Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, June 02, 2008
Phyllis Schlafly :: Townhall.com Columnist
Chinese Drugs Come With a Dose of Danger
by Phyllis Schlafly
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


"Chinese Counterfeits and American Failures," the title of a congressional hearing on April 29, laid bare a shocking problem: A counterfeit ingredient in a blood-thinner widely used in surgery, combined with the Food and Drug Administration's failure to inspect Chinese imports, appears to be responsible for at least 81 deaths in the United States.

The blood-thinner, heparin, which is made from pig intestines, had been safely used for about 70 years. What's different today is that most heparin is imported from China, a country that has no compunction about putting poisons in its products to make them cheaper for the world market.

The CEO of Baxter International, which supplies half the heparin used in the U.S., accused the Chinese of having engaged in a "deliberate scheme to adulterate" the medication by using a poisonous product (an altered form of chondroitin sulfate) that mimics the effects of heparin. U.S. patients suffered severe side effects such as abdominal pain, decreased blood pressure, burning sensations, chest pain, diarrhea, dizziness, loss of consciousness, vomiting and death.

The FDA didn't discover this deception because the FDA inspects China's drug makers every 13 years. Government auditors admit that the FDA conducted only 30 inspections of the more than 3,200 foreign drug companies during the last fiscal year, and plans to conduct only 50 this year.

The FDA did only 21 inspections annually of Chinese drug-making facilities in fiscal 2002 through 2007. The FDA is now trying to establish offices in three Chinese locations as a base for just eight U.S. inspectors, but China has yet to give its OK.

At the congressional hearing, the FDA officials refused to name the Chinese companies that sold the poisoned heparin. The officials argued that such information is somehow "commercial confidential."

Some congressmen at the hearing urged the FDA to inspect foreign companies every two or three years, but FDA Commissioner Andrew C. von Eschenbach said, "I don't believe that's the solution to the problem. It's much more complex."

Indeed it is. The FDA would need 500 more inspectors to inspect foreign companies with the same regularity as domestic companies. That would cost seven times the current budget. Heparin is made in thousands of small unregulated, unlicensed, unsupervised family home workshops where three to five people stir pig intestines in a concrete vat to transform them into a dry substance. It's impossible to trace the ingredients back to the slaughterhouses.

There is no paper trail to document the supply chain, there are no records, and documents, if any, are easy to fake. There is no tagging of the pigs, monitoring of the feed, or files on each animal's vaccinations.

Since mid-2006, China's pig herds have suffered serious outbreaks of a viral illness commonly known as blue-ear disease. Sick animals are supposed to be rejected by slaughterhouses, but enforcement is lax.

These home heparin workshops are not regulated by Chinese because they are designated as chemical makers, not drug producers or pharmaceuticals. Neither China nor the United States has any current procedure or future plan to make the ingredients consistent, clean or traceable.

The FDA calls the contamination "a worldwide problem" that has appeared in 11 countries. Recalls of heparin have also taken place in Germany, Denmark, France, Italy and Japan.

What's the surprise? It is already known that the Chinese intentionally poisoned other products they exported to the United States.

U.S. cats and dogs were sickened and killed by Chinese pet food that had been adulterated by melamine, a chemical used in plastic, which was added to wheat gluten to fake higher protein levels. The Chinese poisoned toothpaste and children's anti-fever medicines by using diethylene glycol instead of glycerin. These poisons are not only dangerous in themselves, but they can compromise the overall usefulness of certain critical drugs by giving rise to drug-resistant mutant bacteria.

Millions of Chinese-made toys had to be recalled because of lead paint used at unacceptable levels. Some 6,000 baby T-shirts were just recalled in Japan following detection of high levels of formaldehyde.

The World Health Organization estimates that 10 percent to 15 percent of the world's drug supply is counterfeit. Some products are completely fake; others have been tampered with, contaminated, diluted, repackaged or mislabeled in a way that misrepresents the contents, dosage, origin or expiration date.

At least 80 percent of active and non-active ingredients in U.S. drugs now come from overseas, the majority from China. Your next medicine might contain cement, gypsum, antifreeze, talcum powder, sawdust, industrial solvents or paint. As a devotee of free trade at all costs, the Bush administration apparently has no plan to ensure that imports of Chinese ingredients into the United States for prescription drugs, food, medical devices, and animal feed meet U.S. safety standards. When will Americans wake up to the high cost of "free" trade?

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Phyllis Schlafly is a national leader of the pro-family movement, a nationally syndicated columnist and author of Feminist Fantasies.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Phyllis Schlafly‘s column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

The Party is Above the Nation
Messrs. eastlake joe, deeteegt and 45caliber

In Communist China, there is a group of thugs, called "fifty cents gang" which refers to an army of a million internet bloggers who are paid 50 cents for each posting apologizing for the Chi-Coms.

Some of the tricks they use in the Western blogsphere(pay must be higher)are that the Chi-Coms are not communists any more, its economy is market-oriented nowadays.

The facts are
the Communist Party which owns the army(PLA) is not a political party in the normal sense,
the Party claims to be the creator of the nation, therefore higher than an emperor('son of heaven' in Chinese) and equal to god,
and the millionaire 'private' entrepreneurs in Red China are but communist cadres themselves(of course, without disclosure as usual).

With this understanding, we will never be confused by the evil one or its apologists about the 'issues' as seen or 'arguments' as presented.

Akagi
Your statement is still semantics. Dead for profit or dead by want is still dead and as such are murderers. Mass murderers at that!

It is
deeteegt:

"Paying more for American made pharmaceuticals is not "economically idiotic"..."

If the quality of the products are generally equal. It is idiotic to pay more for American steel when Japanese steel is as good (if not better) and cheaper.

Since the quality of the Chinese western medicines are perhaps inferior and you can't tell which ones are equal quality and which ones aren't, then paying more for American drugs make sense if your only choice is say American drugs, but it would be idiotic to buy American sourced drugs say when Canadian ones would be cheaper and of the same quality.

My post was in reponse to the poster who said "Buy American products whenever you can." That is an idiotic economic position to hold--and it does you no favors as I said to pay more for products that are equal to other non-American products. In the Chinese example, I would be willing to pay more due to the saftey issue just as I'd pay more for wild caught fish over Chinese farm raised fish--the product quality is not equal.

The rest of your post I agree.

Let the free market work this out...
Paying more for American made pharmaceuticals is not "economically idiotic"... it is a trade off. Is saving a penny a day worth the risks associated with Chinese products? At a penny a day probably not, but at some point, the tradeoff becomes attractive. The fault/failure in all these tainted product cases lies with the consumers. The consumers should have checked out where their heparin (or other product of choice) originated and then performed risk and cost-benefit anayses before deciding to use Chinese heparin. Market forces would then weed out the inferior products... wouldn't they?

Then you must not read much
"The only consumer fraud I've heard China crack down on recently was a manufacturer who claimed the condoms they were making were the type that "Mao Used"."

Chinese have been cracking down on IPR violations for years, the crackdowns just haven't have much impact on the IPR violations as millions depend on the fake products for their income.

And Joe, I am sure, she didn't care, but again, the intent is for profit, not in killing, as if some lao wai dies off in the US somewhere, I am sure she won't care--just as I am sure that gundealer in Georgia that sold tons of guns that ended up on the streets of NYC didn't really care so much that his guns were used in crime and din't really put much effort in keeping them out of the hands of criminals, just like that Chinese woman, he only cared about profits. Did he want them to be use din crime? Did she want Americans to die? No, they just didn't care--big difference between wanting to kill someone and not caring if they die.

Do I really care about the suffering in Sichuan? No--not as long as they have missiles pointed at Taiwan from Fujian. Did I want 80,000 people to die though? No, just don't care that they did. See the difference?


Akagi
While there is some truth to what you state, the one woman they interviewed stated outright she didn't care if someone died from their product. That in itself tells me of intent, semantics or not. I would rather pay more for U.S. medicines that are to FDA standards than take a chance on cheaper Chinese poison.

The Condoms Mao Used
The only consumer fraud I've heard China crack down on recently was a manufacturer who claimed the condoms they were making were the type that "Mao Used". The Chinese government was upset that they used Mao's name rather than the fact that the company only started making them about five years ago, long after Mao's death.

One more thing
"I still say the best thing for the U.S. to do is not deal in any drugs from China till they come up to our standards and make them understand that each violation will result in a one year suspension of drug trade rights."

Sure you could try that. But they'd just take you to the WTO for unfair trade practices and you'd lose because that is what it would be. Oh and it might also spark a trade war--the balance of trade is bad enough between China and the US as it is, you think HomeDepot is going to stop sourcing goods from China over something silly like drugs? Not likely.

But
Yes, Joe, but they aren't doing that to poison people on purpose, but to increase their profits. Same reason you see fake cigarettes as Marlboro, etc all over the world. So of course they sale fake drugs and fake everything else in China (and other places), but the intent is not to posion, but to increase profits.

And me--don't care where a product is made--as long as the quality and price aren't issues.

If a non-US product has as good or better quality at a similar or better price, I'll buy the non-US price, if the other way around, I'll buy the US product. I don't even look at where a product is made usually. You do yourself no favors by buying inferior American products simply because it is made in the US. In fact doing so is economically idiotic. Spending extra dollars on a product you don't have to spend is stupid and especially so if you are doing so only because of where it is made. Those extra dollars you lost could have been put to better use--investing or buying other products.

Does it really serve your interests to pay more for American sugar (way way more) than if you could buy West Indian sugar or pay more for American steel instead of Japanese steel?


Akagi
Not true on the Chinese Buisnessmen not trying to poison anyone. 60 minutes did an expose on this and on the fake drug subject. Some of the higher-ups in the business were exposed as selling fake drugs as the real thing. I still say the best thing for the U.S. to do is not deal in any drugs from China till they come up to our standards and make them understand that each violation will result in a one year suspension of drug trade rights.

Buy American when you can
Check out world net daily for book on buying AMERICAN...there are many options available....

Bush cronies don't care..BEWARE!
As a Bush voter.....(regrettably,) I see in every way how negligent and greedy these people are. As the border gets into a full scale war with Drug Cartels , Bush pulls the National Guard off the border. He also is fighting to have TRucks driven by non english speaking illegals in non safe trucks join the drunken illegals to make Americans Road Kill. None of this matters as long as he and his cronies, like commerce secretary Guiterrez make mucho money! Callous , greedy and beyond contempt Bush and congress make Scrooge look absolutely Generous!

A few things
First off, China can't really be seen as a communist state even though yes the ruling party is known as the Zhong Guo Gong Chan Dang which means the Chinese Communist Party, but since the 1978 reforms China has thrown off almost every aspect of what could be called communist. The issue here is actually 100% anti-communist--pure, unadulterated capitalist greed.

Corrupt business owners cut costs by adulteration to increase profit--this was exactly what corrupt American businessmen were doing in the late 1800s and early 1900s which lead to the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906.

China is not trying to posion anyone. And even Chinese businesses aren't trying to posion, they are trying to increase profits. The Chinese government is too lax and too many corrupt officials and corrupt business owners, but no coordinated campaign to posion. They want live consumers who will continue to buy their products. You think China likes this turn of events? They are trying to improve consumer protection, but it won't be an easy task nor will it be done quickly.

The problem is not with China, but with the US--that is who you need to blame. Why is the US importing products with no real inspection regime in place? Why don't companies that import these products have their own inspection regimes as Disney did over the lead issue?

Oh and as for boycotting Chinese products? Good luck. Been to HomeDepot, Lowes, Wal-Mart, Target, etc lately? You have to live a pretty frugal life to avoid buying from China and the products you do find will be much more expensive. Oh and while China's human rights record is nothing to be proud of, it is far from one of the worst offenders.

Oh and AkingU, even using the obsolete term "Third World," China would not qualify. China is a NIC, not unlike Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore and Hong Kong were in the 1970s--go see Shanghai sometime.




To Be Entirely Frank
With the evidence we now have in hand regarding the stuff that has been imported from China, we should simply cease doing any kind of business with them at all and either take our "business" elsewhere or force them to vastly improve their manufacturing practices. Lest we forget, we are dealing with both a socialist government and one with the worst human rights violations record on the planet. Personally, I do not think we ever should have started a trade relationship with them at all.

As usual...
... Schlafly identifies the wrong enemy. It is government *restriction* of trade that is the problem, and of course government bureaucracy. If we had a more free market approach to drugs, the consumer would have more choices, e.g., drugs imported from, say, Europe that have been used safely for years. Instead, our bureaucratic morass keeps things tied up and we're stuck with few choices and little competitive incentive for Chinese (or other) companies to upgrade the quality of their products.

Schlafly's "solution" is the same as that of Obama and Clinton: hand over even MORE bureaucratic power to the government to control trade, providing less of a free market rather than more.

How about empowering the individual rather than the government?

I would say
It's time to call for the firing and arresting of the FDA officials that refuse to name the companies that PRODUCE the tainted products. Not the one that outsources but PRODUCES them. What the he!! do we care if it hurts their business?!? I think the U.S. ought to ban all Chinese products till they clear up their act completely to our standards. Sure, it might make things a little more expensive but at least it wouldn't be Chinese poison.

Duncan Hunter warned us . . .
California Congressman Duncan Hunter warned us about China cheating on trade.

Not only does China cheat, they play to kill.

Of course, killing Americans is Red China's goal.

Whether they do so by mass weapons or by poisoned consumer products, they care not, just so Americans die.

Yep, that is your friend, Red China.

Duncan Hunter warned us. We shoulda voted for him for GOP Presidential Nominee. McCain has not spoken against Red China and its modern dirty deeds.

Of course, the Democrats never will speak against their commie fellow-travelers.

The problem is the "bottom line"
China needs to clean up corruption and lax quality controls, that's for sure. However, it is not the Chinese government that is sending contaminated toys or medicines in the US.

If you want to blame someone blame the American companies who source in China. Everyone who does business here knows about the quality issues. It is simply a matter of dealing with the trade-off between safety and costs. If American companies were more stringent in quality control issues those Chinese companies that want to stay in business would no doubt comply.

The modern Babylon

Phyllis,
You are right in saying:"(Communist) China, a country that has no compunction about putting poisons in its products to make them cheaper for the world market."

"Cheaper" is probably one of the ingredients of the wine of adultery.

The Bible has warned us that "she has become a home for demons...for all the nations have drunk the maddening wine of her adulteries." (Rev.18:2,3)


China Rejects FDA Warning on Toothpaste

Should we not have all consumables from China labeled use at your own risk?

NPR-China rejected a warning issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration urging consumers to avoid using Chinese toothpaste because it may contain a poisonous chemical used in antifreeze.

Calling the FDA warning “unscientific, irresponsible and contradictory,” China’s General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine said in a statement posted on its Web site late Saturday that low levels of the chemical have been deemed safe for consumption.

The FDA increased its scrutiny of toothpaste made in China because of reports that the products may contain diethylene glycol, a thickening agent used as a low-cost — but frequently deadly — substitute for glycerin, a sweetener commonly used in drugs.

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/china-rejects-fda- warning-on-toothpaste

Phyllis
Is there any chance, that congress will be investigating the companies; which used vaccines in the 50's and 60' that contained viruses,which are causing "CANCERS" today?You are old enough to remember that period.Where is your need to know?All those Cancer patients have a need to know!!!I guess we can't blame the Chinese for that.

How pathetic
We can't even wipe our noses any more without outsourcing the job to China and we whine and cry because they treat us with the contempt we deserve. Is there anything more pathetic than an American?

Chinese Poison
As I read this, I am wondering, 'how many U.S. citizens must die, or suffer needlessly, otherwise, before the legislative do-gooders start talking about barriers to trade?' I realize trade is the preview of the administrative branch, but a little ranting on the house and senate floor may build a fire under the adm. The federales have no obligation to be so 'concerned' about the sensitivities of the pirates in China. They do have an obligation to protect the health and welfare of U.S. citizens. The Chinese have demonstrated themselves utterly untrustworthy. Their threats to the health of U.S. citizens should be outlawed, and if the Pres. won't sign such a bill, he should be promptly impeached.

Another Jones
Here's the reason people are blaming the Bush administration:

"At the congressional hearing, the FDA officials refused to name the Chinese companies that sold the poisoned heparin. The officials argued that such information is somehow 'commercial confidential.'"

They're protecting the companies who are poisoning us.

I don't think companies like Baxter and Mattel should be let off easily, either. If they're going to enhance their bottom line by buying products or components of products overseas, they should be responsible for the safety (and efficacy, in the case of pharmaceuticals) of those products.


China
In China it is 1906. China today is not unlike the US in 1906 (when the Pure Food and Drug act was passed). They have poor quality control, not a very strong regime for consumer protection and due to greed and corruption, business owners are known to cut costs and often these cut costing measures involve dangerous adulterations and this was the case with the US as well.

China recognizes that this is a serious issue, but don't expect this problem to be solved overnight. While someplaces in China are very rich--like Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, most of China is still very poor--in some cases as poor as Haiti.

It will take time--decades--for China to build a top quality consumer protection regime and stamp out corruption by greedy business owners and the government officials that enable them, until then some Chinese products will be unsafe.

The US needs more inspectors to test Chinese (and other) imports and the US needs to assist China in building a high quality consumer protection regime. Short of that, you can simply stop buying Chinese products--try that sometime--that simply isn't an option at this point.


Wait Til FederalCare!
When the Dems take over and nationalize the drug companies we'll be able to make our own adulterated, poisonous drugs and not have to rely on uncertain foreign sources. Just wait until a government hovering on the edge of bankruptcy has to provide free drugs to everybody, you'll see some cost-cutting measures that will have you fleeing to the Chinese in terror of our own band of incompetent socialists.

The Problem is with China
This is an important article, I just don't understand the twisted logic that turns it around and blames the Bush administration and free trade.

Yes, the administration should act, so should congress; but, especially, the Chinese should act. China needs to do something fast to cleanup all of their manufacturing. It isn't good enough to simply go lop off somebody's head. They need to get serious about shutting down dangerous industries and providing legal enforcement on their side.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.