Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Pat Buchanan :: Townhall.com Columnist
November '56: Defining moment
by Pat Buchanan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



November 1956, 50 years ago, was a month the drama of which many of us can yet recall. It was a defining moment of the Cold War.

This was the month Eisenhower was re-elected in a landslide and in which he laid down, in simultaneous crises, the new ground rules of the Cold War, both to our NATO allies and Soviet adversaries.

On Oct. 29, in a strategic thrust of which Ike had not been informed, Israel launched a pre-emptive strike on Egypt, seizing the Sinai. Israel then called on Britain and France to come in and separate the armies and occupy the Canal that Egypt's Gamal Abdel-Nasser had nationalized.

British and French troops moved on Suez. Nasser railed against Western aggression, and Nikita Khrushchev rattled his rockets and threatened to rain them down on London. "I know Ike. He will lie doggo," Harold Macmillan had assured British Prime Minister Anthony Eden.

Like many Brits, Macmillan had misread his man.

An angry Ike ordered the French and British out of Suez, threatened to sink the pound if the Brits did not depart and told David Ben-Gurion to get his troops off the Sinai or face U.S. sanctions.

Ben-Gurion went, Eden's government fell, and, so legend goes, his successor Macmillan telegraphed Ike: "Over to You!" Macmillan meant that Britain's responsibility and role in securing the Middle East would now have to be assumed by the United States. For, without Suez, the Brits could no longer secure it.

At the time, many felt Ike should have let the Brits take down Nasser. But Eisenhower was not only enraged at not being informed of the operation, he had come to believe British imperialism was finished, that Arab nationalism was here to stay, that the Suez Canal was now irretrievable and that we had to deal with the new Arab world rather than attempt futilely to reconstruct the old.

Just days before the Suez crisis, however, Hungarian students in Budapest had risen up against the regime. When some were shot by Hungarian security police, a people's revolution erupted that overthrew the Soviet puppet, disbanded the security police and took Hungary out of the Warsaw Pact. For days, the Kremlin seemed paralyzed.

But with the world suddenly distracted by Suez, Khrushchev ordered hundreds of tanks and thousands of troops into Hungary. In a bloodbath that lasted for a week after Nov. 3, the Hungarian Revolution was drowned, 200,000 fled to Austria and Moscow imposed yet another communist Quisling on Budapest.

America did nothing. Ike sent Vice President Nixon to meet the fleeing Hungarians, some of whom cursed us for abandoning them. The Bridge at Andau, through which 70,000 Hungarians fled to freedom, was dynamited by the Soviets. The border was sealed. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Pat Buchanan is a founding editor of The American Conservative magazine, and the author of many books including State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Pat Buchanan's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
to Lydia:
I agree with about 95% of what I've seen you write. I also don't think we have any business entangling affairs with ANY other nation. We should have a strong military, but it should only be used to defend our own country. Period.

I however, do not agree with you on Israel. I do not think they are our buddies. I do however think that we have allowed our government and media to be directly influenced by them in a large way. We get one side of the story. We give money to Israel and they use a certain amount of it for AIPAC to buy off our elected representatives. I'm quite frankly, sick of it.

I strongly support Jewish people's rights to worship as they choose, as I strongly support anyone else's right to do the same. That does not mean that I support Israel's actions to control our government, media, or to encroach on other peoples' lands or downright invade them.

Seems to me that there is a big difference between the God that one worships and politics. The Talmud is both a religious entity and also has a strong political agenda. Advocating "Talmudic law" is very different than supporting religious freedom. Check it out.

to milkchaser:
If you're worried about our liberty, instead of looking outside, perhaps you should spend some time researching what is happening WITHIN your own country.

The Patriot Acts, the REAL ID Act, the Military Commission Act, John Warner's Defense Authorization Act of 2007 http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2006/10/1732834.php
to name just a few, are doing a fine job all on their own of stripping us of our liberty. Do you understand that we soon will be required to carry a national ID card, complete with biometrics (papers please), you can be deemed an enemy combatant, picked up and imprisoned indefinitely (without ever seeing the evidence against you) and now the President has taken control of all the state National Guards, in case he needs them for a variety of things, "in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy."

Well, isn't that just dandy. In addition to the Halliburton "detention centers" that we funded to be built some time back and the ones built during REX-84, we're just all set, aren't we?

This doesn't mention that our borders have and are being overrun by illegal aliens and that our President has entered into agreements and is executing the plans to combine the United States with Canada and Mexico. It is called the North American Union. Bye-bye Constitution.

No, I think we need to look at what is happening in our own country, if we are all so worried about preserving liberty. We are fiddling while Rome is burning.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.