Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, December 18, 2006
Phyllis Schlafly :: Townhall.com Columnist
Tech industry has ulterior motive regarding H-1B visas
by Phyllis Schlafly
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


The technology industry has dispatched its fat-wallet lobbyists to demand that the new Congress vastly increase the number of foreign computer software techies and engineers who can be imported on H-1B visas. This demand is based on the claim that we suffer a labor shortage in those fields, but that's a bare-faced lie to erect a smoke screen around the real reasons.

Three reasons motivate the tech giants to use their political clout and political action committee contributions to increase H-1Bs:

1. Cost-cutting: H-1B visa holders are paid much less than Americans.

2. The influx of H-1B visa holders depresses the "prevailing wage" for all computer techies and engineers.

3. The hiring of H-1B visa holders prevents potential competition from Americans who might choose to work for other firms or start companies of their own.

H-1B visas are not for entrepreneurs or executives. They are for employees who are tied to the company that imports them, much like indentured servants, and are supposed to depart from the United States after a few years. A technology industry coalition called Compete America gathered at Stanford University in November for a TechNet Innovation Summit, but the goal wasn't innovation. This coalition, backed by Microsoft, Intel and other computer giants, has sent a letter to every member of Congress calling for more H-1B visas so businesses can import Indian, Pakistani and Chinese engineers to fill U.S. jobs.

H-1B visa holders cut industry costs but do nothing to improve innovation. Most innovators are Americans, and the successful immigrant entrepreneurs the industry brags about did not come here as guest workers on H-1B visas, but entered as children and were educated in U.S. universities.

Current law allows industry to import 85,000 workers with H-1B visas a year, but industry lobbyists seek to double or triple that number. They would really like the Cornyn-Shadegg SKIL Bill - known to engineers as the Kill Bill - which could import 1.5 million underpaid workers with H-1B visas by 2013.

The computer giants have thrown down the gauntlet: If Congress doesn't provide more H-1Bs visas, they will outsource jobs. "Outsourcing is the perfect argument for increasing the numbers" of H-1Bs, said a Compete America representative.

But if it's really better to outsource, there is no need for H-1Bs. Nobel economist Milton Friedman labeled H-1B visas a government "subsidy" to enable employers to get workers at a lower wage.

The United States has more than enough engineers. After the dot-com bust in 2000, California's Silicon Valley lost about 100,000 engineering jobs. Many of those who lost jobs remain unemployed, underemployed or have taken jobs in other industries. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Phyllis Schlafly is a national leader of the pro-family movement, a nationally syndicated columnist and author of Feminist Fantasies.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Phyllis Schlafly‘s column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

Displacement or feeding job creation?
Maximpibs - I believe that the executives, doctors, nurses, etc. fall under the H1C program.

I don't believe that anyone thinks that you should not have an opportunity to work. From an American perspective however, the "Right sizing" or "cost cutting" that companies make of their workers in America to make their profits fit for the Stock analysts (and their bonuses) cuts at the heart of our economy.

We have the situation of NOT allowing seasonal or short-term minimally skilled people entry while encouraging larger companies to import while laying off local citizens.

We have a Senator from Washington State who demanded that Boing be allowed a rebid for a contract which may have gone to Airbus - but is NOT outraged about Microsoft laying off thousands of her voters then importing their replacements.

How would an Indian working 12 hour days for Tata like to find out that their jobs were being transferred to foreign Chinese brought in only for that purpose? There would be riots (or at least demonstrations) throughout the country.

Some of the hardest working programmers that I have met are H1B personnel.

Displacement or feeding job creation?
Among misconceptions Re "slave labor", there's also the whole idea that all H1-B workers are high-tech. That is not true. There are young executives, teachers, nurses and doctors aplenty. And there are studies that say that far from displacing US workers, those H1-B and green card newcomers are feeding job creation in the US.
To be honest, I don't see a problem with increasing the processing costs for companies wishing to employ foreign workers. Still, it seems to me that math and sciences are almost ignored as middle- and high-school level, which I think explains low interest of Americans for those areas and makes an influx of foreigners a necessity. Furthermore... I have to say that current visa setup appears to be beyond repair, as Byzantine as the regulations are. If you increase the fee, you should guarantee timely processing. While the excuse that the background check takes time had been used often in the recent Immigration bill debate, few people familiar with the visa process believe it has anything to do with the delays in processing. For that matter, background check for people already in the US is a bit like checking of cattle for infectious disease after letting them roam your field. It needs to be done, but in a manner that made sense.
On the other hand, if you want to kill all the vestiges of the so-called indenture, indeed, the Congress should uncouple the workers and employers once the status is granted - that would also help with wage level enforcement, with workers less afraid to report violations.

Disclaimer: while not a techie, I plan to be a beneficiary of the H1-B program as it currently stands, and then jump through hoops to get a green card and eventually citizenship (probably in about ten years). I have entered US legally, and have no problems with "enforcement first" approach, even though I believe that 80% of INS (now ICE) staff on all levels needs to be fired for gross incompetence and dereliction of duty, and that the whole immigration setup is broken and needs to be fixed. I don't like the current laws, but I have obeyed them, and believe everyone else should.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.