Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, June 12, 2009
Rich Tucker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Media Driving Customers Away
by Rich Tucker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Sometimes stores have “Going out of business” sales that seem to last for weeks, months, even years. At some point, customers begin to think, “Just close already.” The same process is at work in the mainstream media. Newspaper circulation is down. Papers have shut down this year in Seattle and Denver. The New York Times is threatening to close its sister paper the Boston Globe unless labor unions make major concessions.

*** Special Offer ***

Network news viewership is plunging too. CBS may have thought it could save the evening news by bringing in Katie Couric, but all it really did was waste millions of dollars. The network remains in third place, and the number of people watching any of the evening newscasts continues to slide.

A recent political cartoon by John Branch in the San Antonio Express-News predicts the future but doesn’t go far enough. It shows a lone reporter eating pizza as he listens to Barack Obama at the 2010 White House Correspondents Dinner. “If present trends in the journalism industry continue…” the cartoon warns, open-endedly.

The drawing would be even more accurate if the remaining reporter was wearing an “Obama 2012” pin and openly campaigning for the president’s re-election on the air. After all, the slow decline of the MSM has been largely caused by its liberal bias. This bias was on display as never before during the last presidential election.

Recall that in Feb. 2008, The New York Times ran a front page story claiming that staffers for Sen. John McCain had been “convinced” in 2000 that he was having a “romantic” relationship with a female lobbyist 31 years his junior.

Two days later the newspaper’s public editor kinda-sorta apologized. “If McCain had been having an affair with a lobbyist seeking his help on public policy issues, and The Times had proved it, it would have been a story of unquestionable importance,” Clark Hoyt wrote. Well, yes. And if the moon was about to snap out of orbit and fly away, that would be important, too. But it isn’t.

Meanwhile, even as the newspaper of record had four reporters tracking the McCain story, the mainstream media studiously avoided Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the man who served as Barack Obama’s pastor for decades and even inspired the title of his book, “The Audacity of Hope.”

Among other controversial quotes, Wright told his congregation that the United States practiced terrorism. “We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye,” he declared the Sunday after September 11.

“God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme,” Wright added two years later. Most Americans no doubt find such words distasteful. Yet neither McCain nor the MSM ever made Wright the campaign issue he should have been.

For more evidence the MSM is out of touch, look at the front page of The Washington Post on June 10. The second paragraph of a story about the Virginia Democratic gubernatorial primary gets things exactly backward.

“R. Creigh Deeds beat Brian Moran and Terry McAuliffe in every region of the state, including vote-rich Northern Virginia, despite a pro-gun stance and relatively conservative positions that are out of line with many of the area’s voters,” the story says. Despite?

Brian Moran positioned himself as a liberal and promised to “fight” for Virginians. As if there isn’t already enough fighting in politics today? He’s the brother of human gaffe-machine U.S. Rep. James P. Moran Jr., who apparently has a job for life no matter what he says or does. Yet Moran didn’t even win his brother’s ultra-liberal congressional district.

McAuliffe spent some $7.5 million on his failed bid -- roughly $90 per vote. His ads promised to solve the state’s transportation woes with high speed rail -- exactly the sort of program big-spending liberals usually drool over. Yet voters didn’t swallow that either.

Occam’s razor applies here: the simplest explanation is probably correct. Deeds won because of his conservative positions, not in spite of them.

The mainstream media is dying, while alternative outlets on cable TV and the Web are thriving. Columnist Charles Krauthammer recently explained why. “The reason Fox News has thrived and grown is because it offers a vibrant and honest alternative to those who could not abide yet another day of the news delivered to them beneath layer after layer of often undisguised liberalism,” he says. That’s the point.

A liberal party line is about all the MSM still has in stock. Small wonder it’s going out of business and cannot find many buyers, even at bargain basement prices.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Rich Tucker is an editor in Washington D.C. and a columnist for Townhall.com.

Be the first to read Rich Tucker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.< Sign up today!

That's why I quit
I reached the conclusion years ago that most anchors and "journalists" ("reporters" died years ago) have no common sense.

Being a man of reason, I had no choice but to eschew newspapers and the nightly news.

BTW, during the GOP primaries, McCain had no problem citing his NYT endorsement on his website. The endorsement was quickly removed from McCain's website after the NYT farted in McCain's face while he was attempting to kiss their a**.

Well Plumber (13:27)
You stated that you reched the conclusion that "journalists" have no common sense. Using the example of Couric (I all-too-well remember her off-top blame-casting on Christian organisations for Mathew Shepard murder 1999--which revealed her true colours beyond doubt), it appears to actually be MANDATORY condition for employment at lsm.

(one question I've had since 2007: did NBC replace Deb Norville in 1991 with Couric due to Norville's being born-again Christian and letting them know it?)

It's not ideology
The conservative Boston Herald is losing readers faster than the Globe. The conservative New York Post is losing readers faster than the Times. The death of newspapers has nothing to do with the editorials. It's all about the Internet, and TV.

MSM
the end came for me last summer when Brian Williams made a comment about the "so-called surge" in Iraq. After the surge was proven to be successful, the msm still insisted on labeling it "so-called." That's when I decided Williams was no more than a so-called news reader and the nightly news channels were nothing more than so-called news outlets. Their demise can't come soon enough for me!!

svpallava
No Leftist has common sense. Being a Leftist is the requirement for being a nightly news anchor.

I've seen Couric's newscast for all of 30 seconds. I turned the channel, never to return, after she told a female "journalist" that the hat she was wearing looked "cute". I don't view Couric as a serious person, much less a serious news anchor.

I didn't know that Norville is born-again. I'm sure that having a BAC at NBC was uncomfortable for the news staff. They're not used to having to be considerate to the feelings of Christians, especially "white Christians".

Young people can't and don't read
It's not the internet, but younger people, the students of the last 40 years who've been taught social engineering (1972--pres. of NEA said teachers were now *social engineers*).

FOX has defeated MSNBC, CNN, and any other cable channel and was first in the pol. conventions even ag. the networks, and it does not even have 3/4's of the affiliates.

The Wall Street Journal is growing (you can't say it's because finance and the *rich* are doing so well), and Newsman is the fastest growing magazine.

Except for the ossified in DC and the MSM, the old ideas of taxing and spending are really dead, but the media did spend nearly 8 years making jokes of Bush, disparaging Reps. (Pelosi's *culture of corruption) and even Letterman's *pres. speeches* has to take its tool.

They are so afraid of Palin now Letterman has switched to *skrewing* jokes about Bristol Palin, which would have horrified *the press* if such had been made about Chelsea or Amy Carter, who were *off limits.*


More for Plumber
Until 2007 (when I saw an ad, I think on WND but not sure, for an autobio of Norville), I didn't know either of Norville's name being in Life Book (Rev 20:11-15, Ex 32:32).

Even had she NOT made such an outrageous claim, I considered Couric actually below Wendy Mesley (CBC, never "prime" anchor but oft backup) quality-wise.

Svpallava
Oh No, say it isn't so, that one of the alphabets would stoop so low as to be..oooh perish the thought..anti Christian Bigots.
Who knew? It's just not possible.
Sarc/off

Good thing Plumbers
...dont' have to make sense.

You offer this utterly idiotic little nugget of sludge--"No Leftist has common sense"--and then have the gall to accuse the media of lacking in common sense?

You're clearly generalizing WAYYYYYY too far from your own experience.

Mark
You wrote:The conservative Boston Herald is losing readers faster than the Globe. The conservative New York Post is losing readers faster than the Times. The death of newspapers has nothing to do with the editorials.
First, there is conservative Boston Harold and Conservative NY Post is like saying the conservative GW Bush. They are no longer true conservative papers. I use to read the (conservative) Detroit News instead of the liberal Detroit Free Press. They are really no different. I also quit reading the (very conservative) Oakland Press until they were pressured to drop Ann Coulter. They are not conservative.
Second, its not just the editorials that make a news paper conservative or liberal. It's the absolute bias in the so called new articles written by so called reporters. Seems every news article has to include some slant or opinion to help sway the reader to set outcome of the story. They no longer want the reader to just read the news and understand it for what actually happened, but to soften or harden the reader to match the liberal ideology.

An Observation
Obama made the claim that he was never present during any of thr Rev. Wrights inflammatory sermons and that he wasn't the same man he knew all these years (that was the week AFTER he said he could never disaffect himself from him anymore than he could his own father).

20 years sitting in the pews while Wright sermoned from his pulpit and he not only just happened to miss those dicey outbursts, but he never even had a conversation with even one of the thousands of other parishoners who DID hear them....no gossip at all in their community...sure.

Now look at the attitude he has taken in foreign policy and the stark differences between reaching out to the Muslims and distancing himself from the Israelis and our other allies.

Seems like he may have beemn listening all along, dj'think?

The day the New York Times shuts it's doors for good will be declared an official holiday in my house, and it can't happen fast enough.

Good riddance to them all.

Today is the day that rabbit ears go away so now even more people will be forced to get cable and will have access to Fox News...oh the times, they are a changin'.

Thomas
Have three (3) TV receivers on DIRECTV and one on the new digital STB. I set up the STB this morning and it is probably the best picture I've ever seen on a TV receiver.

Also found that there are one hell of a lot more channels. I have not checked 'em all, but 59.2 is a Spanish channel which we have never had in this area on off-the-air TV.

With that many channels and the availability of more I suspect Fox will eventually be on STB.

Related Subject: I thought I'd change from DIRECTV to DISH a couple of years ago because DISH was cheaper. I gave that up instantly when I found Fox News was not part of the basic package. Don't know if that is still true or not.

Mark
The Rocky Mtn News was the "conservative" paper in Denver. It closed. The leftist Denver Post is still running, for now.

Al is right. I told the paperboy who tried to sell me the "conservative" RMN, "I don't want that socialist trash littering my driveway."

Until the very end, the editor of the "conservative" RMN remained in denial that while more conservative than the Post, there was nothing conservative about the RMN. Everytime someone brought up the bias on pages A1 through F22, he would bring up a conservative editorialist; like giving a conservative 24 inches of column space can make up for the several hundred (+ photos) of liberalism. Liberals at the News destroyed that 120+yo newpaper because conservatives abandoned the paper long ago.

close both
THERE WOULD BE SOMETHING IF THE MEXICAN BILLIONAIRE CLOSED BOTH. IT WOULD BE GOOD FOR LIBERALS AND UNION MEMBERS ALIKE. HE COULD MOVE THE ONLINE OPERATIONS TO MEXICO CITY. ALL HE HAS TO DO IS RELY ON THE WIRE AND OTHER MEDIA OUTLETS TO FILL IN WHAT HIS COUPLE OF FREELANCE REPORTERS DO NOT PROVIDE.
THE PEOPLE WOULD NOT STOP BEING SERVED AND THEY ACTUALLY WOULD BE SERVED IN A BETTER CAPACITY.

Bruce
Is self-sufficiency preferable to dependency? Should govt policies promote self-sufficiency? Does continually giving one something they haven't earned promote dependency or self-sufficiency?

When times are tight, do rational people CUT spending, or do they get loans to give to their buddies?

There is only one way rational people will answer all of these questions. Leftists believe the opposite.

I stand by my earlier comment.

World News;
Where I'm at in Central Ill=noise, our paper has gone to mornings only. Still a good paper and the editor has some sense. We were required earlier to go to digital TV as the stations changed with the first go around. All is good. More channels. We get news from around the world now. Britain, Germany, Russia, India, Japan, and Brazil. Now I only give Charlie Gibson a passing glance. They will be trying to control the Internet before long.
Semper Fidelis

Better to be un-formed than mis-formed.

Its really better to be un-formed than mis-formed.

Think of how mis-informed Liberals are and imagine how do they manage to get through life.

Oh thats right, with government help.

Never mind.

What a hoot
Liberals read People and National Enquirer, or can't read at all. They watch American Idol or Dancing With the Stars. The only thing they listen to on the radio is rap. Yet the MSM aims their stuff at the liberals who have no wish to be informed. When presented with facts, they show no inclination or ability to make a sensible conclusion. No wonder Air America, The NYT, Time/Newsweek and CBS/NBC/ABC are tanking. Their potential customers have no interest in what they are saying. Those who might believe them have no interest in paying attention them.

Why Not Read Conservative Papers?
If people don't want to read newspapers that they feel have a liberal bias, they are very free to read newspapers that have a conservative biast (Washington Times and Wall Street Journal are two examples). But they aren't. The fact is that people are turning away from newpapers in general for much more complex reasons that "liberal bias".

When I was a child we got our news photographs weekly in LIFE magazine. We saw the news happening only in newsreels when we went to the movies. Now we see everything instantly on television. I subscribe to two major daily papers, but by the time they are on my morning doorstep, the news in them has already been scooped by what's on CNN, MSNBC, and FOX, and all of those have been scooped by what's on Google News. I understand that young people no longer depend on TV evening news, which is seen as an older generation thing (notice that their advertisers think so too, lots of Viagra ads).

Personally, I am fed up with my newspapers being over 50% ads. Sometimes it's hard to find any newsprint at all among the ads. I read a Democrat paper and a Republican paper and both are equally full of ads for shoes, purses, and jewelry. If I cancel, that will be why.

It's amusing to see the right-wing campaign to convince everybody that "liberal bias" is the reason people aren't reading newspapers. I wonder how many townhallers take daily home delivery of the Washington Times? What's that you say, you read it online? Thank you for proving my point.

lilly
I, my parents, and my in laws all take Washington Times Weekly home delivery. After we've read them, they are given to neighbors to read.

I have My Very OWN *TownCryer*
And she lives here with me! I'm kept alerted to MOST local items of Interest.. I'm also aware of the *Pretty People* (E-something or other).
I refuse to hear "What that guy eats" on Travel..Truly a WASTELAND!!
I don't subscribe to a Newspaper anymore. our Local one did, at one time, do a Fair job of "Reporting" I cancelled my Wife's CrossWord Puzzle, etc due to Political Slant (Pure and Simple) DITTO for Time, Newsweek and a few others..I truly can't begin to tell You what's available on Direct TV because I'm not interested in MOST OF IT..*Alienated Old Man?" Damned Straight!! Or to quote Ms PAlin: "U BETCHA"!! worst of it is I don't see much improvement but I'll keep looking to Ms lilly for *Pointers*..CHEERS

MSM is What?
When you are driving on the freeway, anyone going slower than you is an "idiot" and anyone going faster is a "maniac". Think about it, it's true.

I am an independent and typically I just don't get this paranoia about the liberal MSM. I normally don't see it. However, the farther right or left you go on the political spectrum, the more you will see bias. Kind of like my freeway analogy.

Reporting the news, gets you fired
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hDb3Tn3mwA


Jon Kay and 9/11 Researchers discuss Journalism & September 11

The God Given Gift of Choice
Usefull Idiots said " Better to be un-formed than mis-formed."

Human beings have choices given by God as God gave them to Moses. The most important of those being this: You can be subserviant slaves or you can be free.

Is it a peace filled existence being slaves, never having the freedom to want, never having the freedom to choose, never having the freedom to decide your own destiny? No It is a living hell. The choice to be slaves is yours alone, that one gift from God. Heed this one fact. When you do choose to be slaves, to be taken care of, to freely give your will away you sentence your children, and their children to the same fate. How cruel a circumstance, how barbaric a fate, how undeserved to fall upon our children.

God will fullfill your desire to be slaves as you wish.

In the light of divine guidance if you choose the other path, God will strengthen your hand, strengthen your heart, stengthen your will, and compound your love of those you care about ten fold.....if you choose to be free.

It is easy to say enough, give me a King to take care of me. It is hard to say give me the freedom to stand on my own.

God gave the gift of self determination to men, it is what seperates man from the beasts.

Men were not meant to be slaves, they were meant to inherit the Earth.

What right does the King of America have to take our freedom from us.

What right does the King of Amreica have to choose what we make in a days labor.

What right does the King of America have to dictate to us at all.

After all, under the divine guidance of generations before us, with their sacrifice and belief in freedom, the King answers to us.






The foothills ......
lilly says: "It's amusing to see the right-wing campaign to convince everybody that "liberal bias" is the reason people aren't reading newspapers. I wonder how many townhallers take daily home delivery of the Washington Times? What's that you say, you read it online? Thank you for proving my point."

in the days of old, a smile on my face thinking of that term, 1776, printed warrants nailed to taverns, churches, and schools. Filled with bias against men and women in the colonies who objected to unwarranted searches and seizures, who objected to impressed servitude of young American Men forced into the British Army and Navy. The callous mockery of free mens desire to be free of the chains of England.

Fire was the end result. Warrants and news posts ripped from the doors of schools, churches, and taverns, and burned in the street. At times in front of British soldiers who under the propensity of massed freemen could only hate in silence and watch their printed words framing our servitude go up in flames.

Darkness falling, leading to freemen paying with their lives for such actions, being dragged from their beds in the dead of night, in front of their families to be never seen again.......

It was the foot hills outside of town that put the fear of God and free men into the hearts of the British. The reason they stayed in heavily populated towns and feared venturing into to foothills.

As does the press. They fear us.

Picking up a news paper and dumping it in the trash is not new. It is an honor felt in the heart of free men from the founding of this nation.




Chains that Bind
pistol says: "Yet the MSM aims their stuff at the liberals who have no wish to be informed."

The MSN has no choice. They have cast their lot with followers.

Their is no purpose served by writing words to followers already groveling at their feet. To what end, for what purpose?

There is no challenge, no desire, no thought, and no discernable reason to do so. Yet they insist on doing so.

It is only to satisfy their hearts that in their bondage they have others with them in chains.

Free Men in their reaction can only look once, spit on the ground, think of the ones they love, and move forward, and past them, filled with pity for them, and pride in themselves.


Casting the Spear Asunder
Thomas says: "Now look at the attitude he has taken in foreign policy and the stark differences between reaching out to the Muslims and distancing himself from the Israelis and our other allies."

Israel knows they have been abandoned as was foretold by the prophets.

A long ago prayer.....I breaketh the bow and cast the spear asunder, I shall be exaulted on the earth, for the Lord of Hosts is with us.

Israel has survived since the time of Noah, 5000 years ago, from the time of Moses 3000 years ago......from the time of Jesus Christ....2009 years ago...........

They will survive as a people long after the King of America is gone......

......long after America is gone.......



The Power of the Press
A gift of Freedom in that Free Men yearn to know of anything. The welfare of their families, their communities, their land, their livelyhood, their fortunes.

In that desire we have an understanding that was given to us by our forefathers. The right to freely express our thoughts omongst ourselves.

We have turned that right over to the cities of renown and supposed importance. The New York Times is supposed to speak for us?

I say in our birth men rode for days with letters in their saddlebags from loved ones and from Generals.

Small printing presses told us what we needed to know and to watch for.

I say there are thousands of newspapers in the US against one New York Times. If we did what the MSM and the New York Times do in collusion the MSN would fold like the cheap wet suit they are.

Imagine every conservative newspaper in the United States coordinating print like the MSN does. Imagine that coordinated thought disseminating to every blog, every constistuency, every home, to every corner of this country.

Imagine every said newspaper, and reporters who care, who want to stand, who want to serve their country, all at once and together standing up, asking questions, sacrificing to learn, and in that sacrifice to assure us that freedom prevails...........

A Matter of Honor
Their is no shame to be assigned to the MSN in their efforts to combine forces to cower us, as their is no shame in us fighting back, and fight back we must. There is no longer any choice.

There is no difference now than there was in 1776. We learned then to spread the word of freedom across the nation without modern printing presses or trucks, and despite those who tried to stop us.

We can again......and will




lilly
tisk tisk tisk. Such a shame that you would be so blind, but I doubt your proclaimed age is true, something about your last paragraph sorta destroyed your illusion. No, people are turning away from newspapers and MSM because it is so ridiculously biased, to the point of readily printing inuendos and even out and out lies and untruths that either further their cause (McCain example) or they are just to ignorant and/or brainwashed to realize that its not true (Global Warming for example). I cant get past the frontpage of most newspapers or three pages into most "news" magazines without being slapped in the face with some crude piece of crude agitprop. So I stopped purchasing them. CNN/ABC/NBC/CBS/MSNBC/PBS are all the same, spinning the same stories in the same ways, so I no longer watch them. Their loss, not mine.

With all due respect
to the columnists and fellow posters, leftist bias, television, and the Internet aren't the only reasons the dinosaur media are rapidly going extinct. Others include radio, magazines, throwaway publications, the recession, and bad business models.

Newspapers are suffering because they've relied far too heavily on advertising for far too long, thereby alienating readers, while treating advertisers and capitalism in general with self-defeating contempt. Other media are more cost-effective advertising vehicles, and they also deliver more diverse, more credible content. Fewer and fewer people are willing to search through pounds of ads, fluff, and leftist crap for a nugget of information. Fewer and fewer advertisers are willing to pay for the privilege of reaching those people. Transplanting this model to the Internet accomplishes little.

The broadcast media have a similar problem. Commercial interruptions are so numerous, so long, so loud, and so insulting that not even a pet rock can stand them. AM talk radio and some music stations offer notable exceptions, but a great deal of programming simply isn't worth enduring the barrage. In a desperate effort to stop the flight of viewers and listeners, broadcast media and their sponsors have made their productions increasingly crude. One problem: offensive content either drives people away faster or numbs them, making them harder to reach. Not even the proliferation of DVRs can make for-profit television bearable, and there's no such technology available to radio listeners stuck in traffic.

All the dinosaur media suffer from inability to benefit from the exclusion principle. Why subscribe to the _New York Times_ when you can get its highlights free on network news or NPR? Why listen to Katie Couric prattle when you can read her talking points on the Web free of charge, at your own pace, and without interruption?

my .02
I won't jump to conclusions about all the reasons for the broad decline in the MSM but know why I no longer watch or read them. Their bias angers me and insults my intelligence. I would watch or read if they simply reported the facts. But the MSM, television and print, reports their biased interpretation of facts. Thanks, but no thanks.

Robert
I understand your skepticism, but here's something that may help you see.

If you have CSPAN, watch an event before reading about it. That way you'll see what happened, with no one attempting to interpret it for you. You can make your own judgements about what is of central importance, and what is periphreal. (I know, this probably isn't the most exciting way to spend your time!)

This event should be something that you think should get some coverage in the news, for obvious reasons. Think about what you saw, and form your impressions.

Then, while keeping those in mind, read a news article about that event (or watch the evening news). See what is emphasized, and what is not mentioned at all. Sometimes there's not much difference, other times the discrepancies are staggering. At times, it seems as if the news story is not about the event you witnessed at all.

Then think about whether this is a one off event, or whether it's SOP. To ask the question is to answer it.


media losing ground
The left wing media may be losing a lot of viewers or readers but it sure hit the jackpot in its election of the most left wing president ever!
marge

Lilly
"If people don't want to read newspapers that they feel have a liberal bias, they are very free to read newspapers that have a conservative biast (Washington Times and Wall Street Journal are two examples). But they aren't. The fact is that people are turning away from newpapers in general for much more complex reasons that "liberal bias"."

________________________________________________

Lilly as always you are misinformed, first of all the 2 papers you mentioned are the only 2 that are regularly conservative or better un biased. Further there are 2 papers that have gained readership in this period of diminished subscribers, WSJ and USA Today. USA Today gives most of its papers away to Hotels so an increase in readership is moot, the WSJ however has enjoyed a very nice increase in readership.

I believe that the internet has more to do with the decline because the bulk of the daily papers have been left leaning for decades, the internet gives people an alternative to the local papers that may be to biased for there taste.If those papers had been more even handed they may have not lost as many readers, but we will never know. It is interesting that papers like the NYT in the face of bankruptcy and criticism mostly justified of being very left of center, does not try to be more unbiased in its reporting. As a business man I would certainly try that before I lost everything. However doggedly they soldier own down th epath of their own destruction. Kinda like lemmings.

US media's "conservatism"
No more conservative than the majority of the now-defunct Progressive-Conservative Party (Canada), the depth of whose "conservatism" was revealed in 1993 in Reform slogan "Grit, Tory same old suppository". (Tory=PC, Grit=Liberal Party) to those who hadn't learned from the PC's nine years of misrule , particluarly their exceeding Grits in rob-and-spend.

(note: current Conservative Party was formed from actual conservatives who still remained in PC melding with Alliance under Harper leadership)

Media Manipulation
The liberal leftist media elected this administration. There was no "free press". There was a consorted effort on the part of the NYT, WPost, Globe, etc. as well as CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, ABC to elect President Obama. This is called state run propaganda. These elites are in lock step with every single things these liberal leftist put forth. People know all is not glorious as the media presents this administration when these same people see friends, family lose jobs, due to their own government, then are told that they will have to lessen their expectations versus encourage to excel in their expectations...on a daily basis...this Congress abdicates all responsibility it was elected to be responsible for and not a peep out of the media...czar here czar there and nothing? The SC refuses to get involved in a blatant disregard on contract law...not a peep from anyone...one starts to wonder where the press is? We do not have a media...we have a state run propaganda machine in lock step with their political allies in the liberal leftist democrat party and unions, no wonder we have to go elsewhere to actually know what the heck is going down in our own country......txpoljldy

Conservative Magazines
An article in today's New York Times explores the situation of conservative magazines :"Conservative Magazines: Their Vision Isn't the GOP's" by Patricia Cohen, NYT 6-13-09).

Guess what, conservative print magazines are having the same troubles as liberal print newspapers (falling readership) as the public switches from print to digital information sources. The Right simply tries to use this social change as part of its campaign to convince the United States that conservative thought is mainstream thought. People now turn to the Internet rather than the newsstand, and conservatives try to convince us that they do this because they hate "liberal bias"---if people WANTED to read print, they would be buying conservative print. They're not. They're going online, if not to TV.

BTW, a couple of conservative magazine editors are quoted as saying that they aren't interested in conducting a forum in their pages and that their purpose is to indoctrinate the public and influence thought. I believe, txpoletc, that this is called "media manipulation".

In the beginning
There was the word...media.

The media said:
let there be darkness and there was darkness.

The media said:
let there be lies and stupidity, and there was lies and stupidity.

The media said:
Let us make man in our own image, full of ignorance, arrogance, stupidity, lies and propaganda, and there was ....ignorance, arrogance, stupidity, lies and propaganda.

The media said:

let us crown the obama as lord and master, and he was crowned lord and master.

And the media said:
its all good

Demographics
And what are the demographics for the evening news and the NY Times? Largely senior citizens who maintain a misguided trust in media because they believe objectivity is still being practiced. They do not look to alternative sources for news, thus the liberal viewpoint becomes the default viewpoint on major issues.

if it bleeds it leads
its not about what is important, its what people will buy. thats why when a pretty girl goes missing it takes precidence over anything happening in say foreign policy. something else that sells is outrage. when cable news goes to commercial invariably the tease is "wait till you hear what they've done now". people get excited about stories that can be used to challenge or reinforce the beliefs the have. thats why a crime is more important (marketable)
if it involves representatives from oposing social groups, even if the truth about the individuals involved, or groups implicated, or the facts themselves must be stretched a bit to make it relevant (outrageous). As long as news is for profit, the prime motivation will be sensationalism. So what seems like bias may just be marketing. Not that there isn't bias in the news, I just don't think it's the prime motivation.

LILLY i think you are right. Newspapers are only good for coupons these days. You can go on drudge and watch stories develop in real time.

ROBERT i love your freeway analogy

Good reminder
Some newspapers now have a strong on-line presence and allow people to blog. That is the case with our Colorado Springs Gazette. A few months ago I began a "Media Bias" blog and update it several times per week with comments on how stories are reported and which stories aren't reported in our local paper. Others can do the same. It might do some good.

It's not just political reporting that is biased. Recall how Hollywood thought "The Passion of the Christ" had no audience and liberal movie reviewers couldn't fathom its popularity? Now, we have the New York Times review of the ABC show "The Goode Family" - not in keeping with modern sensibilities. I watched it last night and enjoyed the lampooning of liberals.

To the New York Times Shareholders
Why would you sacrifice your investment in your future, your investment in your childrens future, to cowards and slaves?


Kermudjin
Where is your blog?

I am also in Colorado Springs

Understanding the line
Sometimes you have to cross it.....knowing when you do there will be deafining silence....


In Silence
In silence our children decided on their own to join the military. In silence they endured training. In silence they think about their lives, their families, their weaknesses, their training, and their potential death in combat.

How can we ignore that. How can we as a free people ignore their sacrifice.

Lewis and Clark in the 17th century, on the banks of a river, the first time meeting native tribes....looking in the eyes of a chief who wanted his rifle, and looking at 100 warriors lining the banks of the river, another 100 that came out of the woods to join them, while his men floated off shore 55 in number including one woman......said this to his mountain man guide who translated for him.

Tell him he's not taking my rifle. Not once telling him once but 4 times....each time the chiefs anger growing.

In silence his men watched from the middle of the river, their rifles pointed at the Indians lining the banks, noting the anger of the Indian Chief.

In silence the Chief went in councel with other chiefs and honored his bravery. Then offering to smoke with them.....

It was that moment that secured the Louisiana Territory.

It is strength that secures freedom. Standing your ground. Not weakness and capitulation to make those who want to test us, to kill us, feel better.

A Tribute to a Mountain Man
It was not Lewis and Clark's wisdom that made them decide to stand their ground and refuse to hand over their rifles as tribute, it was their translator and guide. He lived among the Indians for more than 20 years and simply told them this:

If you hand your rifle, in tribute, to them your men will be fed, as scraps, to their dogs in the morning.

Sensationalism vs Truth
Mary says: "if it involves representatives from oposing social groups, even if the truth about the individuals involved, or groups implicated, or the facts themselves must be stretched a bit to make it relevant (outrageous). As long as news is for profit, the prime motivation will be sensationalism."

I ask Mary; what are you willing to do to change your perception of inequity?

Yes you see yet you do nothing.


Gods Come Cheap These Days
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/chuckwagon.php

Robert, #29
Calling yourself independent does not make you neutral, so please forgive me for thinking that where YOU stand makes you the fulcrum from which objective opinion derives.

It may well be that given the staggering confession by journalists that 91% of them are liberal and voted for Obama, your contention that you see no media bias makes you an independent on a very left 'freeway'.

sky
i try and consume less of the crap they are attempting to entice us with. as long as news is for profit, consumers control the purse strings. if enough of us elevate our standards, the media will be starved into change. we will get what we are willing to pay for. thats the thing about the free market we get what we want whether its good for us or not, but at least we have the freedom to decide.

The problem
is that it's not only the "big" papers that spew the liberal/leftist trash. Small-town dailies all across the midwest and south have also become infected because they have been bought-up by two or three liberal conglomerates. Hometown editorial boards are now a joke; their Opinion Pages are straight from AP or Reuters. When my local paper started running leftist editorial hit-jobs (disguised as hard news stories) on the front page it was the final straw for me. I cancelled.

It's not the editorials...
thatt make a paper liberal or conservative; it is the overarching use of AP reporting in all the papers- large and small, both on the coasts and in flyover-land. The drumbeat of coverage, both in selectivity; which stories get coverage, say in the case of the whack job killing because of his delusions at the museum versus the murder of two of America's finest young soldiers orchestrated by islam. Look it up; right now, there are several hundred LEAD stories on the "right-wing" killer as opposed to a dozen on the muslims -and many of those stories do the most bizarre convolutions to not identify his as such. AP must stand for either 'American Pravda,' or 'All Propoganda.' As long as there is virtually a single source supplier of reporting with its attendent glaring bias, there will be one-sided news.

Real journalism
All I ask for is hard-hitting investigative journalism and a committment to objectivity--I don't expect perfect objectivity, but I DO expect it to be the standard. I would buy the paper that did that. Hiring more investigative reporters or trying to be more objective never seems to be an idea that comes up when an ailing paper is looking to find a way to stay in business.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.