Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, July 03, 2007
Pat Buchanan :: Townhall.com Columnist
In Defeat, a Bush Opportunity
by Pat Buchanan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


"I'll see you at the bill signing," said a cocky George W. Bush in Bulgaria, when he heard the Senate had just fallen 15 votes short of voting cloture on the Kennedy-Kyl immigration bill he had embraced.

Bush returned home, went to the Hill and implored the Senate Republicans to resurrect his bill. They did, only to have it go down to crushing defeat a second time, 46 to 53, last Thursday.

Bush has sustained a major humiliation. But he is not alone.

Routed, too, were Teddy Kennedy and John McCain, the Chamber of Commerce and La Raza, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. For this proposed amnesty for 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens ignited a spontaneous uprising against the leadership of both parties, corporate America and the mainstream media, as well.

A defeat like this is almost unheard of in Washington. For when the establishment unites -- as it did behind the Panama Canal giveaway and NAFTA -- it almost always wins.

Indeed, just as it is a defining mark of a superpower that when it commits to war it wins, so it is a defining feature of an establishment that when it commits to a political course, it prevails. When the Soviet Union was defeated in Afghanistan, it ceased to be a superpower and soon ceased to exist. Our establishment has suffered a comparable defeat.

The Beltway was routed by a coalition of TV and radio talk show hosts, grass-roots activists and backbenchers with the courage to defy their masters. The regime was run off the hill by the country that it claims to represent.

Repercussions will be far-reaching, as they were from that Panama Canal debate. Ronald Reagan led the opposition in that fight, and though he lost, it propelled him to the presidency.

Consider McCain. Once thought to be the runaway favorite for the GOP nomination, he has fallen to sixth in Iowa, dropped out of the Aug. 11 straw poll, plunged to single digits in South Carolina and may see his campaign crash before January.

Among GOP senators, Jim DeMint, David Vitter, Jeff Sessions and Tom Coburn have emerged as lions, while Jon Kyl, Lindsey Graham and Mel Martinez have likely suffered enduring damage for having chartered a Teddy Kennedy Republican Club.

Among Democratic senators, newcomers Jim Webb of Virginia, John Tester of Montana and Claire McCaskill of Missouri joined a dozen others to vote down the bill. Bernie Sanders, the Vermont socialist, also voted no.

In this vote are the makings of a new coalition. On one side, Reid-Kennedy liberal Democrats joined K Street Republicans to vote for amnesty. On the other, Red State Democrats joined the conviction conservatives of the GOP. Upon what were they united? Call it a policy of putting country and community before commerce.

Eighteen months before Bush departs, it is clear that his open-borders, free-trade globalism is no longer unchallenged dogma in the GOP. Three of every four Senate Republicans rejected amnesty. And fast track, by which Congress surrenders its right to amend Bush trade bills, expired Saturday. The Doha Round of global trade negotiations is as dead as the immigration bill.

If there is a rising sentiment in America today, it is nationalism.

Americans are growing weary of seeing their sons die in wars to bring democracy to people who do not seem all that appreciative. They are tired of reading of factories going to China and jobs going to India, while illegal aliens march in their cities under foreign flags to demand their "civil rights." They are tired of reading about new billionaires as their wages fail to rise to compensate for soaring gas prices and the falling value of their homes.

The establishment is losing the trust of the people, who are coming to believe that establishment is looking out for its own interests, not theirs -- and the two are no longer the same.

About President Bush, there are two questions: Does he see what is happening? Is he flexible and skillful enough to dump the Kennedy-Bush alliance and take up the leadership of the new center-right coalition that is forming?

In the Harriet Miers affair, he showed that skill. When the right raged against the nomination of his White House counsel to the Supreme Court, Bush skillfully withdrew it, sent up Sam Alito, reunited his coalition and won one of the signal victories of his second term. Reconstituting the Supreme Court could be a Bush legacy. The left is terrified at the prospect.

What should Bush do today? Graciously accept the "thumping" on amnesty, and seize the leadership of the border-security coalition -- 90 percent of the nation -- with a tough new bill that liberal Democrats will choke on, but the country will unite around. And kiss Kennedy goodbye.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Pat Buchanan is a founding editor of The American Conservative magazine, and the author of many books including State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Pat Buchanan's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
For once, I agree
I think this column nailed some very significant issues.

TIME: Why Amnesty Makes Sense
A recent cover story in TIME suggested it is time for amnesty. I read the facile, vacuous arguments they proffered. I could see this one coming --> two weeks later, TIME'S Inbox was full --> letters broke 90%(!) for: "amnesty makes no sense-- we need to enforce existing laws." TIME,
not exactly considered the neanderthal conservatives' favorite fish wrapper, admitted it was, "the biggest mail getter."

When people like Vicente Fox's artful shill Juan Hernandez and Geraldo bray, "Most Americans want a path to citizenship for these good people, our good friends," they are simply proffering the big lie. I actually like it when unctuous "smilin' Juan" Hernandez comes on TV to tell us that ILLEGALS are good for us, and Geraldo says they are not only net benefits, but also LESS prone to crime than citizens. Those tall ones/canards are GUARANTEED to rally Middle America! Middle America has just spoken to Congress as well as to TIME.

Fully 72% (per Rasmussen) of us believe that it is a high priority to secure the border and enforce our laws, and less than 30% care much about a path to citizenship for ILLEGALS. Our immigration system is broken because Washington has willfully allowed it to break becuase they are controlled by business $ and the lure of latino votes. It is time that we turn out the miscreant pols and reject the chamber tripe about "we must have their labors."

Too many inside the beltway have made Faustian self-aggrandizing deals for votes/money/power that are antithetical to the best socio-economic interests of America. We MUST stop the ILLEGAL invasion or lose America. Last week, we took the first step. An advanced economy cannot allow the undereductaed, poor, ethnocentric, culturally disparate to invade and permeate like a cancer-- it will eventually destroy the whole body.

Pat Buchanan, as always, is perspicacious and compelling here... a misunderstood (and often willfully misrepresented) traditional America First conservative who sees the neoCONS and globalists for the artful operators that they are-- I am proud to consider him a mentor.


Pat, Robert, you're both right
Robert,
not every conservative cares what happens to the GOP--if the GOP continues to not care about us either. We ordinary rank-and-file conservative voters don't OWE the party anything.

For those GOP tacticians who only care about winning 2008, they have good cause to be unhappy about the rejection of immigration, which has a) revealed a split within the GOP that probably can't be healed in time for the election and b) alienated the Hispanic vote into the Dem column.

BUT for those of us who are conservative by ideology rather than party loyalty (I'm not a registered Republican), we're rather pleased. When you act on principle, you are prepared to pay the price. We'll pay it rather than go along with something we sincerely believe would be bad for the country. Because in the long term (AFTER 2008), as Pat points out, we may be able to grow this into a potent new nationalist coalition.

Back in 1976, Reagan was the ideologue and insurgent when mainstream Republicanism was Rockefeller/Nixon Republicanism. And that year, he lost, and Carter became President. But four years later, he had a comeback and won.

So 2008 may be a lost cause for the GOP. But I can guarantee you that once she gets into office, President Hillary will present as many opportunities for a revived GOP as Carter did. They're already licking their chops at that one.

Pat for open borders
I hope no one here is such a pathetically deluded nitwit that they believe Buchanan is actually a principled opponent of illegal immigration. Pat spent years weeping and wailing and crying and moaning over the "rights" of someone who gained residence in the US illegally by deliberately concealing his tenure as a guard in a Nazi concentration camp. Buchanan's "nuanced" position on illegal immigration is zero tolerance, unless he thinks someway, somewhere, somehow you murdered some innocent Jewish men, women and children. Then he wants to roll out the welcome wagon with a brass band.

By the way, why isn't Pat shouting from the rooftops that he supports Ron Paul for President? Paul's stance on many issues is practically identical to Pat's but Buchanan hasn't mentioned him at all. I guess Pat is jealous that Paul's 1% in the polls exceeds what Pat got the last time he ran one of his Stassenesque vanity campaigns.

tanabear
No he won't. That comment is said about almost every president after their second term. Clinto, Nixon, Truman and Grant all probably had that said about them. I am no Bush lover, but he did lower taxes, invade Afghanistan, appoint two constructionists to the supreme court. Everyone forgets those things.

Gary Rosen
You speak with a forked tongue. LOL.

Pat's premise is spot on....But....

.....even if Bush "embraces" the majority that he and his goons continue to insult, he lacks any moral authority to parlay that coalition to any effect. at all.

The Man is morally bankrupt! IMHO I have known this since immediately after I voted him in his 2nd term. When he trotted out this illegal lien empowerment act and squandered all the "mandate" political capital on that dog.

History will show he drove the final nail in the Republican coffin. While the rank and file just watched and let him.

responses to posts
to: Roberto...
Predictably leftist, gadfly gobbledegook...
the SCOTUS appointments are one of Presidente Jorge's few concrete accomplishments... 72% of Middle America highly favors real border security (Rasmussen)... the GOP is endangered for now because of RINO, globalist and neoCON actions by Presidente Jorge, NOT because of true conservative policies, which he only chances upon like a blind hog finding an acorn.

to: Gary Rosen
A tad touchy on the old news Holocaust thing there buddy... some folks went nuts over one former prison guard only to discover he was not who they claimed despite their presumptive certitude of his guilt... Pat has been entirely consistent in opposing ILLEGAL aliens, who are simply a clear and present danger to the survival of America. In contrast, Presidente Jorge says "of course border security and enforcement must come first" when he means nothing of the sort.

to: tanabear
Agree that Presidente Jorge came into office bent on the globalist, open borders, cheap labor, NAU/SPP, embrace ILLEGALS game plan... 9/11 slowed him down for a time... the Scamnesty legislation woke up Peoria to what a quisling, indeed traitor, Presidente Jorge is on this.

Petulant pixxant that he is, I doubt that he would follow Pat's advice to carpe diem and follow the CLEAR will of Middle America and stanch the ILLEGALS. He has gone too far down the sell-out path... he promised them down in Mexico that he would work for THEIR interests on the scamnesty bill, and he has already surreptitiously committed to send our pay-as-we-go S.S. funds south to his amigos.

THE REASON FOR THE SUCCESS OF NAFTA
and the Panama Canal debacles are the fact that issues like those did not come into American communities directly and did not affect them immediately.
We are learning years later now what a betrayal NAFTA was to the American working man and woman.
The American people are finally waking up to the fact of what this scamnesty means.
The lowering of the standard of living for all of us.
The start on the road to the North American Union.
If this ever goes through, well, you can kiss Social Security goodbye.
Oh, forgive me. I heard this talking head from the Social Security bureau or whatever agency handles it on Lou Dobbs last week saying that the goverment has done an 'exhaustive study' and has come to the conclusion that granting citizenship to 12-20 million illegals with an average education of the eigth grade will have no effect on our benefits at all in the future and that Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid will be safe for 'years to come.'
Sure.
And I've got a bridge I want to sell you just over the East River in Brooklyn.

Kyl must go!
Sen. Kyl has been so overly concerned about the "horror" of law-abiding Americans choosing to play poker online in the privacy of their own homes that he completely neglected the problems with our borders. So, he decided to make Internet poker illegal while making illegal immigrants legal! Way to prioritize Johnny!!

Everyone: Care about freedom? I do. Show your support by taking two minutes to sign the petition at http://www.thepetitionsite.com/petition/306149419 . This petition will be delivered to every congressman and every senator this month.

Thanks.

The establishment thinks we're stupid.
Lodestar, your 1235 A.M. posting was excellent.

Buchanan as usual has written a well reasoned article.

Perhaps Bush can again fool his base by posturing himself now as a strict border-enforcement man, and all will be forgiven.

Cough.

If his base falls for that, it deserves to be hung out to dry again.

Bush has never been conservative. He is a believer in big government, an establishment man.

I do applaud him on his supreme court nominations, and on his tax cuts. At least that can be a positive for his legacy. Not much else.

But from his intrusive federal govt involvement in education plan(NCLB), to his radically Wilsonian, idealistic and dangerous view that our nation has an obligation to sacrifice our finest, and loot our treasury, in order to bestow the "blessings of liberty" upon a people and region that seem hostile to it, to his disastrous trade policies which envision a abolition of borders between Mexico, U.S. and Canada(lowering the living standards of Americans in the process...while lifting the standards of Mexican workers), this president has betrayed traditional conservative principles.

You can’t say that?


Do you think it is true that in many countries, citizens can have a candid dialogue about preserving national identity and we cannot? And if you Try this in our country, you’re labeled an exclusionary bigot?. Did the defeat of the immigration bill send a signal that we can have the dialogue in the U.S. without the name calling?

By Jonah Goldberg

USATODAY-Historians may well look back on last week’s defeat of the immigration bill as a watershed moment. It was, for good or ill, a milestone in America’s transformation into a “normal” country. Normal countries have arguments about their national identity and immigration’s effect on it. In normal countries, it’s not illegitimate to suggest that too many immigrants, or too many immigrants of a specific origin, may upset the social peace or do damage to the national culture. In America, however, to raise such concerns is to open yourself to charges of racism, bigotry, nativism and all-around hate.

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/you-cant-say-that

If Only
"Kiss Kennedy goodbye". Music to my ears, if only it would happen. Please my good friends and relatives in the Great Palmetto State send Lindsey Graham packing as well.

President Bush grasp
anything???

Give me a break Pat..........

The President is just incompetent...he simply is no leader....just blissfully ignorant....I am praying, just as the "bald eagle" is no longer endangered, American's are no longer endangered...have we gained new wings, sharpened our claws, focused as lasers on the politicians, America haters, that want to "sell-out" America? I pray so.

YOU WERE SO RIGHT MANY YEARS AGO
Mr. Buchanan - you were right then and it is valid today - we need the full border fence - all 1,950 miles of it!
Thank you!

Country and community coalition
How I wish that a new coalition which puts country and community first could emerge from this defeat of the sell-out Bush-Kennedy coalition, as Pat suggests! It will require articulation of positions and legislative proposals covering a comprehensive range of the important issues around which people can unite. I do not see any leadership for such an effort at present.

It will take more than just defeat of one piece of bad legislation and being against the opposition.

Off Subject
Last week I saw the Bald Eagle was being taken off the ESL. The report said we had 10,000 Bald Eagles in the US. That did not ring true to me; I was in Haines Alaska last September and eagles were everywhere. I counted 32 in one evergreen. The people in Haines told us they have 30,000-40,000 nesting Eagles there every year during the Sept-Nov nesting period. Does anyone have an idea as to which figure is correct? I guessed some of the nesting birds in Haines actually fly in from Canada but how do they reconcile the count? I did not see any tagged birds and I was very close to a number as they consumed a salmon.

Good points, Pat!
Maybe Karl Rove will be able to explain it to that Bush fellow.

Gabby
We do not have the military forces to secure the border - unless we draw down the forces in Iraq. Since 9/11, we have not added a single brigade or division, have used the reserve to supplement the regular army, and have allowed their allocated equipemnt to fall below 50%. Many can't even hold a reasonable training exercize due to the lack of equipment. The army is on its third and fourth tours, and, in order to support the surge, has had its tours extended to 15 months, and its time out of the lines to 9 months. Bush will not sacrifice his dreams in Iraq to protect the border.

Bush rally 'round the base? Get real !
Is the fence built yet? Is the remaining 9/11 hi-jacker executed yet? Have we kicked militant Muslim mullahs out of this country yet?

This "debate" isn't over, folks. Not buy a long shot. These clowns in Washington are going to try to ram amnesty down our throats one more time before the next election. The pull of 15 million newly-minted liberal voters is just too strong to ignore. The desire to remain in power is simply too hypnotic.

Until we see positive signs that our elected officials are serious about restoring U.S. sovereignty and serious about kicking the bad guys out of our country, MY SAFETY IS STILL OFF!

John Konop
Excellent post. Just one of the millions of bigots thanks you.

Hey, Robert,
If you are going to troll about someone's education, at least make sure your very post doesn't read like illiterate garbage. ;-)

(Somehow I've gotten into the habit of reading your posts with a caricaturized Carlos Mencia accent--they are a lot more enjoyable that way.)

All, in re anchor babies and what Bush could do: a nice executive order ending the perverse interpretation of the 14th amendment would hit the spot.

Sure, it would raise a hornet's nest of complaints from the Dems, but (and here's one more thing they have in common with Jihadis), they find a reason to foam at the mouth every day, so what'd be new....

I know, the chances of him doing that are zip, but it doesn't hurt to dream.

The mind of Roberto Mencia
Robert said:

Are you home schooled? I asked because several people here seem to not have basic civics knowledge...

I "hear":

Are you jome eschoooled, tio? I asked vecause seberal peepole jere seeem to not jave a vassic cibics knowlege... Teeh-tee-duuh!





Duncan Hunter
Duncan Hunter is the only candidate capable of serving as President. The man has credentials unmatched by any of the poseurs from either major party. We need a real-world, conscientious, patriotic public servant in the Oval Office. Hunter is the one. I would suggest Sarah Palin as Vice-President. Check these two out. Then you may see that there is still hope for the Republican Party; but, much more important, for the survival of America.

comment on a comment
re:

************************************************
Gabby writes: Tuesday, July, 03, 2007 6:25 AM
It was impossible to get through to
Mel Martinez's office. The only way to do it was to tell the DEMOCRAT Senator from Florida (Bill Nelson) to tell Mel to back off the amnesty bill.

I hope the voters give Mel Martinez the boot in the next election. He doesn't represent Florida's interests or the interests of America and he is one big reason why the RNC is losing money.

FIRE HIM!

*****************************************

Did anybody miss how Carlos Gutierrez, Mel Martinez, Ken Salazar, and Roberto Menendez who are all rich hispanics were omnipresent together telling us what a good thing the reconquista would be for us, but nobody in the MM suggested that ethnocentric racism was in play? Throw in Vicente Fox shill "smilin' Juan" Hernandez and Geraldo for that matter, and myriad spokespersons for La Raza, LULAC, etc.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/15/AR2007051502022.html

Gabby makes a good point-- Pan-Mexican Presidente Jorge helped make Martinez head of thE RNC (Rino Network for reConquista), but this is helping drive Republicans away from the current RINO Party.

This globalist, open borders, multicultural, bilingual, NAU/SPP, scamnesty (bring them out of the shadows with a path to citizenship) disingenuous drivel tripe is alienating Middle America. The ILLEGAL alien invasion and permeation will destroy America like a cancer destroying the host body UNLESS we radiate it at the source. We need to secure the border and enforce EXISTING laws.

Fully 72% consider this a HIGH priority (Rasmussen) while < 30% care much about a path to citizenship for the serial lawbreakers. It is NOT that "our immigration system is broken"-- au contraire, it is nonfeasance by our government which instead serves as a welcome mat south of the border. Presidente Jorge is the Quisling-In-Chief. We need to keep rattling their cages in Washington where cheap labor lobbying $ and latino votes direct their thinking against the best socio-economic interests of America. YOU can contact them easily right here-- bookmark it and give them a piece of your mind regularly-- in English!

http://www.congressmerge.com/onlinedb/index.htm

Some light reading where you can stay engaged to save America from the onslaught:

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/immigration_bill_failure_proves_rasmussen_s_first_law_of_politics
http://www.numbersusa.com/index
http://www.grassfire.org/
http://www.newsmax.com/hottopics/Immigration!Borders.shtml
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigration/wm1076.cfm
http://www.grasstopsusa.com/
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=research_researchd74c
http://capwiz.com/usbc/index_frame.dbq?url=http://capwiz.com/usbc/home/
http://stopspp.com/stopspp/?page_id=11
http://vdare.com/misc/070607_economist.htm
http://www.upi.com/Zogby/UPI_Polls/2007/06/21/analysis_majority_oppose_immigration_bill/2755/
http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/back704.html
http://www.cis.org/articles/2006/back906.html
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTUyZjY3NzExYjIxODU0NmVmYWE4MTAxNTZlOWJkNDk=

Unify
I hate to say this, but I think that it is time for a Dem in office. This will rally the base when we see what their agenda truly is. We can go back to being an obstruction party and fight like hell not to implement the lib policies. I would rather have the congress do nothing then make anymore new laws. Look we conservative had our chance and our elected officials became drunk with power.

By the way, I think that Pat is an incredible commentator and wish the man wasn't attacked the way he is. There was a post that was trying to make fun of him for his stance being similar to Ron Paul, for your information, that is a high compliment. If only all our elected officials had the convictions as Pat and Ron. It goes to show that both parties have long been bought by the the same entity (Trilateral Commision and CFF) and if you go against the grain you will be put in your place and attacked. Keep up the good fight Sir, I wish more people weren't blind to what is going on.

What... no soldiers
Gabby thinks we dont have any soldiers to protect the border. PLEEEEEEESE Cut 5000 from Korea, 5000 from Germany and 2500 marines from Japan and you have a nice force . Then add 12000 border agents plus get the 2 out of prison and you have all you need. P.S. shoot the drug smugglers.

comment on : Roberto
Roberto the Pan-Mexican, anti-America troll likes to include in his vacuous ad hominem cognitively bereft posts, "Were you home schooled?" It is fairly clear that Roberto was NOT home schooled... his parents would have given up out of shame, and he would otherwise be better informed.

As information, home schoolers far surpass the average student (average 85th percentile on standardized tests), and notwithstanding the teachers' union envious braying to the contrary, go on to excel in "regular school" and college in social skills as well. Meanwhile, their families continue to pay taxes for union/bureaucracy plagued failing public education while educating their children better at a savings to other taxpayers. The author of Megatrends was prescient about the trend of home schooling. It is an increasingly popular way that Middle America keeps the government from invading our lives to our detriment (we are the govt. and we're here to help you).

Roberto, making as much sense as always
Namely, zero.

No law can override the Constitution? SCOTUS will grant immediate cert? What universe do you live in?

Please point out to me the constitutional authority for Social Security or any other entitlement program, No Child Left Behind, Prescription Drugs for Seniors, or the Fairness Doctrine, to name just a few.

News flash, bud: it happens ALL THE TIME, unfortunately.

Nicely Done Pat
I ususally don't agree with about 70% of what you say but I thought this article was queit good. I am proud of Senator McCaskill. I did not vote for her last year but I am glad she did as the people demanded. I think she knew she would be done in Missouri if she did not. I am proud of Senator Bond too, he also voted against closure twice. Kudos to DeMint and Sessions.

The GOP is not some liberal just like Democrats party. We had to be taught a lession last year and the House as well as 75% of the Republicans on the hill got it. Unforunately it only takes the other 25% to make a majority with the Democrats which has happened thanks to John McCain and the gana of 14 since 2002.

Mr. Rosen,
You can't seem to make a point other tha anti-semetic stabs at Mr. Buchannan. Might it not be that you harbor your own racist bent toward Gentiles?

You may find yourself being guilty of the very thing you are trying to condemn another for.


$.02
Pat needs to run against John Warner for the Senate seat of Virginia. He would do more good fighting globalizim in the Senate than writing columns. Run Pat Run

P. ROBERTSONS STORY ON IMMIGRATION
I AGREED WITH EVERYTHING IN PAT'S ARTICLE TODAY ABOUT THE IMMIGRATION ISSUE. I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY WE'RE JUST NOW HAVING THIS DEBATE THOUGH. THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN A MAJOR DISCUSSION WITH MILITARY ON OUR CLOSED BORDERS 25 YEARS AGO. THAT'S HOW LONG IT'S TAKEN FOR US TO GET MAD ABOUT WHAT OUR GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN ALLOWING. WE ARE PAYING A BIG PRICE FOR YEARS OF BEING SILENT. I'VE NEVER BEEN SO HAPPY THAT ANYTHING FAILED IN MY LIFE. I'VE BEEN A VOTING REPUBLICAN SINCE 1974 AND I AM APPALLED AT THE LEVEL OF SELFISHNESS AND INCOMPETENCE OF BOTH SIDES. IT'S DISHEARTENING TO THINK THAT ALL OF THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS THAT ARE HERE BASICALLY HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS I DO AS AN AMERICAN BORN CITIZEN BUT THEY DON'T HAVE TO PAY TAXES OR FOR THEIR CHILDREN'S EDUCATION OR FOR THEIR HEALTH CARE. EVEN OUR PRISONERS CAN GET FREE COLLEGE DEGREES WHILE SEVERAL YEARS LATER I'M STILL PAYING FOR MY CHILD'S TWO YEARS AT A JUNIOR COLLEGE TWO YEARS LATER. THE ILLEGAL'S FLY THEIR FLAGS AND SPIT IN OUR FACE AND OUR GOVERNMENT TURNS A BLIND EYE. I'M GLAD OUR LETTERS AND EMAILS ARE GETTING TO OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS AND THEY FINALLY KNOW THEIR JOBS ARE ON THE LINE. THIS MAKES ME WANT TO STEP UP MY EMAILS AND LETTERS BECAUSE MAYBE THEY'RE LISTENING A LITTLE BIT BETTER NOW.

President Bush
Now that he has been bucked off his legacy horse of illegal amnesty the questions becomes whether he will continue to act as though he is in retirement mode or again mount the bully pulpit with a plan the country can unite around and effectively deal with the illegal problem. The first step must be securing the border. At this point he seems on a collision course to unite with Jimmy Carter as having presided over a failed presidency. Better he go down fighting the dems with a bill that the nation supports than to cover min the corner on hbis knees and let the dims dominate the issues

Wishful thinking on Bush
Bush won't change his tune - he can't because he's been bought and paid for, the same way Kennedy, McCain, Lott and all the rest of thos "public-minded" politicians have been compromised. The true indicator of Bush's continuing view was stated by his Secretary of Homeland Security, Mr. Chertoff. Chertoff is refusing to enforce the laws already in place re: the borders, illegal immigration, etc. In the military, we used to call this insubordination - a court-martial offense. What the "little peoiple" need to do now is expend he same energy and effort and DEMAND from the political class the enforcement of the laws on the books. If local politicians adopt these assinine "amnesty zones" and "enforcement-free" policies, then expand the Minutemen, implement community watch organizations, document the existence of illegals and physical presnet the evidence to Immigration, Homeland Security, Border Patrol and any other applicable organization. Embarass the hell out of the politicans and bureaucrats - it is the one thing they abhor - it's like sunlight on a bad case of fanny fungus.

Conservative Democrats
Ironic. Neither Pelosi nor Reid had any intention of pushing this bill forward unless Bush got out front. Which he did. Reid, after all, listens to his base - even if most don't like it. However, one thing Reid and Peolosi like is power, and having started rebuilding at least a portion of the old Conservative Democratic base that has been all but wiped out over the years, they weren't about to jeoparize it by shoving such an unpopular bill down the throats of those new Dems that they worked so hard to get elected. This was one of the first real tests, and just as years ago you could count on conservative democrats to join Republicans to buck a liberal bill, we saw the same thing on this one. If the Dems are able to expand this small group, and to support it even if it doesn't pursue the liberal line, this could be more important to future Congressional power than any other recent action. Republicans need to take a hard look at this. If they don't get the message, and Pelosi and Reid keep recruiting conservative Democrats to run in Conservative districts, it could be along road back for Republicans. Conservative Democrats at one time were a solid part of the party, and were the last ones anyone would question the patriotism of. This got lost after VN.



HUNTER FOR AMERICA

Republican voters still get to decide who their nominee will be. Money only buys elections when people act like sheep. If 80% of Republicans are indeed seeking a conservative, we can nominate one. We can nominate Duncan Hunter. The money players won't like it and are trying to convince us only Rudy, Romney, or McCain can win. Hogwash. They want an open borders candidate. Give Americans a chance to vote for a candidate who WILL secure the border and watch turnout soar. Americans want their government to fulfill it's most basic responsibility.

The primary responsibility of the U.S. government is to protect the territorial integrity and people of this country. They have completely abdicated this responsibility. Both parties have been complicit in this. We are being told it is not possible to control our borders, enforce our laws, and thereby control our destiny as a nation. Hogwash. We are being sold out by corporations intent on importing workers for jobs that can't be exported with the taxpayers paying the true costs, financial and human. If we act like sheep and don't stop the inundation across our borders, we will lose our country without a bleat.

http://www.gohunter08.com

Conservativism Grows
We all know that the GOP was voted out in November of 2006, not conservativism. Many blue dog Democrats got elected in our districts. If the Democrats have to put up more and more of them, there will eventually be an in-fight between their liberal and moderate wings.

Still now is our chance. Most of the GOP in the House and about 30 senators got the message the base sent last year. Now is the time to capitalize on the fracturing Democrats. They can't govern, we all see that.

They have the lowest congressional approval rating ever. A new survey by Rasmuessen shows that for the first time this year, people in America identifing themselves as Republicans has increased. We are now back to the levels we were at this time last year prior to 2006 and the scandles. More Americans trust the GOP on immigration (remarkible that came after this bill was defeated by Republicans) and national security.

We can make 2008 a good year for our side. We will win the White House and we can take the House. The Senate is not accessible at this point but we have house cleaning there anyway. Fred Thompson-Michael Steele 2008!

Bush

Bush will never reverse his stance on immigration, because he is a devout believer in erasing America's borders.

That's where the Harriet Miers analogy falls apart.

I don't believe getting Miers on the Supreme Court was an ideological imperative for Bush. Open-borders, however, is.

That's why I don't believe he will make any more effort to enforce our borders now than he has before. He not only doesn't believe in enforcing our borders, he believes America would be a better place if it had no borders.

Personally, I believe America WOULD NOT EXIST if it had no borders, so obviously I disagree with Bush.

But it is always good to try to understand the mind of your opposition.


That is one thing the open-borders crowd don't seem to be very good at. They think it is so self-evidence that America would be a paradise if we just demolished our borders and let anyone come to the country who desires to, that they can't comprehend how anyone could believe otherwise.

In contrast, I can comprehend the open-borders crowd. They have this utopian vision of a World Government where all people can freely move about wherever they wish. Equality for all of mankind. The problem is that is not how it would play out. The way it plays out is that our country, which is already headed for an economic crash of historic proportions, becomes the "social service agency" to the world. We try to provide first-world welfare and other public services to every poor person in the world. Then as those people get the right to vote, they vote themselves an even more generous welfare system.

It could indeed serve the interest of some in foreign countries. Hey, Mexico's wealthy are getting one heck of a deal paying paltry taxes and having the US pick up the tab to educate and medicate their lower-income populace.

Bottom line, utopian dreams may be attractive, but the horrors they can lead to are anything but.

Michael Steele

I am wary of Fred Thompson because of his past record of supporting open-borders policies.

With Michael Steele at the VP spot I would feel a whole lot more comfortable about the situation, though.

But for now, I'm a Romney supporter. Just sent him my $2300 in fact.

The Polls
The latest Fox poll gives Congressional Democrats a 36% approval rating, whereas Republicans are given a 30% approval rating. Typically, over the last year, they both get in the range of 30% to 40%. 29% in April of last years was the lowest recorded in 06.

As far as terrorism, Bush gets about 42% for and 52% against, but on Iraq, he drops on all recent polls to 30% or below for, and 70% or above against his competency in handling Iraq. In terms of who is better suited to handle the war in Iraq, 35% think it's Bush, and 51% think its the Democrats in Congress. Rasmussen reports it at 50% for the Democrats, and 38% for the Republicans. Further, 58% of Americans now see Iraq as a mistake.

In terms of Rasmussen - 53% of the public wants Congress to push Bush harder on Iraq, and the Democratic Congress is 1% above where Republicans were heading into the 06 elections.

In terms of Rasmussens Generic Congressional Ballot, Voters trust Democrats more than Republicans on 9 out of 10 key points covered. The only issue they win, and it is only by a single point, is on National Security - which is at 45% to 44%. On Iraq, the Democrats lead 48% to 38%.

On the rest, the Democrats lead by 4% on taxes, 6% on Immigration, 7% on economy, 10% on abortion, 10% on Iraq, 13% on the education, 17% on ethics and corruption, 18% on social Security and 25% on healthcare. Republicans have gained some traction on those calling themselves Republicans - as you noted - but the sum total added was 1 whole %. Hardly anything to get up and shout about. Democrats, on the other hand, lost 1/10 of 1%.

As far as the surge and whether or not to bring troops home, 26% believe we should bring some troops home, and 40% believe we should bring them all home. This is an increase of 12% over the number prior to the debate on the defense budget. Further, the public, including Republicans, is getting increasingly pessimistic on Iraq.

In sum, whereas Republicans over the years after VN were trusted to handle national security better than Democrats, they've lost that edge.

Under the circumstances, I don't share your optimism at this point.

Rather, I think Republicans still have a lot of hills to climb. They might have a shot at Congress, but it's a very big if at this point.

The gorilla, after all, is Iraq, and the fact that Republicans have lost the edge they once had on National security. Whereas Democrats have kept there's on the Domestic front.

And if, as it increasingly appears, Republicans in Congress join Democrats to force a change in Iraq so that at least some troops come home, I can't see how this will help Republicans.

Left and Right together
From the Left, Bush is an inept bungler whose foreign policy and war are a disaster for this country. From the Right, Bush is an inept bungler whose subservience to the agenda of the political class and business are a disaster for this country.

Any chance we can all get together and impeach him? Just a thought.

I don't think so
I really don't think there is a come-back for Bush. He has blown the trust of many of his erstwhile supporters. Just like many Americans don't trust Congress to do what is right for the country, many Americans don't trust Bush.

And renewing that trust is going to be a long, hard road. A road which will require the so-called leadership to actually start addressing some of this country's problems rather than playing games in D.C.

Fred/Gestell
I also believe Bush cannot make a comeback. He didn't listen to his generals, showed no interst in the Reagan legacy of domestic spending, and then didn't listen to his base on immigration. He picked fights - rather than built coalitions. He didn't need to insult the Army in 03 by by-passing all the active duty generals and making someone a chief who had been on the retired list for three years, and he didn't need to insult his base over immigration. He has a vindictive streak in him. And, when he picks a course, he seems determined to ride that particular pony right off the cliff if necessary. He's a strange one in some ways. I could never figure out why he waited 4 years to make changes in his Iraq policy. People tend to believe their eyes more than their ears, and for so long he kept saying everything was fine - yet people's eyes told them it wasn't fine. Then, he bought into Reid's call for him to put pressure on the Republicans in Congress, which brought him riding in to save the day. All the while, Reid knew full well he had 15 Democrats who weren't going to vote for that bill - and without those 15 Democrats - there was no way it would ever get 60 votes (he can count votes in his own caucus after all). So Reid sat back and let Bush pick a big fight with his own supporters, none of which helped Republicans with Hispanics - and then pulled the plug. We used to call that getting snookered.

I'll be glad when he goes back to Crawford.

President Jorge in a death spiral
Preidente Jorge is a lost cause... in Faustian fashion he sold his soul (and willingly sold out America) for latino votes and business lobby money, and he ran with neoCON dogs and got fleas by invading Iraq, where we are engendering terrorists. God I feel sorry for our troops in the crossfire of a sectarian civil war which figures to drag on another 10 years.

Jorge clearly believes that a globalist, open borders, NAU/SPP, embrace the ILLEGALS agenda is the way to go. On the two great issues of his tenure, he will have been antipodal to and antithetical to the best interests of America. He chose a war against the wrong bad guys, and he has placed a welcome mat at the border-- bienvenido amigos!

Did you catch Pan-Mexican Quisling-In-Chief Presidente Jorge speaking with acute chagrin about the demise of Scamnesty?! Talk about a lame duck-- he looked like a dead duck! Sometimes we reap what we sow. Jorge told them recently while visiting his amigos in Mexico that he personally would work for THEM on immigration "reform" HERE. He had already surreptitiously agreed on his own to send non-existent S.S. funds (taxed as we go) south to Mexico. He has played a shell game with border security and enforcement-- a wink that was well known to the border crashers. He had had his lackeys persecute and prosecute Campean and Ramos in a show trial with kangaroo justice, in part to influence last year's Mexican election.

Stick a fork in that turkey Jorge-- he is done. Contrary to what some gadfly naysayers have brayed generally and in Washington in shameful red herring fashion, we were NOT "fearful xenophobes". The fear was of our own deceiptful, duplicitous government! There is NO TRUST that Jorge would EVER mean his facile lines about, "Of course, border security and enforcement must come first." Sell that disingenuous tripe to the Polish Navy, Jorge! We know that thousands of border agents have been approved and 800 miles of fence, but NOTHING done. Chertoff is a eunuch shill for scamnesty with a leftist heritage-- Jorge picked him to sunder homeland security because the both WANT illegals here. We have been down that primrose path with "we will not engage in nation building" and we "will be fiscally responsible." Once burned, shame on you,... twice burned, shame on us!

THE NEW LIONS OF THE GOP!
Buchanan coined it correctly: Senators Jeff Sessions, Demint, Vitter, and Coburn are THE NEW LIONS OF THE GOP! Is this the beginning of a "Reagan Renaissance?"

America desparately needed some strong leadership to look after things for the American people. These fine Senators stepped forward! They are men of principle and integrity and should form the centerpiece of a new coalition of Senators for they have helped with the grace of God to transform this new Senate and/or Congress into what I believe should be dubbed or called "Reagan Renaissance."

I can think of a couple of Senators on the Democrat side of the isle like Senator Dorgan but I will let these Senators pick from among their own as a new coalition should be formed to replace the rest of the LOTT! Also, I think that it is important that they know that there was divine intervention involved in what happened the other day.

I would like to humbly remind them that a lot of Americans are praying for them and our country because there is a lot of work to be done in order to straighten out the enormous amount of damage that has already been done to the nation and the economy.

Almost forgot?
I believe Senator Jim Webb would make an excellent member of this new "Conservative Coalition" afterall, he was Secretary of the Navy under Ronald Reagan I believe.

I will just have to overlook the book stuff! LOL

We the People
What all this shows us is that if we really are We the People, we must, as the Founders warned us, be vigilant.

What we’ve tended to do is think we elect people to do what we think we’ve told them to do. The reality is that less and less are WE electing anyone.

Why else is someone like Ted Kennedy still in office, for instance? Does Massachusetts REALLY keep electing him? That just doesn’t make sense.

What the defeat of the immigration bill should indicate to all – president, legislators, SCOTUS, and We the People, is that there’s a new way to come together, disseminate and debate information, and be heard above the backstage string pullers. It’s the Internet.

That legislators and the president should be so surprised and angry at what We the People did to defeat this amnesty legislation, should tell We the People more clearly than any other thing, that We the People have not been in control of our own government for far too long, and that we daren’t relinquish this new, tentative grasp. It’s the Internet that’s given us back our right to control our government.

The reason the legislators are reacting by bringing up again the “fair use” issue is only to attempt to silence us by cutting off the previously underestimated power of the Internet.

Just as when it first registered on Congress’s radar and the legislators were so woefully ignorant and out of touch they thought the “Information Super Highway” was a real physical road, and they attempted to impose certain highway regulations on it, they are once again stung by this untouchable, uncontrollable, free and open method of communication that by-passes their propaganda mills, gate keepers and handlers.

Pay special, careful heed: if they are allowed to regulate the Internet, we may as well be resigned to existing in a Gulag. It will happen.

This isn’t about race, neighborliness, trade, or the general welfare, tolerance, or fairness. It’s about who controls lives.

If we would maintain any control over our own lives, WE the People MUST respect and protect and never take lightly the one tool that levels the playing field for us, that once again makes our “elected” officials only our specifically tasked representatives, nothing less, nothing more.

Through the Internet we once again can know what each other is really thinking, where real agreement and disagreement are, what proposed legislation – potential laws ruling our lives – really says and contains, and change our government to reflect us, not the faceless, nebulous string-pullers, whomever they are.

Hold the Internet close; know it is our only weapon against those who would impose their control over us for their own pleasure.

This isn’t some game; my life isn’t some video Nintendo or Game Boy game. Is yours?

Don’t let our government treat us like that. They got a rude awakening last week. Make sure they take it to heart and never again gain control of the joystick!

It doesn’t take special interests, lobbyists, multi-millions of dollars, to participate in government anymore. It just takes an Internet connection.

Don’t let them regulate it; don’t let them tax it. Don’t let them dictate what, who, why, and how. Be responsible for what you allow on your computer. Be responsible for how your child uses computers, cell phones, iPods, etc. Don’t give the corrupt government string-pullers an excuse to limit our Internet access, because that will by definition cut off any real participation we could have in government, forever.

As many of you have pointed out several times, things have gone so far already that if we don’t seize this opportunity to turn things around right here, right now, it is all lost. Strangely, but undeniably, forever has arrived. The Internet is our last, best (REALLY BEST!!!!) hope and means of righting ourselves and our country.

Don’t hand it back to them!!!!

The “fairness” bill may not seem so significant compared to the threat of Islam, international relations and trade, etc., but it is. All else falls, if they pass that one. We will have our throats cut to prevent us uttering a single opposing sound from then on.

It was the Internet that gave us our victory last week, not talk radio. Talk radio is a red herring; it could be heard even by those legislators who still cannot be bothered with the Internet themselves, still “doing business” the old ways. It couldn’t have made a difference if the Internet weren’t there as a vehicle to begin with.

Our victory – in their previously ignorant eyes – was a stealth attack, but like the lizard whose tail the cat got, they’ll be more careful about our ability to communicate and mobilize effectively from now on. Don’t, like the complacent cat who thinks because the thing wiggles it’s the lizard, think we got the beast.

The Internet is our popular voting booth now. Use it well, guard it well.

They have no choice but to pay attention. As long as we choose to make them pay attention.

Someone mentioned somewhere (on another thread another time) that the people can write and submit to Congress bills/laws for legislative consideration. Why can’t we do that with illegal immigration enforcement, border security, “fairness” in media/communications, taxing the Internet, and taxation, period? Isn’t the IRS, as part of OUR government, supposed to be working FOR us, not against us?

We the People have only begun to flex our new-found – RECOVERED!!!! – muscles. July 4 is INDEPENDENCE DAY!!!!

We the People: HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!

Then let’s roll up our sleeves and get to work on this decaying government!

Robert
You need to read the 14th amendment.

It states " All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, "

There is an arguement that can be made to the effect that those who are here illegally are not under the jusisdiction of the US and therefore their children are not automatically citizens.
Congress can define this meaning if they so choose.

This agruement has been advanced by Sen Kyl who, despite his backing of this amnesty bill, is still a noted constitution scholar.

( I know my spelling is not the greatest, sorry)

lodestar
actually we don't know what the president believes in. I think along the lines, that his handlers and special interest buddies prepare his agenda and he willingly goes along. He was given credit for being aggressive against terrorists in the ME but is unable or incapable of understanding a domestic threat. He has betrayed his oath to defend america from invasion and has insulted all americans by his insistance that these illegals are performing a valuble service to this country and we should not only welcome them to live amongst us but we should give them some form of fast track path to citizenship. That he places such a low premium on our most precious pocession and is willing to bestow it on those who broke our law shows american citizenship has no value to him. Fortunately the american people spoke in such large numbers that his legacy is essentially in the dumper. Unless he is forced into action due to some crisis in the ME I don"t expect to see any leadership during his final 18 months on the job. If his latest antics of attending a mosque and placating muslims is any indication I think those in the ME will have a tough time stop from laughing should he talk tough once againLikewise there will be no leadership from the president concerning the problem of the illegals which he seems to believe doesn't exist

It's OK, Lodestar
Your posts contain stuff that needs to be said, repeated and amplified.

So don't worry (as I'm sure you won't) about what Roberto Mencia spouts. By the way, I find it humorous.

Typical of the Jackass party, he nags either way (sorry about the equinely-mixed metaphor):

We: Bush is great. He: you are an hombre muy loco for jolding that thought.

We: Bush is lame. He: you an hombre muy loco because we jave knoon that all along, tio.


Robert: two words
Shut up.

reply to : Roberto
If you liked my last post here, check out the one here:

lodestar writes: Tuesday, July, 03, 2007 12:04 PM

And hope you did not miss this nugget:
____________________________________________

Also enjoy Roberto for his unwavering Walter Mittyish comic relief and unswervingly tangential attempts at cognition. He claims to be a pilot, but probably could not find his stick with both hands and a flashlight. He has been sniffin' more than oxygen!

You gotta' try very hard to outdo Loyal Democrat with pretentious platitudinous prattle! Roberto has wandered off the reservation of reason without a homing device... at least LD is being ironical!
_________________________________________________

I noted that you are good for comic relief, Roberto... you have the schizophrenic's penchant for the inconsequential and extraneous, signifying nothing. You clearly revel in supercilious gadfly gobbledegook, which begs the question of motive-- hence, schizophrenia would reasonably explain the affliction.

As for the length of some of my posts, they are not intended for those with room temp IQ's who are cognitively deprived and gravitas averse.

blueblood
Good article. Of course as Pat is well aware, GWB will not change course and build the fence, despite clear indication of where the american populace stands on the matter of immigration. Even his war on terror appears disinenguous given the porousness of our borders, let alone the illegals coming in for jobs. Bush is a NAFTA NAU man all the way; his blueblood feels no empathy for the redblooded workingman's plight. Jobs overseas, jobs for immigrants, soldiers in Iraq; its all good for big business.

Whoa, Roberto
I just read your last two posts several times each, trying to figure out what idea you were trying to convey.

Absolutely incomprehensible!

So, for your grasp of the lingua franca of these United States, the ability to communicate in the English language as it is commonly understood, you get an F-!




You seem so hot on handing out grades to people. Suck on that one, bud.


PS

Aren't you supposed to be helping your folks pack up, "anchor baby"?

No amnestia, Roberto! La Migra's coming! Andalay!

LIberty means freedom from....
Great article, hit the nail square on the head. Another realignment, Bush doesn't have the wherewithal or guts to turn and lead such a movement.

Reagan Democrats and Reagan Republicans (Red state Americans) could rally to a candidate that speaks with conviction and forthrightness on the War against Terrorism and Secure Borders First. Adherence to the Reagan philosophy, the classical philosophy of limited government, strong families, private ownership of property, free markets, religious freedom, representative government, and more.

Above all else the coming candidate who will galvanize these forces will speak with great optimism and speak of liberty in it first principles, that is, liberty means from from government, regulations taxation.

The latter day materialist speak of liberty in their own image, liberty to them means freedom to do whatever they want.

Patrick J. Buchanan - great article, great analysis

Revision
Above all else the coming candidate who will galvanize these forces will speak with great optimism and speak of liberty from first principles, that is, liberty means freedom from government, regulations taxation.

In Defeat.....Sir Jorge
We are not always with you Pat. You have loused up a few things yourself. You often are on the wrong side of the conservative fence. However,

...you did pretty good today at laying out what this man, called president, ought to do if he has any real backbone. There is just one problem as I see it.

It doesn't fit the plan. You know, the biiiiig plan.
You know, the ONE WORLD PLAN. He was sworn in by some other powerful people to change this country so they can change the world to fit THEIR plans.

Kind of like the Muslims. If you are not one of them, it's OK to lie to you. The end justifies the means, or does it.??.

LOL, Roberto
You have never taught me anything. If you're talking about your idiocy of yesterday, I didn't even bother pointing out to you the obvious point that we are still in the FY for which the funds were appropriated, moron.

You are like an idiot savant, without the "savant" part.

You seem to learn one new word a day without bothering to learn what it MEANS, then you throw it around like you really have a clue what you're talking about. Yesterday it was Fiscal Year, and you were clueless. Today it was "cert" as in Certiorari, a la the Supreme Court, and again you were totally clueless.

Man, watching you embarrass yourself would be painful if it wasn't so damned funny.

Gray Cat "We The People"
You are so right about regulation of the Internet. It is vital that it remain as is. And we must practice self-regulation, as you suggest, so that the government will have no excuse to infringe on our freedoms. Nor can we allow them to tax it. Many would not be able to afford to use it.

Let's take a stand now!!!

BTW, Roberto
Here's the link to the Homeland Security FY 2008 budget, in which you'll see $1 Billion allocated for fences.

http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy08/pdf/budget/dhs.pdf

We are in FY 2008, dumbo. For $1 Billion, I'd expect to see more fencing than 3 miles built, capisce?


My apologies to the Magic Kingdom
for taking the name of the beloved flying elephant in highlighting the mental deficiencies of Roberto The Cretin.

My bad.

FY 2007 budget for fencing
$1.5 Billion.

Where's the damned fence?

BrianR
Perhaps it was not for "fencing" as in a barrier; perhaps it was for providing each illegal Hispanic with a mask, black cape and a rapier so that they could slash a giant "Z" (for Zamnesty) on our collective backside.

THE LIONS OF LIBERTY!
The more I keep thinking about it the more I like it. As Buchanan coined it...Senator Jeff Session, Senator Jim Demint, Senator David Vitter and Senator Tom Coburn are the New Lions of Liberty!

Also, I am now convinced that the three Republican Candidates who are the only ones that can beat the Democrats are some more Lions of Liberty: The Triumvirate...Tom Tancredo, Ron Paul and Duncan Hunter.

These Lions of Liberty can beat the Democrats in 2008. "All for One, and One for All" the old motto becomes their new motto!

LIBERTE!

First you gotta be smarter
In order to train bird dogs, first you must be smarter than the dog!

This premise is lost on the Bush administration. They are not going to push for border control because they don't have the brains to do that. But then, that is just one issue where they don't have enough brains to accomplish anything.

You would think that with the world's best military force and four years of war that Bush and his generals could manage to defeat a third world nation like Iraq and you would be wrong.

You would think that when he had the opportunity to appoint a Supreme Court justice that he would have picked Sam Alito first instead of Myers, but you would be wrong.

You would think that with the dismal performance of American schools that he could have done something to improve that, but you would be wrong.

You would think that he would have vetoed those huge spending bills but you would be wrong.

You would think that he would have vetoed McCain-Finegold but you would be wrong.

But then, when the dog has more brains . . .
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.