Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, December 06, 2006
Paul  Weyrich :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Threat of Reimposition of the So-called
by Paul Weyrich
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


In 1982, under the leadership of Chairman Richard E. Wiley, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) repealed a major broadcasting restriction, the Fairness Doctrine. There were howls of protest from conservatives who did not understand the effect this action would have upon the broadcast industry.

Some even pleaded for the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine. That is because prior to 1982 conservatives had had so little access to the media they wanted to use government to force stations to give them a few minutes to reply to a controversial issue.

What they didn't understand was that the FCC action paved the way for Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mike Reagan, Mark Levin, Janet Parshall and the host of other syndicated radio shows. In addition there are some 1,100 local conservative talk-show hosts. At the time AM radio was going down the drain. Stations were sold for a song. Some even went off the air. Why? Because no one under age 30 had even heard of AM radio. FM was the rage. The FCC action saved AM radio. In the process, controversial issues could be discussed without the need for the Fairness Doctrine. Liberals have tried to imitate what conservatives have done with radio. First, they tried various programs. They all failed. Then with Air America they were going to try to put a network together. In case you haven't heard, it went belly up. Now they are trying again. Likely they will fail. Why? Because of the hopelessness of their message. A third of self-professed liberals listen to conservative talk radio. Why ? Because we offer hope.

I say we because the Free Congress Foundation has an hour show each Friday on Rightalk Radio ( http://www.rightalk.com ) at 1:00 PM EST.

Now that Democrats will have majorities in both Houses of Congress they want to attempt to re-instate the Fairness Doctrine, which would effectively shut down conservative talk radio. How do I know? Because liberals in Congress have said so.

Under the law regulatory agencies such as the FCC have a majority and minority status depending on which President is in power. The Free Congress Foundation has decided to make the preservation of talk radio a major effort. First, we want to be sure if President George W. Bush is able to nominate any potential FCC Commissioner that the nominee would oppose reinstitution of the Fairness Doctrine, whether he nominated a Democrat or a Republican. Next we want to secure commitments from Senators that they will filibuster any nominee put up by a subsequent Democratic occupant of the White House who seeks to re-impose the Fairness Doctrine or its equivalent. We want to press for legislation which would outlaw re-imposition of the Fairness Doctrine.

Some of you may support some type of re-regulation upon the ground that it would rid the airwaves of raunchy material. The FCC took care of that problem by enacting far greater fines than ever in history so all stations which carry filth can be penalized. Further, the FCC ruled that if a network carried the show every affiliate must be fined. The fine was 30 times higher than the previous fines.

That was the reason that Howard Stern took himself off AM radio and on to satellite, which at this time is not regulated. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Paul M. Weyrich is the late Chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Paul Weyrich's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

Content
Make no mistake the Fairness Doctrine is about the content of speech. Years ago I heard two liberal pundits discussing the value of this doctrine. Their idea was to have the feds determine when speech is liberal and when it is conservative. The idea is to then make certain that the liberals get equal time on the air. If this doctrine is ever invoked we will have problems.

Conservative hypocrites.
"Every time liberals can't get what they want though persuasion or the free market they legislate." In other words, exactly what conservatives do. In the end both sides turn to government to impose their will on others.

I never cared much for the Howard Stern show, so I exercised my personal power and did not watch or listen to it. My brother however, thought it was a hoot. Because I actually believe in freedom, I support his right to make that choice.

On the other hand, my brother did not allow his children to watch MTV. Although I did not care for much of what passed as entertainment on MTV, I did allow my to children to watch it.

My brother and I were raised in the same house by the same parents, we each had one girl and one boy child, The similarities of our acculturation far exceed the differences, yet we arrived at very different conclusions about what constituted entertainment and what was appropriate for our kids. How can liberals, or conservatives, presume to know which choices are best for the multitudes of Americans with different backgrounds? What unmitigated arrogance!

Our individual rights are curtailed when either side succeeds in limiting our choices. What part of "Congress shall make no law" don't you understand? It is reactionaries on both sides that keep this struggle going. Whether it is the "fairness doctrine" or the bureaucratic imposition of fines, we the people are the losers.

Liberals believe they must be extreme in their defense of their liberal positions because so many self-described conservatives are extreme in defense of their views. Those of us who desire to share freedom with others find little comfort in the rhetoric emanating from either side.

I'd like to see more "conservatives" get on board, and defend the meaning and intent of the U.S. Constitution, and the ideals contained in the Declaration of Independence, and stop using their delusional sense of moral superiority to impose their will on others. The only answer is to reduce the size and scope of government so as to render both sides equally incapable of imposing their peculiar views on the rest of us.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.