Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, July 09, 2007
Rich Galen :: Townhall.com Columnist
A Live Earth Weekend
by Rich Galen
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


From Seward, Alaska
CUNA Mutual Group & AlaskaUSA Trust Company
Investment Seminar

Let's be fair about this: Live Earth was a tremendous success. Although exact figures are hard to find, some 10 million watched the webcast of some or all of the concerts and "hundreds of millions more" watched on television.

One of the reasons the Earth may well be warming (in addition to that pesky sunspot cycle) is that we measure the success of events like Live Earth on the metric of how many people sit on their butts watching their computer or television screens, burning billions of watts of electrical energy which require who knows how many tons of fossil fuels to produce.

Not to mention the silos of hops and barley that went into making the giga-gallons of beer which were shipped to all corners of the nation on trucks and trains, and consumed at the concert sites as well as by the millions of people sitting on their butts in front of a computer or TV screen.

I am in favor of the Earth not catching fire one day and becoming a 25,000 mile circumference cinder. As I was on airplanes all day while the Live Earth Concerts were going on. I was, like many of the acts who performed at the concerts, leaving my own personal carbon footprint in the stratospheric walk of shame except, unlike many of them, I flew commercial.

Back to the central point. It is one thing for Smashing Pumpkins (or some other group whose first note I have never heard) to ask people to use energy saving light bulbs in our homes.

Mullings Central already uses those bulbs which look like glass Slinky toys. It would have been something else to have figured out something for the "hundreds of millions" of people to have done that very day.

I have an idea for next year: Every person who watches a Live Earth II concert has to promise to plant one tree.

That's it. One tree. Each.

If three hundred million people did that every year, it would have a positive effect on CO2 levels, wouldn't it? Not so much as to completely offset the damage done by Al Gore, the entire membership of the US Congress and most of the population of Malibu flying around on private jets, maybe, but it would be something everyone could point to and say, "I did that."

And, next year everyone could promise to plant another tree and get one other person who was not watching to plant a tree, as well.

In three or four years there would be a Carl Sagan-esque number of new trees inhaling carbon dioxide and exhaling oxygen: Billions and billions.

It's hard to point to a lamp in the den with a light bulb which is one errant elbow away from creating a toxic waste site from mercury poisoning and thinking "I've done my bit for the planet." And, what would I do next year; point to two lamps in my house?

Not only that, but next year the lamps will be the same size as they were this year. All those trees - or at least a huge percentage of them - will be bigger next year and the year after that bigger still.

Some of the coverage of Live Earth was unintentionally amusing. One report from the NY Times told of the point during the concert at Giants Stadium in New Jersey "when Al Gore bounded onto the stage wearing jeans and a black shirt."

Gore in a black shirt: A human eclipse of the sun.

Another bit of unintentional irony was when Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. exhorted the same crowd to "get rid of all those rotten politicians we have in Washington, D.C."

First, one assumes he was tacitly exempting his Uncle Ted. Second, holding an eco-friendly concert in New Jersey is an amusing concept on its face.

So, on this Live Earth weekend, I was in Seward, Alaska where I made my way to the local glacier, hiked up the side of the mountain (down which it still flows) and, like Clark Griswold at the Grand Canyon, looked at it.

No beer, though.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Rich Galen has been a press secretary to Dan Quayle and Newt Gingrich. Rich Galen currently works as a journalist and writes at Mullings.com

Be the first to read Rich Galen's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Live Earth
YRMML, how long have you been interested in climate? I have been since I was a kid in the 50s. I remember the running argument between some scientist I can't recall and the editor of The Farmers Almanac. One or the other said the advance and retreat of ice took about 11,000 years ... the other argued for 22,000 years. I recently read the peak of the last Ice Age was about 23,000 years ago. Oooops, Earth must be warming, as she always has. Then she'll cool again and do it all over. Then there are those troublesome finds of tropical plant and animal fossils in the far frozen north, ice cores showing flora and fauna native to areas much farther south today, a mile or so down in a Greenland glacier ... you know - facts - research - unbiased opinion. If you'll look at correlations between CO2 and warming, you'll find more between CO2 and cooling than warming, and more that says it doesn't matter. Next ask yourself, "Self, is this the ideal climate? Then how in Hades did we get this far since it's been much warmer and much colder before?" Better still, quit swearing by a bootleggers great grandson's and others' politically motivated blather and, as a Britannica (I think) commercial used to advise, "Look it up, dear."

Hey Laughing Boy
Glad you kept your whining short, we are having a real hard time planting trees fast enough to absorb all your fumes.

Golly they showed films that backed up their point of view and nothing that went against it? I can see how you were sold.

Another Liberal Idiot
YouRepugsMakeMeLaugh, you certainly prove the old adagio right. The one that says "Laughter is always abundant in the mouth of idiots."

As for what leroy brings to the discussion, I'd say he brought a good point when he mentioned how biased this whole global warming hysteria is in that its high priests are very careful NOT to present an opposite viewpoint. Not that there is a lack of dissent, either.

But typically, you prefer to laugh instead of making a good point, or actually debating the issue, for a change. Not that I'm surprised, mind.

You are the one who would be so comical ... if only you were not so pathetic.


Kilroy ...
... that was funny. :)

But our little eco-nazi will tell you it's all lies, spread by those nasty big oil companies. Bush's friends, you know.

Let him (her, it, whatever) have his fun. He was born to be dominated. The kind of idiot that obeys his masters' orders and reads by candlelight and layers sweaters in winter, while his betters (Gore, etc.) live in their sprawling central-heated/air-conditioned, energy-guzzling mansions. But that's no problem because they tell YRMML that it's all "energy-efficient," and besides, they buy carbon-emission credits, or some such scam - which Gore sells for a good profit - and our little eco-friendly minion wags his tail, contented and reassured.

YRMML
Sorry, didn't mean to bother you by my long interest in climate fluctuations and collection of facts thereof. Nasty ol' historical facts! Dang!, don't they get in the way? "Consensus" in some minds is provable, repeatable scientific fact after all, since Algorialysis set in. Ask any 5-year-old or agenda-driven Libiot, and he'll tell you an absolute truth (as he sees it). His invisible playmate is as real to him as this warming garbage is to many "full growed" adults. It amazes me.

Oh, please
MY opinion is worthless? At least, it's mine. I am capable of thinking for myself. Unlike you, who merely parrot idiocies your betters brainwash you with.

As for facts, you wouldn't know a fact - a REAL fact; not the factoids your masters teach you - if it bit you in the butt.

As for Kennedy Jr., do you think he was talking of his uncle when he mentioned "corrupted politicians"? You know who his uncle is, don't you, YRMML? The drunkard who drove over a bridge in Chappaquiddick and let the woman who was with him drown in the car while he scurried to his hotel to concoct an alibi?

So I'm only a Republican? Well, better that than being like you. You are so many things, whatsyourname. And ALL of them spell LOSER.

But what am I doing, wasting time with a brat like you? I mean, you're what? 13 going on 7?


Run for your lives!!
Run for your lives. The sky is falling. The Earth is warming. Armageddon is here. Oh wait, we can fix this. All we have to do is raise taxes a bunch, Put onerous regulations on industry that will cripple the economy and bring millions into blissful dependence on us. By us, I mean King Gore and his loyal subjects. Bow down before your God, mother earth, and her prophet Al Gore. Careful you choose the right God. He is jealous.

YouRepubsMakeMeLaugh, better go on now
I believe your mommy is calling to tell you it is your bedtime. Stop wasting space on TH with your unbelievably ignorant, childish, foul mouthed postings.

Al Gore
"Bow down before your God, mother earth, and her prophet Al Gore."

How long before people start burning the American flag in response to Al Gore cartoons?

(Hmmm ... I wonder what Al Gore means in Arabic ....)

Anyway, build more nuclear power stations!
(stepping off my soapbox ... for now)

They used to call it poverty
A while back I wrote about this whole thing that nowadays is called Reducing The Carbon Footprint and that we in the fifties called Poverty. The difference is that we reduced, reused and recycled because we were poor; and y'all do NOT do any of the above for any reason, you just demand that WE continue to do these things and let you keep buying your electronic binkies and throwing the old ones into the landfills at a faster and faster rate.

Because I was taught "use it up, wear it out, make it do or do without" when I was a little girl, I have had the same cell phone since 2001 and will keep it until it no longer functions as what I bought it for -- to make phone calls -- despite the snickers of the kiddies at the cell phone store whose binkies do everything but strip tease. I am also still wearing the same clothes I have been wearing for about 15 years -- if you are careful about your weight and you buy classics, you can do that -- and I carry my lunch which I pack myself in re-usable containers.

And so forth.

This allows me to take the money I am not spending on litter that ends up hip-deep at Live Earth Concert Venues making work for the $40.00 per hour union employees to sweep up, and feed the hungry, clothe the naked (25% of the girls in the local teen emergency shelter are either pregnant or have given birth within the year, and the place is desperate for baby clothes for those nekkid babies), comfort the afflicted (including my parents who are fading fast), and visit the sick (ditto).

But much to the dismay of the underdressed, overweight popsies howling on the stages of the world, it also allows me to fly my Dino to Monaco and spend a three day weekend with my Italian boyfriend driving Henri on the Ferrari Only car park gate absolutely crazy. Yes, I know all about poverty. I save it for when I am at home. That is the benefit of being brought up a Converver -- because I am not trying to save the earth by my poverty; I am following the dictates of my Lord.

My soul is prepared. How's yours?

Hey, YouRep...
Why is it that France gets to generate 80% of its electricity via nuclear power, but people like you throw a tantrum when nuclear power is suggested as the solution for us here in America?

yrmml
"4) Air travel offset through carbon credits"

Well, you had me listening until that point, your, frankly, childish abrasiveness notwithstanding. You seem like a very unpleasant person, but that's ok.

Carbon offsets? Come on, man. That is a total scam.

Gore: "I'm going to use enough energy for thousands of people, but it's ok because I'm going to buy carbon credits...from myself."

Who the heck does that bloated fool think he's fooling?

It's fine to want to reduce pollution, but seriously, Al Gore is a flaming hypocrite and a particularly nasty pandering liar. IMO, he doesn't give a hang about anything but increasing his wealth and power, and that is it.

YRMML-Carbon Credits
Carbon Credits? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Greatest scam ever! But you are the party of Ted Kennedy and Bill clinton. You nutty liberals do make me laugh.

Doomsayers
I am pro-global warming. I could stand a milder winter! Second, I don't believe God is finished with us yet. I trust in the Lord - yet prepare as AudiR10 has so ably stated. I can well afford to do the same as Al Gore - but it is against my nature and the values instilled in me as a child. I live in a log cabin - I am cold sometimes - and hot others. I have learned to adapt to those situations. Man will adapt as he has always - regardless of what the climate does.
God is not finished with us yet!

repukes
I'm beginning wonder too about your cooing to alglob and what your motivation is.-but that is
your business.
But i have absolutly no doubt that you are a damned idiot.
It would be entertaining to watch you pound sand
in a rat hole, or try to pour water out of a boot.
BUT--you are the useful idiots fat al loves to have around.

AudiR10
Exactically--I was reading Good Houskeeping and they had 10 tips for living green. The way I was raised we already do 8-9 of them! Number nine was hang laundry--which I used to do until we moved and the covenants of our property do not allow hanging laundry in the back yard--and 10 was the light-bulbs, the only reason we haven't gotten the cheaper bulbs that last longer is that none of our lights have gone out yet.

Anyway what astounded me was that people have to be told to NOT use a roll of papertowels to clean the house! "Instead try using a cotton wash clothe" I had to show my husband I was laughing so hard!

If you are spoiled enough to need the advice that Good Housekeeping was handing out--you are way beyond trying to live green. And something elase I realized--I already live green, and the PC Green-house gas crowd can quit preaching at me.

when we stop
treating babies like trash, maybe I'll think about recycling and carbon prints. Until then, the earth is doomed.

Global Warming
"Ice caps aren't forever, but they will take damn near forever to replace."

NOT. If the Earth starts a shift into a new Ice Age, the advance of glaciers is remarkably swift in geological time, frighteningly so for the people displaced from their farms and homes.

That the "Climate Change" scare-mongers are led by a Divinity Student and Law School dropout allied with poorly-educated rock stars should give serious people reason to be concerned about the "science" and intentions of Gore & Co.

Rock concerts to save the Earth? For sure, man.

Truetolife
Amen--Did you notice none of the live earth people are too upset about the children who are being held hostage in Pakistan? I think we have bigger problems to fix in the world--and more worthy causes to take to the street about. And like you mine is the sanctity of the unborn life.

The Evil Republican
Unfortunately, none of our alternative energy sources will ever be acceptable or enough for the Greens: they oppose nuclear energy, windmills kill birds, hydropower disrupts water flow and kills fish, and growing more trees poses the problem of "Franken-trees," which would result from the absorption of GHGs. (Plants also produce methane! Oops!)

Besides which, windmill power is only reliable 30% of the time. Hydrocarbons are the only truly reliable source of energy.

Oh--but this would be reality as opposed to the world of the environmentalist.

Cheap extortion, nothing more
If Tony Soprano came into your home and told you it would catch fire if you didn't make a "donation" to the Ba-Da-Bing employee retirement fund the feds would call it extortion and they would do their best to have him brought up on RICO charges.

But Al Gore can threaten the whole world that if they don't donate money to his cause and help him twist the arms of other citizens and politicians to increase taxes while deflating the economy the world is going to die. And a bunch of gullible libs fall for it hook, line and sinker.

Extortion. Legal, but still extortion.

Flourescent bulbs contain mercury. The same mercury that the left excoriated big business for allowing to foul the air and water. The left is so sure they are going to solve this with recycling. Yeah. We'll see. One day it will be legal for a man to marry his own daughter but you'll get ten years for throwing a light bulb in the wrong trash can.

Biodiesel EMITS CO2 WHEN IT IS BURNED. This is NOT a solution AT ALL. It only makes the alleged problem worse, since it emits more CO2/mile than conventional diesel. Ditto E85 gasoline. And that doesn't even count the fuel that is burned to make it.

Planting trees does NOTHING. If there is 'additional' CO2 in the atmosphere (however you define and measure that) it is because plant the growth (and reproduction) of existing plants is already being limited by some other factor, such as light, fertilizer, good soil or (here are a couple of goodies) HEAT and FRESH WATER. You know. The extra heat plants are getting from alleged global warming (liberals have never heard of the beneficial effects of a longer growing season). And the additional fresh water they're getting from snow melting off mountaintops and from the additional rainfall from the additional transporation caused by the rising seas which will soon flood Manhattan (adding to the amount of surface area covered by the oceans).

Mother nature is soooo far ahead of these lib geniuses they can't even begin to comprehend it. And it is only their collective egos that force them to insist the world is dying, so they can bolster those egos by convincing themselves that they are going to save it.

Oh, and BTW - NO ONE has proven the THEORY of global warming. NO ONE has proven that the presence of CO2 in the atmosphere provides a "greenhouse" effect. It is a theory, nothing more. The only 'evidence' is statistical and the so-called statistical evidence was gathered specifically to 'prove' the theory of glogal warming. The pseudo-scientific equilavent of push polling.

But what really fractures me is this. Ninety-eight percent of the politicians and entertainers who are demanding we lower our standard of living to save the earth from global warming couldn't get a passing grade in the kind of physics or chemistry class that is needed to understand even the theory of global warming, let alone evaluate the so-called evidence. And that goes in spades for Al Gore and Robert Kennedy Jr.

Morons.

Did'ya ever see the Earth from space?
Whole lot of green going on!

You have to zoom in a lot before you see ANY evidence of man's activities: cities, deforestation, etc.

Of course, the same Earth at night shows all the lights around the world. Overall though, it strikes me that human effects are pretty puny. Of course, that is just my opinion, and it is not based on hard evidence. In other words, it is probably at least as valid as Al Gore's pontificating.

All those trees and plants need CO2. In the US we have more green space now than we did around 1900.

Before we start running around, like Chicken Little, screaming about AGW, shouldn't we have solid numbers on the amount of CO2 produced, and the amount absorbed by plants and trees? And... what the "acceptable range" of excess CO2 really is?

Global Cooling
In the mid-70's Global Cooling was all the rage. The world was coming to an end. Scientists were convinced that global cooling was going to destroy the earth. Science magazines and news magazines confirmed that we were to be inundated with cold deserts, growing seasons shortened, fresh water trapped in the polar ice-caps. We were clearly on the eve of destruction. And it was oh so real!! And oh so imminent!!

It also turned out to be oh so FALSE! Thirty years later the tune is now Warming! Ask your green buddies 'What happened to global cooling?' It's a great way to get a blank, dumb stare! The greenie will want to change the subject. To explain Global Cooling to admit that they got it terribly wrong not so long ago. Maybe they got it wrong again.

Al Gore has turned GW into a religion. It is a matter of faith not of science. Al himself has become the pope of GW! He even hands down to the unwashed 7 commandments! Heresy (i.e thoughtful questions) is simply shouted down by the GW believers.

It is time to start a counter attack to the current GW nonsense. There is plenty of evidence to support scepticsm. Collect your research. Write your newspapers. Call Rush. Fight back.

The national debate should not be governed by a bunch of GW religious bigots.

Well, well
A lot of wise words from people who are obviously much better informed than The Laughing Idiot.

I wonder what words of wisdom our YRMML will bring to the debate in answer to all of your posts ... if he comes back, that is.

Will he word his wisdom by saying, "You Repukes are so stupid ... Hahaha." Or maybe, "You really make me laugh ... Hahaha." Or maybe he'll get really scientific and say something to the effect of, "Al Gore says the earth has a fever, therefore, it must be so." Oh, yeah. Followed by the inevitable "Hahaha," of course.

This should be interesting.




Gotcha beat, Audi
I've had my cell phone since 1999. It's an antique, and gets lots of quizzical looks and comments. By '99 standards it was really small and light -- today I think of it as the Brontosaurus of the wireless world. Why trade it in when it still holds a charge, and lets me do phone business when I need to?

My contribution to enlarging the carbon footprint is showering as long as I friggin need to, to get the shampoo out of my hair. That goes a whole lot faster with a normal-flow shower head. I didn't ask for or approve the legislation that mandates low-flow shower heads, so since they make it take 18-20 minutes to finish a shower, instead of 5, that's how long it takes. (Besides, after 20 years of Navy showers, I'm still catching up with my lifetime allowance.)

I "carbon credit" myself, on the other hand, with my extremely minimal use of either heat or air conditioning. Why? Because I save money that way. It's inconvenient at some times, and requires patience and planning (like, no sweaty work on summer afternoons, and no using the stove after 10:00 AM). But I save so much that I can afford other things I care about more. What a concept.

No plastic bag or packaging material has ever entered my house without being used again or recycled. Why? Because I save money that way, and do my small part to minimize the rate of growth at the landfills. Furniture, clothes, appliances -- all kept for years and years, as long as they still work. So it all balances out in the end.

Of course, the problem with what the AGW advocates want to do is not so much that it would entail people being frugal, as that it would make it impossible to support modern utilities, modern health care, and the modern economy -- systems that, combined, have enabled millions and millions of people to live longer, healthier lives. And that doesn't mean living past 80 -- it means living past 2, 11, or 25.

The inconsistencies characteristic of, and cosmic choices implied by, the catastrophic AGW perspective really do force us to evaluate our tacit assumptions about the cosmos. Is it really a closed-loop, limited-capacity place where we will have to politically decided to force a reversion to the situation of 200 years ago, in which people conveniently died early of disease, starvation, and childbirth, in order to allow SOME to live?

Or is it a place where each generation, no matter how brilliant it considers itself in comparison with the generations that came before, has no idea what inquiry and ingenuity will do for us next? Actual history would indicate the latter; the question for people who are familiar with actual history is how much we can COUNT on that.

The answer to that question is all in your arbitrary, unprovable cosmological ideas. It is no more PROVABLE that the universe is hostile to us, and in fact is bothered by us as if we are a virus infecting it, than it is that a loving God created the universe to support us, and has given us all the resources we need -- both within ourselves and in the natural environment -- to improve earthly life for ourselves and each other.

Neither proposition is provable. Which one you pick is entirely a matter of attitude. But the significant distinction is that one proposition ultimately demands killing ourselves off, and the other proposition doesn't.

That's the real distinction. As AudiR10 points out, the catastrophic AGW advocates don't "own" frugal living. Responsible people have been doing it for millennia. What the CAGW crowd owns is the pessimistic -- unprovable -- assumption that the planet can't support more people in modern health and comfort than there were in about 1800.

dyerje
Hear, Hear!

Live Earth
Filthy, Smelly, Tree-Hugging, Dopers as high as a kite who burned UNCOUNTED gallons of GASOLINE/DIESEL to get to a concert. While there they put UNCOUNTED GALLONS of human waste into the ground water and Consumed food & drink TRUCKED IN by DIESEL RIGS. THESE IDIOTS are trying to SAVE THE EARTH!

wiseone, thank you for pointing
out the small "fact" about fluorescent bulbs! I believe there are other chemicals besides the mercury as well. Our paper just carried a brief article about the dangers of these bulbs should one break inside the home environment. Also, they are NOT to be tossed in the trash like incandescent bulbs. They require hazardous waste disposal, which I did not realize when I tossed two of those long kitchen bulbs in our trash container about 6 months ago. Is Al Gore et al giving consumers this important information? Not that I have heard (obviously since I put mine out with the regular trash pick up!) The same article mentioned LED light technology which is just around the corner and considerably safer (as well as providing superior lighting.)

Lucille, last I posted YMML
has been confined to his room by his parents.

If only, . .
we could find a way to link global warming to abortion, high taxes, illegal immigration, socialism, and big government, we could count on opposition from its current promoters.

Lets measure the footprints of all the PP offices and clinics, monitor the ACLU's consumption closely, and close Washington DC down as an actual place of governance, converting to telecommuting, and relegating the Capitol to tourist-trap/museum status, ( there's a revenue enhancer for ya! ). Think of all the money we could save eliminating congressional junkets, fact-finding forays, and just plain back and forth travel to congressional committee meetings, hearings, and general sessions. The budget savings alone could kayo the national debt, and the carbon emmision reductions would probably rival Al Gore's gravitational field in magnitude! ( FLASH: New 9th planet Gore found to be twice the mass of planetoid Pluto )

Musical festival was a fraud
This so-called musical festival was a fraud. Most likely neither the attendees nor the performers had ever heard actual music. Since the music stopped when Fred Waring died, this generation has only heard “The Sewer sounds of the Garbage Generation,” the most untalented generation in my lifetime.

Just remember, the words “guitar-music” is an oxymoron.
=====

Oh and by the way, what happened to all the glaciers that used to cover Indiana and Ohio? How many Hummers were needed to melt that ice?

Al Gore
History will note Al Gore's "initiative" as an interesting sidebar to the real problems of the world.

All the foofaraw over global warming will diminish over time as the sea level DOESN'T rise and we get another cycle of colder-than-normal winters.

The media needs Gores and Sharptons and Paris's to keep the viewers viewing. The more radical the idea, the better. Remember the planet-killing asteroids? When an asteroid didn't hit the earth within a couple of months, people lost interest.

The media presents us with the "Scare of the Week". We listen/view, then when disaster hasn't occurred, we go on with our lives.

DavidMac
so true!

Live Earth Without any Music
A previous poster had it right. The audible trash called "music" these days is garbage. The cretinous purveyors of this cacaphonous racket call themselves "artists". There's another good word that has been stolen and corrupted by the barbarians. It is hard to imagine that anything positive was accomplished by this big self congratulatory extravaganza. Sadly, many of today's generation has no experience with actual music. Fortunately, this noisy junk won't last and couldn't possibly get much worse. But we'll have Beethoven and Mozart, etc. forever.

As for cell phones, I refuse to have one. The world got along prety well for centuries without them, and I have no need to be constantly connected.

Art
The words you write ring true. I agree that a lot of today's music is crap. However, there is some Indie music that I find enjoyable. Like the Decemberists (who are going back to very old, abandoned instruments and resurrecting them). They really are "musicians" in that they can actually play many different types of instruments. And their music is fun to listen to, and almost comical in their tragedy (if that makes any sense). I also like some of OK Go's stuff. And I'm 53 years old. It helps to still have a recent teenager in the house (she JUST turned 20).
Regarding the cell phones. I have one so that all 3 of our girls can stay in touch with me in case of emergency. But you're right. If I forget it at home--I'm all nervous--yet, I've lived all but the last couple of years without one and did just fine!
The technology that is available to us now is amazing and frightening at the same time. If my grandfather were still alive he'd be 120 years old!! I come from a large family. Those old traditions (Slovak and Bohemian) are still burned in my brain. Yet, looking from where I was to where I am, it is almost unbelievable to think of the changes since grandpa died in 1956 (and I was 3 years old).....

Good
"Lucille, last I posted YMML
has been confined to his room by his parents."

Thank you, NATBR. I'm glad to see someone's in charge. :)

Unfortunately, school will not reopen for some time yet. Which means we'll have to endure brats like YRMML until September.

Oh, well. This too will pass.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.