Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, July 20, 2007
Rich Galen :: Townhall.com Columnist
Plame-out
by Rich Galen
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Aw, nuts. US District Judge John D. Bates has thrown out the goofy lawsuit filed by Valerie Plame and her husband Joe Wilson against, according to the Associated Press, "Vice President Dick Cheney, White House political adviser Karl Rove, former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage."

This is the end of the Plame-o-thon Super-Saga which has played out in lawyers' offices, Federal grand jury rooms, Federal judges' chambers, print and broadcast newsrooms, at least one Federal prison, and in billions of lines of copy - on-line, on the air, and in print.

You can read the back story to all this just about everywhere, but the one quote which has stuck with me since September 2003 when this whole thing started was this, by the afore-mentioned Joe Wilson, as quoted in Slate magazine:

"It's of keen interest to me to see whether or not we can get Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs."

And that's what this whole thing has been about: "whether or not we can get Karl Rove."

There was no crime when then-Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage gave Bob Novak Plame's name. Right from the get-go that was clear, even when we didn't know who the leaker was (although the special prosecutor apparently knew early on).

Now the civil suit which claimed that the defendants had "violated [Plame's] privacy rights and was illegal retribution for her husband's criticism of the administration" has been tossed out and so Joe Wilson's War against Rove ends, exactly where it should. In failure.

Back in October 2005 when special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald announced a five-count indictment against Scooter Libby, you could almost hear the keening and wailing of disappointment from the Left and their allies in the Popular Press because Rove's name was not on the document.

Hope was rekindled when it came to light that Fitzgerald (who had been touted as the most scrupulous, careful, thorough, complete, detail-oriented special prosecutor since Caiaphas) missed the point that a little-known Washington journalist - Bob Woodward - had been involved in the gossip loop about Valerie Plame as well.

In an excerpt from the book "Lapdogs: How the Press Rolled Over for Bush" by Eric Boehlert:

"Just weeks after Fitzgerald [indicted] Libby for obstructing justice and lying to Fitzgerald's grand jury, a source of Woodward's came forward and told Fitzgerald that he'd actually told the star reporter about Plame's identity long before Libby started chatting up reporters in 2003."

Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Rich Galen has been a press secretary to Dan Quayle and Newt Gingrich. Rich Galen currently works as a journalist and writes at Mullings.com

Be the first to read Rich Galen's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

cherry pickin' anyone?
"Now, I would like everyone to think back to June of last year, when a partially-declassified National Ground Intelligence Center report revealed that US troops had FOUND weapons of mass destruction in Iraq."

The key words being "partially-declassified" Why not give the whole report? Surely it would bolster their case, right? come on Trev, how can you continue to stand behind these losers? I am a conservative, but I can't even get behind this crowd in the White house. I feel betrayed, just like every member of Congress who bought the Bush-Cheney "evidence" back in 2002. Let's stop defending these bad apples who make all conservatives look like naive clowns and get on board with some candidates tih integrity.

"Technical violation"
That's the worst that can be said about any member of the Bush administration in this case. Even if Plame was covered by the Covert Identity Protection Act, or whatever it was called, Armitage's leaking of her name to Novak was, at worst, only a technical violation of the law, since what he told Noval was well-known in political and media circles long before Novak's column.

And Libby's "obstruction of justice" conviction was based on his failure to remember certain details about things that happened THREE YEARS AGO. Yes, he technically broke the law, by "lying" under oath. But again, it was, at worst, nothing more than a TECHNICAL violation.

Now, I would like everyone to think back to June of last year, when a partially-declassified National Ground Intelligence Center report revealed that US troops had FOUND weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Okay, they weren't nuclear, they were chemical: mustard gas and sarin. And they were LIKELY degraded to the point of ineffectiveness. And they were manufactured prior to 1991, so they didn't prove that Sadam had an "ongoing" WMD program. But, they were nevertheless a TECHNICAL violation of UN resolutions aimed at dismantling Hussein's WMD program. Of course, there were plenty of other violations, both technical and substantive, of these UN resolutions. Like the shots fired at coalition airplanes; Like Iraqi planes in the "no-fly" zone; Like Saddam kicking the UN weapons inspectors out of Iraq.

My point is, to this day, Democrats say we did not find any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and therefore, the "justification" for the war in Iraq was a lie. But, even if you ignore the very likely possibility that Saddam simply moved his more-potent WMDs out of the country, or simply hid them better; even if you ignore the fact that ALL the intellgence agencies around the world agreed that Saddam had WMDs; even if you ignore the facts that every Democrat in the Senate that is now saying Saddam never had WMDs was, at one time, QUOTED as saying exactly the opposite...; we STILL have incontrovertible PROOF that Saddam was in TECHNICAL violation of the ban on WMDs. And therefore, by the standard of a "technical" violation, this discovery provided ample after-the-fact justification for the war.

This is, quite clearly, a double standard. Democrats want a SUBSTANTIVE violation to justify the war (not that we don't have one, but they ignore it). Yet, when it comes to bringing down Bush administration officials, they are content with a TECHNICAL violation. They should be called on this!

Regards,
Trevor
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.