Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
Paul  Weyrich :: Townhall.com Columnist
Should He Stay or Should He Go?
by Paul Weyrich
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

Perhaps it is time to say something about U.S. Senator David Vitter (R-LA). It seems that not only was he a client of the so-called D.C. Madam but that he frequented a brothel in Louisiana. We are not certain of the latter because Senator Vitter has been unavailable since he admitted that he had committed a grave sin.

Senator Vitter is a brilliant fellow. In 2004, a good year for conservatives at the ballot box, Vitter won the Senate seat which had been held for three terms by Senator John B. Breaux (D-LA). Ironically, Vitter was first elected to the U.S. House of Representatives when longtime Congressman Robert L. (Bob) Livingston (R-LA) resigned instead of becoming Speaker of the House. Livingston had challenged former Speaker Newt Gingrich and claimed he had enough votes to win the position. When it was disclosed that Livingston had cheated on his wife of many years, he resigned. It seems that Vitter's unfaithfulness occurred before he became a senator.

Former Secretary of State Edwin W. Edwards currently is serving time in federal prison after having bragged that he was a crook. As I write this Commentary, Representative William J. Jefferson (D-LA) is facing multiple charges of corruption. He claims that he can answer all charges, including those concerning the $90,000 found in his freezer by federal agents. Jefferson is innocent until proven guilty. He was able to win re-election by a comfortable margin after the charges were made against him. There is no indication that Jefferson's problems are in any way related to Vitter's. I merely cite him to illustrate that Louisiana seems to elect public officials who have problems.

Back to Senator Vitter. HUSTLER magazine publisher Larry Flynt has claimed responsibility for Vitter's confession. Flynt enjoys pointing out the immorality of Republicans and has been doing so for years. A dear friend of mine told me that she can tolerate Vitter, as he is a weak man and who among us has not done something we regret. But this friend went on to say that she doesn't want to live in a world where Larry Flynt is judge and jury, considering what he has done with his life.

That is exactly how I feel about the situation. Vitter has a weakness. We are all sinners. Scripture says, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." Vitter claims that he has received God's forgiveness. We have a merciful God.

Vitter stated that has received his wife's forgiveness. I hope this statement is true because in an interview some years ago she declared herself closer to Lorena Bobbit than Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY). Hillary, of course, has stayed with her husband even though he has had many affairs. Ms. Bobbit cut off her husband's private parts while he was asleep because she could no longer tolerate his affairs.

What should become of Vitter? That is up to the voters of Louisiana and not us. If he has their support to stay in office, he has another three years until re-election.

He should be looked upon as a public official. It seems to me that we don't want to keep in high office those who have become a public spectacle. Yes, he is entitled to forgiveness. But no, he is not entitled to one of the most important posts in government. That is why I admire what Livingston did. He could have been the Speaker. If he had asked for forgiveness, he could have been the number one official in the House. But he preferred his honor to political power. He gave up one of the most powerful posts, the third in line for the Presidency, because of his immorality.

If there are other public officials on the D.C. Madam's list, let them be treated the same way. If I lived in Louisiana I could certainly tell my grandchildren that Vitter did something wrong but God has forgiven him. Afterwards, I would hope to say that he was ashamed of his actions and left office. That is what is missing from public life these days - shame. Years ago if something similar had been disclosed, one would step out of the limelight. Now, no matter what is done, politicians want to tough it out.

Vitter's future is unclear. Surely he is a man of conscience and probably regrets his actions. Let us pray for the man. If he chooses to stay in office, all that can be said is that he has lots of company. If Vitter decides to follow Livingston's example, so much the better. Livingston has paid for his shame. Whatever Vitter decides he at least can know that God loves him. With that in mind, this very bright, well-educated Senator has much more to contribute. I just hope it is not as a United States Senator.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Paul M. Weyrich is the late Chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Paul Weyrich's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

As a constituent of the Vitt
(I did not vote for him, BTW.)

First off, presuming that he did pay for a sexual session with a prostitute in DC, he did commit a crime. Soliciting a prostitute is a crime in the USA in all but a few counties in Nevada. Yes, obstructing justice like Clinton or Scooter is also, but the case at hand is the Vitt. There is some question as to him also doing so in the infamous brothel in New Orleans. Obviously, the prosecutors for both domains should investigate.

Now, if the Vitt had run as a candidate not focused on family values (like Guliani), then this would not be such a big deal. As others have said, especially in Louisiana, no one cares about private matters. But the Vitt made this a strong campaign issue, and hence it is case of hypocrisy, which is an indication of character. Edwin Edwards may have other character faults, but hypocrisy is not one of them. That means something to a lot of folks since hypocrisy is a proxy for dishonesty.

But the main problem is that the Vitt, like a lot of Republicans these days, ran as a divider. He got his 51% of the vote; unfortunately, many of them came from folks that supported mainly because of his family values platform. At least some of those folks are going to not vote for him because of that. And certainly, few folks who did not vote for him the first time will decide to support him the next time. (There is also the effect of the Katrina dispora and attitude adjustment, but I think that those will be a net negative for the Republicans.) The bottom line is that he will not be able to win in 2010 against a decent opponent (e.g., LA-3 Melancon.)

So now, it is just a question of whether the Vitt wants to run out the clock. I have a hunch that if the Republican wins the governor's race, we will see the Vitt step down at some point.

You gotta be kidding me...
I would love to hear the moonbats who think Vitter should resign over something that happened several years ago get just as incensed over the likes of Teddy Kennedy, Barney Franks, Joe Biden, etc, as they do this Vitter guy.

And consider the following; how many of you outside the state of Louisiana ever even heard of David Vitter before this DC madam thing came up? There are maybe a dozen or so senators who are well-known around the country. The vast majority are unknowns outside of the states who sent them, and sometimes even then.

Yet after all the ballyho about Larry Flynt's secret hooker's phone list, DAVID VITTER is the BEST they can come up with? Talk about a DUD of a story.

It's already slipped out (and promptly suppressed by the Dims and the media) that there was at least one well-know Demo on that list. Think you will ever hear his name? Not unless it's someone like Joe Leiberman, who is on the Commiecrat's permanent **** list.

And who says this Vitter guy is some big-time "family values" sort? Based on what? He's a freshman senator from Louisiana, for crying out loud, and quite literally has no reputation to be talked about, one way or the other, aside from the fact that he has a R after his name, which automatically makes him a target of the likes of...Larry Flynt?

This is an overly contrived flash in the pan, nothing more. He's committed no prosecutable crime of any sort (read this last carefully, moonbats). Weyrich is out of line saying he should step down as senator. That is between him and the voters of Louisiana, not Paul Weyrich, let alone...Larry Flynt?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.