Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, July 27, 2008
Paul Jacob :: Townhall.com Columnist
Making the world safe for . . . politicians
by Paul Jacob
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Guetzloe has now appealed to the Florida Supreme Court. The justices should grab the case, strike down Florida’s anti-speech regulations and free Mr. Guetzloe from the government threat still hovering over his head.

On the constitutional matter, the U.S. Supreme Court seemed clear enough in McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (1995), the case of an Ohio woman fined for distributing anonymous fliers at a school board meeting, after a school official filed a complaint:

Under our Constitution, anonymous pamphleteering is not a pernicious, fraudulent practice, but an honorable tradition of advocacy and dissent. Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the Bill of Rights, and of the First Amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation — and their ideas from suppression — at the hand of an intolerant society.

Guetzloe is not popular. With some. That is, he has plenty of enemies.

Yet, arguably, he and his Ax the Tax organization are responsible for defeating $25 billion in tax increases through the years, including a recent local attempt to hike taxes $8.8 billion. That can make a man unpopular with powerful officials.

Though, doesn’t it sort of show he must be a lot more popular with voters?

Having battled in politics and public relations for the last 30 years, Guetzloe’s certainly no newcomer to controversy. He told me he has “a defective gene” inherited from an ancestor who fought in the Revolutionary War. Because of this gene, he says, “I’d rather grab a musket than have tea at 4:00 pm.”

But the issue isn’t whether we like Guetzloe or his message. The issue is whether he — and we — will possess the most basic freedom of speech. Or be silenced by threats.

The speech regulators no longer engage in mere civil harassment: now they apply the handcuffs and iron bars.

If we let the jail door slam shut on Doug Guetzloe, who will be next?

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Paul Jacob is President of Citizens in Charge. His daily Common Sense commentary appears on the Web, via e-mail, and on radio stations across America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
The Question is, "Was he Electioneering"
Based on the story as presented here, it seems to me the real question is not, "did he violate the Florida laws regarding electioneering," BUT, why was he prosecuted at all!!!!!!??????

If we are allowed to circulate our positions as part of free speech, & so long as he did not advocate for or against anyone in the election race, "what was his crime?"

All he did was inform the populace of the public record of an individual. He sought no vote for or against that person. He was paid nothing for his efforts. He was not a member of any campaign. In short, he expressed an opinion by informing folks about an issue that is a matter of public record.

Sorry, but my fight would be, where is the crime? You cannot stop me from speaking out and especially if I gain nothing by doing so. Plus, what is the crime that prohibits me from advising people about an individual, that is already a matter of public record?

It seems to me this man is a victim of malicious prosecution, perhaps by over zealous individuals, who may be paying favor to some elected official!

I say, this guy is the victim, not the criminal!

Participation
Another example of those in politics who want you to participate, so long as your actions support their positions.
If you do not support what they want, they have the ability & connections to make sure "the system" gets you!
The penalties imposed on this man, defy the rights of free speech, but are also draconian in that they impose excessively harsh financial penalties & excessively harsh incarceration penalties.
This man did not get enough posters out so more voters knew what kind of person they were electing to represent them. I believe had they known fully what kind of person he is, they would have voted him out of office.
The "pamphleteer" deserves to be lauded for his efforts to inform the voting public, not prosecuted for details of laws designed to limit or discourage voter participation.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.