Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, April 06, 2007
Oliver North :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Price of Appeasement
by Oliver North
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


SAN DIEGO -- "Where is the outrage?" Those are the words of one of five former U.S. hostages I have spoken with since March 23, when 15 British sailors were taken hostage by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Another previous victim of the mullah's malice inquired, "Doesn't anyone realize that the Iranians will continue to seize Westerners until they have to pay a price for doing so?" And a third American, held captive in Tehran by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his colleagues back in 1979-80, asked: "Why, after all these years, hasn't anyone stopped them?"

The answer, in a word: oil.

No Western leader -- not Tony Blair, not George Bush, certainly none of the leaders of "Old Europe" and surely no one at the United Nations -- dares risk the wrath of the ayatollahs and the possibility that Iran might shut off 20 percent of the world's oil. Just the chance that the most recent hostage crisis might worsen pushed the price of oil over $66 per barrel -- a 7 percent rise -- in less than a week.

Here in California, where we have been shooting interviews for an upcoming episode of "War Stories" for FOX News Channel, the headlines read: "Crisis Fuels Oil-Supply Fears" and gasoline prices hit $4 per gallon before the potential calamity was resolved. "Experts" -- there are always experts -- said that if the situation had escalated, the price of crude could have soared to "$100 per barrel, plunging the world into a depression."

If ayatollahs laugh, the tin-horned theo-despots ruling Tehran must be chortling in their beards. For nearly two weeks, the Islamic radicals running the world's pre-imminent terrorist state once again had leaders of the civilized world cowering and cutting backroom deals. But the clerics are confident there will be no consequences, all because of oil.

Other than terrorism, Iran has no ability to project power -- yet. Its air force is hardly worthy of the name. The United States has the capacity, in the words of one senior retired military officer, now a Pentagon consultant, "to eliminate the entire Iranian Navy in less than an hour." But Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's hollow threat, "If the Americans make a wrong move toward Iran, the shipment of energy will definitely face danger," is taken seriously in capitals around the globe, because the United States set the gold standard for how to appease terrorists during the first Iranian hostage crisis.

On Jan. 19, 1981, the day before he left office, Jimmy Carter accepted the conditions of the so-called Algiers Accord -- a secretly negotiated agreement between the Iranian regime and the U.S. government that gave Tehran everything they asked for in exchange for the release of 52 Americans who had been seized 444 days before. Later that day, while White House stewards and ushers prepared the Executive Mansion for Ronald Reagan, Carter was a very busy man -- signing no less than 10 executive orders implementing the onerous provisions of the Algiers pact. Among them: E.O. 12283, prohibiting anyone subject to U.S. law from ever bringing a claim against the Iranians for sacking our embassy or taking hostages. It was total capitulation. And it taught the Iranians a lesson about appeasement they have never forgotten. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Oliver North is the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance and author of The Assassins .

Be the first to read Oliver North's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
To Seventh Degree

"BS detector you got the Iran-Contra issue wrong."

Oh, really?

"Indeed, Ollie and others may have sold arms to the Iranians for two things: to get $ for the Contras to fight the Commies in Nicaragua; and possibly to effect release of western hostages held by Hezbollah..."

Possibly? Why are you equivocating? There is no doubt about it - Iran knew that they were able to buy arms only in exchange for their help in gaining the release of hostages, period. And of course, Reagan lied to the world about it.

"...some of whom were American."

Well I damned sure hope so. I mean, if the President is going to lie to our faces about something as serious as negotiating with terrorists, I hope that some Americans benefit.

"But typical of you lefties you FORGET THE CONTEXT OF IMPORTANT DECISIONS BY REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRTIONS: Iran was in a war with another of our Enemies --Iraq--and it was in our BEST INTERESTS to give Iran some support."

Geez, you really don't know much, do you? Don't you remember that photo of Defense Secretary Don Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein in late 1983? If Iraq was our enemy, why did this meeting happen? If "it was in our best interesting to give Iran some support," why did President Reagan say that the U.S. "would do whatever was necessary and legal to prevent Iraq from losing the war with Iran"?

"Get it?"

I do. You? Not so much.

"The context that Ollie writes in now? Iran trying to deflect attention from its nuclear program. YOu, Mr. BS, would allow them to do it,wouldn't you?"

Nope. But then again, I wouldn't have gotten us into a five-year long war that's sapped our resources and diverted our attention from the real sponsors of terrorism and instability in the world: Iran and North Korea.

"Ollie says NO, we shouldn't. THAT'S HIS POINT!!"

And my point is this: why do you give this joker any credit? Do some research, discover his blatant disregard for the Constitution, and find another standard bearer. There are plenty of rock-hard conservatives who still respect the foundation documents of our great country.

.

Drilling our own
Liberty writes: "If we were allowed to drill in Alaska, it would take care of our country's oil needs for quite some time."

Sure, but how many years between the granting of drilling rights and the juice arriving at the pumps?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.