Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, May 28, 2006
Rich Tucker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Now how much would you pay?
by Rich Tucker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


It’s not difficult to spend someone else’s money. Here’s a sample from one of President Bush’s recent speeches: “I’m calling on Congress to provide funding for dramatic improvements in manpower and technology at the border,” he announced on May 15. And, “since I became president, we’ve increased funding for border security by 66 percent.”

There’s a pattern -- Bush’s answer to all problems seems to be more federal spending. Perhaps this explains No Child Left Behind, Medicare Part D and the 49 percent increase in discretionary non-defense federal spending since 2001. The fallacy is that increased federal spending brings positive results. Nope. While Bush is free to brag he’s spending two-thirds more on border security, this increased spending hasn’t made the situation better.

And why would spending even more be the solution? The government is already turning away free and effective help from the often-maligned Minutemen, regular Americans donating their time, cash and effort to secure our borders. The Minutemen have been filling holes aliens dig under border fences with concrete, but the border patrol recently asked them to stop.

“Their purported rationale was because they had placed super-secret sensors at some of the holes to monitor the traffic,” one Minuteman e-mailed me. “When we asked them why they hadn’t detected any of the groups of 8 to 20 that we’ve repeatedly caught and apprehended after coming through the supposedly monitored holes, the Border Patrol senior officials got suddenly rather quiet (leading us to conclude that either the sensors are either entirely mythical, totally inoperative or wholly ignored -- take your pick).”

But why bother installing super-secret (and, no doubt, super-expensive) sensors along the border when average Americans are more than willing to foot the bill for enough concrete to simply block the holes?

Still, American ingenuity knows no bounds. The Minutemen now dump white gypsum, the same stuff used to line baseball fields, into the tunnels. Illegal aliens are leaving an easy-to-follow trail of white footprints as they enter our country.

“We’ve prevented almost all crossings (without even being there) across two linear miles of border, at a cost of $40 for 10 bags of powdered gypsum,” my correspondent writes. If only the government could get as much bang for its billions of bucks, we’d have solved the illegal immigration problem years ago.

Still, as long as lawmakers are spending our money, they want to go all the way. Perhaps that explains why a common-sense amendment proposed by Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., was shot down. Ensign’s measure would have prohibited formerly illegal aliens who get U.S. Social Security numbers from receiving credit for any taxes they paid while they were here illegally.

Good grief. If there’s one benefit we’re enjoyed from the last 20 years of illegal immigration, it’s that many aliens have paid some portion of Social Security taxes for benefits they’ll never collect. By shooting down Ensign’s amendment, 50 lawmakers showed they want to surrender even that small payoff.

The Senate bill would give almost absolute amnesty to illegal aliens who have been here five years or longer. They’d be on track for citizenship, while those here two to five years could leave the country and apply for green-card status and those here less than two years would be told to leave immediately. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Rich Tucker is an editor in Washington D.C. and a columnist for Townhall.com.

Be the first to read Rich Tucker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.< Sign up today!

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.