Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Pat Buchanan :: Townhall.com Columnist
To Die For NAFTA
by Pat Buchanan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


"The commonest error in politics," said Lord Salisbury, "is sticking to the carcass of dead policies."

Lord Salisbury's rule comes to mind on reading of John McCain's delight at the $40 billion contract awarded the French-led parent of Airbus -- to build the next generation of U.S. Air Force tankers.

The contract could run to $100 billion and is a body blow to Boeing in its duel to the death with Airbus. Two-thirds of all air-to-air refueling tankers are used by the United States. The contract gives a 30-year lease on life to the expiring Airbus A330 and means early death for Boeing's 767, the U.S. model for the tanker.

Congratulating himself for having exposed corruption in the Boeing bid, McCain purred, "I have always insisted that the Air Force buy major weapons through fair and open competition."

If McCain thinks Airbus has prospered through "fair and open competition," he is beyond recall. In its first 25 years, Airbus sold 770 planes but did not make a dime in profit. It was started as a socialist cartel, subsidized by the governments of Spain, France, Britain and Germany, to invade and capture a market owned by Americans who built the planes that won World War II.

Airbus drove Lockheed and McDonnell-Douglas out of the business of commercial aircraft and almost took down Boeing. And like indolent buffalo munching grass as they are shot one by one, we let it happen.

Lost U.S. jobs should not be our primary concern, said McCain, "I've always felt the best thing to do is to create the best weapons system we can at minimum cost to taxpayers."

But if McCain thinks cost trumps all in building weapons of war, why not outsource the building of U.S. carriers, cruisers, destroyers, frigates and submarines to the foreign shipyards that constuct America's merchant ships? Why not hire and train foreign sailors as crews?

Why not outsource the scores of thousands of U.S. government jobs handling Social Security checks and tax returns to Bangladesh and India? After all, the neocons want to hire foreign mercenaries to fight America's wars and reward them with U.S. citizenship, as the Romans did in the last days of the empire.

What does it mean to be an American anymore?

It took 20 years to wake up blockheaded Republicans to the social insanity of open borders. Only the collapse of his candidacy last summer jolted McCain into realizing that the 80 percent of Americans who reject amnesty and want a border fence are not all "bigots," as his Tonto, Lindsay Graham, said they were.

Is it going to take 20 more years for Republicans to awaken to the economic disaster they have created and the political ruin they are inviting with this fanatic faith in "free trade," while the rest of the world loots our country through mercantilism?

When Europe imposes a 15 percent value-added tax on U.S. imports and rebates the VAT on exports to the United States, that is not free trade. When China devalues its currency 45 percent, as it did in 1994, and bolts it down to suck jobs and factories out of the United States, that is not free trade. When Japan manipulates its currency, preaches economic nationalism to its people, and shelters its market for TVs, autos and steel, while dumping into and capturing ours, that is not free trade.

McCain admits to knowing almost nothing about economics and is now being advised by my old friend Jack Kemp. In a Wall Street Journal essay bemoaning my views, Kemp concedes, "I'm on the advisory board of Toyota North America and now drive a hybrid Lexus."

Nor is Jack the only pol who has found happiness in a foreign employ. Ex-secretaries of state and Cabinet officers, ex-senators and congressmen, and ex-White House aides are getting rich working for foreigners who are carting off American jobs, American technology, American markets, American factories -- and America's future.

Yet retribution may be at hand for our multinational GOP. In Ohio, NAFTA is a five-letter word with a four-letter meaning, as Ohio lost a huge slice of the 3.5 million manufacturing jobs that vanished under the McCain-Kemp-Bush policy of unilateral disarmament in the trade wars being waged against America.

Look at the Bush-McCain record: $4 trillion in trade deficits, $2.5 trillion in manufactures alone. One in every six manufacturing jobs, 3 million, gone. With America borrowing $2 billion a day to pay for foreign goods, we have seen a collapse of the dollar, the price of gold quadruple to $1,000 an ounce, oil soar to $107 a barrel and gas heading toward $4 a gallon.

Where Bush has created an average of 46,000 new private-sector jobs a month, Bill Clinton did five times as well, creating 220,000 a month.

Hillary won Ohio denouncing the NAFTA deal Bill Clinton cut. The lady gets it. McCain remains a loyal NAFTA man. Good luck in Ohio and Michigan. As the Great Peer said, "The commonest error in politics is sticking to the carcass of dead policies."

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Pat Buchanan is a founding editor of The American Conservative magazine, and the author of many books including State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Pat Buchanan's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Run Pat, Run
Please run for the U.S. Senate!

But Pat,
The NAFTA sticker includes the words "Free Trade." Are you implying that elected officials would deliberately mislead the voting public?

Next he's going to tell us that The Federal Reserve is a privately owned credit monopoly whose reserves consist entirely of the legalized right to create inflationary debt out of thin air.

If the citizenry could reject the government's currency it would be impossible for the political class to finance the trade deficits that debase the dollar, run up interest-bearing deficits and deplete our nation of manufacturing knowledge. The repeal of legal tender laws is an idea whose time has come.

Free trade is great; but until China revalues the yuan and Europe ceases with the VAT, we need to respond in kind with tariffs. We're fighting Queensbury while they bite and pull hair.

The Sellout of America
All the lawyers and all the politicians are selling America to the highest bidders, while those who have grease under their fingernails and grow calluses through honest toil are sacrificed as a part of the deal.

However, those white-collar workers with post-graduate degrees better take heed, a friend of mine with a PhD in chemistry recently lost his job -- it was outsourced to India, where they will do the research cheaper.

globalist playbook
It was part of the globalist agenda to deindustrialize America. Read Brezizski's writings.

They want to take America down and to kill the middle class. Wait till the border is opened and the country is flooded with cheap labor. That's going to be good for us too?!

McCain is boasting about screwing America. I am looking forward to him going down in flames.

I am also sick of being lied to by a bunch of scumbag traitors who are willing to sell their souls for a mess of pottage.

Maybe Lord Salisbury forgot Vultures
"The commonest error in politics," said Lord Salisbury, "is sticking to the carcass of dead policies."

Takes a Pride of Lions to drive the vultures away from the dead and dying.

Few lions and many vultures is the problem today.

NAFTA swarms over with the vultures, and there are no lions to chase them away.


Get the Best Deal for Taxpayers
Mr. Buchanan,

Don't you think you should have included the relevant fact that the tanker will be built in Mobile, Alabama, USA. Even if this were not the case, however, the purpose of defense contracting is to do what is best for the defense of the country, and one serious consideration is cost-effectiveness. Unless you think we're likely to be at war with France in the near future, outsourcing a tanker to Europe does not damage the security of the country, especially since the product will be made in America. If Airbus is a better deal for the country (taxpayers), we should work with Airbus rather than cater to your mercantilist philosophy which has been discredited since the 18th century.

I must have missed something
Is Airbus built in Mexico or Canada? And as the Europeans point out Boeing is hardly free of government handouts either in the form of fat defense contracts.

It now appears--
It now appears that the sell out of America is well on its way. When we see and hear about the money being raised by the "sell outs" it is reported to be up in the millions. Yet this money could and should be spent on saving American jobs, improving the infrastructure, helping the families of our brave veterans, upgrading our education system, rounding up and deporting the illegal aliens, and making America more secure and financially sound. These are just a few suggestions.
It seems that many of the sheep that are sending their money to these sell outs are wishing for the great utopia to fall in their lap.
I doubt that this will happen any time soon.
It brings to mind an old Skandinvian and Russian proverb my family taught us. "Remember this, my children, wealth does not spread, but famine does". Also, "If you feed the wolf you make him stronger and more bold, Make yourself a sheep, and the wolf will devour".

American Traitor/European Protectionists
I am with Anna, I can't wait for John McCain to go down in flames and his straight talking express to go straight to Hades!

McCain/Kemp and the rest of the Globalists crowd yell American Protectionism when American Patriots cry foul about the hypocrisy of awarding a foreign company with one of Americas most lucrative contracts. Its funny though because in this case its the Europeans and Airbus who are the protectionists and yet not a word is uttered by the administration talking heads or the Power Elite.

Whats even worse is that our own country has lodged a complaint and Airbus is being investigated by the WTO because of underhanded tactics used in order to secure the Bush administrations seal of approval.

Bush barely won election the last time because he lied to the folks from Ohio when he said he would help assist in a re-education program to re-educate citisens who have been displaced because of the loss of a manufacturing jobs. Then John McCain recently campaigned in Michigan and tried to sell the same lying package but the folks did not bite! They knew McCain was a lier.

To A Person
And where do you think the tankers would be built if Boeing got the contract? Shanghai?

Ha Ha
Your kidding right? The sell-out was completed a decade ago. This is just the latest indicator. Let's review:

The best 5.56mm carbine combat rifle, the HK 416, stealing a design developed in America.

Our heavy infantry weapons, designed in Europe and built under contract across the Atlantic or occasionally here in the USA,

Our artillery, designed in Europe and built in .....

Our fighters, aging and decrepit, being replaced by jets designed in, you guessed it, Europe, if we ever find the money.

Ha Ha Cont
Critical parts for our strategic and tactical missiles...built in Europe.

Our radars, designed in America, but now serviced by Europeans and Chinese, the contracts sold off for profit.

Parts of our soldiers uniforms and body armor...built in Mexico and other South American nations.

Our infrastructure, bought and paid for by American tax-payers, sold off to the highest bidder to Pakistani, Iranian, Arabian, Russian and Chinese companies.

Welcome to the new world order. In time other nations will start exporting jobs to America, once our economy collapses, and its cheaper to do the labor here for slave wages. That's assuming that our enemies don't learn from our mistakes.

Would the FairTax ...
... change this situation for the better (by far)?

Whatever are you talking about retchemprof, you whacko? What does the FairTax have to do with this article about NAFTA and airplanes?

Read the book and find out.

h,mmmmmm
sorry Pat but i just disagree with you on this, and i am a free trader. Hey just as Mort Zuckeman told you on the tv show. Automation is one of the reasons for job losses. And are you against more of this?

As i told a friend yesterday at work, it is only a matter of time before the Chinese start to ship there cars and trucks to the USA. I saw a small Chinese truck in Malaysia a couple of years ago and thought at the time this. What are you going to do about that Pat? Put up high tarriffs? give me a break. so you just want the American people to pay more for goods. Like that is really going to save jobs. Hey when i have to ship off to the gov 25% of what i earn in taxes then don,t expect me to be buying a new car or small truck.

Complicated By Design
All this debate cannot change our National need for a viable industrial manufacturing base. We absolutely must be self sustaining in the materials it takes to ensure our security and ultimate survival. We must not depend on anyone. Depending on Muslim nations for our oil, when we are at war with elements in those nations, has us over the barrel (oil) now. We all know that to be true. Our elected officials have let us down--frankly, I have significant trouble wishing any of them long life.

Jorge's No Illegal Amigo Left Behind....
Open borders, export of US industries, import of tens of millions of non-assimilating "immigrants" (legal and illegal) and now the outsourcing of US defense suppliers.

The devolution of the US into a 3rd world toilet is almost complete.

The RINOs and free trade fetishists say "Give us more restaurants, nail salons, lawn mowing services - we don't need engineering and manufacturing." Yeah, right.

Mess
It is a fine mess we have here, Patrick.
The CEOs are doing great.
Has the GOP become the party of CEOs and other purveyors of personal paper profits?

McAmnesty FEASTS on the Rotting Carcass!
McAmnesty was endorsed and voted for by the globalists, liberal establishment media LEMmings, illegal aliens, and crossover liberals because they know he is an open borders, globalist, neocon sellout. The whole George Soros scheme they love so much is to weaken the United States economically so that it cannot be a world force. McAmnesty is a useful idiot for the cause. Question him about the failing economy and the disastrous "free" trade agreements? You can't do that, he was a POW! Question him about Constitution Article IV, Section 4 requiring the federal government to protect the states from invasion such as the 25 million illegal aliens and terrorists he has allowed to walz across the border? You can't do that, he was POW! Question him about why he cast the decisive vote against ANWAR drilling so we have to buy the same oil from the Canadians who do? You can't do that, he was a POW! Question him about his medical records and psychological treatment? You can't do that, he was a POW! Question him about how he will fight wars all over the world for 100 years when we are already nine trillion dollars in debt and bankrupt? You can't do that, he was a POW! The worst part is that sellouts B. Hussein Obamanation and Sir Edmund Hillary Clinton are also tools of the globalists, so we have no choice because of McAmnesty's stranglehold on the Republican Party.

Once the United States goes down economically, our stable middle class and democracy are DEAD. Remember THAT each time you advocate another sellout trade agreement or buy another defective, organ-harvested product from the Communist Chinese. Competition is good but we will never be able to compete if we do not elect world class leaders who look beyond self interest and help America WIN! Someone PLEASE come forward!




Why did we let the best man go?
And the only candidate with his head on straight was not given the time of day by the RNC, the talking heads, the pundits, etc. Mike Huckabee is the only man with the intelligence, forsight, and guts to bring change with plans to us. And - he wasn't even given a chance!

Heartland Conservative
Huckabee may be a good man but he has focused his life and fortune on his "gift of gab". It is hard to trust a man that is too glib when being glib is his profession. Words mean nothing which is the exact reason I wrench every time I hear people like HRC and Obama speaking from the failed world of the Socialist. Our system for grooming and identifying political leaders has failed. Al Franken is proof positive of my statement.

More engineering grads, fewer mba grads.
Buchanan is correct that most of our industrialized trading partners protect their industries.

We like to view ourselves as being "open-minded" on socalled "free trade".

But you know what they say about having a mind that is too "open"? Not only can one's "gray matter" fall out, but too "open" of a mind is suspectible to others placing alot of garbage in it. Kind of like "garbage in, garbage out".

I agree with Buchanan on the McCain involvement on the U.S. Air Force tanker bid to Airbus.

Stupid decision.

Especially on matters of national defense, and in the case of Boeing where many of those jobs require engineering expertise along with advanced machinist skills...exactly the jobs that ought to remain here in the U.S...our government should have a predisposition to award contracts to domestic manufacturers.

I disagree with Buchanan that ALL American industry must be protected.

The future is promised to no one.

On many consumer items, be they vehicles, electronics or whatever, if a Germany or Japan makes a better quality product, better engineered, than what is made here in the USA, the American consumer ought to be able to purchase it.

Rather than admiring an Al Gore or G.W. Bush for earning degrees in law or business, our nation should place a premium upon earning degrees in the hard sciences and in engineering.

There is nothing praiseworthy about a MBA or law degree.

By investing in science and engineering, our own people would be developing the superior products that too often now are being made in Japan and Germany.

The answer is not to penalize another nation for making a superior product to that which is made here.

The answer is to create more and better engineers.

Competition
Free Trade can be a good thing, but like all good things, you can have too much of it if it is not consumed in moderation. The Airbus, by the way, is not less expensive. It is larger and therefore more expensive. Perhaps the most interesting element of this quote is that if you award 2/3's of the world's market to AirBus for 30 years, will we ever again have an American based manufacturer able to build such a plane? After all, if Boeing shuts down that division, AirBus will have an effective monopoly now, and in the future. And Boeing will almost certainly do just that, given that it is not likely to be cost effective to maintain it. This is not just about awarding a contract - it's about the fact that if we don't keep Boeing in the game in some way - then it the future, we will have only one company willing or able to build tankers. And, in that future, do you think they will be cheaper or more competitive? How could that be? There will be no competition. The cost to Boeing to rebuild such a division in 30 years, as well as to revisit the engineering and designs necessary to compete in order to even bid on such a contract will be prohibitive.

We're not just awarding a contract. We're awarding a monopoly. Is this good policy?

Science Grads Are Coming From Overseas
jerabaub: Good comments, but remember that the globalist practice is not to hire American young people with science degrees, but cheap substitutes from elsewhere. Remember Bill Gates telling Congress his ideal would be to hire all employees here from another country? No other industrialized democracy allows that! Our young people already know how hazardous it is for them, with their parents' help, to scrimp and save, and invest four to six years in higher education, only to be told by employers here, "no thanks, I can hire someone from India cheaper." Some incentive system, but a globalist's dream!

Iowa PatN
One BIG mistake of the US public has been to continue to support the Liberal controlled US higher educational system with their business. Our kids can get a cheaper education in Mexico, Canada, and other nations of North and South America and have degrees just as valuable as those of India, etc. (I think one can now get an online degree in certain disciplines from universities abroad)
Why have the costs of college educations exploded over the last decade? All those old Liberals in the system are padding their nests for retirement!

Why are you crying ???

If you keep re-electing the same pol's all the time why would anyone expect things to change.

Pat Buchanan - economic illiterate
To the bitter end, Buchanan (no conservative, he's an authoritarian -- there's a difference guys) appeals to emotion with anecdotal evidence against free trade.

The problem with his so-called "protectionism" is that for every person being protected, 10 are being fleeced. If he and his followers really care so much about Boeing, why don't they make up the difference in the bid prices with voluntary contributions out of their own pockets? [chirping crickets]

DEMS and GOP
We are trapped in our own web of blind ignorance, manipulated election after election to be draw, as if in a football game, to one of only two "teams", Dem or GOP, and neither do ANYTHING to further the well being of this nation or her people!
Why wasn't our dependence upon foreign oil ended after the crisis of the late 1970s when people were fighting in gas lines at stations across the USA? prices soared, not only at the pump but just as now in EVERYTHING because oil touches EVERYTHING, either in production, recovery/harvest, or transport...
Why don't we have more nuclear energy production, wind, geothermal, wave motion, electrical damn, solar, and every other viable means to have brought us back to reliance upon our own oil resources where needed by now? Our "leaders" have had 30 YEARS.
Ronald Reagan called a bi-partisan commission to consideer the challenge of the future of the Social Security Trust in the early 1980s, and the only thing I can think of to be adopted by our "leaders" out of the wisdom given by that commission was to extend the retirement age! The Federal "leaders" certainly didn't hear the part about stopping the annual Federal budget raid of the SS Trust funds! Nor did they hear the proposal to diversify the investment of those funds beyond Federal bonds offerring well below market rates; while insurance trusts were raking in funds from proper investments, the poor SS Trust was married to low earnings in "Treasury Securities".
Now, I've broken from the GOP; McVain was the last straw for me, but all I hear from the GOP "cheerleaders" are appeals to "stay with the team". The DEM and GOP "teams" have ruined this country, and not McVain, nor Hillary, nor B Hussein will provide that leadership needed to right the ship of state!

DEMs and GOP
Madam Pelosi (obviously much greater in her own mind than in truth) and her small band of thugs in the US House are holding the business of the nation hostage, even in cases where they know the majority of the US House is against them; is this the "people's house" under the Dems? Is this the leadership we need.
The US Senate overwhelmingly passes legislation vital to the DEFENSE of our nation, the President sigmals he will sign it, and Madam Pelosi, eventhough the votes exist in her chamber to pass the legislation, denied the nation DEFENSE, but she and her thugs can find ample reason, taxpayer funds, and time to alot to suing the US President over Executive Privilege which they know is 99% sure to fail in the Federal Courts!
The majority of the US House is ready to move on legislation submitted by a DEMCORAT to address our immigration disaster, but Pelosi and her thugs hiold it hostage!
To me Madam Pelosi and her thugs are a part of the problems of this nation every bit as much as the GOP President!
...and they are both, the DEMs and the GOP, are THE problems denying US Citizens GOOD government!
I'm tired as Held, and I'm not going to take it anymore; how about you lemmings? Ready to take the plunge and chart a different course...get a new "team" in the game?

Michael
"Pat Buchanan - economic illiterate
To the bitter end, Buchanan (no conservative, he's an authoritarian -- there's a difference guys) appeals to emotion with anecdotal evidence against free trade."

Give me an example of Buchanan being an authoritarian, please.


Pat raises provocative questions
When foreign governments effectively collude with enterprise (Airbus) to overwhelm American production, one really MUST question unbridled "free" trade. RINO neoCONS are trying to say that we should enlist ILLEGAL aliens and make them citizens after two years in the military. Army enlistments of citizens became problematic because the war of choice in Iraq was such a fiasco for too long. Ergo, the neoCONS created the manpower challenge, then sought to alleviate it with the equivalent of Roman freed slaves.

good point:
"However, those white-collar workers with post-graduate degrees better take heed; a friend of mine with a PhD in chemistry recently lost his job -- it was outsourced to India, where they will do the research cheaper."

There is a virtually unlimited supply of East Indians and Chinese... we are providing many with advanced educations which they go home with to compete with us, so our tax $ are subsidizing the global businesses which outsource to them-- with tax breaks as well! Charity begins at home, folks.

excellent post, as usual:
jerabaub writes: Tuesday, March, 11, 2008 9:09 AM

We do have too many lawyers-- 3x as many per capita as in 1960... and guess what, 3x the law suits! The U.S. has seventy percent of the world's lawyers but only five percent of the world's population. The Bar likes to say that law suits add only 1% to the cost of health care-- do YOU believe that when your doctor orders MRI's, etc., "just to be sure"?

Wrong Way Buchanan
No,No, Pat, you're running the wrong way, like wrong way Corrigan, the football player that was so confused that he ran for a TD.......wrong end zone........just like Buchanan has done here.

It seems that Buchanan went to the same school as did Hillary & Barack who seemed also to not understand that NAFTA doesn't have anything to do with China, France, Germany, Madagascar or the Road to Mandalay.

FYI, Mr. Buchanan, Hillary, Barack, that country to the North is called Canada. They supply the USA with their principal source of OIL, furnish the USA with electricity, water, wood products and most of the paper for our magazines and newspapers, along with a host of other products, some of them through underground tunnels.

And that place just below Texas, it's called Mexico, Pat, just in case you forgot.

Neither have much of anything to do with Airbus and the last time I looked, Northrup-Grumman doesn't have their Home Base in Toronto or Tijuana.

Get it, Pat?

reply to: Akagi
re:
***************************************************
Akagi writes: Tuesday, March, 11, 2008 1:33 AM
I must have missed something
Is Airbus built in Mexico or Canada? And as the Europeans point out Boeing is hardly free of government handouts either in the form of fat defense contracts.
***************************************************

The column is about so-called "free" trade, of which NAFTA is a key component. Boeing's lost contract has HUGE multiplier effects on the U.S. economy. IKE was right to warn us to be watchful of the "military-industrial complex," but today we must also be mindful that what is is in the interests of "globalism" might hurt many in the U.S., while foreign governments sway results to benefit their populations. "Fat defense contracts" to Boeing, unlike "entitlements," at least provide jobs to the educated here and stimulate such jobs, education and research, which has a multiplier effect. [I teach college-level econ and business.]

You clearly have a HUGE chip on your shoulder about the traditional anglo-dominant America, but it is common sense that most among us here naturally prefer that which benefits America as a whole-- just as they do in China, Japan, etc. When our government in a representative republic effectively favors other nations, we rightly SHOULD recoil and question same vigorously.

Good Job Pat!
Let us see. I believe it was Mrs Schaffley that exposed some unusual facts. In order to allow the Airbus bid, all we had to do was first reset a few requirements. The first one eliminating the ability to use smaller and shorter runways. Hey no problem, just make the pilots fly longer and maybe miss a few planes cause they can't get there in time. Oh yes, burn more fuel also because we are awash in petroleum. And for the final change eliminate the ability to refuel all our current planes and future ones as well due to turbulence. Other than that, why we got a level pplaying field, and Airbus won the bid!

Leavings
And of course, we are dumping this debt upon debt onto our posterity. Our kids and their kids will be working for 30% of their pay while the government sucks off 70% without any earmarks starting now, nor will this include defense spending.
It did not take a genius to see what has happened to this country under the mis-management of previous Democratic and Republican administrations. We are fast sinking in this political hash brought about by people with degrees from Harvard and Yale.

Do You Want To Keep Your Country?


We the People of the United States of America have the right to have our borders and our laws respected and enforced.

Citizens of other countries illegally in our country have no right to demand anything from our government. They most certainly have the right to petition the governments of their home countries for change if they are unhappy with their home country. If they want to be Americans, we have a path to citizenship, more generous than any other nation, and it starts in their home country.

We need to insist on the equal protection, application and enforcement of the law or devolve into anarchy. Our Republic only functions if everyone follows the same rules. We should not change the laws to accomodate those breaking them.

If America annouces to the world "We can't stop you, so come on in" with another amnesty, the deluge will be overwhelming. If 3,000 a day didn't get your attention, then wait until it's 10,000 a day. We cannot sustain this influx and survive as a nation. We must speak up and speak to each other about this and not let false claims of racism or bigotry be used to intimidate us into silent assent. America is not Congress' to give away. America belongs to We the People. Speak to your neighbors, speak to your coworkers, but please speak up to your Congressmen and Senators. It's O.K. for us to enforce our laws, no really, it is.

Someone please tell Sen. McCain.

Free Trade and Patents
If you think the trade agreements are bad, just wait till the country wakes up to the fact that our political class has effectively destroyed the patent system in the United States. Recent court decisions, changes in the Patent and Trademark Office and legislation pending in Congress, are making it nearly impossible to protect American inventions. So the dynamic reseach, tech and medical industries will be next to go, all to help out the big multinationals.

Buy a globe
North American Free Trade Agreement - Since when are Europe, China and Japan part of North America. Since neither Clinton nor Bush own any businesses, how could either of them create any jobs? What company boards is Pat on? Why aren't productivity numbers ever included in protectionist rants? Smart, well paid engineers design better ways of building the same widgets with less labor. Why does manufacturing output increase while manufacturing labor decreasses in this country?

All of you protectionists have it wrong. Just like libs always blaming America first for everything, you always blame everyone else first for our trade problems.

Here we go again with Pat
Where did the majority of those 3.5 million jobs go, Buchanon? Mexico? Central America? China? You certainly know the correct answer. So why didn't you mention that most of these jobs are in neighboring Alabama, North Carolina, etc.? It appears the union-thinking, high-taxing Ohio is at least partial for their 3.5 million loss and Alabama's grateful gain.

Just a slip of the pen, I'm sure. Imagine that: the ever-NAFTA-slamming Pat is still at it. Some things never change.

I'm sure his next article will be about Israel or military engagement in Iraq as "the world's policemen."

I get it!
When we finally listen to our "leaders", whether they be neocons or neoliberals, we will be invincible. All we have to do is to open our borders up completely, destroy what is left of our manufacturing base and print up an endless supply of dollars and continue to borrow so we can buy up what we need from foreign suppliers. After all, that is the world's reserve currency and the rest of the world will be more than happy to receive these instruments of debt.

That's where we're headed and the only thing we'll have left are bodies to serve as mercenaries for the unstable areas of the world as Thomas Barnett stated in a speech a couple of years back at Ft. Belvoir.

Pat's right on these "free" trade deals. It isn't free, it is managed trade. They only serve to enrich a few on Wall Street at the expense of the rest of the nation. By the time these folks are through we'll have a society that will have a name from the past. It is call feudalism.

NAFTA, Globalism etc.
Anna and Sir Aslan: Clinton(lib),Bush1,Bush2(neocon),Kennedy etal(libs) in office now are all Globalists and are selling this country out. Clinton started NAFTA, Bush is pushing NAU/SPP and don't think for a minute that Hillary or Obama won't sell us out to the U.N. as soon as one of them get in office. If you think current Globalization is bad hang on for the ride of your lives.

Politicians
CHARLIE: WHO WOULD YOU SUGGEST?????

Politicians
CHARLIE: WHO WOULD YOU SUGGEST?????

Obama Blows Out Hillary In Wis On Trade!

NAFTA CAFTA HAFTA FIND A JOB!

…Early exit polls also showed that the economy and trade were the key issues in this working-class state. Seven in 10 voters said international trade has caused job losses in Wisconsin, while less than one in five voters said it created more jobs than it has lost….

WATCH VIDEO

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/obama-blows-out-hi llary-in-wis-on-trade

NAFTA
The people in Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania have themselves to blame for the lost jobs. Their unions demanded higher and higher and higher wages and benefits until blue collar workers were making more than skilled professional and skilled construction workers.

The cost of that caught up with them and the manufacturers in those states because they could not compete.

NAFTA had very little to do with the loss of their jobs and the closing of their mills. I believe Thomas Sowell or Walter Williams recently had a very good article on this subject.

Pat is no economist.

A choice for NAFTA/Bubba
Do I buy a car from an overpaid brute in Michigan with health care much better than mine and who votes for Hillary?

Or do I buy a car from a hard-working Mexican who works for less, provides the same quality, and makes my car for $2000 less?

All you NAFTA-haters just go ahead and take the former.

"Pat is no economist" is quite the understatement...


very well said, Va. Patriot
re:

Virginia Patriot writes: Tuesday, March, 11, 2008 12:25 PM
Do You Want To Keep Your Country?

****************************************************

Folks, time is short to save America from the ILLEGAL alien invasion. Middle Americans just like YOU derailed Kennedy-McAmnesty last year, but the RINO, globalist, open border ilk helped Amnesty John just enough for him to prevail in a crowded field in a flawed nominating process.

We MUST keep barraging Congress AND assure the election of as many right-thinking people as we can. You can reach them in Congress easily at their official sites right here... bookmark it and e-mail/call them often!

http://www.congressmerge.com/onlinedb/index.htm
http://www.numbersusa.com/index

That second site is the most effective organization fighting for orderly, LEGAL immigration and to preserve our rule of law and socio-economic well-being by urging enforcement of existing laws. NumbersUSA has targeted, prepared e-mails you can send to Congress. The other side is monied and organized-- miscreant employers and their chamber lobbies, ethnocentric Hispanic groups, and PC liberals (including remote elites and MSM) wanting more welfare state voters. Get involved today! America would be a terrible thing to lose! She can only benefit from educated, skilled immigrants who want to assimilate, NOT FROM the madding crowd of ILLEGAL, ignorant, indigent, willfully culturally disparate who will morph us into a third world barrio.


mrsparky
I was on board with your 'jobs are being lost to automation, not overseas...' until I found out how much we've lost in productivity, i.e. we're making less stuff overall, and that is WITH the benefit of automation.

Now I'm skeptical.


pjal
"FYI, Mr. Buchanan, Hillary, Barack, that country to the North is called Canada. They supply the USA with their principal source of OIL, furnish the USA with electricity, water, wood products and most of the paper for our magazines and newspapers, along with a host of other products, some of them through underground tunnels.

And that place just below Texas, it's called Mexico, Pat, just in case you forgot.

Neither have much of anything to do with Airbus and the last time I looked, Northrup-Grumman doesn't have their Home Base in Toronto or Tijuana."

Couldn't agree with you more in re: to Canada. I believe our trade partnership has been lucrative due to the wealth of resources we have been able to import as cheaply as possible.

I do note that you were kind of at a loss mentioning any great resources out of Mexico. Sure, they have oil-- (for now, but they've ran that into the ground,) but they're just doesn't seem to be a great wealth of resources that enrich us further via a trade agreement with them.

I remember the logic at the time was that the standard of living in Mexico would leap after NAFTA and with their new wealth we would export hordes of goods south of the border. Unfortunately; nobody remembered to crack open a history book. If I didn't know better, I swear they enjoy corruption, oppression, and living in squalor.

Mexico is as good a trading partner as a ne'er do well ex-con brother-in-law that is always looking to borrow money.

American made, but how?
re:
MellorSJ2 writes: Tuesday, March, 11, 2008 1:49 PM
***************************************************

Why not buy a high quality Toyota made in America by LEGAL residents without the $1,600 bounty per(poorly made) American-brand car by the UAW for retired worker benefits alone? Most of the general salutary economic benefit from that good, reliable, relatively fuel-efficient car produced here remains here. It is true that the unions have largely killed their golden goose via over indulgence... you cannot pay the unskilled $70+/hour and not bring on a day of reckoning.

********************************

Labor cost per hour, wages and benefits for hourly workers, 2006.

Ford: $70.51 ($141,020 per year)

GM: $73.26 ($146,520 per year)

Chrysler: $75.86 ($151,720 per year)

Toyota, Honda, Nissan (made in U.S.): $48.00 ($96,000 per year)

US independence soon to be gone....
lodestar, you're talking ancient history...yes the UAW went overboard but that was many years ago.

Furthermore, we're not talking about cars here specifically, Pat's main thrust was the outsourcing of our defense industries. Our independence lies on self-reliance (for the nation and in each person's life).

Don't you believe the nation is more than a mere economic market? Don't you know the history, the heritage of the American people? Does that mean nothing to you?

Just want goods as cheap as possible, with no national allengiance/patriotism? How sad.

Nessus
It is way off topic, but when I saw your title in the side-bar I thought you were writing about an aircraft carrier.

Cheer up Pat
Cheer up Pat the Fed is going to print more money. Billons more! That should do wonders for our currency. As a country we just don't get it, but one day we will.

Andrews....
You thought I wrote USS Independence, huh? :)

reply to: Nessus
You totally misinterpreted my post... you might read my posts at 10:52, 11:11 and 1:51 to better understand my perspective in context. I am in sync with Pat B. most of the time (both anti-neoCON and America First in outlook), and I am quite the student of history, though I currently teach college econ and business, following a career as a bank exec.

We are headed toward a $2 TRILLION tab in Iraq in a neoCON war of choice against the wrong Islamics (while further alienating > 1 billion of them), even as the globalist, open border ilk myopically sell out the socio-economic well-being of America by encouraging ILLEGALS. There is nothing "cheap" about their labor when the all-in costs are reckoned, and only the few business owners benefit-- your hotel room and food are no cheaper.

re:
"lodestar, you're talking ancient history...yes the UAW went overboard but that was many years ago."

The 3 traditional American car makers are all teetering on the brink of insolvency because of the UAW and bureaucratic bloat-- this won't be "ancient history" as they collapse. The unions have just slowed the bleeding.

Agree
NAFTA is a failed policy that needs renegotiation. Obama and Clinton are correct in calling for that. McCain is showing his stubborn side. I also don't agree with the Airbus award. Companies like Boeing should be favored - Boeing helped us win WWII and has been a builder of quality aircraft for decades. The whole Airbus versus Boeing issue strikes me as anti-American. We need to start looking out for ourselves once in awhile.

Pat Doesn't Get It
I'm confused, Pat. Europe imposes a 15% VAT, making the costs of goods for their citizens more expensive. Pat's logic, then, suggests that if Europe is going to steal 15% from its people, we sure as hell better not fall behind; let's start stealing 15% from our people. That'll show them! And China "cheated" by devaluing its currency. But our currency has also gone down. How is that currency devaluation "good" for China and bad for us? I'm sorry, Pat, but you're either in favor of freedom or you're not. I'm either free to buy whatever brsnd of automobile I think is best for me or I'm not. And if the French of Chinese or Japanese are deprived of such freedoms, that's their loss, not mine. Japanese automakers have built numerous factories here in the United States, but they didn't build them in Ohio or Michigan. You think it just might have something to do with tax policies and union rules in those two states? We lost manufacturing jobs because of stupid tax laws and ridiculous benefit packages. Competition makes you strong; whining is for losers.

Ryan01 answered
Let's define our terms. Generally speaking, Libertarians are for minimum social and economic governmental controls. Liberals are for minimum social controls but central control of the economy. Conservatives are for social controls by the government but economic freedom. Authoritarians are for social and economic controls, in other words, total control.

No friend to the First Amendment, he favors heavy restrictions on media content and speech restrictions under the guise of "campaign finance reform" that would muzzle special interest groups — of course, special interest groups consist of you and me pooling our money together on issues on which we agree. Short of the American Communist party, he's probably the most vocal opponent of free trade on the political scene. You want an example, just read his article!

I'm hardly alone here. Virtually every conservative of note disowns Buchanan. William Bennett, for one, has charged Buchanan with "flirting with fascism." During the 2000 Presidential primaries, candidate Alan Keyes accused Buchanan's advisors of appealing to racist and anti-Semitic voters. Both William Buckley, writing in the National Review, and New York Times columnist Bill Safire have noted that Buchanan demonstrates hostility to Jews in his public statements. I recall Buchanan's stint in the Reagan White House came to an end after he urged Reagan to pay his respects at a German military cemetery where Nazi soldiers were buried.

MellorSJ2
"Or do I buy a car from a hard-working Mexican who works for less, provides the same quality, and makes my car for $2000 less?"

For you, that is an easy decision. Buy Mex! You can save even more money by buying a car from built in India by a hard working Indian who works for considerably less all for the low, low price of $2000 total!

May you one day find yourself working for next to nothing due to "free" trade and outsourcing. Better yet, may you be replaced by an illegal alien.

I love you economic men. Just remember, what goes around, comes around.



independence is our heritage
William Bennett is a conservative? That's news to me, Bennett is a REPUBLICAN, not necessarily a conservative.

Hey I don't agree with everything Pat says but it's also true I don't agree with 100% of what everyone says.

I believe Pat could be described as a nationalist-capitalist, of which I would also proudly welcome being called that. I'm not anti-trade or anti-immigration but I think there is such a thing as going overboard in both (or anything in life). I believe we have gone overboard in both those areas.

When we strip our nation of such critical skills as steelmaking, auto/truck, airplane, shipbuilding, trains, computers/circuit boards, tool-making, small engine making......we are only making ourselves more dependent on the "kindness of others", which adults know is not a wise course. Our nation and each of us individually would be wise to become a little more self-reliant, one of the founding principles of our founding republic.

lodestar: I should have paid more attention to your details. Sorry.



Michael
Thanks for the answer. This is a far cry from McCain-Feingold and an improvement. I would add labor unions to this.

“House and Senate candidates should raise 50% of their campaign funds from within the district they are seeking to represent. Contributions will be limited to $3000 per contributor for the primary, and $3,000 for the general election. Corporate Political Action Committees will be barred from contributing to candidates for federal office. Corporations will be barred from contributing to the national political party committees.”

http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Pat_Buchanan_Government_Re form.htm

As for the “conservatives” you listed above, I consider them to be neocons and to me they have much more in common with authoritarianism than Pat does. I would go so far as to call them fascist starting with Bennett. That includes Buckley. I would make an exception of Safire. All of those guys support the misnamed “Patriot Act” for starters.

To these guys anyone who isn’t an Israel Firster is an “anti-Semite”. To me that is code for saying I can’t make an intelligent counterargument.

Buckley is another person I hold in disdain for being part of the smearbund that put together that hit piece in NR on Pat. Here’s a Buckley quote from 1952:

" ...we have to accept Big Government for the duration - for neither an offensive nor defensive war can be waged given our present government skills, except through the instrument of a totalitarian bureaucracy within our shores...
And if they deem Soviet power a menace to our freedom (as I happen to), they will have to support large armies and air forces, atomic energy, central intelligence, war production boards, and the attendant of centralization of power in Washington - Even with Truman at the reins of it all.”

http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=28147497727 3693&grpId=3659174697241980&nav=Groupspace

I couldn't care less about Bitburg.

Nothing conservative here.

Michael
The comment "nothing conservative here" is made in reference to the Buckley quote.

joey 75
if you can't find an alternative to the Democrats and the Republicans, I can't help you. I would suggest voting for any other party; the point is to break the cycle of the two party political yoke this nation has been saddled with for too long. If enough US voters make the change and end their addiction, a new way might be found.

Protectionist - A Socialist In Disguise
If Pat Buchanan thinks those factories that were in Ohio should never have left, then let him put his money where his mouth is and open a plant on his own and see how much business he generates. My guess is that they would go under unless Uncle Sam raises tariffs on their competition so that us consumers can subsidize his business. No Thanks!

Pat Buchanan is just another Socialist pretending to be Conservative.

UNHOLLY ALLINANCE DESTROYING AMERICA


We have an unholy alliance between many leaders of the Republican and Democratic Party who have sold out our Country to finance their campaigns to maintain power. This policy may help the stock market yet has hurt the average American family. They have pitted Small business and Middle Class America against overseas workers and illegal immigrants with limited rights.

Adam Smith the one of the fathers of the free market system in his Book Wealth of Nations (which is used most universities economics programs) talks about the right of workers to negotiate wages as a key principal in a free market economy.

Yet both Parties with the help of many bought and paid for economist never mention this principal when they talk about trade or immigration policy. Economist and Politicians act baffled as to why real wages are going backwards around the world as we do trade deals ( NAFTA, CAFTA WTO CHINA…) with Countries that have workers who are treated like slaves competing with Americans. They are even more surprised as to why wages would be hurt by an unlimited supply of workers (visa) legal and (Illegal immigrants) illegal with very few rights also pitted against Americans.

The only solution is real trade and immigration reform that does not over supply our Country with workers and pit Americans against overseas child and slave labor. What do you think?

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/unholly-allinance- destroying-america

I understand
that, practically speaking, we are unlikely to go to war with France at any point in the foreseeable future (even less so, now that Sarkozy is president). I also understand that outsourcing, although it hurts some American workers, also benefits many American consumers.

That being said, I've read The Prince enough times to understand that mercenary armies are never a good idea. And while the Airbus deal is not technically the hiring of mercenary forces, it still places a vital component of our national defense into the hands of people who ultimately do not have our interests first at heart.

Even if this does not ever prove harmful, it is still, in principle, a foolish gamble.

Mc Cain ???
The bottom line for me in this article is that John Mc Cain is ready to outsource and sell America out, and he has the GALL to say he learned his lesson on the failed Amnesty Bill ??? If elected he will be selling the electorate out to big Business, Cheap Labor, or anything else CFR desires, before he has lowered his hand from the Bible at his inauguration.
I do not want a Clinton or Obama White House but have no alternative to offer other than a Write In on election day.

Free Trade or Fascism?

Torture of Gao RongRong in the Longshan forced Labor Camp



WATCH VIDEO

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/free-trade-or-fasc ism

The answer to all of this
Check out this article. I think it answers most of your questions.

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2174
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.