Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Rich Lowry :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Lieberman Option
by Rich Lowry
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


A vice-presidential pick is always important, but John McCain confronts a starkly existential choice this year.

Is he running as a Republican or chiefly as a bipartisan deal-maker? Does he have a reasonable shot at victory, or face desperately long odds? Does he want a traditional administration -- with the option of running for re-election -- or something completely different?

The answers will go a long way to determining whether McCain picks Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman as his running mate. McCain has left the door open to picking a pro-choice veep candidate, and the pro-choice former Homeland Security Secretary and Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge and Lieberman are reportedly on his short list.

Selecting Ridge, who is at least a Republican, would be a more cautious choice, but also a foolish one. Whatever help he might give in Pennsylvania would be overwhelmed by the disappointment of the evangelical voters who have of late been rallying around McCain. Although Lieberman is more heterodox than Ridge, he makes more sense -- if McCain is willing to follow through on the radical logic of his selection.

Despite being an independent, Lieberman still caucuses with the Democrats in the Senate and has a standard liberal voting record. In 2007, Lieberman and his fellow Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd -- sometimes talked about as a vice-presidential possibility for Barack Obama -- had identical 70 percent ratings from the liberal Americans for Democratic Action.

Ordinarily, his selection would mean GOP civil war. Never in recent memory has a national ticket had a candidate so at odds with the ticket's party. In 1840, the Whigs put an estranged Democrat, John Tyler, on the ticket with William Harrison -- a clever expedient they regretted when Harrison died and Tyler governed as an unreconstructed Democrat the rest of his term.

To placate Republicans and maximize the political impact of his selection, Lieberman would have to join the ticket as part of a McCain pledge to serve just one term. Both McCain and Lieberman would promise not to run for president in 2012, removing any possibility of Lieberman becoming a successor or putting his imprint on the Republican Party. Their administration would be above electoral politics, a high-minded exercise in competent governance and bipartisan compromise.

To assuage Republican fears of a Harrison/Tyler scenario, Lieberman would have to pledge, if he were to ascend to the presidency, to appoint constitutionalist judges and honor McCain's domestic priorities.

The possibility of a one-term pledge is actively bruited around McCain headquarters. The thinking is that there is no more dramatic way to augment his standing as a different kind of a politician and capture the public's frustration with politics as usual. (Realistically, at age 76, McCain might not want to run for re-election anyway.)

Lieberman is the natural complement for a one-term pledge. He is a politician with no aspirations in the GOP, with little future in his own caucus, and with a long record of bipartisan cooperation. If McCain decides the only possible path to victory is a risk-taking, unconventional one, Lieberman is his man.

The ticket would be the American equivalent of Israel's centrist Kadima party. It would represent the Republican Party's acquiescence to its exile in 2008, although perhaps for only four years and not as far into the outer darkness as if Obama wins. The executive branch would at least be led by two hawks on the war who would check the worst excesses of the Reid-Pelosi Congress.

If they were elected. And there's no guarantee of that. A McCain-Lieberman ticket might have an unbecoming pleading quality -- please, we're not really Republicans, so let us in for just 1,461 days. The ticket would make McCain, the experienced hand, the steward of a campaign verging on the gimmicky. Finally, how could Lieberman follow McCain's domestic priorities when McCain himself doesn't always seem to know what those are?

McCain-Lieberman is a more desperate move than McCain should feel compelled to make right now. But check back after Denver.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Rich Lowry is author of Legacy: Paying the Price for the Clinton Years .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Rich Lowry's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Joe Lieberman
Liberman doesn't have a conservative bone in his body. The only thing he has in common with conservatives is his support of Israel.

McCain is walking on thin ice if he picks a liberal as VP. Many cons will not vote for McCain under any circumstances.Most will.... depending on who he picks.

If he thinks he can keep dissing conservatives and count on their votes,he is mistaken. Obama is the only reason some of us will vote for him. We have no choice.

Doesnt matter
Democrats wont vote for McCain because he is not a loonie enough, despite his pandering to them.
Conservatives wont vote for him because he is too loonie.
At least we will have a democrat that calls himself a democrat screw up the country rather than a democrat the calls himself a republican.


Lieberman would be a mistake
I like Joe Lieberman and as Dems go he is a decent guy and a patriot, but he is a Dem. Just being right on one issue does not a candidate make. So no. Sorry. Lieberman would be a mistake.


And I am perhaps the biggest McCain supporter here. I was for him when he was down. I have to defend him every day from his trogolodyte detractors, but it would be very hard to defend him if he picks Joe Lieberman.

a disaster
McCain absolutely cannot pick Joe. He can win election BUT NOT IF HE PICKS LIEBERMAN! If that is what McCain planned to do he had no business running in the GOP primary. A phoney Republican and a cast out Democrat? This is an independant ticket with no right to be there. Shame on Lowry for implying that this is even close to OK.

No thanks Mr. Lowry
Certainly there are better options. As I'm Joe said, he decent for a Democrat, but there are other important issues other than foreign policy.

Joe
I am not a trogolodyte,but I am a detractor. I would ask McCain "what have you done for me,lately"?

As a longtime McCain watcher,I respect him for service in Viet Nam and what he went through.

I do not respect some of his votes since 2000.I do think a lot of them were payback to GW Bush.

I do agree with him enough to vote for him against Obama,though. He is head and shoulders above him.

McCain's pick for vp
I think I would vote for McCain no matter who he picked. The one exception would be Huckleberry; I would have to not vote, if he were chosen.

Lieberman would draw independents.
The big gamble is whether he would repel conservatives enough to keep them from voting. There is no reason for McCain to make that gamble.

Rich makes . . .
. . . a lame case for Lieberman as VP. McCain needs to name a traditional, dyed in the wool conservative to help solidify his base. Although I have the utmost respect for Senator Lieberman's position vis-a-vis the Iraq war, the fact remains that McCain is the REPUBLICAN nominee. Why confirm for the Republican skeptics that the party has sold out altogether?

McCain-Lieberman?
Why not?

We've already seen,

McCain-Kennedy

McCain-Feingold

How about McCain-Clinton?

It's going to be interesting to see just how much excrement you guys will eat.

Lieberman Would Be Boost To Ron Paul
If McCain is foolish enough to gamble, let him lose. Picking Lieberman would cost McCain more than he realizes. Ron Paul would instantly get half of McCain's former supporters. Picking Lieberman would be the final poke in the eye McCain does to conservative Republicans.

People are waiting to see who McCain's VP is before they contribute a dime to his campaign. Lieberman would be the final straw.


Va.Pat.
I know how you feel,but he is better than :
Obama--Muslim friends and family
Obama--George Soros
Obama--Farrahkan
Obama---Lezko
Obama--Michelle
Obama--Ayers
Obama--Jeremiah Wright
Obama--Pelosi
Obama--Reid

McCain VP choice
Lieberman is the second worst choice only surpassed by Clinton.
1. McCain is boring and the only candidate more boring is Lieberman. We are depressed enough by being stuck with McCain.
2. Convervatives are skitterish about Mccain sticking to a conservative program and Joe Leiberman would just mean that the conservatives would have to fight the President AND the Vice president.
2A. Conservatives want a VP that will help the voting block keep Mccain on Course.
3. McCain is having trouble raising money. I am not hearing that JoeMotion has a national "Black Book" of commited doners.
4. Half the vote is national Security, half is the Economy. Republicans give Mccain the benefit of doubt on the Security vote (except those of us in Arizona that he has left with a wide open border). He needs back up from a VP with an economic track record and strong "gotten it done" in corporate life or running a state. Anything else is a VP with just "more of the same".
4A. McCain is running for "commander in Chief" and smashing government spending. He needs a VP that can take care of the rest planning.
5. An "Only 4 Year Plan" is very short sighted and won't gather any monitary or emotional support.
5A. I would like to see a 24 year Plan. McCain+Romney for 8; Romney+one of our current young conservative governors for the next 8: Etcetera.
6. If McCain gets elected thinking it was all about him and some of his goofy ideas, his ego will lead Mccain to make the Bush 41 mistake.
7. If McCain is concerned about voting against Romneys religion; He would have the same problem with Lieberman if their is an anti-religion vote.
8. If McCain is determined to select a Democrat, Zell Miller would be a better choice. More conservative and more exciting.

McCain being a Maverick
as he claims could choose someone who's name has not been vetted openly by every news anchor for the last 2 months. The possibilities are too many to list but any one of them would be better than a Democrat. The far right Conservatives would stay home.

With "The Election 2008" splashed on every tv screen,I'm due for a break. This could possibly be the first time in 30 years I don't vote for a candidate,rather instead,against one. It's come down to anyone except Obama.

conservative vp
A conservative VP, please. Don't really care who, just cover the bases conservatively. We already have enough doubts about McCain without him adding a liberal to the ticket.

Well, the interesting thing about

that choice would be that McRINO could no longer keep pretending he's any kind of conservative at all.

At least it would be honest.


Of course, it would make his upcoming landslide defeat even more dramatic.


No No No
No to Lieberman. It is the kiss of death for McCain. There's already enough conservatives who will not vote for him as it is without bringing pro-choice Lieberman on board his ticket.
Everyone's only talking about Lieberman. Tom Ridge is nearly as bad as Lieberman. He's a liberal to moderate Republican and will do nothing for McCain's campaign. He didn't do anything for PA but run around giving our hard earned dollars (taxes) away to whomever he thought would like him. Plus, he's the creator of the alert color system for Homeland Security which was so annoying.

McCain's choice should be the Governor of Alaska. She would really enhance his ticket because she looks better than any of the candidates, she is smart, and she is conservative. And..Nancy Pelosi would hate her.

If McCain chooses anyone but a real conservative, Obama will win because of his choice. So what's the point in voting and who will he blame for his loss???? Certainly not himself. Look in the mirror John McCain. A fool will be looking right back atcha should you choose either of these two people.

LIEBERMAN.......GAWD !
Didn't some other clown try joe on the ticket before...a moronic Democrat!!??

LIEBERMAN.....IS LIBERAL EXCEPT FOR ISRAEL MATTERS!

Mc Cain might as well go into a park and drag some homeless dude into the circle and put him on the ticket!! We're really going to find out about John and his decision will tell us why he finished near the bottom of his class..or tell us he has learned something...don't hold your breath on that one!
elvis

Ranger29
I disagree that McCain has the vote of the GOP behind him. I think that many are just as leery of him as they are the Marxist B. Hussein.

"You folks on the far rightjust cannot grasp how much the American people just hate you..."

Let me tell you something. You go from site to site spewing forth your venom. You never have a thing to say, yet you rave on, insulting and denigrating. You cannot begin to understand the loathing, disgust, and utter contempt that you and others of your ilk engender to many of us. I consider you to be stupid, cowardly, foolish, and ill-bred. Ill-bred means that you have had a substandard upbringing and have no manners. Instead if trolling in these waters, perhaps you could go somewhere where the fishing is good.

Ranger29
Pardon me. No one wants a war. By the way, how do you know which of my relatives were involved in this war? Once again, like everything else, you don't. Robert, isn't it is time for your medication?

You're right, BrianR. This guy will be gone by morning. I only hope he is at least a useful idiot to his village!
.

Wow, what a day when
the RINOs of the Republicrat party recommend a liberal Dem as the running mate.

It shows you where we are at doesn't it.

McCain's VP pick is an indication
An indication of what?

How he will govern, what types he will select for the courts, what administrative types he would select to fill cabinet and bureaucratic posts, who he will cater to politically (i.e. La Raza, Illegals, etc.), etc. The prospect is unappealing.

If he selects, Ridge, Lieberman, Pawlenty, or any such lib/leftist, not only will many of us conservatives not contribute time and money to his effort, but may not even bother to vote for him. The Right is fed up with the Rovian dictum: F2ck the conservatives, where else will they go.

So far, he's bombarded me with appeals - I get one nearly everyday. He's either going to give me something to vote for, or get the same from me. Why should I support lib-lite when there's a real Marxist I can get for free. I feel that if this guy's so determined to lose, let him.

Brian in Scottsdale
Excellent points!!! Especially the one about McCain being boring only to be surpassed by Lieberman in that category. Senator Joe certainly didn't do much to liven up Al Bore's campaign.

And you are right about the religious angle - how could he ever justify passing on Romney for religious reasons and yet select Lieberman, a Jew who doesn't adhere to his faith when it interferes with his politics.

Lowry wrote this as if he were judging a beauty contest with his object to select the ugliest contestant.

McCain/Lieberman '08? Surely you Jest!
Rich Lowry asks, "why not Lieberman for Vice President"? How can this question not be a joke? If McCain were to decide that he wants his VP, AKA the president of the Senate, to be a Independent/Democrat, he might as well abandon the Republican Party altogether and run as an Independent or a Democrat. What would it say about McCain's Republican Party if he could not find one man or woman in its ranks who could serve as a suitable VP candidate?
And why would McCain need to pick anyone other than a Conservative Republican? Is McCain the Maverick not maverick enough? Is McCain such an extreme right-wing conservative Republican that his ticket needs to be moderated and diluted by the presence of someone who caucuses with the Democrats? If the writing is on the wall for Republicans, it is because they have insisted on being so much like a nauseating flavor of Democrat (only cheaper, older and more stale).

Instead of gimmicks like hybrid tickets, Republicans need to offer real leadership, fresh conservative ideas and fresh faces if they are going to hang on to the White House.

Say whatever you wish about your favorite VP possibilities, the bottom line is this: there are many Republicans who could serve as outstanding VP candidates with appeal across the political spectrum. McCain need not resort to Lieberman.

Is Lowry serious?
Laughable thesis.

Joe Lieberman as McCain's vice presidential nominee?

Well, he sure was instrumental back in 2000 on Gore's ticket.

"Sore-Loserman", if I recall.

And it was apt.

Yessir! Lowry is right.

The GOP just ought to emulate an Israeli centrist party.

Why in the hell did I not think of that?

Lieberman is just the kind of New England moderate democrat that the GOP south and border states have been demanding for years!

Idle Pratter
Rich Lowry is just indulging in idle gossip of pampered intelligensia. Richard Land endorsed Sarah Palin, yesterday, and I think that matters.

Sad, But Probably True
I can't possibly see McCain pick Lieberman as a running mate, but then again, I really couldn't see any Republican's voting for McCain in the primaries either. It would be not a big surprise at all to most of us if McCain picked someone from outside the party as his running mate, since he seems to get along with those outside of his party better then he does with those on the inside of it.

Like most in this thread, I generally like Lieberman, but would be highly offended if he was selected for the number two position in the country under a Republican ticket.

Good for Clinton
This strategy might win the election, but would practically guarantee Hillary's nomination in 2012.

IF MCCAIN HAS A FUNCTIONING BRAINCELL

.....He will select a pro-life Conservative as his running mate and then announce that he will only serve one term ...

.....If it is McCain's intention to destroy the Republican Party ...then he should select Lieberman ...if the RNC is still capable of cognizant thought ...they should strongly advise McCain to drop this notion or to drop the Republican label .....COLOSSUS

This OpEd Sounds Like a Spy Novel.
Ah, McCain the Moderate. His political disdain for the Religious Right has forced him to consider a "Pro-Life", "Pro Socialist" as President. McCain must know he cannot win without the base (ie Religious Right) showing up on election day in very large numbers.

It seems his strategy is to allow Obama to cut his own throat; McCain's proxies will highlight to Conservatives how dangerous Obama is, all the while, McCain will attract just enough Dems to put him over.

This stratgey will work, but only if the last election's election map holds true. The last election was decided by 2 states: Pennsylvainia and Ohio. Pennsylvania went to Kerry (by a slime margin), and Ohio went to Bush (by a slim a margin). If McCain can repeat Bush's feat in 2004, and also pick up another midwestern Rust Belt State -namely Michigan- he will end up winning.

The problem with this strategy is that Bush, as many here have foregotten, had a huge turn-out. Bush in 2004, had more votes cast to him than anyother candidate in History. Kerry was right behind him (the Dems also have a turn-out machine). Conservatives and Moderates came out in large numbers. Early polling shows that Obama may have a chance in some traditionally conservative states (Indiana, Colorado, Virginia). New Mexico is also in play.

McCain's strategy is audascious, but no GOP candidate ever won the White House without high turn out of conservatives. McCain is betting that a sizebale number of Democrats will defect (5-8%), and that defection will swing Michigan, and Pennsylvania his way.

Lieberman is NOT an Option
McCain is already at odds with many GOP voters. The selection of Lieberman (although I respect some of Liberman's stand on some issues) would be a futher insult to conservatives. McCain's VP selection should be someone who will bring economic expertise to the GOP Ticket.

How to LOSE the election
Mc Cain is ALREADY in deep doo with the conservatives. If he picks anyone less than a staunch conservative as his running mate, he can kiss his election goodbye. If he picks Liberman, it will be the biggest blowout the democrats have won in the last 100 years.

The republicans just don't get it. They CAN NOT win without the conservatives and the conservatives are mad as hell and are NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE.

We have had it with watered down conservatives like the Bush family and we ARE NOT GOING TO VOTE FOR ANY MORE. If it takes putting a democrat in office for the people of this nation to see the total incompetence of them, then so be it. We'll have 4 years of them and be done with it. But if we put another Bush in office, we'll STILL HAVE incompetence, so what's the difference?

BBalldoc et al

Well, don't forget that McRINO's said that he's "redefining conservatism and the GOP" (such arrogance and hubris), and that voting for him means you endorse his policies.

So why not REALLY stick it in the eye of conservatives with Liberalman?

Let's see, the McRINO policies one "endorses" by voting for McRINO: amnesty, no drilling in ANWR or shale use, Cap and Trade, restrictions on free speech (McCain-Feingold).....

Nah. Not for me.



What's even MORE interesting is that a supposedly "conservative" writer like Lowry -- right here on the "conservative" TH site -- doesn't even find this troubling other than as a strategic issue in simply winning an election.

Conservative principles and ideology be damned, apparently. All that counts is "winning".

Well.... winning WHAT? If all you get at the end of the day is a couple of liberals in the White House regardless of what lever you pull, what exactly is the point of this whole exercise?


What makes you think
all conservatives are "mad as _ell." I couldn't be more conservative and I am not mad at all. I think John McCain woud be a strong president and make decisions that are the best he can make for the country. Not everything has to run along the lines of what a certain bunch of people think is best. Sometimes a little moderation is good. I just wish people would quit lumping all us conservatives together and telling the world we are a bunch of sheep. That we are not.

VP Trial ballons
Lieberman is just a trial ballon to scare some Conservatives so that when McCain picks his moderate VP those same conservatives will sigh in relief and still vote for CINO McCain.

If you disliked the last 8 years of moderate George W Bush, you will hate the next 4 years of McCain.

I am praying for a miracle that neither Obama nor McCain is elected.

arguing with yourself?
If you are going to write an article with a premise, don't close it arguing against your premise. That is both poor rhetoric and lack of balls.

Liberman have you lost your minds??
That’s it? That’s as good as we can do? This is what we get..

Mc Cain: the Keating 5
Mc Cain: Voted against Bush tax cuts multiple times.
Mc Cain: amnesty to illegal immigrants.
Mc Cain: voted to give your social security money to illegal immigrants
Mc Cain: joined liberals to fight against a federal marriage amendment
Mc Cain: famously described Christian leaders as “agents of intolerance: in 2007
Mc Cain: met with leading Democrats in 2004 to discuss the possibility of being John Kerry’s Vice-President
Mc Cain: wrote the McCain-Feingold
Mc Cain: attending La Raza Annual Convention in San Diego.
Mc Cain: sounds no different from every left wing nut case on global warming.
NOW LIEBERMANN AS A RUNNING MATE, HAVE YOU LOST YOUR MIND
Well here is my logic: about Mc Cain and Obama.
I know that there are some holes in it but I believe we have to look for the future. Mc Cain shows every day that he does not worry about our votes. He believes in: “where else can they go” theory. So he concentrates on the left and middle.
I have a different idea, if Mc Cain gets in, he is the head of the party, he will want to push his agenda, the Republicans in the House and Senate will be forced to go along, (look at the last immigration bill) so any left leaning bills will never be stopped. Who is there to do it? The Republicans? They will follow Mc Cain’s lead. The Democrats? Never.
If we are the party out of power we will fight to stop legislation put up by Obama, (look what is going on with offshore drilling).
The problem with this is a few things, one the war. That is one spot that Mc Cain is strong on. The other is judges, that is yet to be seen. He said that he did not like Roberts as a choice.
One important point, if we cannot filibuster then all is lost.
If.. that’s a big “IF” Mc Cain picks a real conservative VP and only stays one term, I will vote for him.
If not Mc Cain and the GOP can go to hell. (they are most of the way there).


LIEBERMAN IS A LIBERAL...
I am glad that Lieberman supports America's effort to agressively fight Islamo-fascism., terrorism, and Russian agressive/tyranny...

It is good that America's security & survival are most important, & foremost to Lieberman's political philosophy than his democratic partican socialistic policy idealologies...

That being said,

LIEBERMAN IS A LIBERAL...

He is NOT A CONSERVATIVE, NOR A REPUBLICAN !

His social policy stances are those of bigger government with more government controls, mandates, un-controled spending, and entitlement programs...

Picking him as a VP choice will insure that OBAMA becomes POTUS, America becomes an "official" socialist nation, and the rest of the world including America will be left to the ambitions & hands of tyrants & terrorist...

Although I know he has said he would not be a VP, I sure wish that we could have Fred instead...

WORST IDEA EVER!!!
I've warmed up to voting for McCain, simply because Obama makes me want to puke. I still have serious issues with McCain though, and it will be a "hold my nose" vote.

However, if he picks Lieberman, I will not cast a vote for any president. I'll vote on everything BUT the president. I do believe many conservatives will do the same, if not abstain entirely.

WORST IDEA EVER!

Voters to McCain..NO Pro-Abort VP!

Does McCain still have that sabotaging Demorat on his Staff or what? Nobama is so outrageous that McCain has a decent chance at winning, but he can screw that up real fast if he keeps that "Maverick" thing going.

Considering a VP for McCain, I actually respect Lieberman in many ways, while Tom Ridge is Left of RINO.. Interestingly, the Huckster is Still trying to stick it to Romney, one of the best choices.

The lib leaning Inconsistency of the McCain Campaign is not helping his cause.. Don't make the mistake of taking the GOP voters for granted, Mister..


Everytime
I think I can hold my nose and vote McC, he goes and does something so stupid I can't.

This election will make or break the Republican Whigs. He needs to pick a younger man, we don't know if he will live out the four years.
The job is extremely difficult and stressful for even younger men, who haven't been through
the Hanoi Hilton resort, or had bouts of cancer.
He needs to pick someone that will be able to
pick up the reins if something dire should happen. As Lowry mentioned Harrison lived, what? a month after his inauguration. That's something Republicans need to consider. I would hope that should he be so foolish as to
choose a veep, one who is liberal in all other areas but the war and pro choice, the rank and file delegates would make a huge stink at the convention.
We can let our opinions known by emailing the RNC and our local state RNC chapters. If Lieberman (I like him too, even though I disagree with him on all but the war and Israel), I don't want him on the ticket. In the cabinet sure but not a heartbeat away from the Presidency.

Country First means Principles Last
McCain did not pick his campaign theme of "Country First" by accident.

McCain does not have a conservative worldview and does not understand that "Principles First" is what matters. What the he77 does "Country First" mean, unless it means forget about conservative principles they must be sacrified so that John McCain can be elected President.

Another knife in the back is awaiting Conservatives if they vote for this unprincipled slimy politician, who has wanted to be President since I knew him back in my AZ Congressional District in 1981.

Which Country First?
Mexico?

IF MCCAIN PICKS A PRO-ABOTION
VEEP...

I WILL VOTE FOR CHUCK BALDWIN!

YOU HEAR ME JOHNNY-BOY?!

nation wide primaries all in one day!!!!
Here is a man that want us to “trust him” when it comes to picking supreme court justices and even before we start, he is looking at a pro abortion candidate.
I’m telling you every conservative I know, is biting nails already. That would truly be the last straw. But you know what, the more we complain I think the more they (Mc lame and staff) seems to like it, they will pitch us under the bus faster then Obama did his Grandmother.
How in the hell did we get into this mess. Dam BS primaries, we need national primaries, one day. Screw N.H. and Iowa, this is a whole nation not two states. I live in N.C. when is the last time our vote mattered here? The person is picked before we have a choice.
Well no matter how it goes the liberals will be happy for the next 4 (or 8) years.


Israel First!
I happen to like both senators even though, vis-a-vis Lieberman, I'm pro-life and skeptical of our overly close relationship with the State of Israel.

Our foreign policy, from A to Z, needs a new analysis.

Lieberman could help lead the way--he could help McCain reform our foreign policy.

He's a fair man. He has to be as concerned as I am that 1.4 billion Muslims resent or even hate our foreign policy--because they believe that we are trying to destroy Islam.

Don't Tread On Us, Johny-Mac
Brett’s 1:33 post may be on the money. If it is, than the question becomes, WHO?

No matter how McCain strategizes his choice, he will lose if he picks a pro-abortion lib like Pennsylvania’s Tom Ridge, who is also horrible on national defense.

Go ahead Johny-Mac, commit political suicide if you want. Destroy your party if you feel its best. You will only hand the White House over to a Marxist.

But don’t you dare try to blame America’s Conservatives.

A Pro-Life Conservative is the only way we Conservatives will hand you the Oval Office.

CABINET = YES, VP = NO

I like Joe Lieberman - liberal positions aside Joe's a class-act. But he is not the right pick for VP.

Lieberman would be GREAT in John's Cabinet. Not a VP.

McCain would break the fragile support he has with conservatives.

I agree with usa4freedom
I lived most of my life in Kansas where my vote never counted. I now live in Colorado where we went for Romney on Super Tuesday and then he promptly dropped out.

We will NEVER move the GOP back to where it belongs it we keep letting liberal states like New Hampshire (with their freakin' open primaries) pick our candidates.


McCain picks Lieberman and that is it. I'm leaving the GOP, the Republic is dead (because Obama will win and kill it) and rooftop voting will be our only choice. Period.

no place to go..?? How about IHOP,
Way down south,
Good point. Don’t you sob’s in the RNC try to blame this up coming loss on the base. You and Mc Cain have made a hobby of handing us &^%#$# sandwiches. Don’t expect us to eat them.
This is no way to run a campaign, by your butt.
Well they (the conservatives) don’t like Mc Cain but.. where else can they go.

They might not like global warming stance that Mc Cain takes but.. where else can they go?

They might not like Mc Cain’s stance on immigration but.. where else can they go?

They might not like Mc Cain/ Feingold but.. where else can they go?

They might not like Mc Cain pick for VP, but.. where else can they go?

They might not like that Mc Cain fought the marriage amendment supporting traditional marriage but.. where else can they go?

They might not like that Mc Cain voted to give your social security money to illegal immigrants but.. where else can they go?

They might not like the fact that Mc Cain met with leading Democrats in 2004 to discuss the possibility of being John Kerry’s Vice-President but.. where else can they go?

They might not like the fact that Mc Cain he voted against the Bush tax cuts multiple times but.. where else can they go?

WHERE ELSE CAN THEY GO?? HOW ABOUT IHOP, THE WAFFLE HOUSE, OR DENNY’S
WE WILL NOT SHOW UP, OR WE WILL VOTE FOR A THIRD PARTY AND TRY TO VOTE EVERY RINO OUT!! THAT IS WHERE WE WILL GO..


REPUBLICAN REVOLT

.....email info@rnc.org & info@gop.com and tell them to kiss the Republican Party good-bye if McCain selects anything but a bona-fide Conservative for VP ...if we raise enough dust before the Convention we can make a difference ...otherwise don't complain about what we get .....COLOSSUS

Is this the Twighlight Zone?
This is hilarious ..

Praying For A Miracle In Minneapolis
A convention that produces a conservative Republican candidate, instead of the Trojan Horse Democrat.

Sam
Why Sam?

Virginia Patriot
You are going to get a miracle when Ron Paul's people make fun of John McCain who is a complete clown on stage.

The funny thing is that the "other convention (Ron Paul's)" might have more (seriously - 15,000 plus) than the GOP convention. But thats ok, the Republicans can bus in illegal immigrants and give them whiskey and beer.

McCain/Liberman 08
This is a great ticket.

McCain can be the President of Georgia(he is a Georgian) and Lieberman can be the Israli President.

In the mean time we will elect Obama as the president of USA

Not Acceptable to Conservatives.
GOP, RIP.

usa4freedom
I agree on the national primary day. First Tues in June, everybody votes the same day. It would give us a fighting chance to nominate someone other than the party or media's choices.

Age makes it an issue
With McCain's age and health, there is a realistic possibility of the VP taking command. Even if his health remains strong, he will likely only serve one term, giving the VP a leg up on the 2012 nomination. Therefore his choice is critical, and must be conservative

primaries on one day
VA.

I always wanted a vote on April 16th.
I would take any date.
The parties and the MSM have us by the shorthair when it comes to primaries.
We somehow can vote on one day in Nov.
I would think that even the Democrats would like this with all the headache Rush caused them this year.


usa4freedom
That's a good date. I picked June just to try to shorten the whole cycle, it's getting out of hand.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
I am so sick of you jerks telling "the people" why we have to vote for McCain. I am also sick of always voting for the lesser of the evils and it would indeed be evil if Lieberman is VP. What part of Republican party elects republicans???does Mr. reach across the isle and stick it to the base of the party think he really represents "THE PEOPLE"? When is he going to listen to the people? Why doesn't some pundant tell him, " IT'S ABOUT REPRESENTING THE PEOPLE STUPID".
Call me the flip flopper but every time he goes left I decide I will not vote for him and join the many who will not prostitute the once sacred vote on a liberal, RINO. We know Obama is bad but so is a demagogue who thinks he can do any damn thing he wants and the sheeple will hold their noses and give him his prize. Enough is enough you earn a vote by promising to represent the voter
The balls in his court now, represent us or he's just as bad as Mr Obamarxist
Mad as hell and not going to take it anymore

Lieberman, No way!
It’s very apparent from the way the democrats are taking after Mitt Romney that he is the one they fear the most to bolster John McCain’s chances to become president. He is by far the most honest, moral, dedicated, qualified, conservative choice! If McCain has any good sense he’ll choose Romney. But, Lieberman, no way

hmmmm
I respect Joe Lieberman, I don't agree with almost everything he says but at least he's honest.

That being said, if McCain cannot find a candidate that is more conservative than he is, I will have to vote present.

I've been wondering for months why he hasn't thought about a strong black conservative. I've always liked Michael Steele. I'd love to hear the racist garbage from the left if he were to be selected.

My Letter to McCain Re: Veep Choice
My letter to John McCain:

HONORABLE SENATOR MCCAIN: IF YOU DECIDE TO NOMINATE SEN. JOE LIEBERMAN OR TOM RIDGE, YOU CAN COUNT MY VOTE OUT ... I WILL DEFINITELY VOTE FOR SOME THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE ... WHOEVER THAT MIGHT BE.

I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT SUPPORT YOU UNLESS YOU NOMINATE A CONSERVATIVE AS YOUR RUNNING MATE.

I FIND YOUR "MODERATE" PERSONA VERY UNAPPEALING YET I HAVE THUS FAR DONE MY BEST TO SUPPORT YOU ... I HAVE A MCCAIN FOR PRESIDENT STICKER ON BOTH THE FRONT AND BACK OF MY CAR AND I TRY TO ASK MY FELLOW CONSERVATIVES NOT TO DISS YOU TOO MUCH AND TO HELP SUPPORT YOUR CANDIDACY ... BUT, I WILL GUARANTEE YOU, MY SUPPORT FOR YOU IS RAZOR THIN BECAUSE I THINK YOU ARE A SELL OUT BUT I WANT TO DO MY PART TO "NOT ELECT BARRACK OBAMA" BECAUSE I TRULY BELEIVE HE IS A COMMUNIST WHO HATES WHITE PEOPLE AND HE WILL LEAD THIS ONCE GREAT COUNTRY INTO RUIN ONE HUNDRED PERCENT TIMES FASTER THAN YOU WILL.

SO, IF YOU WILL , PLEASE, ... NOMINATE A CONSERVATIVE ... NOMINATE AT LEAST A PERCEIVED CONSERVATIVE ... NOT A DEMOCRAT OR A WELL KNOWN RHINO ... OR YOU WILL GO DOWN IN DEFEAT BECAUSE YOUR BASE WILL ABSOLUTELY NOT VOTE FOR YOU ... AND I WILL DO ALL I CAN TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY DON'T.

JANICE

AKA JANICE FROM TROY

Romney Should Run Independent
Romney should run as an Independent and pick Sarah Palin, Governor of Alaska, to be his VP. That would be an inspiring ticket!

No way!
I love Joe Lieberman, but if he wants to run as a republican he should become a republican.

Where is the future in this ticket? "We'll only be here for four years."

No thanks.

Get someone you can pass the torch to...

It's got to be Romney.

McCain Liberman ticket
I think that anti-semitism would sink the ticket along with the fact that Lieberman would not be acceptable to the conservative base. I respect Lieberman's position on terrorism and the war and I believe him to be a truer patriot that most of his party but I also believe that he is too liberal to represent conservataive values and policies.

WHAT A SILLY CLUM.
Lieberman or Tom Ridge.
Can you say President Obama.
McCain should focus on the base.BUT
if he wants a jew,He should pick

Rep.Eric Cantor R-Vir.

If He wants a woman,He should pick

Rep.Marsha Blackburn R-Tenn.

I believe both could rally the south

and bring McCain to victory.

ROB

With Respect: No to Lieberman
yJoe Lieberman has my respect for being an honest man who has the courage to stand up for his convictions and against the wrong-headness of his party and its policies which will destroy our economy and make a mockery of the Constitution. But he is not a Republican and is too liberal. He still sits on the Democrat side in the Senate for Christ sakes!!Mitt Romney, Bobby Jindal, or even Fred Thompson would be my choice. He needs to select a strong (at least moderately) conservative Republican who he can pass the torch to. Lieberman is still a Democrat at heart.This is no time to pull the "maverick" act. With Romney's economic credentials he is almost assured to defeat the weak Obama.

Elle Reply#68
I don't think anti-semitism would sink
the ticket.I think liberalism would.
I am a catholic,and i would vote for
Rep.Cantor.AND he is jewish.BUT McCain
must pick a conservative.
If he picks a moderate,he may go down in
the history books as another Bob Dole

ROB

What's Wrong With This Picture?
Does Lowry's article sound familiar?

It is almost exactly the same rhetoric so-called conservative pundits championed that raised McCrud from dead-in-the-water to the apparent GOP candidate.

I, for one, ain't buying it!

BRICKHOUSE....BULLS EYE!
"BRICK" HIT THE BULLS EYE!
MITT GO INDEPENDENT AND PUT GOV. PALIN OR JINDAL ON THE TICKET...BUT LAY THE GROUND WORK
4 YEARS AHEAD OF TIME...!
BUT SOMEWHERE I READ THAT PALIN HAS A ILL/HANDICAPPED CHUILD!? IF SO, THAT MIGHT NOT BE FAIR TO HER..?
ELVIS

Ditto: Lieberman choice a huge mistake
I ditto all the reasons and sentiments of those who are against this idea. I've just read Rich Lowry's piece on my local paper. I cannot believe my favorite commentator is even putting this thought out anywhere.
If McCain is expected to be a one term holder, it is all the more reason to pick a VP who can fill the number 1 slot in case of emergency to take the 3 am call during the first term, but also to make ready for the 2012 race.
Why would republicans squander the benefit of grooming a VP to run for the next president race in 2012 if Joe Lieberman is also expected to be one term?
Anyway, I have always liked Lieberman, but not as a leader for the conservative party.
It is indeed laughable if republicans cannot come up with a better vp choice who can represent the core value of the party and constituents.
Rich, please write a follow up if you change your mind.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.