Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, October 10, 2008
Paul Greenberg :: Townhall.com Columnist
How to Judge a Political Debate
by Paul Greenberg
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


When is a debate not a debate? When it’s televised, media-umpired, poll-monitored, spun to death and endlessly second-guessed. Then it’s less a debate than a spectator sport.

The rules of formal debate, with its scorecard of categories to judge, don’t apply. This is a combination quiz show, beauty pageant and sparring match in which talking points are repeated as if they were actual thoughts.

The whole country looks on, waiting for the clouds of rhetoric to part and give us, as they inevitably and unfortunately say, A Defining Moment. It’s got to be there somewhere, we tell ourselves, like a needle in a cliche stack.

The winner is the debater who breaks through all the hokum long enough to give the proceedings a touch of reality. And puts a human face on politics.

Which is no small challenge. How best meet it? By recognizing that political debate is a branch of drama, of theater, of showbiz. As the great modern presidents — one thinks of Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan — well understood.

Having suffered through more hours of political debate than is good for either mind or body, or soul, I take the great liberty of offering five simple — maybe too simple — tips to any aspiring political debater:

1. Be happy to be there, be honored to be there. Think of it as an outing. Take control from the first. (“Nice to meet you. … Hey, can I call you Joe?”) The winner approaches a debate not as something to be endured but enjoyed. The loser looks at his watch and just wants it to be over.

2. Know thyself. (Yes, I know that’s not an original rule.) And be true to it. Be clear and direct. It’s the rote pretense and empty garble-and-gabble of politics that drives so many of us to tune out. Pauses help. They clear the mind of the speaker and focus the attention of the listeners. When your opponent tries to give you the runaround, don’t let him. Pin him down. For example, if you happen to find yourself up against somebody who voted to go to war but now says he wasn’t really for it, kindly ask for an explanation.

(“You’re one who says, as so many politicians do, I was for it before I was against it or vice-versa. Americans are craving that straight talk and just want to know, hey, if you voted for it, tell us why you voted for it — and it was a war resolution.”)

3. Be unrehearsed even if you have to rehearse it. If that sounds like Zen, it is. Speak plain. Don’t be afraid to say what you’re thinking. (“It’s so obvious that I’m a Washington outsider and I’m someone who’s just not used to the way you guys operate.”)

4. Don’t think you have to answer the question. Rise above it. The way a question is framed can put you in a defensive crouch. Don’t play that game. Direct your answers to the voters; they’re the ones you’re accountable to — not the moderator and certainly not your opponent. (“I may not answer the questions that either the moderator or you want to hear, but I’m going to talk straight to the American people….”)

5. Talk to the future, to the next generation. Your greater object isn’t to win the debate, or even the election. There will be other debates, other elections. A great debate is about winning the future. A great debater doesn’t argue facts; we have fact-checkers for that. A great debater argues great ideas. See Lincoln, A., and his debates across the Illinois prairie with the senator who was supposed to be the greatest orator in the country. Does anyone remember anything Stephen A. Douglas said on those occasions? Can anyone forget that a house divided against itself cannot stand? Mr. Lincoln, let it be noted, lost that election to the U.S. Senate; he won only the future.

One can judge a political debate in any number of ways. A hair-splitting rhetorician can walk away from a debate convinced he won every exchange when he’s actually lost the whole debate. Judging by these five rules, there’s no doubt in my mind who won the vice presidential debate. Nor about which which candidate the American people tuned in to hear, and which one caught and held our attention. You betcha.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Palin
She can talk great w/out a speach writer. I would to see her and obama debate. She would win....

paul
I challenge you to READ the transcripts from the debate. READ them, don't watch her. If you read the transcripts, you will see that she is just not very bright.

Paul
By the way....speech is spelled s-p-e-e-c-h.
Wow. No wonder you are a Palin supporter!!!!

Madison
Apparently, you possess an ability few do; that of being able to read what someone said and pass a vague and general judgment regarding their intelligence. Well...maybe it's not that rare. Many liberals seem able to do it. Of course in the typical Oracle of Delphi fashion favored by liberals (when they are not looking down their noses at the unwashed masses), you are long on the general and subjective and short on the specific and objective.

While I can't claim the kind of insight that comes with your obviously superior level of education and enlightenment, I can read what someone said and determine their relative grasp of objective truth, or at least their willingness to display it. Senator Biden either didn't know or chose to deliberately obfuscate, the unique role that the Vice President plays in both the legislative and executive branches of the government. For one who has claimed to be a constitutional scholar, this is strange. At no time in history has the US (with or without France) kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon. For someone who has been on the Senate FRC for 35 years, having twice been it's Chairman and having been the ranking member of his party on that committee for 11 years, one wonders if he has paid any attention at all during the meetings. Perhaps he was busy watching his special boxed set of DVD's of FDR's televised fireside chats.

Now, those are two specific errors (with a snarky little bonus from his fluffy Katie Couric interview thrown in gratis) made by Senator Biden that are objectively wrong. Make your own determination of his IQ.

Speaking subjectively, I think he has a 15 watt intellect harnessed to a 20 watt personality. He is affably and amusingly goofy. But that's just me. By the way...did anyone ever tell you that you're kind of snotty?

Madison


I watched the debate, read the transcripts, and still feel Palin won. Why? Because it's not very difficult to beat someone who plays with the truth. Biden has a likeability factor, but he wouldn't know the truth if it bit him on his arse. Palin isn't very intelligent? How did you arrive at that view? What was said that made you decide this? Some lame pundit telling you that's how you feel?

Debate, if we must call it that
Madison: Your arrogance is offensive.

Mr. Greenberg: Your insights are profound. The contemporary “debate” structure is designed as a dog-and-pony show for the benefit of the drive-by media. The wise politician is one who can sense that the game is rigged against her, and makes the decision to simply transcend it, going directly to the only scorekeepers who count.

The comparison to Lincoln is particularly apt. Douglas successfully navigated all the wonkish nuts and bolts of a single campaign. Lincoln had vision, based on a belief in the basic goodness of America. So does Gov. Palin.

Great Article!! KUDOS
I agree that you hit a home run on this great commentary. Too bad for the Democrats who have to deride you with all their stupid talking points. This nation will not be able to endure the stench of a President BO! Governor Palin is just what this country needs. I can hardly wait until 2012 when she will be running for President! Tell me, all you librocrats: how can you support BO who is supporting infanticide, taxing us into depression, and appeasing terrorism? What a scary nightmare BO is!!

This bears repeating, I think....
I originally wrote this in response to Hugh Hewitt's column, a few minutes ago. But, its just as applicable here.

Subject: What I would say in the next debate....
...If I were John McCain.

My friends, (I know...but he always says that!) I want to bring up a painful lesson I learned some 20 years ago. I had what I thought was a friend, in a man who turned out to be a criminal. A very smart one, but a criminal nevertheless. I was taken in by John Keating, as were some others. And while it was quickly determined by Democratic investigators, that I was innocent of any wrong-doing, just the fact that I had been taken in like that, was disturbing to me, and very sobering.

I resolved never to let myself be put into such a situation ever again. And it took me years of self-examination and pain to extract all the lessons of my experience.

Senator Obama has my sympathy. My pain is nothing compared to his. I only had to go through it one time, and believe me, that was enough. I never want to face such a thing ever again. Yet, he has had to go through it what? Six or seven times now? It seems that just about everyone he has ever befriended, or worked with, has turned out to be a criminal or demagogue.

Its bad enough to find out you were fooled by one bad egg. To find out that almost everyone you've ever surrounded yoruself with, has been taking advantage of your naivete' must be devastating. And yet, I'm sure that as with me, the passage of time, and these hard lessons, will make him a better man twenty years from now.

Enderdog
I hereby nominate you for speech writer in the McCain administration!


Madison strikes me
as being the human equivalent of a Chihuahua dog (with apologies to the dog) - just a rat with extra chromosomes.


RIGHT ON PAUL !
THE ORATOR FROM THE SOUTH SIDE AND THE USED CAR SALES-DUDE BIDEN,JUST DONT GET IT!OBAMA AS A CHILD YELS TO ALL THE STRAY DOGS AND CATS IM THE GREAT ORATOR,THEY JUST RAN AWAY.JOHN KERRY,SAW OBAMA YELING IN THE STREETS I CAN FIX ANYTHING,JOHN TOOK HIM TO REV WRONG,AND SAID TAKE CARE OF THIS KID HE IS A RADICAL LIBERAL WE WILL PUT HIM ON THE TICKET SOME DAY!MCCAIN PALIN WILL WIN !O WHAT A SHAME IS B.HUSSEIN!

madison S P E E C H=PAUL TELLS THE TRUTH
RIGHT ON PAUL A GOLD MEDAL ARTICLE!BY THE WAY MADISON,IF YOU SPELL EVERY WORD RIGHT AND VOTE FOR A RADICAL LIBERAL DEMO-RAT LIKE OBAMA YOU KINDA,LIKE,NEED TO GO HUG NANCY POLISI OR BARNY FRANK!

Madison,
a movie and a movie script are not the same thing. Likewise, a debate and a debate transcript are not the same thing. Surely you know this. Read the column again for comprehension. I redirect you to this line:

"A hair-splitting rhetorician can walk away from a debate convinced he won every exchange when he’s actually lost the whole debate."

Madison
By the way, an elipses has three dots, and one exclamation mark is sufficient.

Mr. Greenberg,
Well done! I wish Townhall had published this a few days earlier like Jewish World Review did. Ah, well, I'll be forwarding it to quite a few people anyway.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.