Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Saturday, September 22, 2007
Paul Driessen :: Townhall.com Columnist
Malaria Atonement and Forgiveness
by Paul Driessen
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


During the Days of Repentance, Jews ponder their sins of the past year. Today, Yom Kippur, is their final opportunity to make amends and alter the judgment that God will enter in his books, as the sun sets.

This Day of Atonement, however, can assure forgiveness only for sins between people and God. To atone for sins against other persons, we must first seek reconciliation with those we have wronged, demonstrate repentance, and right the wrongs or make restitution.

In this politicized age, many people have their own lists of folks who “ought to be seeking forgiveness.” I’m on several – including Greenpeace’s roster of “climate criminals.”

At the top of my own list are the radical environmentalists – and foundations and others who give them the money and political clout to perpetrate mischief worldwide.

Back when I helped organize the very first Earth Day on my college campus, the nascent environmental movement offered hope for a cleaner, better future. Indeed, thanks to the awareness we helped generate, the river I grew up on was revitalized, air pollution was reduced, and our overall quality of life improved.

It took laws, regulations and a new mindset on the part of people, governments and businesses alike. I’m proud of the roles we played and delighted that people are more committed to protecting our planet.

But over the years, the movement’s activist wing became a huge, multinational, multi-billion-dollar crisis creation and perpetuation industry. Using junk science, over-hyped fears and unrelenting campaigns against companies, technology and development, Greenpeace, Rainforest Action, Environmental Defense, Sierra Club, Natural Resource Defense Council and other groups thwart progress and help prolong poverty, misery and premature death.

Its leaders and foundation mother lodes have much to atone for, if they are to escape harsh judgment in the eyes of God and history.

By opposing fossil-fuel, hydroelectric and nuclear power, they help keep a third of the world reliant on wood and animal dung – or if they’re lucky, little solar panels on their huts. Deprived of energy for lights, refrigeration, hospitals, schools, offices, factories and safe water, they remain impoverished, plagued by disease and despondent about their future. Intense environmentalist opposition to biotechnology prevents Third World farmers from planting crops that resist disease and drought, require fewer pesticides, and yield bumper harvests that would reduce malnutrition and put cash in the pockets of destitute families.

The worst cabal of pressure groups remains virulently opposed to spraying tiny amounts of DDT on walls to keep mosquitoes out of houses, and using other insecticides to kill blood-sucking insects that carry malaria, dengue and yellow fever, and a host of other killer diseases. A year ago, the World Health Organization, U.S. Agency for International Development, President’s Malaria Initiative and other agencies again recognized the vital role of these chemicals – and reintroduced them in their comprehensive, integrated disease control programs. But Pesticide Action Network, Beyond Pesticides and Physicians for Social Responsibility demand that the agencies return to the disastrous policies of recent years, when disease and death rates were rising every year.

The activists and foundations had watched the tolls mount, but did nothing. They knew the approach they advocated didn’t work, but did nothing. They could have supported research into alternatives to DDT, or even bought bednets to protect children, but didn’t spend a dime on that. They spend millions to attack insecticides, and truly comprehensive solutions, but nothing to protect parents and children.

Pesticides, they shout, are “poisonous bandaids.” Some researchers, they assert, have found “possible links” between high levels of DDT and low birth weights in babies, reduced breastmilk production in mothers, and impaired mental abilities in children. One day, they insist, we will have a vaccine. It’s all pure speculation, but they have the money and PR savvy to garner extensive press – hyping minor hypothetical risks of using pesticides, and ignoring the real, life-threatening dangers that those pesticides would prevent.

Meanwhile, an African child dies from malaria every 30 seconds – a million a year. Countless more perish from other insect-borne diseases. Two billion people are at risk, and 500 million get malaria every year, notes Fiona Kobusingye-Boynes, coordinator of Congress of Racial Equality Uganda. Malaria victims are wracked by fevers, chills, convulsions and vomiting. They can’t work, cultivate crops, or attend school. Families must stay home to care for the sick, and spend up to a fourth of their meager incomes on drugs and medical care. Many who don’t die suffer severe brain damage.

Fiona knows this all too well. She has endured repeated bouts with malaria, lost many family members to the disease, and almost died again this week from malaria complicated by pneumonia and intestinal illness that are also prevalent across Africa.

Chloroquine and other treatments can be nearly as awful as the disease, and may not help. Bednets are themselves impregnated with insecticides, and are only a partial solution. So they’re not exactly healthy, organic alternatives to DDT or Icon. And lest we forget, chemotherapy drugs have nasty, proven side effects. Should we ban them, too – along with other potent drugs, and the insecticides that keep mosquitoes and West Nile virus at bay here in the States?

And yet, the Richard and Rhoda Goldman Foundation, Cedar Tree Foundation, California Endowment and other shortsighted donors continue to lavish hundreds of thousands of dollars annually on these radical groups – enabling them to continue their lethal lies, tirades, pressure tactics and mayhem.

Goldman is headed by a wealthy San Francisco insurance magnate. Cedar Tree was begun by a Boston pediatrician. The California Endowment is headed by a physician (an African-American). All support good causes. But the millions they have given Pesticide Action, Beyond Pesticides and Physicians have exacted an unconscionable toll across Sub-Saharan Africa.

Good deeds simply don’t offset this carnage. And while for-profit corporations are prosecuted and penalized for every accident – these callous groups and their bankrollers are not held liable or accountable even for the toll.

Their actions violate basic medical, humanitarian and human rights principles. They violate the ethical and social responsibility standards that “progressive” activists say for-profit companies must follow. They ignore the Hippocratic Oath, and the need to help families insure their children against killer diseases, with comprehensive strategies that include DDT and other insecticides – and actually work.

Goldman, Cedar Tree, the California Endowment and their compatriots must atone for their sins. How?

Stop funding these heartless pressure groups. Donate to organizations like CORE and Africa Fighting Malaria that are working with the WHO, USAID and PMI to end this needless slaughter, get electricity and other modern technologies people in the Third World – and enable them to stay healthy, work more productively, and build strong family and national economies that can afford modern homes with window screens. Buy some bed nets, and help train Africans in how to use DDT and other insecticides safely, responsibly and with minimal environmental impact, to reduce disease and save lives – now!

Then they can seek forgiveness from families who have lost loved ones – and atonement would be made.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Paul Driessen is senior policy adviser for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), which is sponsoring the All Pain No Gain petition against global-warming hype. He also is a senior policy adviser to the Congress of Racial Equality and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power - Black Death.

Be the first to read Paul Driessen's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Being a liberal means...
...never, ever, saying you're sorry. Regardless of the horrible devastation visited on your "beneficiaries". That would indicate you had actually been wrong. We can't have that. That would require humility - virtually non-existent amongst the left.

Been there, Read that,
Johninoregon,

I read Silent Spring, and all I read was a long hysterical rant from someone who had an axe to grind against capitalism and technology.
No wonder Al Bore considers her his hero, They both want the human race to live in the 16th century with no technology.

I've talked to radical tree huggers in the past who have actually said, the only way to save the earth was to remove hankind from the picture.
Each time I replied the same way. "Well maybe you should lead by example, and remove yourself first."

Radical enviro-wackos make themselves feel good by ranting about pesticides killing all the little birdies, while millions of human beings die of malaria. But I'm not surprised these are the same type who spike trees so loggers die instead of trees!

But hey, they're so much more intelligent than we are, so we must bow to their superior intellects. Yeah right! :op

Article (in part) from NYT
By DONALD ROBERTS
Published: August 20, 2007
Bethesda, Md.

DDT, the miracle insecticide turned environmental bogeyman, is once again playing an important role in public health. In the malaria-plagued regions of Africa, where mosquitoes are becoming resistant to other chemicals, DDT is now being used as an indoor repellent. Research that I and my colleagues recently conducted shows that DDT is the most effective pesticide for spraying on walls, because it can keep mosquitoes from even entering the room.

The news may seem surprising, as some mosquitoes worldwide are already resistant to DDT. But we’ve learned that even mosquitoes that have developed an immunity to being directly poisoned by DDT are still repelled by it.

Read Silent Spring
I'm getting tired of these repeated assertions that Rachel Carson is somehow responsible for the deaths of millions. For starters, Carson never advocated complete elimination of DDT or other pesticides in agriculture. Furthermore, she did not suggest that its use be stopped in anti-malaria campaigns. "Silent Spring" is readily available in libraries. Pick up a copy, and check the relevant index entries before besmirching the memory of a remarkable woman who simply recognized that pesticides were being used with wild abandon in the early postwar years, and advocated more responsible use and a search for biological alternatives.

For a more balanced look at the DDT-Malaria controversy than Driessen is prepared to offer, please see the following:

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/06/29/rachel_carson/index.html

Also
I took a micro-biology class a few years ago and the professor made it clear once you leave America, and go to places like Africa, you find all the old diseases and things that use to plague us. I think he said a majority of the people have worms of some sort too. Poverty breeds these things.

Africa and ddt
Following the defeat of malaria in the United States, the World Health Organization launched an eradication effort of its own in the 1950's. The goal was to wipe out the disease across the globe through spraying, surveillance, and the distribution of anti-malarial drugs. The plan worked well enough in places with more temperate climates, but problems developed in other parts of the world. Mosquitoes developed resistance to DDT, and little effort was put into fighting malaria in sub-Saharan Africa.

Bill Collins says it became too impractical to replicate the U.S. model in the developing world.

Collins: "DDT is sprayed on walls. Most of the houses in Africa did not have walls. Where are you going to spray? You had no organization to have spray workers go out into the areas to do it. There was just no way to set up a program in these countries to hire spray workers to actually carry out the program."

http://www.theworld.org/?q=node/4288

Grumpy and Dredd
Just saw your questions, I'll go and see if I can find answers.

Taft
I was wondering the same thing as -Grumpy-, and also, -Well Now- says that DDT was not used in Africa. If that's true, how could the mosquitoes in Africa become immune to DDT, when DDT was not used there? Really just asking.

Taft
I wasn't able to read the articles you linked to, but common sense does suggest one question.

"Malaria staged a comeback because indiscriminate use of DDT resulted in the mosquitoes rapidly developing resistance to the pesticide, not because DDT was banned."

So why didn't it stage a comeback everywhere? If mosquitoes are capable of rapidly developing DDT resistance then it never would have worked anywhere except briefly.


Taft

You told Nam 65, "I am on anyones side who wants goodwill towards Afrikaners. Bush, has, if I remember right spent billions on AIDS there and thats great. One thing though, is his policies on no condoms in African aid and the possibility of it being a very good preventative of AIDS.?

Please read this article if you have a chance.

http://www.crisismagazine.com/june2006/browder.htm

Don't be put off by the religious source. The article cites some credible research and statistics.

Taft
The long link was 'broken' and the second one was an opinion followed by a LOOOONG list of articles that say the opposite.

I'm on my way out the door. I'll check back later. Thanks for your reply.

mrs. Paddy
Here is one source.

"DDT use has decreased enormously, but not because of a ban. The real reason is simple, although not one conservatives are particularly fond of: evolution. Mosquito populations rapidly develop resistance to DDT, creating enzymes to detoxify it, modifying their nervous systems to avoid its effects, and avoiding areas where DDT is sprayed -- and recent research finds that that resistance continues to spread even after DDT spraying has stopped, lowering the effectiveness not only of DDT but also other pesticides (Current Biology, 8/9/05).

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VRT-4GTVWB4-9&_user=10&_coverDate=08%2F09%2F2005&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=searc

Thats one looong link


http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-134256635.html

From a tiny acorn
grows the mighty oak....

that falls on your house and kills you.

Sorry, if you helped the first Earth Day, you are a traitor to your species.

"Mother Earth" for 2 million years tried to wipe us out. Some mother. We survived and thrived in spite of "the environment" not because of it.

Before you try to hamstring the advancement of mankind, and before you try to control the climate of THIS planet... let us experiment on other, already lifeless worlds. What we learn in terraforming them can then be used to control Earth's climate. Plus we get more real-estate.

I used to dream of the day that I, or my descendants, would see grizzly bears fishing for salmon in the rivers of the Valles Marinaris, as bald eagles road the thermals far overhead. But that can't happen so long as "small is beautiful" and "alternative energy" dominates the modern mindset. Man has gone from conqueror to gardener, much to our shame.

Taft
Please cite your sources for your statement that DDT is not effective any longer. The information I have been able to find does not support that position.

Nam 65
I am on anyones side who wants goodwill towards Afrikaners. Bush, has, if I remember right spent billions on AIDS there and thats great. One thing though, is his policies on no condoms in African aid and the possibility of it being a very good preventative of AIDS.

Beckie
You didn't read that link carefuly. See below...

" Prenatal exposure to background, low-level concentrations of DDT was associated with a decrease in preschoolers' cognitive skills."

I do agree that breast feeding, for over a year even, is wonderful and really advantageous healthwise.

sigdoc,

Your wrong.

The DDT story is largely a hoax. Malaria staged a comeback because indiscriminate use of DDT resulted in the mosquitoes rapidly developing resistance to the pesticide, not because DDT was banned. (In fact, the DDT moratorium is not even a complete ban, but the its reduced effectiveness means that DDT's environmental damage is no longer balanced by its formerly effective pest control power. DDT is yesterday's flawed solution.)

I'm not in a forgiving mood
Paul Driessen wrote: "the nascent environmental movement offered hope for a cleaner, better future....It took laws, regulations and a new mindset on the part of people, governments and businesses alike. I’m proud of the roles we played....But over the years, the movement’s activist wing became a huge, multinational, multi-billion-dollar crisis creation and perpetuation industry."

Paul, you sound very much like the Trotskyites who used to say "We Communists were idealists who only wanted to help people. We had no idea that Stalin and the GULAG would turn out to be so bad."

Sorry, that excuse doesn't work for me.

Like the Trotskyites, you committed yourself to a principle and a process that could only lead to a bad result. In your case, your "nascent environmental movement" cared only about creating laws and regulations to deal with the nasty side effects (externalities) of industrialization, like pollution of the environment. But you never gave any thought to the possibility that the laws and regulations you were creating, and the mindset behind them, might have nasty side effects too. Side effects like reduced economic activity and hence a lower standard of living, higher taxes and higher inflation, larger bureaucracies, and an underlying suspicion of capitalism itself as destructive to the environment. While virtually ignoring the environmental disasters taking place within the Communist bloc.

The right answer was to apply cost-benefit analysis to ALL your proposed laws and regulations right from the beginning, something you environmental activists cared not a whit about (and often still oppose today). And to have distanced yourself from the prevailing leftist mindset that thought environmental damage could only come from capitalist societies.

In this you failed.


Thanks Driessen
Thanks for giving us a list of organizations that are doing the RIGHT thing for third-world countries. Where are the rich Republicans (isn't that what they are characterized as...big business?) to boost the practical organizations that are HELPING?

It's hard to fight such well-funded and well-known entities like Sierra Club etc. etc. without some big $$ behind them.

We need to increase support for DDT distribution and economic solutions for third-world countries by helping them to become self-sufficient with ELECTRICITY, PETROLEUM, HYDRO-ELECTRIC and NUCLEAR power. All of these will help improve their quality of life, access to clean water, and ability to combat disease.

Poverty and disease are the biggest pollutant. Shame on those holier-than-thou groups that perpetuate the lies told by Rachel Carson.

Godless barbarians
Those who ban DDT in Africa hate humans and worship nature. They fail to see that the only thing that gives this planet meaning is the humans that inhabit it. The enviromentalists have become Godless barbarians.

ProfBlog, you're on to something...
But I would liken it to genocide. The only continent that never had DDT was Africa.
Malaria USED to be prevalent in Britian, America and Europe - but thanks to widespread use of DDT YEARS ago, we are safe.
But Carson (etal) stopped the practice before it could get to Africa and India.
To keep the *high-breeders* down??? Could be. Probably was at least a part of it.
We KNOW Sanger (planned parenthood) was a raving bigot and I don't doubt for a second that carson was also.
So, if the people died from malaria, dungue fever or starvation - the *do gooders* didn't KILL them - or did they???

The dirty secret is...
The groups that have been radicalized and cited by the author, often subscribe to the "carrying capacity" theory of the earth. Simply put, there is only so much food to go around before we reach the upper limit of human population that the earth can sustain. Many predicted that that limit was passed several billion people ago. Thus, a way to limit the population "time bomb" is to allow natural selection to have its way. The heavy breeding populations in many third world countries are kept from pushing us over the brink of the earth's carrying capacity if we allow disease, (nature's way of controlling out-of-control populations) to run its course. And that, dear friends, is what you will never hear being espoused by these "clubs." But, with their "care for the environment," they cloak their deadly world view with "concern" for third world children's development while allowing the tortured deaths of the same. Thanks to the author for lifting the rock and shining truth's light on on these hypocrites.

Taft

A survey of 475 people,
not a very good sample.

They were all from Spain??

We know about all of the menatl functions of those that died from Malaria. zero.

Opposition to DDT...
...should qualify as a crime against humanity and punished accordingly.In my opinion,Rachel Carlson has killed more people than Hitler,Stalin,and Mao combined.

These are the same people
who continue, as mass graves are excavated in Cambodia and the bones cry out from the graves, to deny that our surrender in Vietnam le to mass slaughter, torture and death not only in Vietnam, but in Cambodia and Laos.

Even the sight of the dead fails to move them. They are wedded to their belief that it did not happen. They are blind to the reality of the bones.

And you expect them to turn from their blindness that they have nurtured and cultivated for generations, and suddenly have their eyes opened to real dying children in the world of today? No, they are instead Marching to perpetuate the same folly of their youth -- because they, as wealthy, loud, opinionated brats back in 1968, were told by the world back then that they represented us.

You lot built them up. It will take more than a couple of airplanes to tear that Tower of Babel down.

Well, Taft,
It would seem that you need to read your own knee-jerk use of citations.
"Children who were breastfed for more than 20 weeks had better cognitive performance regardless of their in utero exposure to DDT. ". As a mother of 4 who believes in breast feeding, all you have managed to do is to convince me that I have been ahead of my time all along. So we need to keep the mothers healthy enough to be able to produce breast milk, which will only come when a person eats right and avoids exposure to disease. It is very easy to condemn DDT use when your life does not depend on it. I would venture to say that the most virulent arguments against the use of DDT is given by people who had no adverse feeling toward using chemicals to alter their mental reality, yet would argue the chemical make up of a life saving insecticide is not warranted in the the pursuit of saving lives. A bit hypocritical, don't you think?

How many people die from DDT use?
How many people die from DDT use?
How many people die because we are not using DDT or other effective insecticides?

You link to some WHO study regarding some study of cognitive abilities in preschoolers and malaria drug resistance. Read your own citations.
Real people are dying NOW!

The Great DDT is Good for you Hoax
something factual.

In Utero Exposure to Background Concentrations of DDT and Cognitive Functioning among Preschoolers

http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/164/10/955

http://www.who.int/malaria/cmc_upload/0/000/014/923/use_of_antimalarials.pdf
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.