Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Rebecca Hagelin :: Townhall.com Columnist
Unleash America's Energy Potential
by Rebecca Hagelin
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


As any driver can tell you, the pain at the pump is pretty acute right now. It’s a simple matter of supply and demand. Demand is up (thanks, in part, to an increasing appetite for fuel in China and India), and supply is low.

And if there’s one thing that makes the pain worse, it’s knowing that supply doesn’t have to be this low.

Are the ridiculously high prices we’re paying the fault of the big, bad oil companies? No, the lion’s share of the blame goes to politicians, who have locked away vast amounts of American energy -- both oil and natural gas.

In the 1980s, Congress began restricting more offshore areas from energy exploration -- prohibiting drilling in more and more places around the country. With energy relatively cheap, it was easy to give in to the carping demands of radical environmentalists, who (then as now) exaggerated the impact of drilling and downplayed the benefits.

Then, in 1990, President George H.W. Bush issued a directive restricting new offshore exploration and drilling. President Bill Clinton compounded this error in 1998 by extending the directive to 2012.

Fast forward to 2008, and it’s abundantly clear that we can’t leave huge deposits of energy to remain buried in our own backyard for another four years.

How huge are these deposits, you ask?

The latest estimates from the Interior Department indicate that the off-limits areas contain 19.1 billion barrels of oil and 83.9 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. According to Ben Lieberman, an energy expert at The Heritage Foundation, that’s about 30 years’ worth of imports from Saudi Arabia -- and enough natural gas to power America’s homes for 17 years.

At a time when you practically need to take out a second mortgage to keep your car in gasoline for a month, it’s insane to keep such restrictions in place. Yet that’s exactly what politicians have been doing for years, even as they harp on the need for “energy independence.” The hypocrisy, even for Washington, is astounding.

But what, some ask, about the environmental impact? If we drill in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, for example, or in many offshore areas, won’t we be harming nature and local species? In fact, technology has improved substantially over the years, reducing the “footprint” of such drilling efforts to a tiny one. (The booming herds of caribou around the Prudhoe Bay area in Alaska, for example, are encouraging.) And their safety record is impressive. As Washington Post columnist Robert Samuelson says, “We have thousands of rigs in the Gulf of Mexico, yet not even hurricanes Katrina and Rita resulted in spills of any significance.”

Fortunately, President Bush has called recently for America’s offshore areas to be opened to exploration and drilling. “If Congress is serious about addressing high energy costs,” Lieberman writes in a Heritage Web memo, “it should quickly send legislation to the president that removes restrictions on these vital energy reserves.”

Lawmakers can take some other sensible steps while they’re at it. They should repeal the mandate to mix more ethanol in our nation’s gasoline supply, for one. As Ben Lieberman notes in another Heritage paper, all the ethanol mandate has done is raise prices -- not only on energy (which it supposedly would bring down) but on food.

It’s also time for Congress to stop subsidizing “alternative” energy sources such as wind and solar power. There’s anything wrong with such sources -- if private investors want to fund them, no one’s stopping them. But more than 30 years of attempts by the federal government to encourage such alternatives have resulted in numerous failures. Even after decades of special tax breaks, wind and solar power account for less than 3 percent of our nation’s electricity.

What else can policymakers do? They can cut some of the regulatory red tape that affects refineries and gas supplies. Heritage research shows that tight refinery capacity contributes to higher prices at the pump. We need new refineries, but current regulations make it all but impossible to build a new one or expand an existing one. This needs to change. It’s also crucial that we get more of our energy from nuclear power.

President Reagan knew how to respond to high gasoline prices. He deregulated crude oil prices in the 1980s, a decision which brought gas prices down and helped spur economic growth.

It’s time we open the marketplace and harness the rich, natural resources of oil right here in America.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Rebecca Hagelin is a public speaker on the family and culture and the author of the new best seller, 30 Ways in 30 Days to Save Your Family.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Rebecca Hagelin's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
We're Being Robbed...
I can hear socialists rubbing their hairy mitts with glee on here. Disgusting. "Buy a Prius. It's your ego stopping you. Drilling won't make any difference. It'll take 20 yrs..." and more BS.

We are the nation that defeated Japan and Germany simultaneously. We put men on the moon, built the Shuttle, and landed on Mars. We can certainly get our own oil out the ground fast and cheap.

Oh please. If I want a HUGE HUMMER, it is my right to have one w/o subsidizing terrorists. I want a giant hydrogen powered land yacht that requires 3 subcompact parking spaces. I want my house at 72 year round 24/7. I want inexpensive quality food, and to be the country that feeds the world. The Shining City on the hill.

Those are our rights as Americans. We can have anything we want.

Start massive drilling and watch gas prices plummet. The ME does not want to lose its mooch acct that provides military protection to boot.

Oil shale

We have between 1 - 2 TRILLION barrels of recoverable crude in shale on the slopes of the Rockies. Canada's development of its Athabasca oil sands have proven the technology viable and economical, and there's even newer technology for in situ extraction and processing, making the resource even more viable.

Those are the largest known deposits in the world at this time, enough to make us energy-independant well into the next century, and even a net oil exporter if we so desire.


Oil Shale Project failed the first time
As I recall, during the late 70's & early 80's, the DOE and Exxon spent/wasted US$Billions in western Colorado on converting shale to oil. It was a failure as it took too much water and it was terribly inefficient. Now, 30 years later, technology is problably better, but is it good enough to avoid another fiasco?

energy
As this column explains, America could return to cheap energy. The democrats will stop cheap energy at every turn. With the media on their side, they will block everything and then lie about it. We have a sad future and it will be worse after the Nov. elections.

The economists
see high gas prices as a good thing. I just listened to an economist running through his speech for the IMF. He said that the target price for gasoline is $10 a gallon because then people will feel the pinch and be willing to give up their private cars. He also said that the fact that it hits the poor and families is a good thing. It will discourage them from breeding.

Finding more oil in this country
is a great start, but only part of a sound, long term energy policy. IMO should push nuclear power as a means of reducing our demand for fossil fuels.
The time is right politically since the Democrats are so concerned about global warming.

McCain should go to Iraq and ;
McCain should go to Iraq and :

1) Claim surged has worked and we'll win in Iraq if he's elected but lose if Obama is elected.

2) Have Malaki make a deal to sell 100% of Iraq's oil exclusively to the U.S. at $5 below market price for next ten years and we'll keep enough troops in Iraq to stabilize his government.

3) During those 10 years start converting coal and shale oil to oil and drill off shore.


Oil Supply
I think everyone is missing the point. In the 70's we were importing about 15% of our oil. Experts were warning then that in the next century we will be importing about 40% to 50%. Well folks, we are there.

The problem we are facing is the Middle East. It's time for people to get their heads out of the sand and look at the potential problems we have facing us. The Middle East could blow up at any day shutting off all imports from these countries. Can you imagine the price of gasoline when that happens. That is, if there any available for the citizens. The supply we have would be limited to the military and the transportation infrastructure.

Yes we do need alternative forms of energy but meanwhile we need to develop the sources we have available today. Drilling companies say they could more wells operating in less than a year if they were allowed to start drilling. People are ridiculing McCain for his $300 million award to someone who could develop a better battery. The Dems would prefer to issue a grant to someone to do just that. Of course, the grant would be more like $300 billion, not million.

Idiots
Before you start riots in front of the Capitol demanding that we drill in everyone's backyard, read the facts: the oil companies have millions of acres in oil leases. They have been sitting on them for all these years. Go complain to the oil companies and ask them to drill in the leases they already have.

Reality Will Intrude
Before you all run out with a post hole digger to find oil in your back yard, perhaps you want to consider the reality of the situation.

George Bush has the power to lift a wide range of drilling prohibitions all by himself. He has not done so, and I think we deserve to know why.

Oil companies have license to drill in a great number of places right now, and they are not doing so. WIll giving them, more space in which to not drill help anything?

There is no oil shortage. There is plenty of oil right now. Current prices are not based on the current supply/demand equation. They are largely based on speculation as to what that equation will be like years in the future.

Oil prices are also influenced by the weak dollar and by Middle East instability.

The vast reserves of oil mentioned inthis article, enough to offset "30 years of imports from Saudi Arabia", will NOT BELONG TO THE US! Those oil reserves will be tapped and piped into the world oil pool, where we will have to bid for them. ANWR oil will be as likely to go to China as to Chicago.

Cheap oil now will spur demand and we will face exactly this same situation in a few years.

There is only one formula that will affect our energy situation. We have to invent, explore and conserve. That is why McCain's 300 million dollar prize for the next generation battery is a great idea! Likewise his call for more nuclear power is a great idea.

There are two really bad attitudes in play. One is the idea that conservation doesn't matter and the other is that finding new sources of energy don't matter. Democrats in COngress have been reluctant to give up their sense that exploration doesn't matter. Republicans have been reluctant to give up their belief that conservation doesn't matter.

Both are wrong.

To win this energy crisis...
we have to look at how we use oil. Big trucks, tractors, construction equipment and planes need diesel and JP. They need the energy density of petroleum to work. Lite duty cars and trucks do not need to use petroleum. Plug-in Electric Hybrid Vehicles (PEHV) would be great for most people.

If PEHVs were used it would make a big difference quickly. If a 20 mpg car is replaced with a 30 mpg PEHV and they drive 15,000 miles per year we would need about 13 million less barrels of oil each year. At $120 per barrel that amounts to $1.5 billion per year.

We import about a million barrels a day from Saudi Arabia. If 30 million PEHVs were on the road they would eliminate our need to import from Saudi Arabia. At $120 per barrel that would amount to 47 billion dollars a year. Keeping that 47 billion in the US would really boost our economy.

The energy crisis isn't just oil. It is about all energy and how we use it.

cigars all around!
Jack's 10:17 posting made some good points.

And I even agree with Goof's Mom's 12:39 that socialist authoritarians would just love to limit what America is all about...our endless highways, the right to drive what we want, limitless horizons, optimism.

Vito's 8:06 posting is also a great read.

Idiots
Before you spout out the Dems playbook about all those leases the oil companies have, lets learn some facts. Where are these leases: what companies actually have them.

One truth is anyone can purchase these leases. The Government sells them on the open market. Many are not owned by oil companies.

These lease are termed 'unproductive' until some oil extraction actually occurs. When a company does their testing and either finds no oil or the cost of retrieving it is greater than the supply available, the companies abandon any further activity. The status of the lease remains 'unproductive'. Unfortunately, whoever purchased this lease has to continue to pay for it. The government continues to make money even though the land is useless to oil companies.

Suggest you ignore the Dems talking papers and find out what the real picture is in regards to these leases.

MCCAIN/OBAMA DISCOURAGE OIL EXPLORATION
GOVERNMENT SOLUTION TO EVERYTHING

.....More regulation ...less freedom for citizens, more power to government ...

.....The Democrats solution to the present energy crisis is to regulate the Commodities market ...less free market more government control ...

.....Democrat talking points are that the oil companies are to blame because they don't want to drill so that prices will stay high ...if that is true then why not lift the restrictions on the Continental shelf and Anwar? ...if the oil companies don't want to drill then they won't go there ...

.....Why doesn't some so-called news anchor ask these questions? ...If the oil companies don't want to drill then why keep Anwar off limits? ....

.....Politicians wan't one thing only ...power! ...exactly what our Constitution and Bill of Rights is supposed to deny them ...but then, who pays attention to the Constitution anymore? .....COLOSSUS

What about the subsidies
The lack of media play.. even in this format.. China and India are subsidizing the importation of oil creating an unfair playing field.. their collective demand is higher because of the subsidies.. either put a "oil equalization" tax on the imports from these countries or pursue them in the World Trade format. So far this issue is off the radar.. WHY?

We ignored the wake-up calls...
We ignored the wake-up calls of 1973 & 1979. Maybe now, with oil at $140 a barrel and gas approaching $5 a gallon, we have finally awakened to the fact that we must become energy self-sufficient.

We need to set our priorities on not just the short-term but also on the long-term. Our economy and national security demand it. Doing the right thing will not be easy, but the most difficult task will be overcoming politics as usual. Doing the difficult things has always been a virtue of American ingenuity. However, outside of the Space Program and its by-products, American ingenuity has failed to keep pace with the world around us.

We need to start drilling now…not tomorrow! We have the technologies to do it safely and cleanly. We need to build more refineries and power plants. We need to invest in other technologies to use and produce clean sources of energy. The challenge and question is not; can we do it, but will we do it.

I hope for the sake of my children’s and grand-children’s future and the future of America; WE NOT ONLY CAN, BUT WE MUST DO IT.

We must demand that our Representatives in Congress come up with viable energy policies that address short and long term goals, making America energy self-sufficient.


Something isn't adding up
If the directives restricting offshore drilling were instituted by presidential order, then such orders should be able to be overridden by the same presidential authority. Is there something I am missing here?

Hey Jack
I agree with a lot of what you posted. However when you say there is no shortage, that depends on how and where you are standing. World output is close enough for speculators to be predicting that this time next year, demand will increase. Just how much, I have no Idea but I think the speculators do.
When you say oil will go to china, this may be true. However, this is as it has always been. All the worlds oil is put into the big tub and distrubted from their. If we have the refineing capacity it would be more profitable for the much of that oil to remain here.

Consider this: Iran is in the process of developing a nuclear bomb. Many in the middle east would not like to see this happen, most of all Israel. What happens to the Persian Gulf if Israel strkes at Iran?
Until we are able to pump and refine sufficient oil to supply our own needs, we are facing a severe National Security risk.
The free market will provide for your new battries whether the oil crises exist or not, assuming enough people are willing to buy a car that runs on battries. I believe they will. But what I don't believe in is social engineering by our government. They never seem to learn about "unintended conseqences" The Ethanol Boondoggle is a very good example.
One last thing and I'm done. This whole controversey started over Extreme Environmentalist yelling fire in a crowed theater. There is no evidence of Gloabal Warming or Climate change and the "false evidence" that was originally provided has been proven false. There are 31,000 + Scientist, 9,000 + of which are PhDs that will support what I just said.
Conclusion: Drill Here! - Drill Now! 10 years is Propaganda. Get rid of environmentalist.

Jack
When I said get rid of the environmentalist I forgot to include their attorneys. Also, I was referring to "Extreme Environmentalist".
ALSO
DanNV says:
Something isn't adding up
If the directives restricting offshore drilling were instituted by presidential order, then such orders should be able to be overridden by the same presidential authority. Is there something I am missing here?

I have wondered the same thing, I suspect that there would be many law suits which will tie up a presidential decree for years. Or Congress will pass legislation taking down whatever bush has put up. Who know for sure? Maybe he doesn't want to offend Arnold in Cally Fornia
Bush would have been a much better president had he learned to communicate with the American.

Sandrob
I agree with some of what you say. But certainly not all.

I fervently agree with your concern about the law of unintended consequences. Every policy decision should be backed up by a group of people specifically tasked with trying to estiamte those problems. (I think specifically of the decision to invade Iraq, where dissenting opinions were squashed)

But you are wrong about refining capacity. There isn't really an indication that we can't process enough fuel. Refineries are not running at peak capacity right now.

I agree that a Middle East eruption would create enormous risk. But the oil from the driling here and now would still go into the world supply. In short, there is no point in doing the drillign unless you add in some mechanism reserving that oil to the American market in case of worldwide fuel shortages.

Your contention that there is no evidence supporting Global Warming is absolutely absurd. There is a great deal of evidence. Just as there is evidence that there is no global warming or that it is not man-made.

And finally, but very importantly. your sig line is part of the problem, not part of the solution. Oil issues will never be resolved outside of environmental concerns. Getting rid of environmentalists is not an option and suggesting it only makes things worse. Likewise, the "drill here drill now" talking point is meaningless partisanship. This has to be resolved by innovation, exploration and conservation. Not realizing that merely pushes the day of reckoning off for a few more years.

Hey Jack
I agree that we disagree.
I dissagree with just about everything you said.
First please provide me with some facts without the platitudes.
Like, with regards to Iraq, Who got their opinions squashed and by whom? I remember a lot of MSM and congressional squeeling but no proof. Unless you want me to believe a proven liar (by his own testimoney)like Joe Wilson and his lying wife (Also proven to be a liar.

Like where are you getting your info about refineries not being at full capacities?
http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/17/news/economy/refineries/ind ex.htm
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6019739/
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/05/24/sports/prices.php
These are just a few MSM article describing the bottleneck and lack of refining capacity.

Like Gloabal Warming Exist? Where's the beef?
I provided your with 31,000 scientist:
http://www.petitionproject.org/
What do you have? A movie by another anti-american opportunitist who's electric bill would provide energy for 124 normal households.
I'll bet you still believe in Santa Claus.
2007 set record low temeratures all over the world and guess what? C02 was high!
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/dec/19/year-of-glo bal-cooling/
Getting rid of the Extreme Enviornmentalist will do things like put our country on the right track and prevent people in third world from starving because we think ethanol is the answer. People like Al Gore and James E. Hansen should be tried for crimes against humanity.
And last but not least, I live 45 miles from town and there are millions like me. If the battery is developed that will get me where I want to go then I will consider it. Otherwise Drill, Drill, Drill.

Hey Jack again
I got a little too serious with my last post so to make up for it I'll provide a little humor from George Carlin, rest his soul.

CARLIN: I'm tired of these self-righteous environmentalists, these white bourgeois liberals who think the only thing wrong with this country is there aren't enough bicycle paths, people trying to make the world safe for their Volvos. There is nothing wrong with the planet. Nothing wrong with the planet. The planet is fine. The people are (bleep) -- difference, difference. The planet is fine. Compared to the people, the planet is doing great. It's been here four and a half billion years. Did you ever think about the arithmetic? The planet has been here four and a half billion years. We've only been engaged in heavy industry for a little more than 200 years.
LOL

sandrob
Excellent points, especially the point about lack of suffcient refining capacity.
It seems that even the pundits and so many that harp on the need for more drilling aren't aware of that problem.
And BTW, you are probably aware of this, but for some others: there is overabundant proof that, rather than cause warming, CO2 levels historically lag warming, sometimes by as much as 200 years.

sandrobber
Allow me to reiterate. I do not claim that you or anyone else will find the evidence for global warming convincing, I merely claim it exists. You, on the other hand, not only claim the evidence is not compelling, but that doesn't exist.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), some 2500 scientists actively engaged in climate research, agree it exists. Scientists at NASA, at the US Academy of Sciences, within the US government (Even G.W Bush now agrees climate change is happening), SCripps Howard, NOAA, and any number of other scientific organizations also agree it exists.

AS I said. The evidence exists. You decide what it all means.

We need global warming
The reason that so much of this planet has had drought for so many centuries is that we’ve been in an ice age, and the water needed for normal condensation has been frozen into glaciers. Glaciers are frozen water needed as condensation for barren and frozen lands of this planet, causing drought and flooding. When glaciers melt, some water runs into the oceans. Some water thaws the ground below where the glacier was, and soaks into the ground. Some water evaporates into the upper atmosphere where it becomes normal rainfall for the whole world.

The heat of the sun, and the absence of cold from glaciers and sea ice will cause more water to be evaporated from the oceans, lakes, and rivers into the upper atmosphere than there presently is; and the winds will blow it evenly around the world, providing normal rainfall world-wide, even where there presently is drought, and barren and frozen land, preventing flooding.

The worldwide rainfall will cause long-dormant seeds in barren lands to sprout and grow into new plants: The best way to go green. The new plants will inhale carbon dioxide and exhale oxygen, which we breathe. There will be so many new plants, that we might have to increase the amount of carbon dioxide we generate, to provide enough for all of them

A glacier in Greenland is melting, returning the land to the way it was a millennium ago. Larger crop yields are already the result, and the codfish have returned. Put the UN there.

Snow fell before leaves, and a month before winter started. Parts of the country and the world have record low temperatures and record amounts of snow and ice. We’re entering another ice age. How soon will Greenland be frozen again and the codfish gone? We need global warming as soon as possible.

The "evil" speculators
Start allowing us to drill, and the speculators will immediately bid future prices down in anticipation of the lower current prices that will follow as soon as the drilling starts to increase supply. http://www.poorgrandchildren.com

Point of Order
Few of the advocates of big government are socialists because few are proposing that government actually confiscate the oil companies. We are faced with fascism which has no problem with the illusion of private ownership of businesses and other property so long as government retains invasive controls over all major policies and procedures.

The slogan of American fascists is, "There ought to be a law..." http://www.poorgrandchildren.com
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.