Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, February 05, 2007
Phyllis Schlafly :: Townhall.com Columnist
Parenting skills should trump mental health screening
by Phyllis Schlafly
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


This bill would prohibit schools from requiring a student to take psychiatric medication in order to attend school and prohibit the state from removing a child from parental custody based on a parent's refusal to consent to the administration of psychotropic medication.

A bill introduced into the Connecticut General Assembly is more specific. It would require all parents who are requested by the school to have their child evaluated be first provided with a statement that the government does not recommend any particular checklist, assessment or evaluation for psychiatric or psychological disorders, plus a copy of the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (the federal law that requires prior written parental consent before schools can require students to submit to psychological or psychiatric testing or treatment).

In 2006, Alaska enacted a law forbidding schools from conducting psychiatric or behavioral health evaluations and from requiring that a child take a psychotropic drug as a condition for attending a public school. Also in 2006, Arizona passed a law requiring that schools obtain written parental consent before conducting any mental health screening on any pupil and must make the actual survey questions available for inspection by parents.

Someone should notify state legislators and school districts that are contemplating mental health screening requirements that the American Psychological Association recently urged that "in most cases" of childhood mental disorders, nondrug treatment should "be considered first." This should include techniques that focus on parenting skills as well as help from teachers.

Even the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, an organization whose members strongly favor drug treatment, just completed new guidelines recommending that children receive talk therapy before being given drugs for the common complaint of moderate depression.

Parents should take on the responsibility of being parents. They should beware of the psychotropic drugs that have unfortunate or even tragic side effects. Parents should help to pass pro-parent legislation before those who think the "village" should raise all children use mental health screening to label their child as nuts.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Phyllis Schlafly is a national leader of the pro-family movement, a nationally syndicated columnist and author of Feminist Fantasies.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Phyllis Schlafly‘s column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

Alas...
On indoctrination: Public schools only serve the interests of those in power, as power continusously shapes and reshapes a society in its own image. I recommend Louis Althusser's work to anyone unsure of how this phenomenon operates. (You can probably find an adequate and readable summary online. Worry not!)

Sececondly, I see in these responses a pathological and wrathful suppresion of basic human compassion--an impulse away from it. This is not to imply that the respondents should develop deeper rivers of compassion in their hearts, but simply to point out that they set the conditions for their own folly. They are so preoccupied with hating what they are convinced is a "liberal agenda" and pre-consciously turning away from admittedly tired terms like "special needs" that they constitutionally cannot entertain even the possibility that 5-10% of school may have psychological illnesses. More unfortunate, I estimate, would be the steely cold manner in which they would turn their backs to the astonishing statistics of psychological illnesses and prison inmates. Imagine if these men and women had been helped and recuperated as children? Many of them could have contributed to society and their communities rather than prey on them.

In sum: Stop hating viewpoints; start evaluating solutions--in that order.

Respectfully yours,

Will Sucari

Answering Rich Boomker
You ask why a child's mental health is any of the school's business. It is their business because they are charged with teaching children, and when a child is sufficiently depressed or anxious or psychotic or terrified, he is unable to learn. 1) All families were not designed in Disneyland; all parents are not competent. Some are delusional. Some are having sexual relations with their children. Some get drunk every day---the child comes home from school to find Mom drunk, or hides in fear when Dad comes home drunk, again. (BTW all of these examples are taken from a nice, expensive, upper-middle-class suburb composed chiefly of white professionals.) All children are vulnerable, but those living in horrible family situations are doubly vulnerable because they are dependent and helpless---they can't move out. And because of this, they will deny and lie and tell themselves their parents are really good parents and it is they, the children, who are bad. They will rearrange their own personalities, shaping themselves into weird convolutions, to try and fit into this crazy family so that they may have some kind of parenting. Such children often become so anxious or depressed that they can't function well in school. They need to be identified, though I question whether a 15-minute test is adequate to do this, and I don't believe that classroom teachers are competent to make a mental health diagnosis. But don't pretend to yourselves, folks, that all parents are good-enough parents. They aren't. And their children, who may be struggling alone with a real-life nightmare, deserve help. 2) I have addressed here situations where children are reacting to a bad mess at home. This doesn't take into account the times when a kid turns out, for example, to be schizophrenic or have some type of autism. And mental health epidemiology shows that the LAST to recognize a family member's mental illness are: the family members. 3) People posting to this thread have been quick to assume that medication will always be prescribed for a child identified as at emotional risk. Obviously, this is not true, and parents still have the say-so.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.