Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, March 16, 2009
Rich Galen :: Townhall.com Columnist
Taxpayer Retention Bonus
by Rich Galen
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


AIG - American International Group, Inc. is the single most toxic asset in America. Over the past few months you and I have paid $173 BILLION of our tax dollars to bail these bozos out of the financial sewer they themselves designed, dug, filled, and jumped into.

The big news over the weekend was that AIG - recipient of $173 BILLION of our tax dollars - has paid out - ta da - bonuses of over $280 million to its excellent staff.

That includes $165 million in what is only a down payment on about one billion dollars in "retention bonuses" which were due yesterday. That, according to the UK Guardian, is "in addition, to AIG providing $121m to 6,400 employees across the rest of its sprawling global empire."

Nearly half of those retention bonuses are for the staff of the Financial Products Division which is almost single-handedly responsible for the ills which have befallen AIG and, by extension, you and me.

The Financial Products Division is located in … London. Mayfair, London.

According to the Guardian AIG paid "bonuses of $450m (£322m) to staff at the London-run financial products division that crippled the company with vast losses on toxic derivatives."

That would be $450 million of your money. And mine.

But wait! There's more.

Of the $173 Billion of our tax dollars which have been used to bail out AIG "more than $90bn [has been paid out] to a list of clients and counterparties dominated by European banks," wrote the Guardian. "Top names are Société Générale and Deutsche Bank, both of which got more than $11bn. Barclays has received $8.5bn, HSBC has had $3.5bn and Royal Bank of Scotland has been paid $700m."

Let's recap: $173 BILLION of our tax dollars have been used to bail out AIG. AIG has, in turn, used our tax dollars to pay out over a quarter of a billion dollars in bonuses half of which went to a bunch of Brits who got AIG into this mess in the first place. In addition, about a quarter of the $173 BILLION of our tax dollars which has been sent to AIG is being used to pay off what AIG owes to French, German, British and Scottish banks.

May I ask a question? If AIG made bad decisions and we have to use $173 BILLION of our tax dollars to pay for those bad decisions, why can't the Germans pay for Deutsche Bank's bad decision to deal with AIG? Why can't the French pay for Société Générale's bad decision?

Why is it that, once again, the American taxpayer is paying for the rest of the world's bad decisions.

Got attacked by Germany? Surrendered? No problem, American taxpayers will pay to build enough military equipment and go into harm's way themselves to get you your country back.

Got defeated in a world war? Well, never mind. American taxpayers will pay to rebuild your country after we beat you in a war that you started.

Got involved in some really shady financial dealings like credit default swaps with a group of slick haired, French-cuffed, Italian shoed, monogrammed-shirted, bonus-sucking thugs from AIG? There, there. Not to worry. Step right on over to the third window on the left and pick up your $90 Billion courtesy of American taxpayers.

How is it that someone like, say, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner (who was the President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank before he joined the Obama Administration) didn't know anything about any of this until last week?

Geithner didn't come to Treasury from being a teller at a local bank in Naperville, Illinois. He was the PRESIDENT OF THE NEW YORK FED. What the hell was he doing up there?

We know he wasn't doing his taxes. In fact, Geithner went to great lengths NOT to be an American taxpayer.

Here's a good idea: Instead of continuing to pick the pockets of American taxpayers, how about extending the tax cuts which are due to expire next year?

Call it a Taxpayer Retention Bonus.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Rich Galen has been a press secretary to Dan Quayle and Newt Gingrich. Rich Galen currently works as a journalist and writes at Mullings.com

Be the first to read Rich Galen's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

I think
I'm going to throw up. Thank you, Dumbo. Now how can this be communicated to those few who voted for him who are not brain dead?

Rich Galen:
Are you trying to lead your readers to believe
that somehow Obama is responsible for this
shameful divvying up of money. Last I heard
Obama and gang were trying to figure out from
contracts signed with Bush and gang just what
can be done to put a stop to it.

Also you mentioned that this money was going
to AIG from money provided by the rest of us.
And you included yourself. I hope that is an
accurate statement. Just yesterday I read
about 470,000 Americans who have hidden assets
in Swiss Banks ( and that is just the Swiss
Banks ). Not everyone is participating in
this bailout.

Good stuff
Tammy in IL, recall that McCain begged for oversight of the TARP. Dems were so busy politically dismissing him that they didn't see the need.

And while discussing the U.S. paying for all that's wrong in the world. How about Israel destroys Palestinian assets in Gaza - and we pay to rebuild them!

Short on actual sense....
While it may be emotionally satisfying to vent on this this topic, some understanding of contract law and actual human behavior may be in order.

If the government can over-ride contractual obligations to pay people for their performance, then all business is based on shifting sands.

That AIG was permitted to exceed it's sustainable base as an insurer, to become a packager and seller of derivatives, was a failure of proper regulation.

That Govco, through the instrument of the shrill snivelings of Barney the Dinosaur Fwank, wants to prevent them from keeping on board, the vast majority of good actos in the AIG saga, is akin to saving an Airline, by giving them enough cash to operate on a daily basis, while at the same time insisting they fire every pilot, with more than three years experience, as a "cost-saving measure".

I have an idea! Since we were forced to buy this company, in effect, just send me my share of the shares, according to my percentage of taxes paid, to dispose of as I wish. I may choose to sell them for pennies on the dollar. I may hold them, if I think there is a real chance it would come back. I might even buy up a bunch of other people's shares for pennies on the dollar, since an actual price would be quickly established.

As a share-holder, I would get to vote on bonuses and the like for performers. I would also have a great interest in getting our crap debt off the books...I'm talking about paying back the government here...and get back to business....especially before my grandkids have to pay off the mess.

Oh, but wait. That couldn't possibly work. That's a free-market solution.

Ron Paul Calls Bernanke's Bluff
The Federal Reserve System has been first on Congressman Ron Paul's short list of governmental entities to abolish for years.

When the Federal Reserve System stonewalled Congress about what had happened to the $170 billion given to bailout AIG, Paul decided there was more than one way to skin a polecat like the FRS.

"The Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009 (HR-1207)" was introduced by Congressman Paul on February 26, 2009.

HR-1207 would require Congress to audit the Federal Reserve System for the first time since it was founded in 1913.

Paul commented that if they couldn't abolish the FRS outright, maybe the American people could at least force this secretive central bank to reveal what they were doing with all our money.

The Federal Reserve banks are a private, central banking system that Congress gave full power to oversee the US monetary system and economy without having to answer to Congress or the American people in any way.

In other words, Congress threw away one of its few powers that was actually enumerated in the US Constitution to a group of bankers that answered to no one but themselves.

Thomas Jefferson had abolished the first US central bank when he was President, and the second central bank of Andrew Jackson's administration likewise was dissolved due to its pernicious influence on the US economy.

Now we have to watch the spectacle of Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and other Johnny-Come-Lately Democrats huff and puff at the Federal Reserve like it was their idea all along.

Too late! Ron Paul already called Bernanke's bluff and caused the Federal Reserve and AIG to throw in their hands and fold under the pressure.

Posted on my blog but relevant here
I'm stunned by all the outrage. We've got three choices.

1. Take over AIG (and any other person we're loaning TARP money to). Of course we don't want to do this, not so much for the fears of nationalizing the businesses but for the politics of owning a company that provides services to Americans. Imagine, cutting jobs or restricting policies and then going in front of a Congressional subcommittee to explain why. Not to mention all the bad decisions that would get made in the name of "fairness".

2. Pull the investment. Think of AIG as like South Africa back in the day. If you don't like the fact that they are paying bonuses, pull your investment (or call the loans). Sure this will cause them to collapse and the government will be the proximate cause of all that pain but it's the second legitimate option.

3. Stop complaining. If you aren't willing to do either of the first two then stop complaining. We invested in a company that pays bonuses. There's no particular reason to expect them to stop, any more than we would expect them to stop investing in the investments that earn the highest return. That's what they do.

I guess there's a fourth option which is making a lot of noise with no effect. In the end, this one doesn't do anything other than provide fodder for bloggers, but that is a bit fun I'll admit as long as you don't take it too seriously.

there is only one solution
execute all those who authorized or received the bailout. then ask if anyone else wants a bailout. meanwhile, the $6000 i had invested in aig in 2002 is worth about $70. i suppose i should be grateful for the bailout, or my stock might be worth only $69.

Ok, now who owns the assets? AIG Should.
Who are the idiots that gave AIG the money without asking where it is going. The same as to the banks. AIG did what it did to preserve it's insurance obligatiions. Any business person can understand that. This is a perfect example as to why our government representatives should stay out of the art of doing business.

"The AIG THat Laid The Chickens"

Read at TownhallPlus.com

Kermudjin
"And while discussing the U.S. paying for all that's wrong in the world. How about Israel destroys Palestinian assets in Gaza - and we pay to rebuild them! "

How about let's forget Israel altogether and just let them fight their own battles.

Why Bernanke Wouldn't Name Names
The Federal Reserve head, Ben Bernanke, and the second man at the FRS, Donald Kohn, infuriated members of Congress when they refused to name the institutions that received the $170 billion of taxpayers' money.

No wonder they didn't want Americans to know that they had paid out most of it to foreign banks in the France ($15.9 billion-Societe Generale Bank), Germany ($11.8 billion-Deutsche Bank), England ($7 billion-Barclays (UK-BCS), Scotland, Switzerland, and Canada rather than to American banks.

No wonder that former Treasury Secretary Paulson was so twitchy when he was asking Congress for this bailout and tried to have it written in that he wouldn't be prosecuted if the people weren't happy about it.

Paulson and Geithner had both been with Goldman Sachs that came in for $12.9 billion of the package. Geithner is notorious for having been confirmed as Treasury Secretary because "only he knew enough how to fix things."

Paulson also got several billion dollars when he shorted the market just before the collapse. When castigated about him making billions off the meltdown he threw $150 million to a charity that helps people with their houses in foreclosure. What a guy! No wonder he was so quick to get out of government.

The obvious answer would be to "claw back" the money from all those in Congress or the Federal Reserve who had anything to do with putting through the bailouts.

Forfeiture laws for the bailout scam could be put into place, and Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Maxine Waters, Nancy Pelosi, Paulson, Bernanke, Geithner, Raines, Spectar, Snowe, Collins and the recipient foreign bankers could all pay back every dime...with interest...to the taxpayers.

Charity begins at home!







AIG Bailout
AIG should have been allowed to go bankrupt. This would have terminated all existing contracts. It is a sad thing that people are paid bonuses for poor results. Just who wrote these contracts and signed off on them to begin with? Of course, we see the same thing in sports and business every day where someone leaves and is paid to do so. We always hear we couldn't hire them in the first place unless we gave them a severance package too. When did this begin, hiring someone and at the same time, providing for their failure? The financial sector at AIG found an accounting loophole which allowed them to show these derivatives as assets without explanation and there are plenty enough oversight people that should have, could have seen this but turned a blind eye because it was worth money to do so. Anytime a company gets so big and so intermingled with global economy and politics, you can just bet no one really knows what's going on most of the time. Just look at how pork is fed into the stimulus package without anyone really claiming responsibility.
Entitlements is what we're all about today and the AIG folk simply got theirs and they can laugh all the way to the bank.

AIG and Socialism's Hook, Line & Sinker
Wage controls are socialism's hidden hook, line and sinker in the AIG's $173 billion dollar bailout.

The government now "owns" 80% of AIG and it is virtually nationalized in the socialist/Marxist style of the Obama administration.

AIG now must takes orders from the private, central banking Federal Reserve System and the US government beginning with the wages it pays its employees and the compensation of it employers.

AIG should have been allowed to go bankrupt like Lehman Brothers and any other businesses in a capitalistic free market. This recession would have short and quick as the market corrected itself.

Out of the nearly $180 billion of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Citigroup took $45 billion, Wells Fargo took $25 billion and Morgan Stanley accepted $10 billion.

These huge amounts make Merrill Lynch's "loan" of $1.8 billion seem miniscule in comparison and brings Goldman Sachs' payout at $12.9 billion back into perspective.

But at what price to the taxpayer and to the businesses involved?

Obama's administration, Congress and the Federal Reserve System have just taken a giant step to socialize the US banking and monetary system by transferring ownership to the government...entirely at the taxpayers' expense.

The US is fast losing any pretense of being a capitalistic, free market economy thanks to a corrupt, ignorant Congress who have "hurried through" in a fake panic these unconstitutional bailouts.

Wage controls on AIG are illegal in a free market because the federal government neither has the enumerated power in the Constitution to intervene with bailouts of private companies nor to decree the wages of employers or employees.

Central government planning of an economy is the definition of socialism and the middle step to communism. Is anyone awake out there?




Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Teddy faul
The orgin of the "financial crisis" was Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Teddy Kennedy and other liberal Democrats passing legislation under Bill Clinton that FORCED banks to offer sub-prime loans to urban deadbeats. Then they expanded the programs, just as Bush and McCain introduced legistation to curtail the lunacy.

When will the American public know the real cause of our "financial crisis"?

They knew
SomeONE knew what AIG was going to do with the bailout money. They knew there would be a backlash. And now gov'ment can step in and fix everything? Talk about a manufactured crisis. It's bad enough already, we dont need more government intervention. Let those businesses fail and someone else will come along, pick up the pieces and get it back on track. Let the market do its thang.

Or, maybe I am being too cynical.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.