Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login | What's Hot
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, June 18, 2007
Phyllis Schlafly :: Townhall.com Columnist
It's Official: Americans Want English
by Phyllis Schlafly
Forward Print Share Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


Hardly anyone predicted that the Bush-Kennedy-Kyl-Reid steamroller could be stopped. But as the New York Times reported on page one, the "Grass Roots Roared, and an Immigration Plan Fell."

The American people are fed up with the six years of "silent amnesty" President Bush has given us by his refusal to enforce the laws against illegal entry into our country, against hiring illegal aliens, and against allowing visitors to overstay their visas. The American people demanded that Congress reject the 400-plus-page bill that would grant Z visas to make Bush's silent amnesty permanent.

The grass roots showed their power over the White House, Big Democratic Establishment, Big Republican Establishment, Big Business, Big Unions, Big Media, and Big Church combined. Let's consider just one (largely unreported) of the many terrible proposals hidden in the crevices of the unlamented Kennedy-Kyl immigration bill: a surreptitious attempt to convert us to a bilingual (or even multilingual) nation.

Section 702(b) would have forbidden the government to "diminish" any existing rights under U.S. "laws" that concern services or materials provided by the government "in any language other than English." This section was given extraordinary scope by Section 702, which defined the word "laws" to include "Presidential Executive Orders."

These deviously written sections would thus have exalted Clinton's Executive Order (EO) 13166 to the status of U.S. law. Clinton's order requires all recipients of federal funds to provide all information and services in any language requested by any recipient of federal funds (such as a private-practice physician who accepts a Medicare or Medicaid patient).

Ergo, all applicants for the new Z visa could apply in any language of their choice. Applicants would even be provided with tax-paid attorneys to demand their Z visas and challenge any rejection.

Clinton's EO 13166 should be repealed and English should be legislated as our official U.S. language. A new Zogby survey reports that 84 percent of Americans support this, one of the highest percentages of yes votes ever recorded in public opinion polls.

CNN's televised presidential debates highlighted the chasm between the two parties on this issue. When Wolf Blitzer asked all the Democratic candidates "to raise your hand ... if you believe English should be the official language of the United States," only former Sen. Mike Gravel held up his hand.

A few nights later at the Republican presidential debate, Blitzer asked any candidate to speak up "who doesn't believe English should be the official language of the United States." Only Sen. John McCain spoke, hedging his reply by talking about the sovereignty of American Indians in Arizona.

Blitzer followed up with the question "is there anyone else who stands with Sen. McCain specifically on that question?" No Republican candidate responded. A good example of the effect of NOT legislating English as our official language can be seen in the June 22 release of the U.S. Department of Agriculture about the school lunch program. I quote verbatim: Continued...
1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Forward Print Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Phyllis Schlafly is a national leader of the pro-family movement, a nationally syndicated columnist and author of Feminist Fantasies.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Phyllis Schlafly‘s column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

Join The Debate!

Post Your Comment
(93 comments so Far)
View in ascending order     View in descending order
Reply # 1
Date: Jun 20, 2007 - 1:51 AM EST
TO lilly re: to various
My question on your point number one, lilly:

Is it really necessary to translate menudo into English?

I have no trouble recognizing filet mignon, crepes suzette, gyros, tabouleh, or goulashe, do you?

That's among the neatest things about the English language: we incorporate and adopt thousands of foreign words into our vocabulary with ease and with no ill-effect to our understanding.

And on point number two: I suppose here you are arguing for Spanish-language advertising in print, TV, and radio. I would concede, for example, that if we had a million Chinamen here to build us another railroad, that it would be, not only the decent thing to do, but good business sense too, to advertise in Chinese (provided, of course, they all came from the same locality in China; if they came from Liaoning, Hunan, and Sichuan your advertising budget would have to be tripled -- not good for the bottom line).

The problem before us is a bit thornier, however. It's that land-bridge that, rather than promoting a cutting of the umbilical cord, serves instead to strengthen it. So much so, that MANY Latinos (and remember, I live here in so. AZ) are arrogant and proud of their Hispanic-ness. So proud, indeed, and so disdainful of white Americanos who took their land from them in the war with Mexico in 1848, that they think this land is theirs!

So they arrive, descend on us, or whatever, already with a sense of entitlement.

But I digress.

To many Latinos it is a matter of pride to keep their language, keep their first loyalties to Mexico, and for some, to promote a re-taking of the area they lost a century and-a-half ago. NOT GOOD.



Flag as Offensive

Reply # 2
Date: Jun 20, 2007 - 12:44 AM EST
Lilly
I apologize for believing you to be a typical but thinking liberal. I too, am an independent thinker, and no matter how much I generally agree with someones statement or position I will take exception to nonsense or mistaken facts.

I too, have spent some thirty years out of the country. Even as I write you, I am out of the U.S. I speak, read and write fluent Spanish with multiple accents.

So in a very real sense I quite understand you better than before. As I said previously, your logic is good. The problem is there are not only too many at this time, but their numbers will swell to twice or more what they presently are unless we stop it now.

I believe that the average American, whether his reasoning is good or not, recognizes that there is a very real threat with the actual immigration (migration), and that something different has to be done and now.
Flag as Offensive
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
 *
State:
 *
Zip:
 *
Phone:
       
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.