Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, October 27, 2006
Rich Tucker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Idiots and Intelligence
by Rich Tucker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Jake J. Brahm is an idiot.

The 20-year-old Wisconsin man is in federal custody. He’s accused of writing on a Web site that “dirty bombs” would explode on Oct. 22 at seven NFL games. Federal authorities detained him before the weekend and announced it was safe to attend football games (which it was, except for Eagles fans). If convicted, Brahm could face five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Still, while the feds are throwing the book at Brahm, he may turn out to be a useful idiot.

Clearly, he got authorities thinking about the possibility that terrorists could attack a sporting event. Did that help investigators identify gaps in our security? Did it force them to keep a closer eye on truck rentals and purchases? Did it encourage them to verify the whereabouts of low-level nuclear material (such as hospital waste)? If so, then this hoax may have been a blessing in disguise.

The United States is doing plenty right in the battle to defeat terrorism. That explains why we haven’t had an attack on our soil in more than five years. But, sadly, terrorists don’t actually have to hit us anymore to cripple us. Even our victories turn into defeats of a sort.

This summer when British intelligence broke up an Islamist ring that intended to blow up airplanes over the Atlantic, that was and should have been a great triumph. But months later, we find that the terrorists, in a way, succeeded.

As anyone who’s flown lately knows, they’ve forced us to add an extra layer of security. Passengers can only bring a few ounces of liquid through checkpoints. That’s slowed down travelers, thus costing the economy money. Meanwhile, countless passengers have been forced to throw away expensive health-care products. And because more people are checking baggage, the amount of lost luggage increased almost 25 percent in August, The Washington Post reports.

Our knee-jerk reaction ignores a key point: We’ll never win this war by making people give things up -- whether that’s bottles of contact-lens cleaner or our basic civil rights.

If you doubt that, then imagine this:

A small terrorist cell, no more than five or six men, soaks $20 bills in some sort of poison. The men drive across the country (in winter), stopping frequently to buy gas with the tainted 20s (because it’s cold, they don’t arouse any suspicion even though they’re wearing gloves).

One week later, they contact newspapers in each city along their path to explain they’ve entered poison bills into circulation. Of course, the terrorists claim they’ve spent hundreds of 20s, not just a handful. One newspaper learns that a gas station clerk along the interstate died mysteriously, and runs with the story.

Panic would ensue. Merchants would refuse to accept cash, the government would have to withdraw all $20 bills from circulation, our economy would be paralyzed. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Rich Tucker is an editor in Washington D.C. and a columnist for Townhall.com.

Be the first to read Rich Tucker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.< Sign up today!

Can't take "back" a radical faith
"Taking back their faith" that has been "hijacked" has not only been overused, it's terribly misleading: how can a faith that is radical at its roots be hijacked? It's wishful thinking that Islam is actually moderate. If the moderates "took back" their faith, they would actually be the ones "hijacking" it from those who interpret what Mohammad says in its most plain and obvious sense. Islamist are not hijacking the faith of moderates; they are acting on what the Koran actually says. The reason jihadists are not roundly condemned is that to do so is actually to condemn Islam, to admit there is something wrong with Islam AS WRITTEN. I wouldn't mind that happening, but to expect Muslims to do that is is probably not realistic.

O. W. Holmes vs. Packrat
Just so you know....
Schenck vs. US was overturned.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.