Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, February 01, 2008
Pat Buchanan :: Townhall.com Columnist
Tapped Out Nation
by Pat Buchanan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


It was to be the year of change, of new ideas, a new politics.

Yet, as of today, it appears the Republican Party will be led into the future by a Beltway favorite of the media and Washington insider who has spent the last quarter of a century on Capitol Hill.

And the Democratic Party appears about to build a bridge to the past by nominating the spouse of the last Democratic president who has herself been a Washington insider for almost 20 years.

With two-thirds of the nation saying the country is on the wrong course, the two parties are offering candidates both of whom played major roles in setting that course. And neither probable nominee has advanced ideas to deal with the crises America faces, nor even shown any great awareness that the country is in crisis.

The first crisis is fiscal, with the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid costs about to break the bank as the baby boomers reach early retirement. Add the other entitlement programs, defense and interest on the debt, and this consumes perhaps 90 percent of the budget.

No one is proposing cuts in any major component of the budget. Indeed, Mrs. Clinton is promising universal health care and McCain is promising an expansion of the military. Both favor a stimulus package of roughly $150 billion. As our savings rate is about zero, where are we going to borrow the money for all this?

A second crisis is financial. With the economy in danger of seizing up, the Fed has cut interest rates from 4.25 percent to 3 percent in two weeks. This has sent the dollar plunging again. A sinking dollar means surging prices for oil and all those foreign manufactures to which we are now addicted.

As the dollars pour out, nations have started to spend their dollar hoards to buy up this country at the fire-sale prices being offered in the global marketplace.

A third crisis is strategic. With an army of half a million and a Marine Corps a third that size, we are ending our fifth year of war in Iraq and entering the seventh year in Afghanistan. With the Taliban and al-Qaida now re-established and threatening Pakistan, what will it require in blood and treasure to prevent a strategic disaster there?

Mrs. Clinton is committed to a withdrawal from Iraq, but McCain says we will stay 100 years if necessary and warns, "There's going to be other wars." But wars against whom? Iran? Pakistan? Russia? North Korea? With the U.S. military stretched to the breaking point, and the quality of army recruits falling, who will fight these wars?

Then there is the immigration crisis. It is estimated that there are 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens in the United States today, with many hundreds of thousands being added each year.

McCain and Hillary both voted for the amnesty bill, neither is committed to sending back the illegals, and both give only grudging support to the idea of a border fence. How do they propose stopping the scores or hundreds of millions from Latin America, Asia, Africa and the Middle East from breaking into the United States in coming decades? Does anyone see in either Clinton or McCain the resolve to deal with what Americans are coming to believe is a crisis of national identity and national survival?

Then there is the crisis of the American middle class.

As economist Robert Reich writes, the real wages of working men have not risen in 30 years. Families maintained their standard of living three ways. Wives went to work. The men began to work longer hours than in almost any other developed nation. The family's equity in its home was then borrowed to sustain consumption.

Now, with the middle class tapped out, the home equity used up or declining, and mortgage, auto and credit card debt turning rotten, the U.S. government is going abroad to borrow 1 percent of GDP to hand out in checks in May to get consumers buying again to prevent a recession.

What kind of long-term solution is this?

How can a government as deep in debt as this one, going deeper every day, with the Social Security-Medicare crisis looming, continue to borrow to fight wars, finance foreign aid and defend nations that refuse to make the sacrifices to defend themselves?

America today faces both a fiscal crisis and a currency crisis.

Our dependence on foreign loans, foreign oil and foreign manufacturers is unprecedented.

We are being invaded from the south and seemingly lack the moral fiber to defend our home and throw out the intruders.

We have neither the men nor the weapons to honor all the treaty commitments and war guarantees we have given out to nations all over the world -- and McCain plans to add several more.

Yet, we are consumed with the issue of whether Bill Clinton, by comparing Barack Obama to Jesse Jackson, was playing "the race card."

We are an unserious people in a serious time.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Pat Buchanan is a founding editor of The American Conservative magazine, and the author of many books including State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Pat Buchanan's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
We simply cannot Afford McCain
McCain wants to support everyone who
breaks into this country:

McCain wants ONLY THE USA TO BE PUNISHED and PUNISHED even destroyed to bear the burden of the "GLOBAL WARMING" Scam:

McCain wants to fleece every productive and successful ambitions responsible citizen;

McCain has no energy policy except to tax USA Citizens who can least afford it ?

EXCEPT perhaps to "BLOW UP IRAN" or ????

A simple solution.
We certainly can afford all of the things Pat mentioned, plus a great deal more. All we need to do is dramatically increase taxes across the board and issue earnings caps on all jobs and corporations.

It would be a simple matter to have a government panel determine the appropriate pay scales for all types of work, as well as a minimum income needed for a citizen to afford a basic living. Then, whenever an a citizen applies for a job, the government panel could determine their needs, match that against the approved pay scale for the job, and tax 100% of the earnings that are above the sanctioned level.

This would keep labor costs in line, and increase a company's profitability. The panel could then in turn determine the appropriate income for individual firms, and tax 100% of the excess revenue earned.

By doing this, everyone earns a fair living as determined by a government panel, and the surplus income is converted into tax dollars. Those dollars could then be spent where the government deems necessary, instead of it being wasted on the people who earn more than they need.

...
By the time either Clinton or McCain gets through, the former US not only should be a third world country, but part of the NAU. This country has gone insane.

Best Article
This is flat out one of the best articles I have read in a long time. I have been enraged at the idea of McCain being the GOP nominee but this puts things into even more perspective and reminds me of just how serious things are right now with all of it coming together for a what could very well be the end of our Republic, at least as we know it.

We have forgotten what it really means to stuggle because we have had it so good for so long. He care more about Paris Hilton than our fighting sons and daughters in Iraq and our Freedoms here at home. He have become a nation of spoiled brats and soon our eyes will be opened.

If its McCain vs Hitlary or Obama, in the end the American people lose.

"Seized up" economy
While I'm far from being economically literate, I have done some reading in elementary economics (Sowell, Hazlitt, etc.). I don't believe I've read anything about an economy "seizing up", though. I'm a bit baffled. I guess I need to do further reading. As for the "fire sale" by which others are "buying up" this country, surely none of the sales are coerced; they are being made freely by the individual sellers, who deem the sales to be beneficial. Economic conditions ebb and flow, and at times may give rise to particular problems or concerns, but such conditions should not lead to sweeping statements of gloom and doom, or worse, to outright fearmongering.

We need an old warhorse...
...as there is no young one on the horizon. Give it another shot, Pat.

Fearmongering
is Pat's stock in trade, Jim. He loves a good disaster. Where Reagan made "it's morning in America" his catchphrase, Pat's would definitely make reference to a setting sun, or impending doom of some sort.

But Pat is a shrewd analyst, with a keen mind. I like reading his columns, even though I do feel like reaching for the prozac afterwards.

Maybe Pat has a sizeable chunk of stock in Pfizer.

Ron Paul
has been saying all the above since day one, but because the establishment says he is a kook, all you sheepublicans jump on the bandwagon and say baaaaaa against Paul. Fools.


I like Pat
But I really hate it when he's right.

Other than a couple of statistical fudges, this is on target - it's just not very encouraging.

Bush wants $200 billion in Medicare cuts
How will this play with Americans while Bush and congress is spending 9 billion a month in Iraq?

Politico-

Setting the stage for one last budget battle with the Democratic Congress, President Bush plans to propose $178 billion in long term cuts to Medicare in the fiscal 2009 budget he will unveil on Monday.

A White House official confirmed Thursday that Bush will propose $208 billion in mandatory budget reductions in all, with Medicare cuts taking up the majority of that figure.

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-wants-200-bil lion-in-medicare-cuts


The Demise of a Nation
As other nations such as Rome. The Ottoman Empire have fallen and ceased to exist, the USA unfortunately, is headiing in that direction.Wi th the present administration more interested in every foreign country ignoritng America's home security. we are fast failing as a nation. Our politicians have been busy giving America away or selling cheap.our country's sovereignty, heritage and culture along with our soul. It's all a matter of time.

McCain Is the Repub Terrell Owens
As Republicans approach the Super Bowl of national presidential elections, the team remains divided with the probability of starting an aging quarterback who is at odds with members of his team and really doesn't want to include some of the plays that have been successful in the past. Some of his teammates are not sure if they will support this QB with an all-out effort.

Meanwhile, they face a team with two potential very popular quarterbacks that is united in its pursuit of victory over a team that has dominated them for eight years.

Guess who's going to win this match. Hint: it ain't the one led by a T.O. aging juvenile misfit.

Hold your nose and vote Hillary/Obama
Sadly, get used to it America - it's either Hillary/Obama or McCain. And, no traitors. No way.

Looks like, if things go as they are, we're holding our noses and voting Hillary/Obama.

Go Hillary/Obama!!!



Cynical
I agree and they're doing it simply to line their pockets.

I examine this very issue on my blog, in an essay on fifth columnists in America. (Click on my handle)

Vintage Pat
Mostly correct, I would say, except for the "fire sale."

Remember when everyone was screaming about Japan buying up the USA?

Where are the Japs now? Faded away because their government attempted to control their economy and it crashed.

Sounds like some of the stupidity offered by MuhCain and the two junior senators running for the dhimmicrats.

I think MuhCain will lose big, and repubbies in congress also. They are arrogant elitists who think they know better than the people, who they dismiss and ignore as soon as they've bought their votes, pandering to which ever group they need at the time... The mindset of DC is the same for each party, even if their goals and policies differ somewhat. Number one is always number one with these people and MuhCain exemplifies this as well or better than Billary.

I'm digging out my "Impeach Clinton" poster.

Loyal DEM
What the Hell are you smoking, the Government is the problem now and you want to have a Government Panal set standards for workers.

Wait until the UNIONS see that one and they will not allow that to happen/LAUGH you off the stage

Look at Medicare,Food Stamps , Welfare, Un-Employment all are going broke WHY?

BIG GOVERNMENT

What a Joke, but a typical LIBERAL RESPONSE to everything is BIG GOVERNMENT/TAXATION without Representation is what LIBS do BEST.

Better hold on to your wallet because if HITLERY is elected you want have to worry about a Government Panal setting REGULATIONS because you are about to see the BIGGEST TAX HIKE IN HISTORY when RANGEL gets through with his PROPOSAL

McCain vs Hillary: What's the Difference
This may be the first election in a long time where conservatives stay home. Tom Delay had it right when he said a few weeks ago that if, God forbid, McCain gets the nomination he will sit this one out and stay home. A Republican candidate can not win without conservative and evangelical support. McCain will get neither. With the one exception that McCain supports our military and Hillary loathes it, there is very little difference. Both want open boarders and amnesty for illegals, both want government run healthcare, both think we should treat terrorists with respect; both have contempt for the rule of law and our constitution. Both would appoint activist judges to SCOTUS, both are arrogant and not too intelligent. After eight years of the least intelligent president we've had since Carter, it would be nice for a change to have a president we could be proud of. But, alas, that will not happen this time short of a miracle.

chuck
You've been tagged and bagged by Loyal Dem! He writes satrically using leftist-commie slogans and groupthink! haha.

Join the big group of people he's nabbed! (I'm in that group.)

He is a pro at using libsquirt bleating points! haha

Too Lazy, too easy
Remember that in France Sarko, a real conservative followed fake conservative Chirac. We need to hold our nose and vote for McCain, then work hard and constantly keep the heat on him during his (preferably single term) tenure.

Third Party
I am looking for a Conservative Leader. If the Republican Party is foolish enough to let McCain be the nominee, they will officially become the Moderate Party, and I will vote for whomever chooses to start a Conservative Party. If no one steps up to do that, I will write in Mitt Romney. I refuse to go along any longer with the idea of compromise, which really means "giving in" to the socialists. When have the Dems ever compromised by going along with Conservative ideas?
NO MATTER HOW MANY PROMISIES HE MAKES, WILL NOT VOTE FOR JOHN MCCAIN, BECAUSE HE CAN'T BE TRUSTED.

Tapped ou Nation

Loyal Democrat recommends a new set of tax tables. You simply find your category, determined by Big Brother, then turn in to the IRS all above that determined amount.
This is the kind of unserious mettle Pat is talking about.
Don't laugh! If Billary gets in it might get even worse than Loyal Dem recommends.

Vote for Sanity!
VOTE ROMNEY.

Semper Fi

Conservatives need to unite!
Let's not let the MS and independents choose our next leader. It will take a huge effort but call your friends, talk to co-workers, get the vote out for Romney. Even if you did not support him in the past we must realize how destructive McCain will be not only to the party but to the country.

Romney is optimistic. He's a proven leader and, if you think his positions have shifted, at least they are shifting in the right direction.

Thanks Pat
You have completely demoralized me for the weekend. This really is so depressing. The trouble is that most of the voting public has no clue about issues. They don't care about issues.

Ronald Reagan said...
"A strong foreign policy starts with a strong economy."

Who thinks McCain knows how to lead us through a recession? When asked in the last debate why he would be better qualified to lead the economy over Romney who has been a CEO and is a Harvard MBA, McCain said, "I led a flight squadron".

You have got to be kidding me.

No Solutions
Pat,
You, and the candidates are great at detailing the problems.

But, not one of you has any new ideas.

It's the same old stuff from the Repubs and Dems.

Guys, it's a new world. The old ideas don't work any more. I'm tired of hearing about trickle down and redistribution.

There are better ways. But, our political system is not discovering them.

These debates are boring. The candidates' ads say nothing. The media is dishonest and incompetent. Wall Street is just moving cheaper and cheaper dollars around the world.

Better start thinking about what really creates wealth in an economy and give creativity of the people, not the politicians, a better chance to participate in the capitalist system.

Conservatives UNITE!
I am with ReaganMan and Dee and all truth-loving, Founding Fathers-honoring citizens of this country: conservatives must not accept defeat, and reconcile now. We must get the word and vote out for Mitt Romney.
Take hope, encouragement, and resolve from the words of Winston Churchill:

"You ask, What is our policy? I will say; “It is to wage war, by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us: to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy.” You ask, What is our aim? I can answer with one word: Victory—victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival.

We shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and the oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender."

NEVER SURRENDER.




Pat Is Right
I'm generally not a big fan of Pat Buchanan, but he is right on the mark with this artical. Something smells funny to me about this election that McCain is winning any Republican primaries. I don't hear support for him from anyone anywhere.

As to Loyal Democrat, thank you very much for reciting the communist manifesto for us all here. Some of us have probably forgotten the "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" that made the Soviet Union the economic power house that it is now. You have once again demonstrated the complete lack of understanding of basic human psychology that all democrats have.

The Only Fiscal Conservative
According to a report released Tuesday by the National Taxpayers Union, Texas Congressman Ron Paul is the only remaining presidential candidate who proposes net spending cuts.

According to the report, Congressman Paul’s proposals would cut government spending by over $150 billion, a conservative estimate of the spending reductions Dr. Paul has proposed. The report concludes that the other remaining Republican candidates, Mitt Romney, John McCain and Mike Huckabee, have proposed spending increases of $19.5 billion, $6.9 billion and $54 billion respectively.

“It should come as no surprise that when you crunch the numbers Ron Paul is the only Republican who would actually shrink the size and cost of the federal government,” said Ron Paul campaign economic advisor Don Luskin. “Romney, McCain and Huckabee don’t hold a candle to Ron Paul – the only true fiscal conservative running for President.”

In ten terms in Congress, Ron Paul has never voted for a tax increase or for an unbalanced budget.

The National Taxpayers Union study can be found at http://www.ntu.org

http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?nd mViewId=news_view&newsId=20080130006171&newsLang=en

GREAT ARTICLE PAT!!
McCAIN IS SUICIDE FOR THE G.O.P.

Why do we think a Washington insider Senator is the best nominee?

John McCain will join a list of Washington Insiders Senators who think they should be President.

JOHN KERRY AND BOB DOLE COME TO MIND.

Why would we nominate McCain knowing that Presidential campaigns are always against Washington.

JOHN McCAIN IS WASHINGTON!!

In a change election, we will be running against a female and the african american vwersion of Bobby Kennedy.

We look like IDIOTS putting a 24 year Senator up in this election.

THE BEST CHANCE WE HAVE BASED ON HISTORY IS TO NOMINATE A GOVERNOR. GOVERNOR'S WIN ELECTIONS!!

GOVERNOR BUSH, CLINTON, REAGA AND CARTER.

AT THIS POINT, ROMNEY IS THE BEST CHANCE THE G.O.P. HAS, YET WE ARE ABOUT TO NOMINATE A 24 YEAR SENATOR AND WASHINGTON INSIDER?


good article, with a couple of caveats.
Pat is getting warm, and is even in the ballpark, but I have to take exception to a couple of his conclusions.

Our nation is calling for change, and two/thirds of the people do think our nation is on the wrong track. Pat is right about that.

But, it is anything but a forgone conclusion Hillary will defeat Obama.

And, say what you will about McCain, he has always run as a maverick, distancing himself from the Washington establishment and Beltway Republicans.

That is why the Tom Delays, Karl Roves, hate him so much.

Pat is on solid ground about Hillary's obsession with foisting entitlement programs upon us.

And Pat is right that McCain's asinine remark about keeping U.S. forces Iraq for 100 years, if necessary, is most worrisome, and smacks of Bush/neocon thinking that has so ill-served our nation for the last few years.

Maybe McCain will experience a moment of clarity on this matter. One can only hope.

Hillary will never experience a moment of clarity regarding social programs. Her lust for them knows no bounds.

One bright note: Unlike Bush, at least McCain has the intestinal fortitude to use his veto pen on pork-laden legislation, and obscene congressional appropriations.

I think he definitely will cut government spending.

I also agree with Pat on the indebtness of the middleclass..it is tapped out, as well as the gargantuan debt the last seven years of the Bush administration has saddled the nation and American taxpayer with.

khomar
I voted for Ron Paul long ago when he ran as a Libertarian, and he as much chance of winning now as then, sorry, but reality is sometimes hard to accept; however, I beg you to consider that with McCain or Clinton in the Whitehouse, there is NO change; it is more Washington as usual.
Mitt Romney IS an outsider (that's exactly why all the Washington "beltway" good ol' boys and girls don't want him); he CAN bring the change of a fresh face to Washington, but with the experience of both the private and public sectors as a CEO and Gov.
Dems, and their allies in the MSM, know that if they run their liberal candidate, either of them, they will be at a national disadvantage unless they can split the GOP and the easiest path to that is to promote McVain to head the GOP ticket because he has damned the conservative wing of the GOP publicly and many of us, like myself, simply will not go blindly to the polls AGAIN and vote against the Liberals by voting for a near liberal Republican!

Harvard MBAs need not apply
RM: "When asked in the last debate why he would be better qualified to lead the economy over Romney who has been a CEO and is a Harvard MBA, McCain said, 'I led a flight squadron'."
-----------------------------
Remember the LAST Harvard MBA we had?

If the Chimp can get one, they obviously hand 'em out like penny candy.

Ideologue or manager?
The reason one can overlook Romney's changes of opinion and too-slickness is that he is a businessman. He will approach the Presidency as a management challenge. Managers must look for the best interests of the organization and its stakeholders, who are in this case US citizens. Managers are less concerned with the why of ideology than with the practicality of how. Meanwhile, what is Mr McCain driven by? His ego? His patriotism? Has he displayed any understanding of management or of economics?

If he is selected to represent the Republican Party we should support 100% against Democrats, but Romney remains the best choice.

Buck
I agree that Pat is just too negative - the US can surmount its challenges, and so can humanity. There is too much of the reactionary (let's go back to the 50s) about Mr Buchanan.

In the Spirit of Goldwater
I've been reading "The Conscience of a Conservative" (1960) by Barry Goldwater lately.

If it weren't for Goldwater and that book, few of us would likely be here today discussing Conservatism of any kind, because it was Goldwater who helped the people take back the Republican party from the big-government, establishment Republicans who have since found their way back in.

There is a new book that promises to be the perfect resurrection of Goldwater's masterpiece. It is currently #4 on Amazon.com's bestseller list; the only book of the top twenty that has to be pre-ordered because it hasn't even been released yet!

It is called "The Revolution: A Manifesto."

The author is the man whom Barry Goldwater, Jr. called "the only Goldwater Republican in this election."

Ron Paul

Pat is right on our challenges . . .
which is why we need a leader drenched in optimism based on conservative principles. Romney is just such an optimist.

loyal democrat
I realize you posted way early and probably no one even read your idiotic post but I just have to respond (forgive me any of you who have already responded to this mongoloid). Your "simple solution" has a name. It's called socialism, and it doesn't work. When you tax people more they produce less because you have removed the incentive to produce, and the principle you socialist libtards never seem to understand is no matter how large you grow the government YOU CAN NOT FORCE PRODUCTION. It's been tried, and it has failed. You want the government, the same bunch that can not deliver a driver's license inside of five hours determine people's needs??? Are you crazy, or just incredibly stupid? God forbid people with your ludicrous ideas ever assume real power.

The real simple solution is to cut taxes dramatically. This will increase revenue to the govt. (I know you will never understand how this works so just look at the damn numbers over the past 8 years) Also it will increase productivity because there is an added profit-motive (you see, people will work harder when they know they can make more money).

I know you hate these ideas because they are little more than freedom, which is what you really hate about conservatism in general. It would be better in your twisted world view if everybodies life were controlled by big-government liberals like you. That of course is why you are a loyal democrat.

Brilliant, absolutely brilliant!~
There are lots of things about which I disagree with Pat's philosophy, but a lot I agree upon. These candidates are absolute jokes. At least Romney can balanace a balance sheet. McCain v. Hillary? Vote for Billary -- at least the Repubs will be forced to regroup and self examine. I cannot vote Repub at any level anymore until they get back to small govt. (Save Romney, would take chance on him.) Even local city council members seem to adopt this big govt. conservatism. What fools.

BTW, finally, by GOLD, GOLD, GOLD. How do you think they will get rid of the upcoming debts from SS, etc.? They will debase the currency.

Prostitutes, to put it kindly. The big govt. conservatives know they are being dishonest. At least Hillary is promoting what she really believes in.

Pat got it right ...
... "We are an unserious people in a serious time." (Especially in Florida)

People who could support someone with a record like McCain because he is a "war hero" define the word "unserious".

Thanks Pat for Stating the Obvious
Pat is right on 100% with my assesment of our situation.. Romney is right with his observation "If we send the same people back to Washington to just sit in different chairs. We will get more of this non-sense"

Nearly every other country in the world views having Balanced Trade or an Export Led economy as vital to its economic health.

For 200 years that was also the policy of the united states.

There was a sensible conservative idea that prevailed in our country, "DON'T ENSLASVE THE COUNTRY TO FOREIGN MASTERS VIA DEBT"

What are we going to do when Petro-China wants to buy Exxon Mobil. Or Dubai Leverages its Stake in CITI-BANK to buy out Bank of America. Through Mortgage Securitization, every American is already paying 3 or 4 full mortgage payments a year to Foreigners... Our Own banks don't even have the money to lend to Americans for their homes....

This is consequence of a Decade of $Billion Dollar Trade Deficits, thank you NAFTA, WTO and our friends at the FEDERAL reserve for making all the funny money to support this disaster.




Buchanan
Hasn't Pat been warning us about the falling sky for the last fifteen years? I recognize we have problems but it's not jump off the cliff time. We can handle all these issues and we don't have reinvent the wheel in order to do it. The basic problem is the implementation, fostering and preponderance of LIBERALISM. We must first defeat the left in the arena of ideas, the media, and in elections. This is hard to do because they cheat, but we can do it, we are Americans (most of us anyway). Some common sense things we could do (and of course that the libs will never go for) are this:
-Eliminate the IRS and replace the current system with the Fair Tax or a flat tax.
-Remove assanine restrictions on oil production and allow companies to drill for oil wherever it exists in country. Also remove whatever restrictions currently exist and even add incentives for companies to build and operate new oil refineries.

That right there will pretty much take care of the problem, but if you want optimum performance you could also:
-Eliminate the EPA and OSHA.
-Make Social Security completely voluntary; if you want to stick with the original plan you can. If you want to opt out at any point you can and get whatever the real dollar amount on what you contributed.
-Enact massive tort reform to prevent ambulance chasing trial lawyers (like John Edwards) from suing businesses, particularly in the medical sector, for some frivalous reason that is usually contrived.

Now if you want turbo speed...

A battered American
Hugh:We are an unserious people in a serious time."

You cannot understand why the voter will not step forward and act because you, like society, cannot understand why it is so hard for a battered woman to walk out on her batterer. Washington has become the voter's savior, protector, everything.

Voters have been coddled and battered...coddled and battered...coddled and battered...until most voters have been rendered docile, dependent and with little self-confidence in making an important decision in their lives. Very important decisions affecting the voters lives happen regularly outside of the voter's ability to change.

Hence, the nearly complete dependence on "endorsements" from special...all knowing...super intelligences...to tell the voter who he/she should vote for.

Random samplings of polls of complete strangers are lauded regularly by both the media and the general public. Leading the average voter to the belief that the polls are the absolute truth. Because of this belief. Millions of voters either stay away from the polls or change their vote to the "popular" choice. This base of voters that are led around by the nose make that poll a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Perfect example...NH...the polls said that Obama would win. Hillary cried. The voters became so emotional that they ignored the polls and voted for Hillary. The poll fallacy was broken.

If the battered Conservative voter really wants to break away from Washington...he/she can...All the voter has to do is IGNORE ENDORSEMENTS......(And Huckabee's stance toward McCain is an endorsement plain and simple.)
IGNORE POLLS...GAIN INDEPENDENCE AND VOTE THEIR CONVICTIONS

It is not impossible...I put two children in a truck and drove...I escaped because of my convictions that I needed a better life. If true conservatives want to do it...really want to be break away and stand up for the consevative values they believe in...they can..

an apology
Pat...I apologize dearly...for misquoting you as Hugh...my humble apologies...must have been your sincerity...

The Battered American
Pat:"We are an unserious people in a serious time."

You cannot understand why the voter will not step forward and act because you, like society, cannot understand why it is so hard for a battered woman to walk out on her batterer. Washington has become the voter's savior, protector, everything.

Voters have been coddled and battered...coddled and battered...coddled and battered...until most voters have been rendered docile, dependent and with little self-confidence in making an important decision in their lives. Very important decisions affecting the voters lives happen regularly outside of the voter's ability to change.

Hence, the nearly complete dependence on "endorsements" from special...all knowing...super intelligences...to tell the voter who he/she should vote for.

Random samplings of polls of complete strangers are lauded regularly by both the media and the general public. Leading the average voter to the belief that the polls are the absolute truth. Because of this belief. Millions of voters either stay away from the polls or change their vote to the "popular" choice. This base of voters that are led around by the nose make that poll a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Perfect example...NH...the polls said that Obama would win. Hillary cried. The voters became so emotional that they ignored the polls and voted for Hillary. The poll fallacy was broken.

If the battered Conservative voter really wants to break away from Washington...he/she can...All the voter has to do is IGNORE ENDORSEMENTS......(And Huckabee's stance toward McCain is an endorsement plain and simple.)
IGNORE POLLS...GAIN INDEPENDENCE AND VOTE THEIR CONVICTIONS

It is not impossible...I put two children in a truck and drove...I escaped because of my convictions that I needed a better life. If true conservatives want to do it...really want to be break away and stand up for the consevative values they believe in...they can..

wuzzledorf
That is one hundred percent correct. You are incredibly brilliant. I could not have put it into words any better than that and I have tried. I do wish people would ignore most of what they see and hear in the drive by media and in much of the "popular" culture. Then so many would not be fooled by false notions such as 'McCain is the ONLY republican who can win'. Why? Because a whole bunch of poles of people who I don't know by people who hate conservatism say so. 'The economy is bad, and we're near a recession.' Why? Because that is what is reported every damn day in the drive by media. To the extent the economy has problems, they can almost all be traced directly to over taxation, over regulation, and illegal immigration.
There are countless examples of this. It is unfortunate as it turns good people into blithering idiots, who might do something crazy like vote for John McCain because the Governator endorses him. I think you're right. Generally speaking I think endorsements are useless to thinking people, though not in all cases. Ted Kennedy endorsing Obama is hillarious, for example. But supporting McCain because he gets endorsements from Rudy, Rick Perry, Charlie Crist, Stormin' Norman, or Sly Stallone is democratic malpractice.

This morning, however, Rick Santorum and Laura Ingraham officially endorsed Mitt Romney. Those are two people whose opinions' I respect greatly. I already voted for Romney, but for anyone who is undecided these are two blue chip endorsements from conservative thorobreads.
Thank you again wuzzledorf for your brilliant analysis.

No Change
We know the problems, and yes, there are solutions. But Pat points out what many of us also see, which is that right now we are an unserious people in serious times.

To start out with, we need conservatives in Congress, yet perhaps nothing better symbolizes the upper hand the Democrats have nine months before Election Day than the lopsided imbalance in the number of seats left open by incumbents who are retiring or seeking other offices.

Five Republican members of the U.S. Senate will retire in a year in which the GOP, overall, must defend 23 of their seats. There are 12 Democratic incumbents up for election -- and all 12 are seeking re-election.

On the House side, 24 Republican incumbents are relinquishing their seats compared to just five Democrats. And that doesn't even include the five GOP members who have resigned (or soon will) from their House seats early: two to assume statewide offices, and three who simply left.

CQ Politics stays abreast of these races, and in the Senate, Warners previous seat in Virginia and Sununu's in New Hampshire, both of which are running against popular Democratic governors seem to almost certainly go Democratic (Sununu is badly behind). Throw in two tossups for vacant seats in Colorado and New Mexico, several others the Dems have in play and the fact that no Dem is seen as vulnerable and you get the picture.

In the house, there are 2 previously Democratic and 9 GOP seats clearly in play, primarily due to retirements, but none of the other incumbents seems to look vulnerable.

Add in the substantial advantage the Democrats have this year in money. Not only does the GOP have to defend more seats, but it has much less money.

So how does anything get done other than what has been done for the last 7 years? Throw in the presidential, and you can see why I agree with Pat on this one. This is not a change election folks. and virtually nothing on Pats list is going to get done - and that is discouraging.


Cognitive Reasoning
Hank: thanks for your comments. I, too, love and recognize conservative thoroughbreds. However, the problem with a battered thinker is that cognitive thinking is underdeveloped.The relationship of cause and effect becomes blurred and even sometimes rationalized away. Voters in America need to stand on their own two feet. They need to recognize the effects of politicians in their lives.When this happens, opinions,endorsements and debates can be processsed and reasonable conclusions can be drawn. Any endorsement should be weighed and accessed for its value not only to the voter but of what value it might be to person giving the endorsement. Unfortunately battered voters swallow endorsements whole.

McCain and Dole
The problem is the RNC, not the average Repub voter. Remember 1996? The decision was made to put Bob Dole as the nominee, because (in essence) it was "his turn." And then they stuck Jack Kemp on the ticket to try to make it palatable to fiscal conservatives.

DISASTER!

McCain is winning primaries because "the powers that be" are out there using the same tired old arguments about "who can win." McCain, it is thought, will win the military vote, and the "centrists." Then they'll stick Huckabee on as VP to try to placate the evangelicals.

This is nothing more than the same failed strategy of trying to elect a Republican by running a Democrat. NEWS FLASH: Democrats are not going to vote for McCain. And it's an open question how many Republicans will.

These arguments were made and the strategy tried, and both failed abysmally in the last COngressional elections. The same will happen in the next Presidential election.

Republicans will LOSE because they have not cultivated any new blood in 15 years. They have become arrogant and self-righteous, and we're reaping the consequences now.

Pat...
this article is elegant and accurate. The country is in deep peril financially and morally. We have lost our way and are too stubborn or stupid to stop and look at the causes.

America was founded on a belief in God, a commitment to true freedom, and a passionate respect for individuality. We have abandoned God, sacrificed freedom in a vain search for security, and replaced individuals with hyphenated groups.

What we see today are symptoms of a sick and dying civilization. Bankruptcy, openly flaunted immorality, worship of false gods (money, fame, drugs,etc), and unlimited self adulation are the trademarks of colossal failure.

Only God can save us, but we are too self-absorbed to even ask.

Take the GOP back
If the RINOs nominate Juan McCain vote Hillary in 08.

Revolt now!

Romney the great hope?
I wish I had some hope that Mr. Romney is any better than Mr. McCain. But how many of Mr. Romney's advisers and staff are Bushies looking for a new billet? We are afflicted with a class of Washington insiders worse than the royalty of old Europe; they perpetuate themselves for their own interests. We should recall that the Second Amendment was inserted in the Bill of Rights as the ultimate backstop against tyrrany.

Tax Breaks & Healthcare for uninsured
Conservative Health Insurance Plan And Tax Break-At the Same Time!!!
The issue of the “47 million uninsured” is not going away in this political environment, therefore, a plan has to be instituted that will not destroy the quality of the current system and will not result in socialized medicine.
Rather than create another Federal Bureaucracy with a host of employees and endless new departments and rules and regulations, it should be left in the private sector where they are already equipped to handle new insureds. Current health insurers have the employees, facilities, computers and complex infrastructure to handle the influx of the uninsured. Therefore, it would be more efficient to leave to each State their share of uninsureds to absorb into the various insurance companies servicing their area.
Why would the private sector take on this burden? Answer= Significant Tax Incentives. For example, if a company could write off $2.00 for every $1.00 it expends in insuring the uninsured, then it would be motivated to take on the uninsured and provide a policy. Obviously, it depends on a business model and the ultimate tax burden of each company, which would have to be calculated.
The beauty of the plan would be to prevent a new bureaucracy and to lessen the amount of money going to the Federal government, which is ultimately wasted for pork projects and/or inefficiently used. It would lessen the amount of new Federal employees, and ultimately lead to more people becoming insured for each dollar expended. Is there any question that the private sector would do a better job than a Federal bureaucracy? The more of our money the Federal Government has the more power it has, and the greater potential for abuse of power.



Pat


You are absolutely and positively correct! Now, where do we go from here?



McCain fan -- NOT
Pat,

I don't agree with you very often, but your assessment of John McCain is spot on. McCain is a nasty Washington insider who will do anything to get elected. I can't imagine voting for a Clinton, but if McCain is the GOP nominee -- I'll hold my nose and vote for Billary Clinton.

AJ...no need to hold your ...
Nose... or anything else for that matter :)

McCain HAS endorsed Hilary for POTUS...
No sh*t...his own words! No guilt!....
Thank you GOD...
and Mark Levin :)


Don't vote Hillary!!!!!
I can not stomach Hillary or Bill. Vote against her, pleeeeeeaaaaase!!! Send her to the fat farm with Gore and Bill to the sanitorium.
Do what you have to in November to vote Republican.
Get drunk, hold your nose, hit yourself with a hammer, but please no Hillary! The Clinton machine must be stopped.
Do it for Lincoln. His bedroom is going to be sold out again!! Don't you remember?
Obama is an unknown socialist. He is too much of an unknown.
Vote Republican!!! Just do it.

Bush
Bush is against Mitt and for McCain. In fact his brother Jeb was down there working against Mitt in FL behind the sceens. Bush has a huge ego and like McCain does not belong in the GOP. When Mitt went after Bush and McCains signature piece of illegal legislation, Bush took it personal and sent the dogs after Mitt.

Andrew McCain would not do anything different than Hitlary. I will be voting for her in Nov if McCain is the GOP nominee. I just pray that we can retake congress and cause gridlock for 4 years until we can run a real conservative. If McCain gets the nod then we need to continue to work against him but fight tooth and nail for congress.

test run
Good piece Pat!

Pat Is Right
Pat is right. Pat is always right.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.