Thomas’ positive attitude, sound advice and commitment to principles.

I wish every American had the opportunity to engage with Thomas in the same way. Hearing him speak about his remarkable life not only dispels the misperceptions painted by the media, but it also yields valuable insights about humanity and the state of our nation

My encounters with Thomas have produced some important lessons. The one that stood out last week came from his answer to a question about the level of political discourse in Washington -- something that has frustrated me since I arrived here six years ago. If anyone is qualified to answer this question, it’s Thomas, who called his confirmation hearing in 1991 a “high-tech lynching.”

Thomas chose to tell us about the importance of manners in society, particularly when raising children. For whatever reason, Washington politicians appear to lack those manners -- contributing to the coarse nature of politics.

“People in this town think it’s really cute to make little, nasty comments about people,” Thomas told the crowd last week. “That really makes you a big person because you just came up with some cute slur. That’s what gets over in this town for being genius.”

He said it would be unthinkable for such conduct to be tolerated in other professions. Take a hospital operating room, for example. “You would figure out a way to limp out of there, crawl or feel your way out. Now, if we would not allow that in the operating room, why do we think that’s a good way to choose who will have control of our nuclear arsenal?”

Asked about his personal tribulations, Thomas shrugged and explained the contrast between his life and that of his grandfather. “How can I complain to him -- no education, no father, raised in part by a freed slave in the Jim Crow South? He never complained. My grandmother never complained. How can I tell him that as a member of the United States Supreme Court I can complain? I have every reason to be happy, none to be sad.” Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Robert B. Bluey is director of the Center for Media & Public Policy at The Heritage Foundation and maintains a blog at RobertBluey.com
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: Not really that far fetched
Doc5000 writes: Tuesday, November, 20, 2007 12:29 AM
Concerning Anita Hill
"...I came up with the theory that she was harassed by someone else and attributed the actions to Justice Thomas at the time of the hearings. I know that it is far-fetched, but the overall effect of phrasing of the comments, the details, etc. led to that impression."



But I doubt it. I'm not sure either how the accusations got made public, but I wouldn't doubt that Kennedy or his staff might have done it. The man always has had a big mouth, and when he's drinking, NOTHING he says would surprise me.

Anita Hill, on the other hand, I never believed for a second.
Her story just sounded too coached and came out at a time WAY too convenient for the Democrats, who were getting desperate for a way to block Thomas from the SCOTUS.
Aside from that, I saw real inconsistancies in her testimony that just sent up all kinds of red flags.

Concerning Anita Hill
I thought it was significant that when she first "came forward" Ms. Hill did so under the condition that she be able to speak to staffers and give information to the Senate committee anonymously and in secret. The allegations were leaked to the press (by one of Senator Kennedy's staffers, if my memory is correct) and the furor got so heated that she had to come forward and testify. Not exactly the picture of the Oppressed Woman Courageously Stepping Forward To Right A Great Wrong that some people have suggested.

At the time, I listened to Ms. Hill's comments and those of a couple of other witnesses to whom she supposedly made contemporaneous disclosures about the harassment. I came up with the theory that she was harassed by someone else and attributed the actions to Justice Thomas at the time of the hearings. I know that it is far-fetched, but the overall effect of phrasing of the comments, the details, etc. led to that impression.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.