Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, March 13, 2009
Rich Tucker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Economic and Educational Enigmas
by Rich Tucker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


When then-Sen. Barack Obama titled his autobiography “The Audacity of Hope,” (borrowing from a sermon by his spiritual mentor, the controversial Rev. Jeremiah Wright), he probably didn’t suspect his young presidential administration would be marked by far too much “audacity” and far too little “hope.”

Let’s start with what ails the country.

The problem in the United States today isn’t that our medical records aren’t computerized. It isn’t insufficient funding for Pell Grants. It’s that the credit markets aren’t operating properly.

Banks don’t know how much their holdings are worth, and they’re afraid to make big loans. Investors doubt that the recession will end soon, so they’re reluctant to put their money into a market that may keep going down.

If the Obama administration starts by solving the banking crisis, the rest of our problems should seem smaller by comparison. Obama nodded in this direction during his primetime news conference on Feb. 9.

“We are going to have to work with the banks in an effective way to clean up their balance sheets so that some trust is restored within the marketplace, because right now part of the problem is that nobody really knows what’s on the bank’s books,” the president declared. He added that his administration had a plan. “I don’t want to pre-empt my secretary of the treasury. He’s going to be laying out these principles in great detail tomorrow,” Obama announced.

But when Timothy Geithner spoke the next day, he didn’t offer a detailed plan, just vague hopes and promises. The stock market tumbled further that day and for the next month, wiping out untold trillions in paper wealth.

Newsweek magazine thinks it understands why Geithner is struggling. “So why are key posts at the Treasury Department -- every single job requiring Senate confirmation -- vacant except for his own?” The magazine asks. “One answer: a tough IRS bureaucrat is spooking potential hires and embarrassing people who do apply.”

Embarrassing them, eh? How so? Well, that IRS specialist has been combing through nominee’s tax returns. “So far, the [Senate] committee’s review has turned up embarrassing tax issues for several nominees, including Geithner himself. Sources say the vetting has emerged as a serious deterrent, especially for experts from the financial industry,” Newsweek writes.

Oh, so these nominees haven’t been, you know, paying everything they owe in taxes. Indeed, that is embarrassing. Especially to the tens of millions of Americans who do pay everything they owe every year. They, rightly, don’t understand why so many of President Obama’s nominees have run into tax troubles.

The answer is simple, of course: Politicians ought to fix our nation’s broken tax code.

A flat tax -- one that charged everyone a single rate with no deductions -- would be so simple even a sub-cabinet nominee could figure it out. Sure, there’d be plenty of CPAs and tax attorneys out of business -- but they’re smart people. They could certainly find other meaningful work.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Rich Tucker is an editor in Washington D.C. and a columnist for Townhall.com.

Be the first to read Rich Tucker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.< Sign up today!

As a CPA...
I would have no problem with a simplification of the tax code. Individual freedom is more important then the artificial benefit my industry receives at the expense of the general population.

Great Idea
But it will never happen, it would decrease the number of government employees and the ability of politicians to buy votes.

It's logical and cost effective, but you cannot put those words together with "government."

An income tax...
... is still a tax in productivity and a deterrent to domestic industry vs off-shore. It doesn't matter how flat the tax is, it is still an income tax. And never forget that the original income tax was pretty dang simple and small. It doesn't take long for it to be manipulated and gamed by politicians on behalf of special interests who fund their elections in return for tax favoritism.

Rich's point is on target, but the solution he offers is weak compared to the Fair Tax plan.

Practice Marriage

After my first marriage was terminated by annulment, my attorney told me I may need to investigate refiling my taxes. Sure enough, in the tax books I found a section that required refiling of taxes at the higher single rate if a marriage is dissolved due to an annulment.

So being a good American, I refiled and paid the back taxes. Next thing I know the IRS is calling me asking why I did this. I explained the tax laws and after several phone calls, they asked me if I could fax them the page with the law.

I could only shake my head in disgust.

Dumbo talks big
"effective.... clean up.... trust....principles" and comes to mind "reform...hope...transparency...efficiency...open...audacity". I'd call that mighty bold talk from a big-eared south Chicago politician. No sign yet of delivery, and plenty of same-o same-o and worse. Somebody give me an estimate of when this "new" policy of tax and spend at government direction is going to make us all rich and prosperous. Lots of posterrs say he can't miss. Is it too much to ask when?

Moonkeeper
I appreciate your sentiment re: tax code complexity vs. greater good of society. I also agree with FeedFwd (#3) that, morally, the income tax is an affront to free people. Penalizing productivity should be anathema to every thinking person. Thus, the Fair Tax - taxing consumption equally, with adjustments as described in it - would collect otherwise elusive income (black market, etc.) and release our manufacturers to compete on a more level playing field.

Of course, I would add that FedGov be limited in scope to that which is expressly allowed in the Constitution. At 20% of its current size, we may not even need a Fair Tax to fund it!

SALVADOR "THE SAVIOR" ALLENDE & OBAMA

Salvador (the savior) Allende, like messiah Obama is doing now, rushed his revolutionary program to socialize Chile's economy trying to do too much too fast: nationalizing the banking and copper industries, getting control of the healthcare and educational systems and redistributing income and property to Chile's poor on a massive scale. Obama is very much an echo of the hasty, rash, precipitous Marxist Allende. Allende exacerbated an already divided and polarized country and his programs made a shambles of Chile's economy causing soaring inflation, deficits and negative GDP growth. There is no better analogy to the socialist Barack Obama than the mad, impatient, ruthless progressive Salvador Allende.

Click my name and read the rest of the piece: The Man with the Middle Name Hussein, or Barack Hussein Allende

a chilling effect?
"Congratulations, Mr./Ms.______, you've been nominated for a top position in the Treasury Dept! Yes, it's quite an honor! There's just this minor formality of a comprehensive audit of your returns for the last 10 years or so."

"click"

"Hello? Hello? Is anyone there?"

(sound of dial tone)..................

Obama's politics
Obama seems to be following his spiritual mentor's complaints about America and his attitudes about what is wrong with us. Rev. Wright preaches hate to those who do not agree with him and Obama listened to this for twenty years, so to think he was not influenced by things he soaked in when in that church is beyond reason. Most have appreciation for our beloved country, and are grateful for the freedoms we are allowed to enjoy, and what we make of ourselves is ours, not the government's responsability.

Why?
Dont' expect any fundamental change in the tax code. The Annointed One and his minions perceive it not as a mechanism for funding gubmint operations, but rather as a punative redistributionist vehicle.

Robin Hood and Taxes
An income tax is a horrible penalization of people who have jobs. The 16th amendment needs to be repealed.

Of course people who have jobs, (i.e. recieve a W2), are middle class and/or poor. The rich don't work for a pay check. They're not that stupid. So when any politician tells you they will raise the income tax only on the rich, you can bet they're lying. Social restructuring through forcible taxation always hurts most those who think they will benefit.

The only real beneficiaries: politicians who gain power over people through their money.

Read "The Law" by Frederic Bastiat and check out the Constitution Party http://www.constitutionparty.com/

Oh, the hypocrisy!

Huh. What do you know? After all their policies and political philosophy, it tuns out in practice liberals don't actually like paying taxes either. Don't they consider that unpatriotic, or is it only unpatriotic when conservatives propose sharp decreases in taxes?

AND DON'T FORGET
95% of us are going to get a $13. tax cut!!!!

Can't wait for my "Tax Cut"
Gonna buy myself a *BINKIE*

For the first 150 years . . .
this country was funded by TARIFFS. It is time to go back to that system. Any product being exported would be TAX FREE. Anything imported would be subject to DUTY.
The only reason that an "income tax holiday" was rejected was that people would finally see what their "whole paycheck" looks like. It might then be difficult for the government to reimpose withholding. If "withholding" were eliminated and the total amount of income taxes were due by April 15, a tax revolution would take place.
By the way, it was Milton Friedman that thought up the idea of "withholding".
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.