Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, April 22, 2007
Paul Jacob :: Townhall.com Columnist
Atrocity, tragedy, spectacle
by Paul Jacob
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Here in Virginia it's a bright, sunny, spring Sunday — for most of us. But for those with loved ones killed or wounded at Virginia Tech, today is just one more day in a long, hard "aftermath."

Life certainly isn't fair. On most matters, this is a fact for which most of us should be thankful.

This tragedy touches us all. We can all imagine the pain of rearing a child to the point of adulthood and struggling so hard to place that child in a rewarding and very safe environment. And then for that child to be gunned down, murdered in cold blood . . .

But we're merely imagining. Most of us have no frame of reference to truly appreciate the unfathomable but very real and crushing loss faced by 32 — no, 33 — sets of parents, spouses, siblings. And close friends.

Death often sneaks up on us. As did this explosion of terror. I got the smallest taste of this when I mentioned to my wife that it sure is a good thing our oldest daughter's boyfriend had recently left Virginia Tech, having graduated. She told me his younger brother was still a student there. And there was that moment, before she said his brother was okay.

In fact, on that fateful morning the brother had still been asleep in his dormitory — where and when the first shooting took place.

That little detail reminded me how quickly life can change. In the bat of an eye we can go from lucky, if that's what you want to call it, to unlucky. Or vice versa.

It also reminded me of my own college days. I slept through a lot of things, too. Like the first semester of my freshman year. Unfortunately, the incredible sadness in Virginia this week turns my usual jesting into a feeble attempt at humor.

So what do we do — we, the bystanders?

Maybe it's what we don't do. The media was quick to jump on the response to the shooting by the university's administration and police. As if college officials are supposed to be clairvoyant.

In the first hours and day after the atrocity, Virginia Tech students spoke about healing, and they expressed again and again what a welcoming campus environment they had at Tech, but the media (with all the subtlety of a trained seal working a jackhammer) again and again solicited any possible anger the students might express toward the university for failing to maintain some kind of perfect security utopia. Mere hours after these university officials witnessed first-hand the human carnage, with many bodies still yet to be identified, was not the proper time to begin their trial by mass media.

This is not to say that the university response or that of the police shouldn't be reviewed. But any critique should be conducted calmly after they and the victims have had some time to absorb the horror inflicted upon them.

Sure, I know journalists want to pursue the next story. That's only natural. And the media will dither on about competitive pressures brought about by today's 24/7 news-cycle. But it really is possible for people in the media to exercise self-control, to have standards, make sound judgments and show respect in their coverage.

The folks dealing with this horrific event deserve no less.

Of course, while journalists do indeed have a moral and social (though not legal) responsibility to put the right stuff up on our television screens, there is a dual responsibility on our part — to turn the channel when they don't.

For instance, should the killer's video production have been splashed across the nation's television screens? It is news, but it can serve to perversely glorify the killer. It's a tough call for the networks; an easy one for anyone whose TV remote has an on/off button.

Others will rush to debate gun control. But guns were already prohibited on campus. Seems Cho Seung-Hui broke that rule, too.

Others will look for changes in policies regarding mental illness. But not every one suffering from mental illness shoots up a college campus. Neither do most people who write creepy stories and essays about bloodbaths. Our policies shouldn't assume they will.

Stephen Chapman said it best on Reason.com: "[T]he first error is taking a freakishly horrible event as a basis for anything except mourning."

The students and faculty that comprise the Hokie Nation, and their loved ones, will take time to heal. They will hug each other and talk. And they'll suffer and grieve and go on as best they can. That's the bittersweet reality of this world.

This healing has already begun. On the Virginia Tech campus, a memorial has popped up with 32 large rocks to symbolize the 32 victims. The rocks have been decorated with notes and flowers and personal memorabilia. One of the most moving acts of this past week was the fact that students added and decorated a 33rd stone. For Cho, the killer.

What a beautiful sign of the strength of love, goodness and humanity that is possible in our world. At week's end, I am greatly more impressed with Virginia Tech as an institution than I ever was before.

And as for the rest of us, we will hold our own kids a little tighter.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Paul Jacob is President of Citizens in Charge. His daily Common Sense commentary appears on the Web, via e-mail, and on radio stations across America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Virginia Tech Article
The author implies the administration should not be blamed as perfect security cannot be provided everywhere. The second half of that is true. But it was the administration which led the fight to prevent students and/or teachers from having the means to protect themselves against such madmen if they wished even if they passed the legal requirements to carry a concealed weapon on their person or in their car. It was also the administration that decided there was no need to warn anyone that there was a killer roaming the campus. The Virginia Tech administration has a lot to answer for. Bill D.

Perfect security
This is another liberal fallacy, plaguing us from cradle to grave. Perfect security, perfect safety is simply not possible.

33rd stone
One of the most moving acts.......I know he was someone's son, but to me he was a monster, and I hasten to say how I would decorate his stone

a little late!
I see how everyone is quick to do something special to remember the killer. This is the third article i have read about something being done FOR the killer. Why now? isnt it a little late.

i feel that these 'sympathizers'actions only serve to make them feel like they are so much better than the killer. they should have done something FOR him before he snapped and took 32 folks with him.


What if....

What if Fox News (and the MSM) had ONLY done the VT story when there were actually new FACTS to report. What if instead of a 72 hour marathon of the same pictures, the same 'thoughts', the same assinine remarks from on-air personalities, WHAT IF this story had been handled like NEWS?! Instead of a festival of hand wringing over why oh why is this happening?!!!.

It happened because NO ONE stopped an evil deranged killer until it was too late. Glorifying him (and his act) will only encourage another evil nut to 'best him' and the MSM will be right there to immortalize the next gunman and his act of evil. For hours, and hours, and hours, and days, and days, and days, and weeks....

to Vader- ya mean like shoot'im?

I just watched Fox News Sunday
in which the President of George Washington University was questioned about the two main tenants of prevention. The gun control aspect and the mental illness aspect. The answer with respect to gun control I thought was simply specious to the point of ridiculousness. He said given the rarity of the event there was no need to reevaluate either of the two aspects of their gun policies, neither the students nor the campus police are allowed to have guns on campus.

On the metal illness side of the coin he said that they had learned during the civil suit in which a student with mental problems had been dismissed and sued under ADA and GW university settled. I guess VT will now learn also what happens if you don't expel them.

What I thought was most compelling in the interview was that there was no COMMON SENSE applied by anyone in any of the answers. I guess that is what you get when you take a liberal college professor, make him an administrator, and then give him a dose of litigious society.

My advice to college administrators who read this is this. When you ban all guns on campus then you assume the responsibility for protecting the people because you have not permitted them to protect themselves. When you allow nutcases with serious signs of aberrant behavior to stay on campus, adherence to ADA is not going to help you (note this guy has tried to burn down the dorm once also.).

BTW, the Republican Lt. Gov of VA was there too. He might as well have stayed home as he contributed nothing to the discussion.

Talked to death
The difference between Star Trek and Star Trek: The Next Generation is that the people of TNG believed it was possible to talk their enemies to death. That is, until they met up with the Borg.

The difference between the ordinary woman in the street and the media is that we who live in real life understand that you can't talk the enemy to death.

There is nothing you can do for a mentally deranged person except lock him up and keep him locked up. You can't solve his problems by talking him to death. You've now met the Borg. Maybe y'all can get the hint.

P.S. If the students who were hassled by the press had declined to answer the stupid questions of the media, they would have gone away and shut up.

Tragedy to Spectacle
Good thinking, Paul.

The VA Tech tragedy was real, but it was the media which turned it into a spectacle---as usual. Consider NBC and what it did; CNN and its wall-to-wall coverage; Fox; MSNBC; and so on. The newspapers had a field day. But, it was a news event, and some coverage was necessary---for survivors, families, and the public. We all have a need or want to know more. I just don't like the excessive and repetitive coverage and self-serving attitudes from so many producers playing the ratings game. They seem more interested in that than in getting facts out to the public. [I'm sure Greta will feed off this event for at least the next year.]

As Paul Jacob says, the pressure comes from so many news channels on a 24/7 basis.

In any case, I offer my unqualified condolences to the survivors, families, and school students and staff. They shouldn't have had to deal with something like this.

Gun Control is always going to be brought up by left after such events because they don't understand the causes of these tragedies. Guns aren't the cause; People are. [Now, isn't that original? But it's true.] Liberals who hate guns [or at least permitting others to own them] and keep promoting control laws are one of the contributing causes. They're the ones who insist people are really good at heart, should be released from psychiatric care, and wouldn't hurt a fly.

A mentally ill person or maniac is difficult to guard against, and all the guns in the world won't stop someone who really wants to create havoc anywhere. But in some cases, it certainly is a safety net for an armed someone to stop the perpetrator of an atrocity in his tracks.

I have some difficulties with the generality of arming ourselves, though. I'm all for the second amendment and the right to bear arms, but I don't want to see high school students armed to the teeth. As a rule, they play with their cell phones, harass authority, and fight each other regularly for real or imagined slights. High-flying hormones are not good around guns. Staff and teachers, yes. Students, no. But, this may be mitigated with the current concept of denying permits to those under 21---though I think 18 is a better age. Eighteen year olds can vote, so why not have other privileges and responsibilities of citizenship?

College is different. I don't think all that many students are going to go out and buy a gun [especially with so many mush-headed Liberals floating around---though sensible people may opt out as well], but enough will purchase them and provide a safety net. I think those who do arm themselves are going to be bending over backwards to show how responsible they are. At least I hope so. Still, I have some reservations about the numbers of guns floating around the campuses.

As for the professors? There again, I'm not sure about who should and who should not. But I wouldn't be rushing to arm professors like Ward Churchill too soon. [Is this one way to legally fire him and his ilk?]

I know. I know. Such beliefs don't fully support the pure first and second amendments' concepts, but then I'm trying to think realistically. I'm not perfect either.

When we have a tragedy, the news media will do their level best to create a spectacle. We may have to get used to it, but we don't have to like it.

Paul Jacob wrote,
". . . it can serve to perversely glorify the killer." (regarding the media's broadcasting Cho's videos)


I hear that sentiment repeated frequently, but no one has explained how this is "glorification" of Cho. What exactly is "glorifying" about seeing the rantings of a psychotic killer?

Please, can someone out there explain to me, sans the emotional BS, why the media shouldn't show what a madman really looks like and what he says?

DavidMac
The playing of the killer's video, and the publication of his photos and writings, is exactly what he wanted. It has made him a celebrity, even though he's dead. He referenced Klebold and Harris. They also had a video that got some publicity. The next deranged arseloch might see this video and think that's the way for him to get noticed, even if it costs him his life.

continued....
It'll make for a better part of the history books and better for sites on the internet that will preserve him forever....kinda his own immortality.

Admin responsibility
Vic said all that needs to be said on the gun control debate when he said:

"When you ban all guns on campus then you assume the responsibility for protecting the people..."

This applies to all those intellectual retards screeming for more "gun control"; the majority of which consist of two groups.

First, the well meaning "protect me from cradle to grave" elite who have the means to hire protection, and,

Second, the politicians who pander to any and all groups who contribute to their reelection coffers. They also have armed protection; at our expense.

I will consider surrendering the means to defend myself when my "protector", either, institution or government can guarantee my safety and assume responsibility therefore. I said "consider" because if they fail I wouldn't be around to collect.

Good News Only Please
Conservatives sometimes complain that the media present too negative a picture of the Iraq war. They also complain enough about the New York Times that I assume they probably don't buy copies and read it. Therefore, I will now as a public service share an item from the front page of today's NYT: Putin's Kremlin, via its representatives on the Russian News Service, has made a rule that 50% of all news about Russia must now be "positive". News of "death, violence, or poverty [will not be considered] positive". Opposition leaders [within Russia] cannot be mentioned on the air. Also, "The United States is to be portrayed as an enemy." (Ref New York Times 4-22-07, heading is "50% Good News is the Bad News in Russian Radio")

Perhaps we could model on Russia and pass a law here that Bush's opponents (eg Reid, Pelosi) cannot be mentioned in the news at all. And we could censor out news that makes our progress in Iraq look, er, negative. Sunshine, sunshine, uber alles.

The Crawfish
Although I don't remember Cho expressing it exactly that way, you might be correct. You could infer from his Jesus references that he wanted immortality via historical documentation.

Regardless, we do not need to censure the writing of history any more than is already done. Sure, the winners write the history books, but that doesn't make them right.

When Mao conquered China (in the name of socialism), their history books reflected the glorious and victorious march of revolutionary communism. Our history books don't see it that way, though.

Cho's words were the words of a psychotic killer. Shouldn't HISTORY reflect those words just as it reflects the words of Jesus and Jefferson?

When we pick and chose what "history" to allow, we are on a seriously slippery slope.

To DavidMac
I believe the writings of this lunatic could have been preserved and promulagated without glorifying him in the manner that was done.

BOYCOTT NBC 4 RECKLESS DISREGARD!
One aspect in this tragedy is the NBC complicity resulting in the broadcast of the "exclusive" tapes. Below is the letter I’ve written to Steve Capus, President of NBC News.

I would urge those reading this to post it on to as many web sites as possible and forward it to others, urging them to do the same.
______________________________________________
Mr. Capus,
When I learned of your decision to broadcast the “Exclusive” video and accompanying rant mailed to your news office by the deranged individual responsible for VA Tech shootings, I refused to view it and all subsequent NBC coverage of this event. I realized your decision to broadcast the tape was self serving and only facilitated this person’s agenda by giving him the public platform he desired, while encouraging others to follow. In allowing him to achieve this ultimate agenda, you are culpable. Subsequent events confirm this. Within days following the event, others seeking similar notoriety have made threats to schools around the country. Why? It’s not just that they’re deranged. Should they act on their threats, they achieve international "recognition" and “fame” they crave, due to news media executives who are thoughtless and stupid enough to broadcast their videos and rants; thus providing additional inducement to carry out their plans. The forum you provide facilitates this. In the likely event of copy cat incidents, encouraged by airing this tape, you will share some of the responsibility. It’s also likely the families of future victims will sue both NBC and you personally, claiming your reckless indifference in airing the tape encouraged others to claim their moment of fame. Should this happen, I’ll be the first to urge such litigation on as many web sites as possible. Your shortsighted decision to broadcast the tape was based primarily on your quest for ratings. Your greed and indifference is despicable. Well, you got your ratings. And I suspect greed and indifference are integral parts of your character.

Normally, I write letters that are civil and polite, regardless of circumstances. My upper-middle class background encouraged this. My education and subsequent professional career reinforced this requirement for civility and politeness (in most cases). However, in yours I must make a rare exception. Your monumental stupidity causes me to tell it like it is. The truth is; you’re a reprehensible, self-centered, greedy little prick. You could care less about the likely result of your ill-conceived decision. The consequences should be evident to any intelligent person. But as President of one of the largest news broadcasting networks in the world, your complicity in the agenda of a deranged person, by airing his tape, is inexcusable. As President of NBC News, you’re charged with the responsibility for balancing the Public need to know with Public welfare. You have grossly lost sight of this responsibility and overstepped the bounds of balance.

This letter will be published on numerous blogs, with recommendations that NBC be boycotted. No American with any intelligence or sensitivity should watch your network. And the NBC Board of Directors should fire you for your reckless and callous disregard. And that, “sir”, is about as polite as I can be. Don’t like my tone? Too bad. You’re welcome to contact me and discuss it. But we both know you won’t. It’s unlikely the sycophant admin assistants you hire to read your mail will show you this letter. In your obsession with ratings and disregard for the consequences, you will disregard public opinion as well. But perhaps the opinion of the NBC Board of Directors and some of your major sponsors, who will receive copies of this letter, may get your attention.

BOYCOTT NBC 4 RECKLESS DISREGARD

Confused....
The Media is the self-appointed watchdog of all that happens. Or, they try to be such.
If they are going to ding the police, university, etc., they should have done it before the guy became so evil. Then the evil guy could have been removed from society.

Tone it down
Thanks to the notion that the lunatic fringe can be treated on an outpatient basis, there are a lot of deranged people essentially at large.

While the vast majority are harmless, I think we have to assume that there are others like Cho out there who are just as depraved and who insanely crave the notoriety of getting THEIR pictures plastered all over the world, too.

I don't think it's possible to overemphasize the danger of sensationalizing crimes like Cho's. I think that the information about these awful murders could have been conveyed in a much more muted fashion, and without giving Cho the attention he demanded. NBC's decision to air his garbage was made quite cynically for one reason: to boost ratings. It remains to be seen what the consequences of this type of coverage might be.

Single Causes Never Explain Tragedies
Everyone wants a single explanation for who or what to blame whenever anything tragic occurs.

The problem today is that we are experiencing multiple tragedies, in multiple locations, with different backgrounds of the perpetrators.

Finding a single explanation for one tragedy then lets everyone sit back and assume that nothing tragic can happen again, because the tipping point was reached and identified.

It's time to consider that multiple causes have been allowed to build, which affect multiple perpetrators in different ways.

As a result, usually only one cause is given at least temporary consideration, while the rest continue on, building to more tragedies.

Let's take time to take a good look at how many different ways society has taken a wrong turn and set about re-building an overall more stable, more respectful, less panacea-oriented society.

Let's stop accepting the need for anger management and work at the early self-control idea. Let's stop accepting the self-esteem idea and work at respect for self and others.

Let's stop saturating the entertainment offerings with violence and sick behavior and replacing most of it with talent and sane behavior.

Let's stop saturating education with push-the-envelope type of studies and concentrate on academic, not exhibitionist materials.

Let's stop rewarding youthful bad behavior with extra compassion and attention, and stop offering excuses for it.

There are lots of other common-sense ideas that might help to lessen the increasing numbers of violent and vicious crimes everywhere.

Maybe then society might stop nurturing so many varieties of deranged and vicious people. Maybe then, it could be easier to recognize those with potential danger to others.

Maybe then it might be easier to identify the particular causes which might have affected those individuals enough to set them on destructive paths.

When society has changed to the extent it has, there can be no single cause and no instant solution.






Journalism????
Not that long ago this type of media coverage would only have suitable for the rags you see at supermarket check outs alongside stories about space aliens and women giving birth to crocodiles.
This is NOT journalism, its sensationalism meant to sell papers and magazines. American's feed off of this c**p and believe it because "It was in the paper!"

Vic
How is showing the video "glorifying" Cho?

It's simply showing the evidence of his insanity. It's not as if the MSM pointed to Cho and told the children emulate him.

If we are to stop psychopaths before they start killing, we need to educate people as to the appearance and verbiage that a psychopath exhibits. We need to tell the kids that this guy was a killer and there are more out there.

To merely say that Cho was bad but never put a face to the evil is, IMO, dereliction of the duty we owe to educate kids. Instead, we tell them that EVERYONE is good and decent and has intrinsic worth. That's merely politically correct BS.

We are all flawed to some degree. The ones like Cho are rare indeed, but we do not need to pretend they don't exist.

The unknown is a lot scarier than what is known. It's the same as when the Homeland Security says, "Be alert", but never tells us what to look out for.

Just as the Jews need to remember Hitler and his bunch, we certainly can't forget that there are other Chos out there, waiting.


Just a Thought
Have you ever seen college kids on spring break, as shown on TV? Do you really want them to be armed?

To DavidMac
Mamadoc said it best, so I will not repeat what she said. I think that posting these wingnut's actual rambling manifestos is a reward for their behaviour.

To Lilly;

The kind of college kid who is responsible enough to go through the effort to get a concealed carry permit is not likely to be in that fraction of a percentage that you see on TV at the beach on spring break getting drunk and generally acting like sailors getting in port after 60 days at sea. In any case, since the students are at these places outside of anny parental/authority supervision how many shootings have you seen? No what you see is children who have been sheltered their entire life going out getting drunk for the first time and if their bud's haven't watched them they get in REAL trouble; like Aruba.

Lilly
lilly writes: Sunday, April, 22, 2007 9:01 PM
Just a Thought
Have you ever seen college kids on spring break, as shown on TV? Do you really want them to be armed?

Yes, I do. Give kids more responsibilities and they become more responsible.

Vic is right: Exposing kids to the realities of life with parental guidance works. Requiring discipline, responsibility, and accountability works. Kids who are exposed to firearms and trained in their use are, in fact, more responsible overall.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.