Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Saturday, January 20, 2007
Patrick Hynes :: Townhall.com Columnist
Girl Power!
by Patrick Hynes
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

Did a majority of Americans vote for Democrats on Nov. 7th, 2006 because they were sick and tired of men running the show? Did America decide it was time to smash the "marble ceiling"? Of course not. We know from exit polling and post-election data that corruption and frustration regarding the war in Iraq had reached their tipping points, and Republicans fell victim to the voters’ anxiety and anger. Nevertheless, you would be forgiven for mistaking House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s swearing in festivities for a historical reenactment of the Seneca Falls Convention.

Introducing Pelosi at her big coming out party, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (C-CT) laid it on a bit thick. “When Nancy takes the gavel tomorrow, she takes it for all of us—for every little girl who wondered what they could be when they grew up. And tomorrow we’ll find out the answer: anything you want to be!”

Pelosi had to shout over former Texas Governor Ann Richards’s favorite song, "Don’t Fence Me In" when it came time for her to speak. "That was Ann’s favorite song … and that’s women’s message: Don’t Fence Us In!"

It went dreadfully on like this. Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus gushed with approval. Presumably typing with one hand and clutching a damp, mascara-stained tissue in the other Marcus wrote, "The key to ensuring future Pelosis is a workplace that accommodates women—and men—looking for ways to shuttle in and out of work or to craft flexible schedules that let them be good employees and good parents. … Who better to help accomplish this than a female speaker?"

As for me, I would prefer a speaker—male or female—who places victory against the jihadist enemy higher on his or her "to do" list than setting policies “to ensure future Pelosis.” But we all have different priorities, I suppose.

"Nothing irritates male voters more than to have a woman politician belligerently point out the obvious: that she is a woman," one prominent Republican pollster in Washington told me. "In focus group after focus group, we see support from white men nosedive when female politicians from either party deliberately suggest that their gender makes them better suited for high office."

I can validate this phenomenon from personal experience. I once observed a focus group for a client, a Republican woman candidate for Congress. She was thought to have innumerable weaknesses, though we considered her gender an obvious strength. We were thrilled to see that she sustained her favorability when we highlighted her presumed shortcomings to participants. But when we played up the gender-angle, the needle plunged among white guys. The focus group fundamentally altered our approach to voters.

"That’s the kind of thing you see whenever these situations arise," my source told me. "Generally speaking, being a woman is an electoral advantage, but running as a woman is a weakness."

Nevertheless, that Pelosi is our nation’s first female Speaker of the House is a fait accompli. There’s no turning the clock back on this one, boys. But Pelosi’s Girl Power! routine runs the risk of harming the prospects of that other Democrat woman looking to achieve higher public office: New York Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.

It may not matter that Sen. Rodham Clinton has heretofore avoided Pelosi-style Girl Power! rhetoric. Male voters have tended to express their irritation toward in-their-face gender politics in subsequent elections. Remember, 1992’s "The Year of the Woman" was followed by 1994’s "The Year of the Angry White Male." (Yes, I know, the Angry White Male dynamic is an unsubstantiated myth, but you get my point.)

This is a problem for Sen. Rodham Clinton because men are very much part of the Pelosi coalition. President George W. Bush beat Sen. John Kerry among male voters in 2004 by a margin of 55% to 44%. But in 2006, male voters chose Democrats over Republicans by a margin of 50% to 47%. Republican support from white men fell from 62% in 2004 to 53% in 2006. In a manner of speaking, white guys gave the girls the gavel. Will they regret it?

"If I were Hillary Clinton," my source says, "I would ask Speaker Pelosi to cool it."

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Patrick Hynes is the president of New Media Strategics, a blog relations consultancy. He is the proprietor of Ankle Biting Pundits and the author of In Defense of the Religious Right (Nelson Current).

Be the first to read Patrick Hynes' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Thinkwell: Finally...

Well done, Thinkwell!

The sad thing is that you did not put these sites up three days ago when I requested them. Now all of your work and mine will likely be read by (maybe) three people - you, me and some cyber-lost soul making an errant mouse click.

I don't understand why you played that "I got'em but won't give'em up" game.

But on to your cites -

I've read through them and see no correlation between any of the data and your premise that:

"The greatest burden one can take on in society is the sacrifice of life itself. By that measure (deaths incurred in building and maintaining society - birthing children included), American men take on a grossly disproportionate share."

And from your earlier post -

"...don't you find it disingenuous and unreasonable to expect more of society's benefits for women when you women are unable/unwilling to take on a corresponding greater amount of society's burdens?"

I have to believe that you have developed your beliefs around this subject out of your own personal prejudices and not from any of the numbers you present or their contexts.

You apparently believe that dying is the greatest sacrifice one can make. On the contrary, many people make life-long sacrifices that trump dying on the job.

As far as the burdens you think men carry so much more than women, how about the fact that "women still bear the burden of poverty much more often that men" in our society?
http://www.minneapolisfed.org/pubs/fedgaz/06-11/gap.cfm

As for the fact that men take jobs with more risks than women, what about the fact that they earn more for the risks they take?

"Did you know that, according to the AFL-CIO, the average 25-year-old woman who works full-time, year-round until she retires at age 65 (if that's when she's able to retire) will earn $523,000 less than the average working man?"
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Careers/10/22/equal.pay/index.html?eref=sitesearc

Men on average make 25-30% more than women for their work, depending on whose numbers you use.

You seem particularly bothered by the fact that women do not get killed enough in the military.

Of course there are fewer deaths since there are fewer women enrolled. You seem to believe that that is the result of cowardice - or something.

Actually, there are numbers of reasons women do not flock to the military, such as -

Sexual harassment is rampant in the military. The good ole boys club there protects the military establishment in instances of abuse and rape. And you wonder why women aren't racing to join the club?

(The same holds true in many male-dominated workplaces - mining, construction, etc.)

Also, military recruiters do not solicit women. When have you seen a TV commercial encouraging women to join up?
http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-399923_ITM

And don't forget the benefits soldiers get throughout their lives. That certainly is a reward for their service civilian women don't share.

The home and workplace will have to adapt quite a bit before women and men race equally to take on risky jobs - even though women are moving in that direction.

"Despite the inroads women have made in entering the labor force, the work-family dilemma has remained surprisingly intractable, in large part...because of the deep inflexibility that pervades each aspect of the triangular relationship. As work-family scholars have demonstrated, the workplace has proved to be unwilling to adapt to the challenges of working parents. Men have likewise demonstrated strong resilience to changing their own behavior patterns both in and out of the home, and as we have discussed, women, too, have frequently proved inflexible to changing their own norms and gender roles when it comes to issues of childrearing. If we are to make more progress, something is going to have to give, and we strongly believe that women should not relinquish their workplace roles as a means of achieving an acceptable balance. We also believe that most women are not in a position to diminish their workplace lives, and thus, what is necessary is a greater societal commitment to easing the burden of working parents. This will require new social programs such as better before- and after-school care and more publicly financed daycare, but it will also require greater attention to the needs of working parents, which will also require changing our reigning gender norms. Until we do so, we are unlikely to pierce the intractability of the current dilemma.
http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?13+Duke+J.+Gender+L.+&+Pol'y+7

In other words, there are good reasons why women are not out there getting themselves killed in riskier jobs in current times - primarily the fact that we still believe women should shoulder most of the BURDEN of child care.

It's a convoluted cultural dilemma with no easy answers.

Your belief, however, that woman owe men something extra because they die more often at work is off the wall.

Perhaps you should re-consider your definition of "sacrifice" and "burden" with eyes looking past your own personal issues.



















Typo (correction)

Percent U.S. military deaths in Iraq (latest war only):

Men about 98 percent (2900) [s/b 2990 - tw]
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.