Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Peter J. Wirs :: Townhall.com Columnist
Stop Griping Conservatives, This is It
by Peter J. Wirs
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Now, we the Trustees don’t want to sound like a broken record, but if you want the power you have to donate. And there’s a critical reason (beyond the obvious that money is the milk of all politics). All you have to do is look at the Obama campaign to understand why. Barak Obama is piling up support from super-delegates, particularly long-time Clinton allies, because he does not have his left hand out begging for money while extending his right hand soliciting support.

At the same time, by relying on grassroots Democrats to fund his campaign, Obama has truckloads of money to use for the fall campaign. McCain has conceded he must rely on public financing, at the risk he will be outspent by up 3 to 1 or more. Obama remains the media’s darling purporting to be free from pay-to-play politics, all the while Democrats are stockpiling campaign contributions.

Remember, 2008 is not merely about John McCain. There are 6,348 Republicans running for office. Republicans regaining control of governorships and state legislatures lost in 2006 is upmost concern in light of the fact that 2010 elections control redistricting for the next decade. Conceding a veto-proof Congress to the Democrats makes no sense in the long run, as incumbent reelection rates for Democrats are notably higher than for Republicans.

If you, the grassroots Republican want to regain control of your Republican Party, you have do it with votes, and with volunteering and cash. You can’t gripe and think that’s will cure all. If you want the Republican leaders to be responsive to you, then you have to control not only the vote, but the pocketbook.

James’ biblical reminder to be doers of the word, and not hearers only, is as valid in politics as in life generally. In other words, you can’t just talk the talk, you have to walk the walk. Otherwise, you’re merely deceiving yourself.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Peter J. Wirs is currently the Chairman & Co-Trustee of the Republican Leadership Trust as well as the incoming President of the National Conference of Public Officials. The views and opinions found in this article represent the author's views and opinions and not those of any institution or organization with which the author is affiliated.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
opposite week concluded
...

You keep writing things like "in order to punish, the government must conduct surveillance ...". Again - the government does NOT conduct surveillance on me as I raise my children, but if I kill one, they'll be able to "gather evidence, arrest, indict, and convict" me and anyone that helped me anyway. A properly crafted abortion law would be similar.

"as if voluntary abortion is undertaken through 'malevolence.'" - yeah, I consider intentionally killing your own children to be a great example of malevolence. (Obviously if mom's about to die and regrettably ends a pregnancy that would end when she dies anyway, that's a different story - but those abortions are a vanishingly small percent - and would be legal under "my law"). A child conceived from rape or incest is no less human than any other child, so I would not make an exception there.

"...agents of the government can and *WOULD* wire the pregnant woman for 24-hour-a-day monitoring." And then she can sue under the 4th Amendment and have that stupid policy overturned.

"Note that the privacy provisions of HIPAA protect your private health information from everyone *BUT* the government, which is arguably the one agency in society that no American citizen wants to have looking into his/her medical records."

- I completely agree.

Your entire position can be summed up as "anarchy - Which is preferable to a police state.". The whole concept of limited government for the last 400 years, best codified in our constitution, is how to find a happy medium between anarchy and tyranny. My position here is completely within that spirit.

And finally, "... Pregnancy Police statutes for which chris is calling." yeah - maybe in opposite world. Instead of making up positions for me, why don't you read what I wrote.

opposite week continued
... [man, pasting from notepad sure made a hash of my comments]

Child Abuse - I have major problems with the way various "child protective services" agencies usually operate - by presuming guilt, and many times attempting to perform warrantless searches. I would have the same problem with any "Pregnancy Police" agency.

I already said in earlier posts that parents are responsible for their children, not the government, so the government should not dictate what a women does to her body - even when pregnant - unless she has done it to kill her baby on purpose. It is NO business of the government if a woman choses to smoke or whatever while pregnant. And sex while pregnant is probably good for the mother...

"All of this [forcing potential mothers to live healthy], chris might argue, is obviously for the mother's own good" - must be some other guy named Chris. I've been very clear in previous posts about holding the OPPOSITE position to which you're attempting to ascribe to me.

If I wrote an anti-abortion law, it would be fairly easy for a woman to get away with it. But a HCP running an abortion mill would probably not get away with it for long - someone would eventually file a criminal complaint about something, and after getting a warrant, the police would investigate.

Like with "Child Protective Services", I'd even be interested in a provision that no anonymous tips be investigated, and that a false informant is liable for the various damages a criminal investigation causes. Sort of like "loser pays", but for criminal instead of civil cases.

...
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.