Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, March 10, 2008
Paul Greenberg :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Test of a Candidate
by Paul Greenberg
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


While the race for the Democratic presidential nomination could go on till the convention or just mutual exhaustion, the Republicans now have their candidate. Tuesday night, John McCain finally went from his party's expected to presumptive nominee.

On such occasions, the speeches of both victor and vanquished exert an irresistible fascination for fans of American rhetoric, an art form that has seen much better days. Like baseball, which can no longer be called the national pastime except as a courtesy, American eloquence continues its slow fade. But if the speeches of candidates at such pivotal moments no longer merit attention for what they say about the state of the Union, they remain deeply revealing when it comes to the character of the candidates. By their words we can still know them.

John McCain's victory speech had been scheduled for weeks. It was no longer a question of whether he would pass the magic number of delegates required for the nomination (1,191) but when. Tuesday night, he did. Sometimes it just takes a while for the inevitable to arrive, especially when one's Honorable Opponent refuses to accept it. Mike Huckabee finally did, just as he promised he would once that decisive 1,191st delegate was chosen.

Like the senator's victory Tuesday night, John McCain's speech lacked drama. The drama had been played out some time ago, when he came back from the politically dead just last summer. Even his top staff had given up and fled, but he soldiered on. Strangely enough in politics, he won by sticking to principle. The principle? That in war, to quote an American general named MacArthur, there is no substitute for victory.

Not long ago, John McCain's emerging as his party's presidential nominee in 2008 seemed as improbable as The Surge's proving successful in Iraq. Indeed, the senator's fortunes and those of American arms are linked, and what a remarkable turnaround the country has seen in both. Who would have thought it? The whole saga restores one's faith - not just in a presidential candidate but in America.

Yet there was no braggadocio in Sen. McCain's speech Tuesday night - no vainglory, no hollow cheerleading but an almost severe dignity, a subdued acceptance of responsibility rather than an exuberant cry of victory. ("Now we begin the most important part of our campaign: to make a respectful, determined and convincing case to the American people that our campaign and my election as president, given the alternatives presented by our friends in the other party, are in the best interests of the country we love.") Goodness. How old-fashioned. How courteous.

Shades of Adlai Stevenson! It was as if the Republican standard-bearer was addressing thinking citizens of a republic rather than an exultant crowd of partisans.

In this old republic that became a mass democracy some time ago, John McCain's restrained tone was a step back in time, and up. I may be the only one to think so, but his rhetoric, antique as it sounded, was refreshing - as if he were conscious of the grave challenge ahead rather than the heady victory he'd just sealed.

As for Mike Huckabee's concession, I confess to having looked forward to it - not because I'd wanted Arkansas' native son to lose, quite the contrary, but because I knew his well-earned reputation for eloquence. Those of us in Arkansas have been lifted up by his words on more than one occasion.

For example: There was his speech from the state Capitol at the end of his first, long, grueling day as governor of still frontier Arkansas in 1995, when his disgraced predecessor had refused to budge from office hour after embarrassing hour. He emerged from that test not only triumphant but gracious and forgiving.

Some of us in this state had first heard him in the pulpit of Immanuel Baptist Church in Pine Bluff, Ark.; others will never forget his inspiring words on the steps of Central High School in Little Rock on the redemptive 40th anniversary of The Crisis of '57, when the ghost of Orval Faubus was finally, definitively exorcised from that historic site.

Now surely Brother Huckabee would meet this test, too, I thought Tuesday night, for nothing tests a politician, or anyone, like defeat. Sad to report, I was disappointed. Yes, he did meet one test - he finally conceded - but without the elevation, the full quotient of grace many of us had come to expect from the man and preacher.

But this night he made the mistake of so many campaigners at the end of a campaign: He more or less repeated his stump speech instead of plowing new ground. Only in comparison to the other candidates Tuesday night was he eloquent. Which says a depressing lot about the current state of American rhetoric.

Mike Huckabee's concession proved a long, uneven mix of the sublime and strange as he went from citing Scripture and Col. Travis at the Alamo - you can't hardly beat those choices - to plugging a national sales tax, an exaction so unfair that naturally it's been renamed the Fair Tax in keeping with the deceptive times.

Ah, well, even Demosthenes must have had an off night, and surely the country will hear from Mike Huckabee many another time, especially in light of the surprisingly effective presidential campaign he finally wrapped up. Who beyond his immediate family and a few of his more loyal congregants would have guessed that the ol' boy and bass guitarist would have done as well as he did in a national race, reviving us again from coast to coast? The moral of this story: Never underestimate an Arkie. Especially one who clearly loves what he's doing.

It was fitting somehow that the last two candidates standing in the GOP column should have been a maverick senator and a Baptist minister. The warrior and the preacher. Achilles and Paul of Tarsus. As types, John McCain and Mike Huckabee represent the twin sources of their party's and country's - even their civilization's - strength: Athens and Jerusalem.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
You mean Dud senator don't you?
I think we've managed to wind up with the worse in the whole bunch. The man who keeps saying he's a conservative when in fact he is not.

I've heard he's supposed to try to bring in the conservatives but since he doesn't know what one is, it seems impossible he could succeed.

Take for example the fact that they have Kay Bailey Hutchison on their lists of possibles for VP.

This is the infamous senator from Texas who's accomplishments include killing the border fence and being involved in a scandal regarding the Trans-Texas Highway. She likes crossing that aisle as much as McCain and heaven only knows why she can't be loyal to Texas.

Sorry Mr. Greenburg,
but "one principle" is not enough to convince me that McCain should be representing the conservative party as the GOP nominee.

As for "by their words we can still know them" and McCain. You must mean the words he uses in public, not the foul-mouth curse words he uses when no one (i.e. media) is listening.

More importantly, I would say, "by their voting record we can still know them" and McCain's lets us know a lot. Mainly that he will not govern as a conservative when his best friends are Democrats.



Did Obama Win a Proxy War against McCain

HP-Yesterday, little-known Democrat Bill Foster scored a major upset and won the congressional seat held for 20 years by former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, a Republican. The race was a proxy war between Barack Obama and John McCain. Obama cut an add for Foster

WATCH VIDEO

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/did-obama-wins-pro xy-war-versus-mccain

spin
I have always respected and enjoyed Paul Greenberg's articles. This was the first one that looked like it had been written by a Democrat spin artist instead of the Paul Greenberg I have respected for so long.

I am disappointed. - P

Principles
To some winning is everything principles be damned

No, the RINOs have *their* candidate
--
If there was any possibility that John McCain might represent the best that the Republican Party can offer America, Mr. Greenberg, then we might as well blow it to hell and start over from the beginning.

Conservative political cartoonist Chuck Asay did a great little two-panel piece in January. See:

http://www.townhall.com/funnies/cartoonist/ChuckAsay/2008/0 1/18

...in which he showed a representation of a victorious Republican party standing astride "Reagan's Three-Legged Coalition," consisting of:

1) Strong defense

2) Limited government

3) Traditional family values

The second panel showed the situation prevailing in mid-January, with surly dwarf elephants stacked under at the 1st and 3rd pillars, representing various candidates' voters and one - only one cadre supporting the "Limited government" position.

Asay labeled that struggling, lonely Republican group "Ron Paul Voters."

The miracle of this campaign season has been that the Republican Party has retained *ANY* remnant of Reagan's victory triad.

With nothing more than John McCain to offer this November, Mr. Greenberg, the RNC (again!) gives American voters - particularly us conservatives - no reason to even bother going to the polls.

We'd have to hate and fear whatever scumbucket the Democrat Party nominates more than we hate and fear John McCain.

And it looks as if Senator McCain has no intention of giving us any reason whatsoever to hate and fear him any less than we do right now.

--

Sorry, Mr. Greenberg
This article doesn't cut it. I usually enjoy your articles but this article doesn't live up to its headline, "The Test of a Candidate."

The true test of a candidate is NOT in his ability as an orator, and that seems to be what you have focused on. More than ever in this political arena, words are vacuous and meaningless. It remains the candidate's voting record and documented political behavior that is the best test of whether or not his rhetoric will meet reality if he is elected.

Obama is a great orator. Huckabee was pretty good. McCain is mediocre at best. And that is why I think Obama will win -- because he is A-No. 1 at rhetoric. Pity the poor USA.

Quit yer bellyaching, folks
and support 'ol John McCain because he's the only game in town.

The GOP voters have selected the Senator. He's our man. Yes, 2012 looms ahead, another chance for conservatives to be organized instead of fragmented with our infighting.

Romney was gracious and practical in his concession timing and speech. The backlash against him because of his religion was messy and reflected poorly on the GOP. But the liberals saw his intellect and determination and helped light the media fire that burned him alive. Shame on all of us for not dousing that media firestorm.

Huckabee was initially charming in his folksy campaign but later felt too provincial and self-serving with his warm and fuzzy ways. I'm glad he's finally sitting down as he got to be annoying. He was an average musician and even mean to incite prejudice towards Mitt - all the while presenting himself as your average, trusted neighbor, etc.

(Remember he was a keynote speaker at a Convention for his church in SLC - basically an anti-Mormon conference. So he had more information on actual LDS beliefs than he let on. He knew his innuendo was a misrepresentation of doctrine but let the question stand and the media ran with it.... He lost my potential vote with that little media grandstand play.)

But we are where we are in this campaign and the bottom line is NEITHER one of the Democratic candidates should step foot in the White House as the POTUS!

So first things first.

Unite as a GOP and let go of the justifications as to why we should not be where we are with the candidate we have.

John is here.

He strikes terror in the hearts of our multiple enemies.

We back him and we keep this nation safe.

And we elect conservative people to Congress. Part of this mess is our fault.

As GOP constituets we stay focused to get John elected and have a GOP platform that protects our freedoms, our borders, our economy and protects our family values.


Quit yer bellyaching, folks
and support 'ol John McCain because he's the only game in town.

The GOP voters have selected the Senator. He's our man. Yes, 2012 is another chance for conservatives to be organized instead of being fragmented with our infighting.

Romney was gracious and practical in his concession timing and speech. The backlash against him because of his religion reflected poorly on the GOP. When the liberals saw his intellect and determination, they helped light the media fire that burned him alive. Shame on all of us for not dousing that media firestorm.

Huckabee was initially charming in his folksy campaign but later felt provincial and self-serving with his warm and fuzzy ways. I'm glad he's finally sitting down; he got to be annoying. He was even mean to incite prejudice towards Mitt - all the while presenting himself as your average, trusted neighbor, etc.

(Remember he was a keynote speaker at a Convention for his church in SLC - basically an anti-Mormon conference. He knew his innuendo was a misrepresentation of doctrine but let the question stand and the media ran with it.... He lost my potential vote with that little media grandstand play.)

But we are where we are in this campaign and the bottom line is NEITHER one of the Democratic candidates should step foot in the White House as the POTUS!

So first things first.

Unite as a GOP and let go of the justifications as to why we should not be where we are with the candidate we have.

John is here.

He strikes terror in the hearts of our multiple enemies.

We back him and we keep this nation safe.

And we elect conservative people to Congress. Part of this mess is our fault.

As GOP constituents we stay focused to get John elected and have a GOP platform that protects our freedoms, our borders, our economy and protects our family values.


RE: wise woman
Nope, not gonna do it!
It is wrong to abandon principles to win.
In the long run it is better for the nation to lose this one and give the people the bid dose of socialism they want. Hopefully a lesson that will bring back the principles this country was founded on will be brought back next time.
We MUST demand better candidates. John McCain is a poor alternative, a little bad is still bad.
"None of the above" will be my vote as well as many others who have thoughtfully considered this election.

wise woman,
"The GOP voters have selected the Senator.."

Excuse me? The GOP voters most certainly DID NOT
select McCain. Go back and look again at the primary percentages in which McCain "won" for real proof. Then look at the states who DECIDED our choice for us. McCain was chosen by Independents and Democrats who crossed over to intentionally skew the results (or because they are truly frightened of a Clinton/Obama win.)

As far as I'm concerned, ALL state primaries should be closed and voters should not be allowed to change their party affiliation near or around the actual date of the primary. This would be a much more accurate reflection of the two parties desires for who they want to represent them.

You said, "....have a GOP platform that protects our freedoms, our borders, our economy and protects our family values."

Again, excuse me? How do you propose to get McCain to support that platform when he is 1:4? And that is generous given his position on freedom (close Gitmo? Trials for terrorists?)He cannot be said to support the economy just because he opposes earmarks, but falls for the global warming hoax. McCain may "agree" to support that platform just to get elected...but if he were elected what makes you think he actually would? Remember he revels in his maverick status.


not ashamed to be right
You are the wise one, not "wise woman." Republican-identified voters never ushered McCain to the forefront. You are absolutely correct -- it was indeed crossover Dems and independents.

Whether the pitcher hits the stone, or
the stone hits the pitcher, it is all the same for the pitcher. (Paraphrase from Man of La Mancha. [not sure of spelling so apologies.])

Why allow the GOP (the pitcher) to be broken and sit this election out in pieces because we (collectively) don't think McCain measures up to our expectations?

We have a conservative score of ZERO with the Demos! At least John respects life and that is a biggie. He is forced to listen to the rest of what we consider necessary planks of his platform. We are not without influence. Let's use it.

McCain is practical. He has to move more towards conservative values to have our (GOP) support.

The idea that most of the Independents and Democrats voting for McCain had ulterior motives skips the obvious fact that he just may be their real choice for POTUS. People admire his strength of character. He's a hero to many.

You points are well taken.

I take my clue from the good but former candidates in our party who have now all endorsed McCain.

So I write again for us to unite behind McCain rather than cutting off our nation nose to smite our face. Every abortion counts, every attach on our cities counts, every border intrusion counts - and the list goes on. This is no time for us to quit the GOP game because we are unhappy with McCain as our standard bearer. He is it.

We cannot take the national risk of having either Obama or Hillary-Bill in the White House. That is an unthinkable option. I plead with you to count the cost of abdication.

Four years is too long to risk trying to undo all the harm, all the indoctrination, all the entitlement mentality, all the media half truths and expect the country to see conservative GOP people as the solution.

What candidate could overcome that kind of attitude entrenchment. Socialism is addictive. The solution will be more socialism, not less. Just look at Europe and you'll see the passive pattern.




wise woman - I love proverbs. How 'bout
--
...this one?

"When being raped, relax and enjoy it."

You keep on posting "Rockefeller Republican" suckage, lady.

Repetition doesn't do dick to make it believable.

Unless, of course, you also espouse another saying that's risen to the level of proverb status in the RNC:

"The great masses of people will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one. Especially if it is repeated again and again."

Of course, we all know where *THAT* little slice of wisdom comes from.

--

I'm sorry
but I have to agree.

McCain wasn't my first choice, to be honest. I don't have a deep abiding hatred for the man, I simply felt that Thompson would have been better.

But facts are facts. McCain is now the nominee whether you like it or not, there's no two ways about it. You can whine about him being a RINO and stealing the election and whatever else you want, you're entitled to your opinions. Afterall, Hillary hasn't been able to censor the internet yet.

But this talk of "teaching the GOP a lesson: get a REAL conservative" is total BS. You think fostering an entitlement mindset, the attitude of blame-America-first, and bankrupting the next generation (well, mine seeing as I'm fifteen) while leaving us sitting ducks for unreasonable pyshcopaths is going to solve anything???

Honestly, the real RINO's are those who abandon their party because they're dissatisfied with the nominee. I know someone's going to think "dissatisfied is an understatement!!" but having either of the Dems leading the free world (or attempting to reign supreme, I should say) would be a disaster far beyond that of putting McCain in there.

And for people who say there's no substantial difference between McCain and the Democrats is (for lack of a better word) an idiot. McCain is pro-life, he's not going to be legalizing gay marriage any time soon, he's against socializing healthcare, wants lower taxes along with cuts in spending (exactly what the economy needs), and most importantly he holds the attitude of "let's kick terrorist @$$ and let's kick it hard." An attitude I'm proud to share.

mollay - ''McCain is pro-life..."
--
...posts mollay_mellee, "...he's not going to be legalizing gay marriage any time soon, he's against socializing healthcare, wants lower taxes along with cuts in spending (exactly what the economy needs), and most importantly he holds the attitude of 'let's kick terrorist @$$ and let's kick it hard.'"


Yep, that's what he's mouthing right now.

Consider, however:

1) What does his record of "bipartisanship" in the Senate indicate that McCain is likely *GOING* to do if he gets elected?

2) What recourse do us conservatives have if John McCain - acting as President *AND* head of the Republican Party (commanding the effectively unquestioning loyalty of the overwhelming majority of GOP representatives and senators in the U.S. Congress) - should follow his proven inclinations and "go over to the Dark Side"?


The continued GOP loyalists' litany of "hold your nose and vote for John" is beyond sickening, and to read it in a post written by someone who claims to be a conservative is even more disgusting.

I can understand this sort of sentiment among blatantly hypocritical Republicans, who are concerned only with the opportunities to exercise political power (and slurp up the pork available therewith), but for anyone remotely concerned with the health and well-being of this nation over the course of not only the next four years but the next couple of decades, the very thought of a John McCain presidency has got to be one goddam shuddersome prospect.

It's like you were wishing for the reincarnation of Richard M. Nixon and expecting conservatives to hold our gorge and support *THAT* spectacularly reeking POS for "Four More Years!"

--


McCain
Scr*w McCain.

"Keep this nation safe". Start reading lady. The only "nation" we are going to have is the North American Union.

McCain out bragging about scr*wing one more American industry (Boeing) by giving contracts to foreign co.

I am going to enjoy watching that scumbag go down in flames. Jorge was the last pol to sucker punch me. I am not going to bend over and take it in the rear again.

If the country is going to be killed let the Dems do it. This election was over before it even began. The CFR controlled media, including Murdoch proclaimed who was "electable" and the sheeple believed it. All the top tier were in the bag.

Multinationals don't need us anyway, they own BOTH parties. Take a look at Pat Buchanan's article on Nafta. "Free trade" is another one of those lies.

McCain is admired...
McCain is admired by many democrats.

Many republicans...
...I have spoken with say they support McCain as the nominee. Invariably they know nothing about McCain except that he is a "war hero". It takes about two minutes to expose enough of McCain's real record to change their minds. In the end some of them will still vote for him, solely because he is the Republican nominee. But it will not be enough. He will lose in November. And he will possibly take what is left of the Republican Party into the dumper with him. McCain is a disgrace. If he is not an out and out traitor he is only one small step above it. He has repeatedly shown his contempt for The Constitution. McCain represents the very worse America has to offer.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.