Rebecca Hagelin : Sen. Kennedy Snubs Ailes at Free Speech Awards

Friday, March 16, 2007

Rebecca Hagelin :: Townhall.com Columnist

Sen. Kennedy Snubs Ailes at Free Speech Awards

by Rebecca Hagelin

Rebecca Hagelin's Email | Rebecca Hagelin | Author Biography

Read Comments | Post Comments

Forward

Single Page

Vote on It:

Average Vote:

[+] Text [-]

Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?

Yes
No
Maybe/ Don't Know

<p>Anticipation was high. The black-tie crowd had just finished a wonderful meal and enjoyed several moving presentations. The evening’s keynote speaker and top honoree was approaching the podium. But before he could utter a word, Sen. Ted Kennedy rose from a table in the front of the room and exited. His silent, rude snub was plainly intended to send the honoree a message: Your work and values are invalid. I'm taking my toys and going home!

Who could this loathsome individual be? Roger Ailes. His crime? He runs the most popular and successful cable news channel, Fox News Channel. Fox daily beats the liberal-leaning cable news stations, and that's just too much for Kennedy, et al., to stand.

Fortunately, there are those in journalism who recognize Ailes' genius and service to this country and to free speech. The black-tie event I’m referring to was held March 8 by the Radio and Television News Directors Foundation, and the group was presenting Ailes its First Amendment Leadership Award. I’m sure that many of the foundation’s members are liberal and that they disagree, perhaps quite vehemently, with Ailes’ personal views. But they rightly recognize Ailes as a staunch defender of free speech, one dedicated to the right of journalists to pursue the truth. And for that, they saluted him.

If only all liberals were willing to take such a principled stand. Shortly after the dinner, the Nevada State Democratic Party decided to pull out of a presidential debate they had agreed to co-host in August with Fox News. Caving in to pressure from MoveOn.org and other thin-skinned radicals, party leaders there took exception to one of the jokes Ailes made in his acceptance speech. After poking some good-natured fun at France and Hillary Clinton, he said this:

“And it is true that Barack Obama is on the move. I don’t know if it’s true that President Bush called [Pakistan President Pervez] Musharraf and said, ‘Why can’t we catch this guy?’”

Nevada Democratic Chairman Tom Collins and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid signed a letter claiming these remarks unfairly compared Sen. Obama to the infamous terrorist leader and “went too far.” Never mind that they were plainly aimed at President Bush’s tendency to mangle names -- or, ironically, that Ailes probably included them to ensure that his barbs were more balanced. Their dislike of Fox and Ailes is so intense that it clouds their judgment.

That’s a shame, because Roger Ailes is someone that Americans of every political stripe can admire. First and foremost, he’s a hard-working individual whose drive and vision has led him to lead a highly successful news company. He’s been a leader in television for 40 years, having gone from winning Emmys for producing The Mike Douglas Show to presiding over Fox News, which regularly trounces its competitors in the cable-news field. He cares deeply about his employees, as demonstrated by his untiring efforts to free Fox’s Steve Centani and Olaf Wiig after they were kidnapped last August by four masked gunmen in Gaza City.

Moreover, Ailes is fiercely dedicated to the First Amendment -- and, as he made clear in his speech, to making sure that it’s interpreted correctly:

“It is important to remember that while the constitution guarantees freedom of the press, freedom depends on fairness in the press. Only people who understand different points of view can exercise an informed decision in the voting booth. Freedom of the press did not invent democracy. Democracy invented freedom of the press.

“Bias is not necessarily what you believe in, but it can be reporting a story and leaving out other people's valid beliefs. The First Amendment also guarantees freedom of speech, which is linked to another favorite word in today's world, 'diversity.' But diversity is not just skin color, economic status, geography and religion. It is also diversity of thought.

“The greatest danger to journalism is a newsroom or a profession where everyone thinks alike. Because then one wrong turn can cause an entire news division to implode. We must respect and encourage diversity of thought and speech in the newsroom.”

Perhaps that’s why Sen. Kennedy left early. He didn’t want to be reminded of a central contradiction in modern liberalism -- namely, that for all their loud talk of “diversity,” many liberals would prefer to see alternative views silenced. For them, “diversity” is a buzzword, a political slogan -- not something to be taken seriously. Yet, day after day, Ailes’ network presents -- brace yourself -- both sides of the political debate, implicitly exposing the left’s hypocrisy. And in the process, it racks up huge ratings.

“If any of your people are in trouble,” Ailes told the assembled journalists at the First Amendment awards, “Fox will be there.” Lucky for them. Lucky, in fact, for all of us.

Digg

Del.icio.us

Facebook

Newsvine

My Web

MySpace

Forward

Single Page

Vote on It:

Average Vote:

About The Author

Rebecca Hagelin is a public speaker on the family and culture and the author of the new best seller, 30 Ways in 30 Days to Save Your Family.

TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Rebecca Hagelin's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

Jackson tribute organizer in liquidation

Dutch rapper convicted of threatening lawmaker

ABC Newsman Charles Gibson's last day at work

Carrie Prejean, Sexting and a Lost Generation

Maria Shriver Misses the Point

Violence Against Women and Girls Explodes on Television

View in ascending order View in descending order

Dollar Bill Location: GA

Reply # 1
Date: Mar 17, 2007 - 12:24 AM EST

WHAT ELSE WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM HIM?

That Senator Ted Kennedy should shun a ceremony where conservative journalist receives a well-deserved award should not surprise us at all.

Senator Kennedy has the same motto as the rest of the left establishment.

"BE CORRECT! DO IT OUR WAY!"

If you don't fit that mold, then you don't deserve any award.

It is ironic that those who shout the loudest about tolerance are the most intolerant.

Woe to you scribes, pharisees, hypocrites.

Flag as Offensive

landofconfusion Location: MA

Reply # 2
Date: Mar 16, 2007 - 9:55 PM EST

Why Ted Gets Re-Elected in MA

I'm from Massachusetts, and I had this question on my mind for years, so I went and found the answer:

Why he gets re-elected -

It's more than one reason. First of all, no one good ever runs against him. It's considered a waste of money to do so. A lot of people here, even Democrats, complain about the guy, honestly. However, they think that there is no other choice, and they're correct, because as I said, no significant challenger takes a stand against the guy.

Secondly, the people I know who do vote for him, don't vote for him on ideological grounds, nor do they vote for him in hopes he will serve their personal desires. Even my buddies who have union jobs who vote for him, vote for him because he's old (which they think makes him smart or somethin), he has been here for a long time (for some reason, they think that means he must be good, so they mineaswell not even question his leadership, voting record, or beliefs), and because he's a standard in Massachusetts right now, like the Red Sox, the Big Dig, or playoff football. They think it just wouldn't be the same without him. I get the feeling they think life as we know it will end if he's not around anymore.

If I try to explain to these friends of mine that he killed a woman, is pro-(Insert Liberal Cause friend doesnt support), or acts rudely like he did at this award ceremony stuff, they think I'm feeding them right-wing false propaganda. They think I'm a lunatic. They don't even see for themselves, and even when the truth is before their eyes they instantly doubt it. They think he's infallible perhaps. If you don't want Kennedy around anymore, then you'd have to find a way to show the people of Massachusetts, who are quite Liberal but are a lot smarter and nicer than many of you think, who Kennedy really is without seeming like you're trying to indoctrinate them. The Boston Herald newspaper exposes Kennedy's insanity fairly often but it is a tabloid that also prints tabloid-like stories, such as fake female wrestling (accompanied by uh... nice pictures... of course :P ) or puts Anna Nicole Smith BS on the front page. The only other thing we have is the Globe, which is owned by The New York Times.

Flag as Offensive

(Read all 24 comments)

If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!

Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.

Salutation:

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Nickname:

Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.

Address 1:

Address 2:

City:

State:

Zip:

Phone:

Townhall Daily Alert

Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.

Townhall.com Spotlight

(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.

Join The Debate!

Today's Cartoons