Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Saturday, June 23, 2007
Rich Tucker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Good News is No News
by Rich Tucker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Ready to read about an example of the American dream, and the American reality? Look no further than the June 17 front page of The Washington Post. “Mia Hall just moved into her dream house, a five-bedroom Colonial in Southern Maryland featuring a gourmet kitchen with a center island and a double oven, twin fireplaces and a finished basement, as well as a whirlpool tub and dual shower heads in the master bathroom.” Sounds perfect.

But the Hall family isn’t completely happy. You see, they share a mailbox with neighbors. “When I walk down there, I think, ‘Jeez, this is a long walk.’ It would complete our home if we had a nice mailbox out front that has our number, our name on it,” Mia Hall, a 37-year-old government employee, told the paper. The story also notes that the Hall’s neighbors are building a $618,000 home next door, and are also unhappy with the communal mailboxes.

These folks aren’t alone in their unease. According to the “Economic Mobility Project,” a study sponsored in part by the Pew Charitable Trusts, many of us are troubled.

“Over half of Americans surveyed thought that the American Dream is no longer attainable for the majority of their fellow citizens,” the study insists. “Other polls suggest that Americans are increasingly worried that they will be able to maintain the standard of living they currently enjoy.” Now, is there a reason Americans might wonder if we’re doing well enough? Perhaps because the media bombards us with bad economic news day after day, while good economic news goes virtually unmentioned.

For one example, think about how the press covers gasoline prices. When they’re climbing (as has often been the case in recent months), we see an endless round of stories. But if prices start moving in the opposite direction, it’s ignored. In my neighborhood, gas is again less than $3 a gallon, but that isn’t front-page news.

But the Pew survey gives us other reasons to be depressed. “Those in their thirties in 2004 had a median income of about $35,000 a year. Men in their fathers’ cohort, those who are now in their sixties, had a median income of about $40,000 when they were the same age in 1974,” it says. “Indeed, there has been no progress at all for the youngest generation. As a group, they have on average 12 percent less income than their fathers’ generation at the same age.

This suggests the up-escalator that has historically ensured that each generation would do better than the last may not be working very well.” Statistics don’t lie, but they can certainly mislead. So let’s take on this idea that Americans aren’t doing as well today as our parents did. Start with something we can’t put a price on: lifespan.

Americans are living longer, healthier lives than they did a generation ago. In 1980, life expectancy at birth was 73.7 years. Today, it’s 77.9 years. In addition, we enjoy prescription drugs that people in the 1970s couldn’t have dreamed of. There are pills to lower blood pressure, to control cholesterol, to reduce blood sugar. It’s easier than ever to be healthy.

Also, consider our homes.

Since 1979, the median size of newly built homes has increased almost by half, from an average 1,485 square feet to 2,140 feet. 90 percent of new homes have central air conditioning, something only 40 percent had in 1979. Homes such as those being built by the Hall family (with or without a mailbox) would have been eye-popping in the 1970s. Today they’re routine, and even a middle class family getting by on a government paycheck can afford them.

Meanwhile, Americans have pretty much defeated hunger.

In most countries, poor people live hand-to-mouth, never more than a meal or two away from hunger. But here, even poor children eat plentifully. Studies show they get twice as much protein as the USDA recommends.

As poverty expert Robert Rector testified before a House subcommittee this year, “Most poor children today are, in fact, supernourished and grow up to be, on average, one inch taller and 10 pounds heavier that the GIs who stormed the beaches of Normandy in World War II.”

It doesn’t stop there, of course. Today our globalized economy allows us to enjoy electronic devices undreamed of decades ago. We take our easy and inexpensive international travel for granted. In short, virtually everything’s taken a giant leap forward. But somehow, we’re supposed to believe we’re worse off?

The American dream isn’t dead. It lives on in our bigger houses, our nicer cars, our longer, healthier lives. This generation will do better than the one before. That probably won’t make the papers. But you can count on it, even if you have to walk a block to get your mail.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Rich Tucker is an editor in Washington D.C. and a columnist for Townhall.com.

Be the first to read Rich Tucker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.< Sign up today!

wow!
I wish i had only problems like that... ;)

Hello Mr Tucker
Gas in MY neighborhood has been moving back and forth between $4 and $4.19.9 all this spring. A box of cereal costs $4.89. A ride on the subway or bus costs $2. Crappy little houses that not long ago cost $85,000 now cost $600,000. I don't need the media to tell me that the cost of living has gone through the roof. Is your philosophy "Hold a happy thought and it will come true"?

Really?
Wow, lilly, over $4 a gallon. That is well over the national average. Maybe you need to investigate why this is so. If you are paying nearly $5 a box for cereal, maybe you need to investigate Costco or some other such place. That sounds way too high, too. And if crappy houses are costing over half a million dollars, maybe you need to move to a different area.

Are you exaggerating, lilly? Are you one of those people who use "creative facts" according to who is in power? Your numbers just ring a little false.

Not so bad
What is so pathetic about the life expectancy? The nations ahead of us are not exactly backwards.

I say it is miraculous that we are in the top 50! A huge number of Americans have a terrible diet (their own choice, I might add)--fast food, junk food, restaurants with HUGE servings, etc), many do not engage in any kind of exercise. We get in our cars and drive short distances instead of walking.

I was in Italy recently, and one of the first things I noticed was they do not have the obesity problem that we have. They take measures to conserve gas (it is much more expensive there), and one of those is walking. Restaurants served small, but adequate, portions. I think we should give credit where credit is due. Some people in the world are doing better than us when it comes to life style choices. But, we should be free to make our own choices.

Ditto Dottie
Americans are eating themselves to death. As for
lilly, where does he live, anyway..Maybe time to move...

Housing & Life Expectancy
More Americans own their own home than anytime in history. That means a record number of mortgages. A record number of mortgages means the potential for a record number of defaults. That is not counting second homes, however more Americans have second homes than ever before. Of course then we have those folks that wish to tell the rest of us how to live, Gore, Gates, Edwards, and most Hollywood stars all of which own several homes and their primary residence could house several small villages from a third world country.

Life expectancy is a strange piece of data and certainly odd as a measure for quality of life. Half of the countries on the list are tiny countries with very small populations. Yet if one looks at the statistical distribution of means for each country on the list we are talking only about a difference of five years. If Americans, especially men in their late teens and early 20s, just quit killing each other in automobiles our mean life expectancy would change almost by that much. Yet the lists leaves out a majority of the world's citizens, e.g., China, Russia, Indian, Pakistan, Eygpt, the entire continents of Africa and South America. The list repeats data because it includes the European Union as if it were a nation and Hong Kong as if it were separate from the People's Republic of China.

Yet what is responsible for the majority of the increase in average longevity world wide and what is the cause of low average longevity. Basic sanitation is a significant factor on determining longevity. Clean drinking water and adequate food are the next. Next major factor is the reduction or elimination of childhood diseases either through vaccines such as whooping cough, tetanus, typhoid or the source control, for the likes of malaria, yellow fever and a long list of arthovectored parasites that children are affected with throughout the second and third world and we had just two generations ago in the USA. All of those are fixable by any country that has a government that cares about its people. Together these programs alone dramatic raise the average longevity to around seventy, since the highest mortality in any country without such programs is among children. When a large percentage of people die before their fifth birthday that kind of blows longevity.

Yet the left would continue to have us believe that Americans live in a country that grows more divided each day between rich and poor. Yet If you placed our poor in the broader context of the world as a whole they would fall above the middle on the list relative to quality of life. Someone "certifiably poor" in the USA probably owns some or all of the following, a car, a color televisions, portable electronic devices, beds, heating and air conditioning, etc. Unless they just refuse to participate they have access to enough food, clean water, telephone, clothing and an education. What is amazing is that if poor are working they pay no payroll taxes except social security and the Democrats would eliminate that tax yet still allow them to qualify for social security and medicare benefits.

I would love to see the media go and live with the lower 25% even 50% economically in China, India, Pakistan, and in much of Africa. Not go and stay in a western owned hotel but eat, sleep, drink, and live in the same places a large portion of a given country's population does.

I would love to see an objective reporter look at the health care system from an individual middle class citizen's view in almost any EU country. Consider life time costs in taxes, lack of access, delay in access, etc.

Yet they will not, they have an agenda to sell and it doesn't include the truth.

Housing
Mr. Tucker touches on an important and often ignored subject when he talks about housing.

As Mr. Tucker points out, by every measurable standard, housing is better than it was in the 1970s. What he doesn't mention is that housing in America in the 1970s was far better than it had ever been before. As recently as 1950, over 35 % of the nation's homes did not have complete plumbing, according to the Census Bureau. Their criteria for "complete plumbing" was hot and cold piped water, a bathtub or a shower and a flush toilet. The typical new home of 1950 was one story, had less than 1000 square feet of living area, and consisted of two bedrooms and one bath.

Home equity is, by far, the largest share of a household's net worth. It is, in fact, close to half the nation's net worth. How is this wealth spread out? In 1900, the homeownership rate was 46.5 %. In 1950, it was 55 %. Today it is 70 %. In the last decade, the greatest gains in rate of homeownersip have been made by minorities. In Europe, by contrast, homeownership rates are often in the 35-40 % range.

Housing costs
Does it strike anyone as strange that the construction companies are all hiring illegal labor, but home prices keep skyrocketing? It is also said that if we don't use illegal farm workers, our grocery prices will zoom upward. Well, they seem pretty high to me now. The savings garnered by the use of illegal aliens is NOT passed on to the consumer. Speak up this week to your representatives. It's a crucial time for this country. Our government will use every dirty trick in the book to try to outsource the American middle class. Let's not let them!

,Visiting Europe
I used to wonder why all the residents seemed to be out and about every evening, not just weekends, I soon found out that the majority of them live in small apartments, and get out at night with the children, the dog, and grandmother. As for myself, I have moved through the years from a 4,000 square foot house, to 3,000 townhouse, now to retirement to a 2,000 square foot house. Does this mean that my American Dream is fading?

Hall's Mailbox
A government employee exposes the mailbox crisis in the United States!!!
We need a new federal law-The Mailbox Enhancement Act of 2007-and a new agency that could employ thousands of mailbox police to enforce the placement of mailboxes withing three large steps of a front door. This would also have the side effect of improving the living standards of the supernourished by reducing energy spent walking to a remote mailbox!
This new agency would need thousands of SUV's for their employees to follow mailmen around to insure that they are placing mail in only the newly approved mailboxes. These new mailboxes would all be painted green to show that we are environmentally friendly and taking steps against global warming...
Finally, these new government employees could afford homes in Ms. Hall's neighborhood.
Another crisis averted!!!

Unable to think?
The posting with 43 average life expectancys just proves how desperate the left is to make the weak minded feel bad.

Here is the good news:

How long each individual will live is a personal matter. If you died of natural causes at age 39, in The U.S. it is too late to envy those who lived to 78. But it also means you were saved 39 years of listening to the left cry about how miserable life is.

There is a trade off in the U.S., leftist worry us into an early grave because of our freedom of speach. I bet none of the countrys ahead of us in life expectancy have a written constitution with the "no law infringing" speach clause.


Makoshark
You answered the laughing boy with logic. He's now all confused.

Liz
"Does it strike anyone as strange that the construction companies are all hiring illegal labor, but home prices keep skyrocketing?"

Right. Every one of the 500,000 or so construction companies in the US is hiring illegal aliens. And, just to make sure they control home prices, they're colluding with 100 million owners of existing houses. It's a conspiracy, man.

Did I miss something???
It seems to me the column addressed how we are fed bad news rather than good news.

And...as we experience every evening, the formerly major networks make a concerted effort to cast every story in a negative light. We sit and wait for the "but" if they mistakenly offer a positive lead on a story...and most every time, it comes along on cue!!

There is MUCH to be thankful for in this country and it is too bad that the formerly major networks feel it is their primary purpose to negate any feelings of well-being.

Be afraid...the boogeyman is going to getcha!

Sorry, I'm not buying it!

Our country has the best life has to offer a person - all they have to do is exert a little effort and hard work, along with some self-control re: health/eating/drinking etc. and it is there!!!

Good moral values used to be taught by teachers, Sunday School teachers and parents. Those used to establish a firm foundation for the way one lead their life...how many can remember the PA morning prayer in school??? The politically-correct crowd has truly diminished our society!

Why prices have gone up:
(Constant-dollar prices, that is.)

Government regulation.

We fund our regulations through consumer prices. You don't think "business" somehow pays all those costs levied on it, without having to recoup them in its prices? Whether you're talking about the employer's government-mandated costs to employ people, the costs of environmental regulation, or just the cost to businesses of county property taxes and fees -- you're paying them all whenever you buy something.

Don't forget, however, that in the housing industry, a big driver in many markets is politically-restricted supply (Thomas Sowell writes often about local land-use policies that prevent the building of more housing units), and the increase in demand that results from a growing, and more affluent, population. Government regulation also comes into play, in the form of mandated requirements for builders to lay utilities infrastucture, lay or improve streets, and put in parks.

It's no mystery that things will cost more when you make business spend more money on everything related to delivering them to the consumer. Doing that has the effect of employing more people -- in the jobs, both public and private, devoted to servicing all aspects of the government regulation. It can have no other effect than elevating prices.

What Tucker's article doesn't make clear is that the reason the constant-dollar "income" (which really reflects purchasing power) of the average worker was smaller in 2004 than it was in 1974 is that in 1974, we didn't artificially jack up consumer prices to nearly the extent we do today with the cost of government regulation. That's about the biggest difference.

Given the progress in technology since 1974, we'd actually be paying LESS for a lot of things today than we paid in 1974, if we didn't subsume the costs of so much government regulation in consumer purchases.

New Business Opportunity
Retrieving the mail for anyone who has to walk over 50 feet, and do it dressed up in an Uncle Sam costume.(costumes can be ones choice)

I will start the bidding for this hand delivery @ the price of the stamp on the letter.

Home ownership? ha ha

Very few today are owned, well actually none by a citizen.

The taxing powers and the money lenders own it all.

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them, will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."


So it is


A myth and truth combined Liz
Liz writes: Saturday, June, 23, 2007 10:08 AM
Housing costs
Does it strike anyone as strange that the construction companies are all hiring illegal labor, but home prices keep skyrocketing? It is also said that if we don't use illegal farm workers, our grocery prices will zoom upward. Well, they seem pretty high to me now. The savings garnered by the use of illegal aliens is NOT passed on to the consumer. Speak up this week to your representatives. It's a crucial time for this country. Our government will use every dirty trick in the book to try to outsource the American middle class. Let's not let them!
-----------------------------------------------

The illegals are driving down wages to the point its impossible for a law abiding worker to meet his obligations for both law and family needs.

But labor is about 1/10th of the cost for new homes, and always has been.

Materiels, Management, Codes, Insurance, Land, Developement, Taxes, Utilities are 9/10th of the costs.

Same with autos, labor is the least of it

"Lilly the Loony Lib" is back.
Can anyone explain “Lilly the Loony Lib”? She constantly posts her rants on conservative blogs, but never responds when criticized for some of her stupid comments. At best she is viewed as just another crackpot Lib and ignored or laughed at. At worst, she’s loathed for the liar she occasionally is. What I can’t understand is why she continues to seek such abuse. Perhaps she’s a masochist or just delusional; thinking she’ll actually convince someone. Perhaps she could if she were reasonably intelligent, rational, and presented well thought out arguments rather than, inconsistencies, distortions, half truths and occasional lies. And perhaps we’d take her more seriously if she ever responded to comments and criticism. But she never does. She’s known as Ms. “Hit & Run”. She drops her B.S. bombs and then runs rather than respond. But this in itself says something about “Lilly”. She can’t handle criticism. She never fires back a response because she has NO ammunition.

Since “Lilly the Loony Lib” obviously isn’t going to go away, perhaps the best recourse is to place her on PERMANENT IGNORE. Or to put it another way: Refuse to engage in a battle of wits with the MENTALLY DISARMED.....LMAO

Other changes to consider
The U.S. has changed dramatically in the last 40-50 years. The work force, in percentage terms, has increased by 30-40% (I don't have an exact updated number) with the influx of women workers. If you think about it in abstract terms, if you had a 40% increase in the workforce, that glut of supply would have driven wages way down. The increase has been gradual and the economy has grown to accomodate, but there has been some depression in earnings due to an expanded workforce. In parallel, the average family size has decreased. So even if the mean per capita income has dropped, the number of workers providing for fewer children has increased. Add in governmental programs to provide for the elderly, poor children, food stamps, etc. and the income versus outlay per family member (in two parent family cases) has risen sharply, even with spending on day care and before and after care programs taken into account.

Finally, one reality is almost always ignored in the type of statistics Tucker is talking about - young, inexperienced workers are lumped in with older experienced workers. The reality is that most people earn (dramatically) more the longer they've been in the work force. John Edward's 'Two Americas' is typically a division between the young and the old. There are disparities in our society, but today they have far less to do with differences in opportunity than they do with differences in how opportunities are exploited by the individual. 70-80% of millionaires come from unpriviledged backgrounds - meaning they earned it, they didn't inherit it. I would bet that the number of people earning 500,000 or 400,000 or 100,000 or even 50,000 all earned it as well and didn't really come from monied backgrounds.

One final note about life expectancy - one reason it's lower in the U.S. is that people here tend to work their asses off and are pretty damn worn out by the time they reach 70 - if they get there at all.

Good ole days
Come on now folks, 40 years from now those still around will be calling 2000+ the good ole days. People will be living to 125 with ease, cancer will be all but gone, the mode of transportation will be moved with something other than fuel oil, and we will have wiped out most of world hunger, with new food sources. In the 1950s few if any homes had AC, the toliet was outside in the cold, the homes were less than 1/2 the size of what we live in now. If you got any one of several types of disease you just died. If you had a phone, it was a party line, and T.V. came one to a neighborhood. Today 70% of us in the U.S. own our homes, and have two cars in the garage, and our main consern is money for the kids college. Of the 6.5 billion people in the world 1/2 of them outside the U.S. live on about $2.00 a day. We have very little to complain about...Praise God. for a free country...

Personally...
In order to measure how well off Americans are, I'd begin (and end) with concentrating on their real incomes post adjustment for the CPI (consumer price index) as published by the Federal reserve. GDP is a wonderful measure of total economic activity, but real income is a better metric of actual welfare. Tucker's right on citing these nuisance complaints as being absurd to use as demonstrating that the "American dream is dead," but I also think that we give far too little thought to what constitutes a good welfare measure. Home ownership, gas prices, etceteras are fringe issues, but don't address the economic conceptual core of well-being.

False Sense of "Entitlement"
A side note to the implication by “Lilly the Loony Lib” and her fellow traveler Socialists: that somehow it’s “societies fault” that they can’t realize the “American Dream”: They offer such lame excuses such as, “gas is too high”, “housing costs too much”, “food is too expensive”, "I have to share a mailbox". Horror of Horrors! Such misery!

Of course, the underlying message these moron leftists are sending is that it’s GOVERNMENTS responsibility to provide them the standard of living to which they feel they’re ENTITLED. Well, I was able to achieve the “American Dream” within 6 years after graduating college. And millions like me have done the same. How? Carefully defined goals: A well thought out game plan: Determination: And HARD work.
So, people like “Lilly the Loony Lib” and other socialists get NO SYMPATHY that they haven’t achieved what they consider to be the American Dream, and someone, (read here Government), other than themselves is somehow responsible for this “failure”. Perhaps if these losers like Lilly did some traveling, it might dawn on them that their “failed American Dream” is looked upon as PARADISE by BILLIONS of far less fortunate people around the world. So screw their sense of ENTITLEMENT. They’re entitled to didley squat If they don’t like the cards life has dealt them? Suggestion: Get off your lazy butt and DO SOMETHING ABOUT!

Lifetimes
Friday I did a rough estimate of what my retirement income is likely to be (6 years to go!) and that included getting a print-out of my Social Security contributions. I started contributing 43 years ago, so the progression of my income included on the SSI printout was rather amusing to me and absolutelyl shocking to the 25 year old in the next cubicle. The idea that at her age I was taking home $350 per MONTH and incidentally that my life (in the 1970s) was much more comfortable than hers in now in Soviet Kanukistan, completely flummoxed her. It was possible to have nice things back then too. Just for one example, I have a very nice Los Angeles Kings Team Watch that I got because I had friends in high places. I bought it for $35.00 which was 10% of my monthly take-home pay. The same watch today would cost me about 10 times as much which would still be 10% of my pay. In 1958 you could buy a Ferrari for $10,000 which was the cost of the average family home. Today the prices are, relatively speaking, just about the same.

As far as the lifestyle outside the USA, with which about 20% of Americans have any contact at all and most of those don't have friends they can visit over there, you don't have to go that far to find out why IKEA is the most popular furniture store in the world. Come up here and take a look at a beautiful downtown condo you can buy on the 61st floor of a building surrounded by other tall buildings, for only $800,000! You will get your very own 600 square foot space! You will have a washer and dryer -- in a closet in your bedroom that you can't access unless you close the bedroom door. Odds are small that you will have air conditioning; in my building you can instsall ONE window unit in your living room only, but on hot days the province will scream for you to turn it off for the good of All. IKEA exists to build furniture to allow a family of three to live comfortably in a 600 square foot condo. That is the norm outside the USA.

Just think about life expectancy when you start crying about SSI going broke; when it was created, the average man lived to be 50 and SSI was deliberately set to kick in at an age most people would never reach. Today's equivalent would probably be 95.

But there are always people who think that they are suffering if one person in the world has five cents they believe rightfully belongs to them. Toxic Envy is the besetting sin of those who have so much that they have no clue what real people worry about.

And another thing
Why does Townhall.com install so much spyware on my computer? I clean my computer after I get off this site and find 7-12 Spies have climbed on board.

Rob
Re: “Lilly the Looney Lib”.
Your response to "Lilly the Loony Lib" is a waste of time. The following is Stored Response I usually post when ever I see one of her posts on TH. It pretty much explains this nit-wit Socialist.
*********************************************
[Re: “Lilly the Looney Lib”.
This ubiquitous pest keeps showing up on Town Hall despite the fact that she gets destroyed when ever she posts a comment. She’s obviously a masochist who loves looking like an idiot and being humiliated. This Looney Lib posts irrational rants which have neither logic, nor proof. Her comments to other posts are rarely to the point. Her typical tactic is known as “Hit & Run”. She drops her bombs and leaves. She never responds to criticism, as she has no ammunition with which to respond. So it’s a waste of time responding to her. My advice is to just ignore this idiot. Or to put it another way: Refuse to engage in a battle of wits with the mentally disarmed. Perhaps then she’ll eventually go away].
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.