Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Pat Buchanan :: Townhall.com Columnist
Tonkin Gulf II and the Guns of August?
by Pat Buchanan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


Is the United States provoking war with Iran, to begin while the Congress is conveniently on its August recess?

One recalls that it was in August 1964, after the Republicans nominated Barry Goldwater, that the Tonkin Gulf incident occurred.

Twice it was said, on Aug. 2 and Aug. 4, North Vietnamese patrol boats had attacked the U.S. destroyers Maddox and Turner Joy in international waters. The U.S. Senate responded by voting 88 to two to authorize President Johnson to assist any Southeast Asian nation whose government was threatened by communist aggression.

The bombing of the North began, followed by the arrival of U.S. Marines. America's war was on.

As Congress prepares for its August recess, the probability of U.S. air strikes on Iran rises with each week. A third carrier, the USS Enterprise, and its battle group is joining the Nimitz and Stennis in the largest concentration of U.S. naval power ever off the coast of Iran.

And Tonkin Gulf II may have already occurred.

In Baghdad, on July 1, Gen. Kevin J. Bergner charged that Iranians planned the January raid in Karbala, using commandos in American-style uniforms, that resulted in the death of five U.S. soldiers.

As The New York Times reports, this "marks the first time that the United States has charged that Iranian officials have helped plan operations against American troops in Iraq and have had advance knowledge of specific attacks that have led to the death of American soldiers."

The Quds Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards is using Hezbollah to train Shiites to attack our soldiers and providing them with enhanced IEDs that have killed scores of U.S. troops, Bergner charged. He says we have captured a veteran Hezbollah agent and documents pointing to direct Iranian complicity in the Karbala raid.

Iran has denounced the charge as "ridiculous." But the Senate has voted 97 to zero to censure Iran for complicity in killing the Americans.

If what Bergner alleges is true, President Bush has not only the right but appears to have the blessing of Congress to attack Iran. And he now has the naval and air forces at hand. What is stopping him?

For it is surely not Congress, which buried a resolution last spring declaring that Bush must come to Congress before taking us into a new war in the Middle East. Congress appears to be signaling Bush: "If you want to hit Iran, you have the green light. No need to consult us."

Is this yet another abdication by Congress of its moral and constitutional duty to decide when and whether America goes to war?

And something smells awfully fishy here. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Pat Buchanan is a founding editor of The American Conservative magazine, and the author of many books including State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Pat Buchanan's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Pat will be remembered...
Pat will be remembered for standing against the lunacy of Bush's globalist idealism. The bizarre views of Bush & Co. have obscured the vast problems the "long war" will make for our country. Bushism is strange; it is blindly idealistic, imagining that American power can do absolutely anything, and yet hideously short-sighted. I can readily imagine that Bush will instigate (with proper provocation out of LBJ's Gulf of Tonkin playbook) some sort of action against iran. It will look very flashy on TV--probably lots of shock and awe, and do about as much good as that did. What may well follow is some sort of embogment (that's my new word, combining "bogged down" with "embedded") that will cost a lot of American lives and accomplish about as much as the surge is really doing in Iraq.

In doing this, Bush's political strategy will be to emphasize the imminent threat Iran poses to the US, hoping to generate a domestic patriotic surge that will elect a Republican president in 08. That Republican will be committed to more of the same in the Middle East, with more of the same results. [The Republicans can hammer on religious/moral issues to put them over the top; expect another wave of anti-gay marriage referenda--they worked well in 04, so they might as well be rolled out again for 08.] Religious and moral rhetoric will be piled onto patriotic bombast so the Republicans will keep the White House.

Now you'd expect me to say that a Democrat in the White House will be great, but I'm not so sure. The last thing we need is some sort of leftwing peace-mongering and dissing of our military, and I'm afraid that's what the Dems will serve up.

What's needed is someone who can understand competent advice about the real danger: the emerging "long war" of Islam against the West, that my children will be paying for, and in which my future grandchildren, if any, will be fighting. Is there any potential candidate who can see past the next news cycle to look ahead a few years? If so, I haven't heard of him.

PV
"Time For Pat to go
Just like most of our long-in-the-tooth politicians of both stripes, journalists like Pat and Novak have outlived their usefulness.

They are shells of what they once were and all of them and us would be much better if they took up golf full time."

--------

Interesting comments, PV. Are you also one who believes the Constitution to be outdated? How about our country's sovereignty and heritage? Is that outdated too? Hey, maybe freedom is a thing of the past in your book too, PV.

If we want to have a country much longer, we'd damn sure better start remembering what set this country apart from all the rest. Hint: It had something to do with some people, long ago, who PV would probably call antiquated, who devised for us the greatest form of government the world had ever seen. Benjamin Franklin, when asked what form of government he and the rest of the Framers had given us remarked, "A Republic M'am, if you can keep it." Apparently, we forgot.

The greatest experiment in the history of mankind will soon be over, if we don't start remembering right now.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.