Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, July 25, 2006
Pat Buchanan :: Townhall.com Columnist
Syria emerges front and center
by Pat Buchanan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Tehran, too, has suffered a loss of prestige. As patrons of Hezbollah, they are today seen in the Middle East as being complicit in an act of stupidity that has brought ruin on an Arab nation. And Iran's failure to aid her Shia allies in battle with Israel exposes them as something less than heroic Islamic warriors of Tehran's propaganda.

Indeed, the perceived impotence of Iran to aid Hezbollah, while Bush was giving Israel a free hand in Lebanon, may force Iran to show it yet has power to damage U.S. interests. Public denunciations of Israel by the U.S.-backed, Shia-dominated regime in Baghdad may be an indicator of where Iran intends to exact payback.

Syria's Bashar al-Assad seems to be the lone beneficiary of the war, if there are any. Though an accused enabler of Hezbollah, Syria is emerging as the only party that can ensure that rockets from Tehran do not reach Hezbollah through the Bekaa Valley.

If at the time of truce Hezbollah's Katyusha arsenal has been depleted, and the Lebanese Army and a NATO force are to be moved into the border region with Israel, Syria's cooperation in blocking Iran's resupply of Hezbollah is essential. Realizing this, Condi Rice has indicated a willingness to talk with Damascus. The question will then become: What is Syria's price for cooperation?

The answer is apparent. Syria has long sought a reopening of negotiations with Israel on the return of the Golan Heights, and a resolution of the Palestinian question by a return to land for peace.

Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert, however, abandoned that road in favor of a unilateral withdrawal from Gaza and unwanted parts of the West Bank, and annexation of all the rest, including all of Jerusalem and her distant suburbs. If Israel refuses to discuss the Golan with Syria, or to negotiate with a Palestinian Authority led by Hamas, it is hard to see any negotiated end to this Middle East crisis.

With its devastation of Lebanon, its blockade of the West Bank and Gaza, and its determination to destroy the Palestinian Authority, Israel is creating failed states on three borders. How this serves Israel's or America's interests is difficult to see.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Pat Buchanan is a founding editor of The American Conservative magazine, and the author of many books including State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Pat Buchanan's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
What You Say
Mr. Buchanan, a few points, in the order you present them:

You say the holocaust was part of the cost of ending Nazi Germany. Do you think Hitler, if unchecked by the Allies in their war against him, would have destroyed European Jewry less thoroughly than he did?

You say the collapse of the British Empire was part of the cost of ending Nazi Germany. What do you think would have become of the Empire had Hitler not been stopped by war?

You say this war Hezbollah has brought to Israel “seems to be winding down,” perhaps leaving Nasrallah as one of the “few winners.” What actions by Israel lead you to suppose it’s going to consider this whole thing over while Nasrallah draws breath?

You say the Lebanese government has condemned Hezbollah’s aggression against Israel. Have you seen the recent interviews in which Lebanese President Emile Lahoud and Lebanese PM Fuad Saniori express their respect for Hezbollah and acknowledge its role in the “liberation” and governance and defense of Lebanon?

You say that unless “aid is gotten into Lebanon” (after it’s gotten out of our pockets, eh?) and refugees are let back to their homes, that “Lebanon could become another failed state.” How successful a state do you think Lebanon was when Hezbollah was bringing thousands on thousands of rockets onto its territory and hiding them among the general population, which it is now pleased to “martyr,” piecemeal, as Lebanese political leaders sing its praises?

You say that “the perceived impotence of Iran to aid Hezbollah…may force” it to come now after US interests. And that Syria can soon demand the Golan Heights and land to the Palestinians “for peace” as inducement to block transit of Iranian weapons to what you think is going to remain of Hezbollah.

I think you are saying that the United States of America should reconsider its friendship with Israel, as our support of this democracy’s right to defend itself – of its right to exist – incurs the wrath of blood-lusting tyrants. I think you are saying we should encourage Israel to give itself up to those tyrants, so as to slow those tyrants’ approach toward us.

You make Neville Chamberlain look like Churchill and Rambo and King Solomon rolled into one. It is a good thing in this world that you are in charge of nothing.

Criticism of Israel part 2
To add to my comments below: some people here need to learn what true anti-Semitism is. You cheapen the word, and you cheapen the horrors some Jews lived through as a result of it.

Merely calling Israel "fallible" is not an incidence of anti-Semitism. Crticizing the effectiveness of a military operation (or what some see as the avoidable destruction that resulted) is not anti-Semitism.

Actual anti-Semitism consists of outright and outspoken hatred of Jews, and putting forth the notion that Israel does not deserve to exist as a nation, and acting on that notion...etc., etc. I find it exasperating and strange that I am thus compelled to define these things.

Being critical of the nation of Israel and her policies is NOT anti-Semitism.

In my comments in my previous post below, of course I do not mean to compare Israel to China...Israel's government is entirely different, and they are not a threat to Democracy. It is merely to illustrate a point about inaccurately labeling people with a seriously nasty term, by way of some half-assed association.

But Israel is indeed fallible, and acknowledging this, or calling Israel to task on some issue or other, is not a sin. The Bible is full of the Lord's criticism of the Israelites. He has been infuriated with them many times, and punished them with cruel punishments; but He will always love His chosen people.

In the meantime, keep writing your conscience, Patrick. Don't let the knee-jerk name-callers get to you.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.