Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, December 14, 2007
Rich Tucker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Lead in Toys: Should Government Metal?
by Rich Tucker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


’Tis the season -- to worry about lead.

Yes, the big story from coast-to-coast this Christmas seems to be about the danger of heavy metal, and we don’t mean the Twisted Sister Christmas album. Lead is in our toys and on our lights, and we’re told only one thing can do solve the problem: More government intervention in the economy.

For example, at a recent Democratic debate in Iowa, the candidates insisted our country is under siege. China is “sending dangerous toys into the United States,” former Sen. John Edwards charged, and the Bush administration hasn’t done anything about it. “As president, I would end -- flat, bang, no importation of those toys,” Sen. Joe Biden added. Sen. Barack Obama agreed. “I would say toys cannot come in.”

Finally, Sen. Chris Dodd made it clear he wasn’t going to be rhetorically outdone. “When we got word that they were sending toys over here with lead paint in them,” he added, “the president had the authority immediately to suspend importation. He wouldn’t do it. Had that been a U.S. corporation doing that, their doors would have been shut in 20 minutes.”

Dodd has stumbled over the truth here, but to paraphrase Winston Churchill, he managed to pick himself up and continue on anyway, with a typical pander to Iowans (he vowed to buy only toys made in their state). The truth is that when a corporation, American or not, sells a dangerous product, it is quickly punished. Not by the government, which can take months to act. By the market.

Consider the food industry. You’ve probably never heard of the Topps Meat Company, and you’ll never have another chance to sample its products. Back in September the company was forced to recall more than 20 million pounds of meat after it sickened some 40 people. Six days after the recall started, Topps went out of business.

“In one week we have gone from the largest U.S. manufacturer of frozen hamburgers to a company that cannot overcome the economic reality of a recall this large,” the company’s COO explained. The Department of Agriculture also announced it would step up its inspections of the meat industry, but that’s like locking the barn door after the cow’s already been turned into hamburger.

No government inspection regime will work as effectively or as efficiently as the market pressure that shut down Topps. Rest assured other companies, worried about going out of business too, improved their inspection process long before Uncle Sam even managed to hire the new meat inspectors.

Returning to the subject of lead, it’s worth noting that the metal isn’t confined to our toys. “The sparkle of Christmas lights may be toxic. There’s lead on the wiring that millions of Americans string up in their home and medical experts warn that lead can be dangerous, especially to children,” reporter Greg Hunter warned recently on CNN.

A few weeks earlier, anchor Kiran Chetry had announced, “There is concern that the tree itself might be toxic or the lights or the wreath that you hang on your door.” Chetry went on to interview a woman from Florida who’d purchased a Christmas wreath that contained lead. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Rich Tucker is an editor in Washington D.C. and a columnist for Townhall.com.

Be the first to read Rich Tucker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.< Sign up today!

Immediate contradiction
lilly provides us with an in-line contradiction, and illustrates her knee-jerk anti-US hatred.

She explains to us why she buys US seafood instead of Asian seafood, because Asian agriculture is disgusting. Then she says:

"The Chinese now see the reason for government regulation and for enforcing any existing regulation. Would that we did."

Clearly, whatever it is we do, it's sufficient to produce acceptable seafood. But Lilly will never miss an opportunity to say "The US is stupid," so she goes for the cheap shot -- even while demonstrating that she KNOWS our seafood is safe.

Liberalism: reliable in its dismissal of the best.

(Unrelated to this thread, please read my political blog, "Plumb Bob: Squaring the Culture" at http://www.plumbbobblog.com. Thanks.)

Sam
Due to a holiday season family visit I have had an unusual amount of recent exposure to seafood so I can provide current data:
1) On Thursday I bought wild-caught US-caught shrimp @ $9.99 lb. I could have bought shrimp from Thailand or China for $5.99 lb..
2) On Saturday at an upscale restaurant the menu informed us that the shrimp was US-caught.
3) On Sunday (today) at another nice restaurant a board at the door informed us that the scallops were wild-caught on Nantucket Island.

American seafood IS available. It is not the cheapest. Each of us has to decide what's important. I no longer buy or order Asian seafood. I don't mean my "personal boycott" as a political statement---I am just too grossed out by reports (with pictures) of what goes on in Asian aquaculture. BTW the New York Times had a huge article on this the other day, but this isn't the first time US media have provided the information. China freely admits that it grew too much too fast and ignored food safety for the sake of profit. The water in which fish are grown is very contaminated, then heavy doses of drugs are used to keep the fish alive at all. The Chinese now see the reason for government regulation and for enforcing any existing regulation. Would that we did.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.