Barack Obama found the perfect
booster in Oprah Winfrey. Not only
can she fill a football stadium with
30,000 adoring people and put a
hammerlock on a news cycle, she
specializes in the warm-and-fuzzy
uplift that is the very foundation of
Obama’s candidacy.
This was the pontiff of daytime
television bestowing secular sainthood
on the golden child of latterday
liberalism. “For there is born to
you this day a savior.” The Oprah-
Obama match is made not quite in
heaven, but in a haze of inspirational
piety with heavy religious overtones.
People had “Oprah for V.P.” buttons
at this past weekend’s rallies.
The Queen of All Media surely
would never accept such a demotion.
But Obama-Winfrey would make a
natural ticket. They are both African-
Americans with major racial
crossover appeal. They are arguably
the nation’s biggest celebrities in
their respective fields of media and
politics. And they offer affirming
messages of hope and self-help.
In her stump speeches on Obama’s
behalf, Oprah zeroed in on the heart
of the matter: Obama’s post-political
messianism. In South Carolina, she
declared that it isn’t enough for candidates
to tell the truth, “We need
politicians who know how to be the
truth.” One wonders if in the news
reports, it were merely a transcription
error that “the truth” wasn’t rendered
in divinized capital letters.
Michelle Obama spoke in the same
terms: “We need a leader who’s
going to touch our souls. Who’s
going to make us feel differently
about one another. Who’s going to
remind us that we are one another’s
keepers. That we are only as strong
as the weakest among us.”
This isn’t merely overpromising.
It’s a creepy inflation of a political
figure into a secular version of the
Second Coming. Oprah implied the
same thing, quoting a film in which
an old, long-suffering woman asks
every child she meets — in a question
fraught with messianic symbolism
— "Are you the one?" Oprah
continued, referring to Obama, “It’s
a question the entire nation is asking
— is he the one? South Carolina — I
do believe he’s the one.”
Is he really? It’s hard enough for a
presidential candidate to have a plan
to save Social Security and stabilize
Iraq, let alone embody the truth and
touch our souls. Obama plays into
this messianism because it’s what
gives his candidacy its unique
appeal. Otherwise, he has a collection
of pedestrian Democratic positions.
It’s the promise to redeem our
politics, “to create a kingdom right
here on earth” — as he put it at a
church event in South Carolina a few
weeks ago — that accentuates his
status as a different kind of candidate.
The American left might be overwhelmingly
secular, but it still has
religious impulses, which tend to be
channeled into their leaders.
Democrats want to revere their candidates.
This has at least been the
case since John F. Kennedy, the martyred
president who embodied all
that would have been good and true
about America if it hadn’t taken a
catastrophic wrong turn with his
death. Obama offers Democrats the
opportunity to fall in love all over
again.
This is because he is relatively
unsullied by politics. Hillary Clinton
is not. No one could invest millenarian
aspirations in Clinton. She has
been attacked, and has attacked in
turn too much. She has compromised
too much. She has positioned herself
with an eye to practical political considerations
too much. Her goal isn’t
to transform politics — she’s much
too realistic for that — but to move
public policy in a leftward direction
that she thinks would help people’s
lives. This is the stuff of grubby,
everyday politics, and there is no
wonder Oprah wants nothing to do
with it, not with the ideal of an
Obama presidency shimmering off in
the distance.
Who knows how much Oprah’s
endorsement will help Obama? This
much is certain. If she helps get him
elected president and expects politics
as usual to dissipate under his glorious
dispensation, she will be disappointed. |