Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, February 05, 2007
Phyllis Schlafly :: Townhall.com Columnist
Parenting skills should trump mental health screening
by Phyllis Schlafly
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Mental health screening of all children is the goal of legislation introduced into many state legislatures this year. Typical of these controversial bills is the Missouri bill that would require every Missouri school district, in collaboration with "the office of comprehensive child mental health," to develop "a policy of incorporating social and emotional development into the district's educational program."

The Missouri bill requires schools to "address teaching and assessing social and emotional skills and protocols for responding to children with social, emotional or mental health problems." The bill also requires the Missouri State Board of Education to set "social and emotional development standards."

One marvels at the arrogance of government officials who think they can set children's social and emotional standards. Where on the chart would they place a child crying because he fell and skinned his knee?

Cortland County, N.Y., has already announced a plan to screen annually every fifth-grader and ninth-grader for mental health problems. The purpose, according to the county director of youth services, is "to raise awareness that mental health issues are in essence no different than other physical issues, such as heart disease." Apparently, you are not "aware" if you think otherwise.

The screening process, which takes 15 minutes, involves getting the kids to answer a series of yes-or-no questions, on either computer or paper. It is claimed that parental permission will be necessary, but all children of any age in foster care will automatically be screened.

Mental health screening is based on the assumption that 10 percent of children suffer from a mental disorder severe enough to cause impairment, and that 5 percent of children have emotional or behavior difficulties that interfere with learning, friendships and family life.

Cortland County plans to refer the 10 percent to the county mental health clinic or other providers for further evaluation, and it is well-known that referrals often result in orders for drug therapy. The clinic will be rewarded with $50 of taxpayers' money for every child sent to the clinic.

Parents are starting to wake up to this invasion of their authority over the care and upbringing of their own children. A bill that would prohibit school personnel from making mental health recommendations or requirements for children, including the use of psychotropic medications, just passed out of a committee of the Utah Legislature.

This bill would prohibit schools from requiring a student to take psychiatric medication in order to attend school and prohibit the state from removing a child from parental custody based on a parent's refusal to consent to the administration of psychotropic medication.

A bill introduced into the Connecticut General Assembly is more specific. It would require all parents who are requested by the school to have their child evaluated be first provided with a statement that the government does not recommend any particular checklist, assessment or evaluation for psychiatric or psychological disorders, plus a copy of the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (the federal law that requires prior written parental consent before schools can require students to submit to psychological or psychiatric testing or treatment).

In 2006, Alaska enacted a law forbidding schools from conducting psychiatric or behavioral health evaluations and from requiring that a child take a psychotropic drug as a condition for attending a public school. Also in 2006, Arizona passed a law requiring that schools obtain written parental consent before conducting any mental health screening on any pupil and must make the actual survey questions available for inspection by parents.

Someone should notify state legislators and school districts that are contemplating mental health screening requirements that the American Psychological Association recently urged that "in most cases" of childhood mental disorders, nondrug treatment should "be considered first." This should include techniques that focus on parenting skills as well as help from teachers.

Even the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, an organization whose members strongly favor drug treatment, just completed new guidelines recommending that children receive talk therapy before being given drugs for the common complaint of moderate depression.

Parents should take on the responsibility of being parents. They should beware of the psychotropic drugs that have unfortunate or even tragic side effects. Parents should help to pass pro-parent legislation before those who think the "village" should raise all children use mental health screening to label their child as nuts.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Phyllis Schlafly is a national leader of the pro-family movement, a nationally syndicated columnist and author of Feminist Fantasies.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Phyllis Schlafly‘s column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

IMHO
these bills arose because it's a lot easier for public school teachers to control students through drugs than say, anything involving effort on their part. In addition, once they're 'diagnosed', the responsibility for their lack of performance can be shifted away from the teachers and schools.

Who will conduct the screenings?
My Leftist mother was a Psychiatric Social Worker, who was pretty darn nutty herself. Looking back, I suspect that she was bi-polar or perhaps had a borderline personality disorder. Nevertheless, she was employed by the government to "help" people.

I remember the year when the powers on high caved into the political activists of the day and took homosexuality off the list of mental disorders.

I was suddenly forbidden to say any common sense observation about gays: I was not even permitted to say that I could tell a gay man from a straight man (here's a hint mom, the straight men check me out).

As time went by, the activist social engineers created a flip-flop in the things that were defined as mental disorders. Nutty people were considered healthy, and well-adjusted people were considered neurotic.

So my point is, who are the "experts" that are going to be hired to determine it your child is normal or not?

Sounds like the Soviet Union under Stalin, where they "reeducated" people, and those who resisted the Communist state were labeled mentally ill and tossed into an institution.

My suspicion is that most of those backing this are not only crazies in the most literal sense, but also rabid activists who want to use this as a tool to brainwash your children.

Parents
Can create children or - if unplanned, unwanted, or inconvenient - murder them via abortion. But increasingly, it's becoming difficult for parents to RAISE their children the way they see fit.

Both philosophocon and Mountain Rose are correct.

I work with social workers
Many of them believe that traditional parenting is unhealthy for children. They have a different definition of mental health than average people do. Thus, they mistrust any parent who is not being evaluated to make sure they are producing a certain kind of person. This screening is one way to assure that will happen.

I live in Alaska where we made that law saying there will be no screening for mental health. It was because we have a Republican-controlled legislature and a Republican governor that we were able to pass it. It also doesn't hurt that we have one of the most privacy-oriented state constitutions in the country (which has definite drawbacks -- pot, anybody?), but in this case, it's a good thing. The social workers I work with see that bill as a failure of government to properly protect children.

I would note that very few of these social workers have children of their own and those who have adult children are visiting their offspring in jail (I am NOT kidding!). Yet they still see themselves as the experts and the rest of us as abusive, stifling, repressive monsters. This is the world as social workers see it.

Schools
Why would this be the business of the school system anyway? They are in the business of education, not all the other stuff that they do instead nowadays. They cannot do what they are suppost to be doing, why would they do better at being at being shrinks? The schools are charged with education of the kids, at the point where the kids are. They aren't there to be changed so it is "easier" to teach them. It is just backwards the ways schools do things today.
Too many "educators" (I hate that term by the way) think they know better then the parents. Even when they are smarter then the parents, they still need to let the parents be in charge. They are the parents no matter what!

Strangely Suspicious
First off, Mountain Rose your line of: here's a hint mom, the straight men check me out

Cracked me up, thank you!

I just think back to when I was a kid. There was no such thing as ADD, we called them class clowns. We said the pledge of allegience each morning and there was no controversy saying "Under God" and I was in a primarily Jewish school. We made in arts and crafts Christmas Tress, Easter Eggs and had a blast. We sang Christmas carols, acted in plays about Thanksgiving. We also respected our teachers and our parents. I could go on and on, but I won't. I'm sure a lot of you can fill in your own blanks of how different things were back then.

Nowadays, our school systems have literally sucked the joy out of childhood and smeared it with a big campaign of Liberal Reality. No more holiday celebrations, let's learn about gay daddies and mommies instead. Let's not learn about Patriotism because it's a Christian Right Wing agenda to be war mongering haters. If that hasn't driven these kids to be more crazy and confused, let's test them and give them a pill for the rest of their life.....

My gosh, what will these kids be 30 years from now.

Considering the source.....
I just love getting parenting advice from a woman who has spent years of her career making sure her own son is denied legal rights.

This is like getting "Morality" lessons from "Dr." Laura, who abandoned her own Mother.

You GOPers' Family Values are enough to turn my stomach.

Scary, Scary People
"Why would this be the business of the school system anyway? They are in the business of education"

ummm..no they are not. They are in the business of indoctrination.

Public School Indoctrination
The same extreme Left "people" who feel they have the right to tell kindergarten children that it is okay to be gay (happened to my kids) are now gonna inspect them psychologically ? This woman actually asked my child if he thought he would grow up to be gay and how it was okay to do so. This same woman showed an explicit R rated movie to these five year olds ! No, she did not have permission and no, she was not fired ! If only prayer was allowed on school grounds, I would have Blessed her ! This "mental health screening" is absurd ! Parents, get your children out of the Public Indoctrination Schools as soon as you can, or risk losing them forever. Before you do, tell the School Board what your opinion is of this kind of crap.
Elisabeth, I will pray for you. God wants all to repent and be saved.

aurorawatcher - conservative government?
Gee, I'm thinking; "how soon can I move to Alaska?!"

Maybe I should wait for that Global Warming to kick in!

Something tells me I am going to wait for a very very very long time!!!

Mountain Rose
Whoever even entertained the thought that the school system has the "right" to test kids for mental problems should deal with their own, for starters. While they don't have a clue, they have proved how whacked out they themselves are.

Or, this is a deliberate plot with the goal of having children reared, essentially, by the government, as in: "It Takes a Village to Raise a Child".

And this from "Mother of the Year" Hillary. Simply laughable. Too bad she's duped so many stupid Americans. This "ideal" mother taught her daughter to stand by a man who has treated her like a piece of crap.

I will add that many children have home environments which are detrimental to their mental and physical well-being. How can this be rectified?


So what's new?
When I was in school in 1958 (Grade 5) I was sent to a Child Psychiatrist because I didn't want to grow up to be a nurse, teacher or Mommy (and was too smart, I was told, to be a secretary). Something was seriously wrong with a girl who could read a book and describe every detail of the 'hot rods' the boys were building but did not remember any detail of the prom dresses the girls bought. That girl had to be 'modified' and 'brought to her senses' before she got into High School and Ruined Her Life with her stupid daydream of being an astronaut and that grease on her hands became permanent! And by the way, begged both the school and Mama, can't you make her love dollies and tea parties and stop playing with tools?

Being of sound mind and having inherited Daddy's stubborn attitude, I sat for an hour a week in that Child Psychiatrist's office in absolute silence. Eventually the experiment was given up and the school advised that I simply be forced into charm school and given only those gifts that "girls want" and eventually I would 'come around'.

The difference being that the school had convinced most parents that there was only one standard model of Girl, and any Girl who didn't fit in that box was mentally ill. Oh wait, that's not a difference, is it? It was just the people on the other side of the spectrum that were holding the axe back then!

Y'all don't have a problem with forcing people into boxes; you just have a problem with the current box. If there was a way to force us all into YOUR box, you'd be out there crusading for a law to require that and to send all the girls who didn't want what you want to re-education camps or anyway give them drugs to make them malleable and obedient as all girls should be, just like they wanted to do in the Fifties.

The only reason y'all are upset about this is that it's not your side in charge of deciding which box we all have to get in.

Typical
Those that disagree with the context of the article can only attack, attack, attack. Typical! Have a bad experience in school weighing on your shoulders for years...... attack, attack, attack. Typical!

Not that simple ...
For every one of you, there is a parent who has no interst in the responsibilities of parenting. (Okay, I have NO data to back that up.)

My wife is a gov't School elementary teacher. Every year it gets worse. A 6 year old whose every other word is some variant of the f-word. A 7 year old who imprints a perfect mold of the dental arch, upper and lower, on my wife's arm. She has had to take classes in restraint techniques which will be effective while protecting her from law-suits. We carry an umbrella liability policy.

Parents automatically believe the child's word over that of the teacher's, and my wife often has to defend herself against charges of being racially prejudiced, and is guilty until proven innocent.

Kids come to school unwashed and unfed. They SMELL! They're sick. They have no clue how to act.

YES the gov't schools are turning into indoctrination centers. YES they have less and less time and money to spend on education as they branch out into being social service super-markets. This evidently is what the people of the county want. The lure of state and federal money, the sense that what we REALLY need is computers and sports equipment, and the loss of any sense of public and private decency is showing up at the schools. The teachers are by no means without fault, but the schools in your community are the canary in the coal mine. They are where the rot shows first -- or maybe second, the jails, prisons, and sexual disease clinics may be first.

If we don't take back our schools, you can expect more of the same.

social and emotional milestones
I can see the points on both sides of this argument. I do not appreciate how the NEA's political agenda infiltrates, controls, and destroys good education. This is a prime example of taking a really good idea (bear with me here) and screwing it up until it fits that agenda.

I do not believe that school personnel (not even school psychologists) should be able to dictate a pharmacological approach to "improving" child behavior. I do not believe that most educators are aware of how their teaching techniques are adding to the problems the children are developing because of their home environments. That is not to say that all children are developing problems because of their home environments. There are many wonderful, engaged, and very motivated parents who happen to have children who have significant challenges stemming from physiological difficulties. On the flip side, there are many parents who fail their children, but the children manage to rise above it all. It's not a simplistically catagorical situation.

What is important here is to recognize that the social and emotional developmental milestones in childhood are just as important as are physical or academic milestones. Years of research done by Stanley Greenspan, MD (the nation's leading child psychiatrist) and his long-standing research partner, Serena Wieder, PhD, have uncovered what those milestones are. These milestones were tested by both the National Institute of Mental Health and the PsychCorp (publisher of many valuable psychological and academic/achievement tests), independently of each other, and were found valid. Therapy -- and pedagogy -- for children with behavioral problems, if founded on these principles, helps children develop as normally as possible. Those of you who are conservative would find no argument with the milestones. Neither would those of you who are liberal. That's because the milestones are based on principles of child development, not a politically-influenced mindset.

I encourage those who are interested in finding out what the milestones are, and the well-developed method of encouraging the greatest success in milestone development, to visit http://www.floortime.org and listen to the webcasts from Dr. Greenspan. If we could band together to insist that these milestones be the ones tested for in our children, we would help all children grow into as successful adults as possible, no matter what political views they take.

So, rather than take umbrage at the concept of testing social and emotional development, I believe we should work to insure that better testing methods (than questionaires) and better criteria (based on valid developmental concepts) be used. The means are available, if we can just get the NEA and the districts to listen.

Harmony: "It takes a village"
The purpose of this Stalinist plan is not really for improving the "mental health" of children, but to assist in brainwashing them.

I believe it is a "seek and destroy" mission to find out which children are being raised with traditional conservative values and "reeducating" them, so that they agree with the Leftist elite.

So this begs the question: "why don't they just teach their own children?"

Ah, but the Lefties are not having children!

What's an activist to do when they have no kiddies to indoctrinate?

Grab someone else's kids, wrest they away from their parents and indoctrinate them.

Because the Left was out of power for the last decade or so, they are behind schedule in the Leftification of the United States. Don't they realize what it looks like to normal people when they start shoving through so much Leftist legislation as fast as they can?

It is just as well, because the voters will kick them out all the faster.

Mountain Rose
Mountain Rose, check my blog. Liberals ARE having kids who are turning vicious!

(Newbies click on my handle to see the gouge on socialist liberals at work tearing down America!)

been through this
First off, I would second very strongly checking out Greenspan and Wieder's work. It is absolutely wonderful, the good that this floor time can do children!

Having two children with "special needs", I witnessed a lot in the public school system until we finally brought our children home.

And it simply amazes me, when I look back on things, that our eldest (now just 12) went to specialist after specialist and medication after medication with no real progress made until I started working with him myself and "tweaking" his diet. The final button was pressed when I read that the medications my son had been run through-- including depakote, adderall, risperdal, abilify-- had not been tested on children. Gee, now, how could they do that? That would be unethical, wouldn't it? So, my child was literally a guinea pig. Now that's ethical. NOT. The psychiatrists assured me there were no adverse effects from these. How did they know? How does ANYONE know-- how can ANYONE assure me these are "safe" to use on our children? How dare they tell me these are safe??

How dare they think teachers should be able to require children be on these? I applaud states like Alaska and Utah for their legislation against this.

I still cringe when I think of the unknown long-term effects these medications-- which he is no longer on-- may now be heading my son toward.

It was his second grade teacher, newly out of college, thinking she still knew everything, and her mis-treatment of my son-- and the head of the special ed department assuring me that hers would be the class my autistic son would be in the next year-- that made me certain I didn't want them in the public school any more.

Working with my children one on one where they're at, watching closely what they eat (eliminating high fructose corn syrup, refined sugars, artifical colors, using omega-3 fish oils, etc., etc.), and things like this that are helping my children unlike what I've seen them endure anywhere else.

My eldest has been med-free for almost a year now, and is doing better overall than he has in years.

Yes, there are good teachers out there. My autistic son had some wonderful teachers in his special preschool. But, given the issues addressed in this story as well as considering so many other issues-- indoctrinations-- now happening in the public schools, I'm glad my children are now where they are.

Mad Dawg..Still Smell After School's Out
When we were in school we were REQUIRED to shower after gym class. No longer the rule.

I am SHOCKED as a health insurance agent at the number of children on A.D.D. medication. I've made an observation which I assure you is absolutely TRUE. The overwhelming MAJORITY of those medicated are the children of liberals who CHOOSE to medicate rather than SPANK.

The rare conservative who goes the medication route is the parent who has been TURNED IN for spanking!

These children's medical records are 'branding them' for life with the over-prescribing going on. The medicating is a cop out for the lack of discipline. Bring back the class clown.
We are stifling originality and creativity.

It takes a family
Here is what we have to look forward to if we let the state take control of our children. This is taken from a Home School Legal Defense Association e-mail regarding the German treatment of home schoolers: "The situation for homeschoolers in Germany is getting worse each week. Just last Thursday, a 17-year-old homeschooled girl was forcibly
removed from her parent's custody by over 15 police officers. The
homeschooled girl has been placed in the child psychiatry unit of the
Nuremberg clinic.
Homeschooling is not legal in Germany. There are over 40 cases
currently in court or being appealed. Christian families are fleeing
Germany for safety in nearby countries. The unconscionable treatment
of sincere and faithful Christian homeschool families is a sad legacy
from Germany's past. Homeschooling was first banned under Adolf
Hitler, and that ban is still enforced today.
Many families who have had their children forcibly taken from their
home each day and taken to government school have since fled Germany,
but there are still some homeschoolers. The latest incident involves
17-year-old Melissa Busekros, the girl sent to the Nuremberg
psychiatry unit. What is being done to this sensitive girl--just to
set an example of enforcing the compulsory schooling at all costs--is
reprehensible and causing trauma to unassuming and lovable Melissa.
In the summer of 2005, when Melissa was 15, she was told she would
have to repeat the seventh grade at the government school because she
was failing math and Latin. She had good grades in the rest of her
classes, so her parents tutored her at home for those two subjects.
When the school officials found out they were angry and then expelled
Melissa, so the family began to homeschool full time.
However, the Youth Welfare office then took the family to court
because they were homeschooling. Then, on Tuesday, January 30, 2007,
social workers and police officers came to the Busekros home and
forcibly took Melissa to the child psychiatric unit where she was
questioned for four hours before she was returned home. Then two days
later, 15 police officers and social workers came to the Busekros home
and took Melissa away from her parents by force and placed her in the
child psychiatric unit.
According to Melissa's father, Hubert Busekros, this treatment was
justified by the psychiatrist's finding two days previously that
Melissa was supposedly developmentally delayed by one year and that
she suffered from school phobia." I ask all who care about freedom to share their concerns with the German Embassy and our legislators in the US. Parents should be allowed to direct the education of their children.


P.S.
Abovethesun- your stories from the HSLDA about Germany make me cringe as well. I lived in Germany while in college. I have taught German. I have a great affinity for Germany and still am in contact with several friends there. I also know of how there tends to be an air of authority-- "Don't doubt me, I know something you don't"-- and they tend to not like to admit mistakes or shortcomings. I had some friends there from Cameroon who endured racisim and hatred simply because of their skin color. And this was the early 1990s. It's pretty sad that is still going on there right now. . . . . .

But I neglected to include this to what I wrote before. I've now gotten my children in to a well-known homeopath who has I'm certain correctly determined that my eldest son's "probelsm" had nothing to do with a psychotropic illness. He had some pretty traumatic situations happen when he was very young-- wandering off at a crowded zoo (it was a nightmare on my part alone!) and doing the same at a crowded grocery store. He's been working through issues stemming from separation anxiety. She told us she'd seen this before, has given him a single dose of a certain remedy. And, along with the diet he's been on, our son is finally not having his rage attacks that have affected him so negatively for too long.

I'm sorry, but I think WE, his parents, know what is best for our child. This is altogether clear to me. No one knows our children like we do. No one has a vested interest in our children like we do. I got so tired of seeing the pens and stationery in the psychiatrists' offices labelled with pharmaceutical companies' names and names of drugs these produce. Where do their real interests lie? Not in the best interest of my children. Heavens. If they didn't "need" the meds they make, where would their profit go?

mental health issues
social services are already over whelmed with children that need help with mental health issues and have shown they do a terrible job with kids that parents already know who need help. They don't need to go out and find more kids, until they can do a better job with those already identified

This Is Compassionate Converatism
Many of these "firsts" in Public Education orginated in Texas when W was govenor.

So, public schools failed educating our students - now they wish to be mental health administrators. Of course, this does make perfect sense. The entire education industry has become more and more Stalinists as the decades go by. First ADD, now this.

Years ago, when I worked for a public schools/IT Dept, and I was repairing the nurses PC, I noticed a line of about 40 students (it was lunch time). The nurse told me it was "meds time". All of the students were boys picking up thier Ritalin. It was like a scene from One Who Flew Over The Kookoo's Nest.

The Student's had the last laugh though. It appears all of the boys that were perscribed Ritalin were selling thier pills during break. It was huge scandal. None of the boys actually had ADD, they just acted the symptoms.

The Target
I believe the intent is to wrest control away from parents who teach external moral authority, and it's "ego damaging" and consensus rejecting world view. The very idea that someone may actually grow up to think they are sinners in need of a savior is offensive to them.

Here is some excellent topical reading:

http://crossroad.to/text/articles/MentalHealth2-99.html

http://crossroad.to/Books/BraveNewSchools/Contents.html



on screenings and other posts
I'm not against public school screening of
children for ears, eyes, posture, etc.

But I do not get why one would have to
screen for "mental health"

Teachers should be able to recommend
whether a kids need screening. And the
parents should be notified and play a
part in the process. Much like how
teachers are mandatory reporters of
physical abuse or neglect (at least in
my state).

Like others on the list I believe kids
are often overmedicated and wrongly
stimulated - too much media not enough
human communication.

But:
- I know of no connection between
medication and spanking or Liberals
and medication.

- School psychologists can recommend,
not dictate, drugs; teachers (public and
private) are usually told never to do this
(liability!).

- What Ravitch doesn't like about the
NEA she likes about the AFT, see the
current issue of AFT's _American Educator_:
http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/issues/winter06-07/includes/ravitch.htm

- MAD DAWG seems to have it right.
My wife, a 1st grade teacher observes:
Too many kids are coming to school with few
boundaries. They think they can
1) do what they want, and
2) everything is open to debate, such as
rules and consequences.

- I'm not sure including more Christian
themes, like carols or (I guess) unquestioning
patriotism would improve schools or make
them more joyful. Perhaps a better testing
schedule would. Though I am not against testing. That said, I do take public school kids caroling
through one of the clubs I advise.
And in US history class I have kids look
critically at Victor Davis Hanson's "The
Civic Education America Needs":
http://www.city-journal.org/html/12_3_the_civic.html
Interestingly kids don't seem to find his
memories of school much different than their
own experiences!

- homosexuality is not a mental disorder, still
thinking it is maybe should be, but I'll leave
that to the parents to decide . . .

JP
You said: The overwhelming MAJORITY of those medicated are the children of liberals who CHOOSE to medicate rather than SPANK.

Bravo. My sister, the Leftist who is in fear and hates all Christians, had her son (my nephew) on meds, initially recommended by his teachers and not a health professional, by the time he was 7 years old.

I guess the teachers and the dcotors affliated with his school later examined him and decided a 7 year old boy who was active and liked to chew on his pencil and make fart jokes is unusual, therefore, he must be drugged.

My sister was all for it, although I begged her not to. See, my sister hated to discipline him. She thought it was best to "watch him grow and make his choices for himself...." Basically, that meant in her-speak 'Don't bother me, I'm on the cell phone with a potential boyfriend and being a mommy right now is a turn off...'

So today, my nephew, age 14, is still on these meds. He's now needing higher dosage, "they" tell him. Oh, he also has taken up smoking in the house, which also includes pot. My sister feels that's fine, as long as it's in the house and not on the street.

IMHO, if my nephew, who was born innocent, was disciplined by a normal dedicated parent that would've spanked on occasion (or at least grounded), perhaps he would not be a boy who smokes everything in his house and getting into trouble. Perhaps if my sister refused him taking medication and was there for him, he'd be a happier kid on a good path. Instead, whatever ails my nephew, he believes he needs a pill to solve it...he lost all coping capabilities.

Elisabeth...
... have you bothered to learn about Dr. Laura's childhood and how her mother abused her?! Have you?! If more people WOULD listen to Dr. Laura, Mrs. Schlafly would have to write about an entirely different topic. It does NOT take a village to raise a child. It takes a male father and a female mother, committed to each other and their children.

Perhaps you yourself would benefit from a few sessions with Dr. Laura. She's on for three hours everyday, Monday through Friday. Check your local listings and tune in...

This is why I homeschooled my kids!
I have homeschooled for 17 years. I have 2 in college and 2 in high school. I read these reports and thank God every day that my kids weren't exposed to this kind of garbage. I pray that my kids will have the opportunity to homeschool my grandchildren someday and keep them away from this detrimental and dangers "It Takes A Village" mentality.

My 17 year old daughter was diagnosed with severe food allergies when she was 18 months old. Wheat was the main culprit and it made her hyperactive. She was also alllergic to a lot of other foods including nuts, chocolate, beef, and turkey. All she had to do was eat a piece of bread and she was like the Tasmanian Devil! When she reached school age, I had so many "well meaning" people tell me she was hyperactive, had ADD and needed to be on Ritalin. They rolled their eyes when I told them it was food allergies. She eventually outgrew all of these food allergies by the time she was 8 years old.

Her pediatric allergist did a 10 year study showing that 45-50% of kids on Ritalin these days are misdiagnosed and have severe food allergies. Most of these allergies are wheat and/or dairy. An inexpensive blood test to check the allergen count in the blood can easily diagnose food allergies.

But our "experts" diagnose kids with ADD and won't take the time to figure out what's really wrong with our kids. And now they want to do mental health screening?

God help us!

wrong wrong wrong
Having had a child "screened" and found to have ADD and having spent a small fortune to find he did not have ADD And have him labeled as a Problem when his only problem was he thought as an individual. I am glad I no longer have a child in the public school system, even though I have a daughter that teaches high scool English. My super grand children that are being home schooled are being taught to love God, their fellow man, all forms of learning and find ways to make this a better country. Not, I repeat, not tear down everything their father and grand father gave part of their lives fighting for. sorry to end the sentence with a preposition, but I am a product of the public school system.

Also How can you judge a childs mental health in 15 minutes???

Thanks...to many
Gunny G....Thanks for the great blog, it will keep me busy for far too long.

Conservative Child Therapist, Thanks for the link about developmental milestones.
Unfortunately, I don't think the schools are the place for this type of screening.

Kath...DITTO. I was a public school teacher and was taught in college that I knew so much more than those "parents"...UGH,such arrogance. Fortunately, I came to understand the errors of my ways as I saw what the teacher's union was foisting on parents who only wanted their children to LEARN. Also the litigiousness of parents whose children had been "diagnosed"...so much money spent and just one more child growing up to believe that he was truely the center of the universe. Blessedly, I was exposed to homeschooling before I was ever married and had children. Thankfully, my husband is on board, and our children are doing great. I can't imagine ever sending my kids into the sewers "for thier own good".

AudiR10...didn't I read the same post about another article today..."you had the hammer, blah, blah, blah...
Luckily, I love tools and woodworking, so my girls love their tools too, of course they also paint, sew, crochet, bake, dance ballet and many other things. I'm not planning to encourage my son to put on a pink tutu though!

homeschoolmom
All I'm attempting to point out is that the school house as indoctrination centre is not something that suddenly sprang to life out of nothing. From the two-room school houses on the prairies to the modern lockdown centres, the only thing that changes is who's got the ax and what they want to chop off to fit the student into the box. If any of you are old enough to have seen the "Mental Hygiene" movies they used to show in the schools in the Fifties, you know what I'm talking about. And God help you if you were not a Stepford Child and if you actually laughed during one of those movies. They were deadly serious in their earnest attempts to train us into happy little zombies; they just didn't use medication because they didn't have it. Add to that the fact that parents had much more respect for school teachers and administrators than they do today, and you were breeding the Sixties.

That way of indoctrination was wrong; so is the modern version. Teachers are there to teach the children to read, write, count, think critically and understand the history and culture of the world they live in. That's all. The fact that you don't fit in the box doesn't mean you're mentally ill -- and you don't need drugs. My grandson's mother had him on so many drugs that he had to go into rehab to be 'weaned' off them when the school psychiatrist finally, FINALLY convinced his mother that he was simply a very energetic little boy with a lower IQ than she had hoped he'd have, perfectly capable of caring for himself and learning a trade but without any of the Syndromes and Disorders she'd been told he had. What he needed was exercise. That was all. Just like what I needed was a set of wrenches, a football and a planetarium and not a psychiatrist.

Parents need help
PHILLIS SCHLAFLY WRITES: One marvels at the arrogance of government officials who think they can set children's social and emotional standards. Where on the chart would they place a child crying because he fell and skinned his knee?

Parents that allow their children to kill animals, parents that allow their children to bully, parents that allow their children to be intolerent of others' differences, parents that teach their children that men are superior to women, parents that molest their children, parents that physically and mentally abuse their spouse, must I go on as to why THE CHILDREN NEED HELP................

The above mentioned happens to children everyday in the so called "good family homes" and the children are suffering in SILENCE.

Don't dare tell me the old story "my parents beat the hell out of me and I'm alright", that's one of the reasons why this society is so violent. Parents need help in raising their children and our society is proof.

For the people that are not aware that children are suffering, please open your eyes.

CEO..etc..on & on..ya Moron...
What a boob..You live in an alternate universe.

The irony here is..You're probably pro-abortion too!

Mountain Rose
You are welcome to visit my wonderful state. You will find that the inhabitants of the state are pretty unconventional. We don't live stereotypical conservative lifestyles. However, we are political conservatives and our current governor, Sarah Palin, is a fiscal conservative. She's only been in office a month, but she's already impressing us by keeping her campaign promises.

horrible
This sounds horrible. Pretty soon they'll include tolerance of the liberal agenda as part of the "psychological evaluation".

But stop blaming teachers. Now they're giving them something else to do?

They have raised the standards in math and science. And everytime a standard is met, they just push it back to an earlier age. Alot of kids have learning disabilities but that doesn't mean there is something wrong with the kids psychologically. Despite everything that people have learned about kids, and learning and the brain, the govenment still only lets a max of 10% of the children be recognized as having a problem You can have 4 different levels of learning going on in a classroom plus 4 different languages, and the teacher is expected to have different lesson plans for everyone in the classroom. Plus you have the "leave no child behind" which effectively lowers the rate of learning in the classroom to the lowest denominator. And everyone is busy preparing for an objective test which is being prepared 3,000 miles away, and really is not geared for children. Even adults would have a hard time with the tests. Math tests no longer involve math, they involve convoluted essays about facts where the kids have to be able to read English to be able to show that they can do math. At some point they decided to take the burden off parents with sick children and "mainstreamed the children" into the classroom without increasing the budget of the schools to handle it. That is where alot of the money goes, getting people who are credentialed teachers plus credentialed in special ed and special medical conditions that require the changing of diapers and the cleaning of air tubes and feeding tubes. You can have regular kids, and bright kids and mentally retarded kids and cerebral palsy kids and kids with autism and kids with emotional problems, and kids with hearing problems and kids with family problems and kids who were born with a brain problem due to the parent having taken drugs or alcohol while pregnant, and the teacher is responsible for all of them simultaneously. Then they cut teachers' aides, and art teachers, and music teachers, and gym teachers and people responsible for the kids at recess and lunch so the teacher can't even run off to pee. And when you miraculously have a teacher who can handle this, you get perfectionist parents who are critics. Also the schools are providing breakfast and recess snack and lunch, and the teacher is supposed to provide food, and only healthy protein food(but not peanut butter) for the children, because the parents can't be expected to feed their children.
In some districts the teacher is responsible for buying all the supplies for the classrooms because the children should have "equal" supplies. And all those books and rugs and furniture are all supplied by the teacher.
And they've even taken away the right of a teacher to deduct those expenses. Plus there is mandatory continuing education which is not enjoyable courses but courses at the universities with homework.















and
and I forgot to mention that the "leave no child bhind" is a cookie cutter approach to learning as if everyone reaches a level of understanding and skill at the same moment and as if boys and girls have the same rate of development...

Answering Rich Boomker
You ask why a child's mental health is any of the school's business. It is their business because they are charged with teaching children, and when a child is sufficiently depressed or anxious or psychotic or terrified, he is unable to learn. 1) All families were not designed in Disneyland; all parents are not competent. Some are delusional. Some are having sexual relations with their children. Some get drunk every day---the child comes home from school to find Mom drunk, or hides in fear when Dad comes home drunk, again. (BTW all of these examples are taken from a nice, expensive, upper-middle-class suburb composed chiefly of white professionals.) All children are vulnerable, but those living in horrible family situations are doubly vulnerable because they are dependent and helpless---they can't move out. And because of this, they will deny and lie and tell themselves their parents are really good parents and it is they, the children, who are bad. They will rearrange their own personalities, shaping themselves into weird convolutions, to try and fit into this crazy family so that they may have some kind of parenting. Such children often become so anxious or depressed that they can't function well in school. They need to be identified, though I question whether a 15-minute test is adequate to do this, and I don't believe that classroom teachers are competent to make a mental health diagnosis. But don't pretend to yourselves, folks, that all parents are good-enough parents. They aren't. And their children, who may be struggling alone with a real-life nightmare, deserve help. 2) I have addressed here situations where children are reacting to a bad mess at home. This doesn't take into account the times when a kid turns out, for example, to be schizophrenic or have some type of autism. And mental health epidemiology shows that the LAST to recognize a family member's mental illness are: the family members. 3) People posting to this thread have been quick to assume that medication will always be prescribed for a child identified as at emotional risk. Obviously, this is not true, and parents still have the say-so.

Alas...
On indoctrination: Public schools only serve the interests of those in power, as power continusously shapes and reshapes a society in its own image. I recommend Louis Althusser's work to anyone unsure of how this phenomenon operates. (You can probably find an adequate and readable summary online. Worry not!)

Sececondly, I see in these responses a pathological and wrathful suppresion of basic human compassion--an impulse away from it. This is not to imply that the respondents should develop deeper rivers of compassion in their hearts, but simply to point out that they set the conditions for their own folly. They are so preoccupied with hating what they are convinced is a "liberal agenda" and pre-consciously turning away from admittedly tired terms like "special needs" that they constitutionally cannot entertain even the possibility that 5-10% of school may have psychological illnesses. More unfortunate, I estimate, would be the steely cold manner in which they would turn their backs to the astonishing statistics of psychological illnesses and prison inmates. Imagine if these men and women had been helped and recuperated as children? Many of them could have contributed to society and their communities rather than prey on them.

In sum: Stop hating viewpoints; start evaluating solutions--in that order.

Respectfully yours,

Will Sucari
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.