Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, March 11, 2007
Paul Jacob :: Townhall.com Columnist
What we know won't work
by Paul Jacob
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Adults have been educating children for thousands of years. Yet, in this 21st century, somehow, I feel a need to remind myself of this fact.

In modern times, education seems mysterious and illusive, leaving us with a schooling system that costs ever more while never quite making the grade.

That's why I was so intrigued by a column written by one Phil Power, former newspaperman, former University of Michigan regent and now president and founder of the moderate Center for Michigan. Power says: "Maybe we really do need to partly reinvent the wheel."

Boy, that's going a long way back. But there is, indeed, "a lot of worry and hand-wringing in Michigan" — and everywhere else, too, of course — "about the costs and quality of public schools."

Seems there is both "a growing taxpayer investment" and "a multi-hundred-million-dollar deficit in the school aid fund."

Strange. More money from taxpayers, but less to go around for education. And why is no one surprised?

But Mr. Power asks a different question: "What if all school employees became state employees?"

Power offers that he understands his question is "consciously radical." (Thank goodness he told us.) When I think about education, however, my mind goes to students and teachers and subjects like Algebra and British Lit and methods of instruction. It just never occurred to me that the level of government that cuts the checks to the folks working in the schools could be the make-it-or-break-it difference.

I guess that's why I'm not an educational expert.

Mr. Power proposes to negotiate just one big statewide contract for teachers and other school employees, as opposed to Michigan's present system where many contracts are negotiated at the local level in each of Michigan's 549 local school districts. He sees this reform as a golden opportunity to open the state's educational system to other much-needed reforms.

Let's call it the "Single-Employer" Plan.

One of Power's hopes is that shaking up the contracting between unions and school management will enable "a statewide pay scale that directly links teacher pay to educational outcomes."

If you want to improve performance, it does make good old-fashioned common sense to relate pay to performance. It seems there is something about pay that makes it a strong incentive to just about everyone.

But merit pay is consistently fought by the school employee unions. They are a powerful political force at both the local and state level. They know the way to the state capitol.

Power also envisions that moving this mighty tussle to the state level might help lead to a restoration of fiscal sanity on health insurance and pensions costs for school employees. Currently, those run $1,200 a year per pupil. And growing. The Citizens Research Council predicts these costs will escalate to gobble up 1 of every 3 educational dollars within a decade.

Or perhaps there will be more school consolidation? Power wisely wants to reduce duplicative administrative jobs and reminds us that now teachers in Michigan represent less than half the employees of the K-12 school systems.

These seem dandy. Never lose hope. Anything is possible. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Paul Jacob is President of Citizens in Charge. His daily Common Sense commentary appears on the Web, via e-mail, and on radio stations across America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Common Sense edit!
You wrote, "What happens when the candidate whom most people claim can’t win then wins an online poll?"

My edit would have read, "What happens when the candidate who most people claim can’t win then wins an online poll?" It is THIS way because the English language is meant always to be reversible. In this case you would say, "most people claim he/she/we/they can't win." Since this is a nominative usage, you use WHO.

replies to last 2 comments
I am advocating for an across the board pay raise for all qualified
teachers. If districts followed the recommendations listed on
pay raises and extending the school year they could change the
language for firing teachers.

I am not for or against getting rid of unions. That is an individual's
choice. If individuals choose to do so, so be it. FWIW, I am for the
Free Choice Act which would make joining a union as easy as joining
a political party. see here for one reason why:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0312/p17s01-cogn.html?page=1

I am for changing language for incompetence or underperformance
as reasons for firing as my initial post alluded to. But this will
be difficult to do without improving pay.

Testing of teachers is already prevalent to gain entry into the
profession. I am for this. Other teachers should have to
perform or lose their jobs.

You will find that the NEA and the AFT have wanted to regulate
the teaching profession as other professions already do theirs,
such as the American Bar, . But
do you think school committees could get behind this?

Right to work does not equal educational excellence.
The belief that teacher unions negatively influence student
outcomes is wrong based on the correlations between
these 2 maps one on Right to Work states the other on
attainment:

http://www.uschamber.com/icw/reportcard/default
http://www.nrtw.org/rtws.htm

Articles in defense of teachers unions, for your reading pleasure:
http://www.letsgetitright.org/blog/2007/03/a_shanker_classic.html
including one by Diane Ravitch here:
http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/issues/winter06-07/index.htm
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.