Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, October 13, 2006
Oliver North :: Townhall.com Columnist
Insanity
by Oliver North
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Albert Einstein is credited with defining insanity as "doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different outcome." This Mr. Einstein is, of course, the Nobel physicist whose 1939 letter on atomic fission to President Franklin Roosevelt resulted in the Manhattan Project -- and the development of the first A-bomb. In the wake of North Korean "product demonstration" and claim to have detonated a nuclear weapon, U.S. decision-makers should heed the late scientist's pithy observation -- for our policy toward the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) certainly seems to fit the definition. It's time to face the facts: None of the "diplomatic initiatives" the United States has tried since 1945 have worked to prevent North Korea from becoming a serious threat to U.S. national security.

The post-World War II "diplomatic" decision to partition the peninsula at the 38th parallel allowed the creation of a family-run Stalinist dictatorship. When the DPRK invaded the democratic Republic of Korea on June 25, 1950 -- the United States took the case to the United Nations. Two days later, the U.N. Security Council resolved to "repel the armed attack" -- not to "unify" the two countries. Even this measure would have failed had the Russians -- with veto power -- not been absent when the vote was taken. The resulting four-year-long Korean War cost the lives of 54,229 U.S. servicemen and ended in a "diplomatically negotiated" stalemate right where it began -- on the 38th parallel.

Subsequent "diplomatic initiatives" have fared no better. In the 1990s, faced with the prospect of the DPRK developing advanced missile and nuclear technologies -- while millions of North Koreans starved -- the United States engaged in lengthy bilateral diplomatic discussions aimed at convincing the militant regime to cease and desist. The 1994 "Agreed Framework" has proven to be a disaster. The agreement required Pyongyang to stop all nuclear weapons development and the United States to provide North Korea with billions in foreign aid and two light water nuclear reactors for generating electricity. We complied. They lied.

By the time George W. Bush arrived in Washington it was apparent that "bilateral diplomacy" hadn't worked. When U.S. and allied intelligence services reported that Kim Jong-Il was secretly accelerating missile and nuclear weapons development, the Bush administration decided to try a "multilateral" approach -- the so-called six-party talks -- with U.S., North Korean, South Korean, Japanese, Chinese and Russian diplomats all sitting down at the same table. Now, in the aftermath of last week's claimed nuclear test, it should be clear that this "diplomatic effort" has failed as well. President Bush acknowledged as much in his press conference on Oct. 11: "With its actions this week, North Korea has once again chosen to reject the prospect for a better future offered by the six-party joint statement. Instead it has opted to raise tensions in the region."

The key words in the president's statement are "once again" and "raise tensions in the region." The "once again" observation is a reminder of Einstein's insanity definition. The "raise tensions in the region" proclamation is a gross understatement. Here's why:

Cash-strapped North Korea's only exports are counterfeit U.S. currency, illicit drugs and rocket/missile technology. Pyongyang's No. 1 customer for these "products" is Tehran. The Iranian Shahab-3 and Shahab-5 missiles are identical in design and performance with North Korea's Nodong and Taepo Dong missile series. Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has made it clear that neither "diplomacy," nor U.N. sanctions are going to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Using words remarkably similar to statements by Kim Jong-Il, he describes U.S., European, U.N. Security Council and International Atomic Energy Agency diplomatic efforts to deter the Iranian nuclear program as "useless resolutions."

It requires the willful suspension of disbelief to trust that Iran -- awash in petro-dollars -- won't try to buy North Korean nukes. Put differently, if you think that the jihad being waged against us is a tough fight now -- just wait until Islamic radicals have North Korean nukes. At that point, the "caliphate" of which Bush spoke on Wednesday will be a foregone conclusion.

It need not happen -- if we abandon the process that has repeatedly failed in the past. Mr. Bush says he wants to "give diplomacy a chance." He added, "there must be a strong Security Council resolution" to cause North Korea "to dismantle its nuclear programs." Past performance ought to tell us that won't work.

Instead of going back to the United Nations -- where Kofi Annan insists that "The U.S. and North Korea should talk," Bush would do better to recall the Congress into session until it fully funds and deploys the U.S. ballistic missile defense system; sends more Patriot Pac III and Aegis defense systems to our Asian allies and resolves to form a new alliance of Asian/Pacific democracies to ensure that the DPRK cannot export its nuclear and rocket technologies by sea or air.

Demonstrably firm U.S. leadership would be welcome by Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines, Australia and New Zealand. Building such a coalition now -- instead of repeating what has failed in the past, would offer hope that we really aren't insane.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Oliver North is the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance and author of The Assassins .

Be the first to read Oliver North's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
OK, so I'm just gonna jump in
Our son was in the Army, so he put himself in jeopardy for our country. We are blessed that the order to "stand down" was given while he was on the tarmac for Desert Storm.

He was over for lunch the other day when I told him I just might not vote this year. He said, "Mom, you cannot allow yourself to feel that way. Too many sacrifices have been made for that privilege." You know the time when your child says your words right back to you? What an epihany that is unforgettable.

So, yes, I will vote - sadly - holding my nose and wishing I had the knowledge to know as to which of these politicians is the lesser of the two evils. The worst of all is that I see an entire generation of children with no hope that anything is going to turn out right for them. I am finding it harder and harder to forgive.

We fiddled around to long
Fallujah, flatten it, Sadr and his city flatten it and kill him. Obvious solutions when the problems first arose.

Pantywaist, snivelling, politically correct, kinder gentler, meals on wheels military doctrine of the Clinton years is alive and well today.

You see it in the lawyers who determine the rules of engagement. I knew we were in trouble at the outset when the army court martialed a Battalion Commander who was a target for assassination.

The Commander blindfolded a suspect, dragged him to the weapons clearing sand barrel, put the suspect on his knees, cocked his weapon put it to the suspects head, then fired a shot into the sand barrel.

The commander got the names and information he needed to conduct his mission and the suspect got a new pair of under britches.

Right now the jihadist are all rooting for the democrats to win. It is the talk of the islamo-chat computer rooms. Bin Laden was right about America's cut and run, paper tiger, can't take casualties cowardice he saw in the Clinton.

Why did he do a political commercial for Kerry back in October 2004? Why is the pace of combat picking up in Iraq right now? Why did the potbellied dog eater try to fire a nuke? It is obvious, they are trying to scare up support for their democrat allies.

We might be in real big trouble if their choice, the democrat party wins. The democrats have been supporting their war on the west from the day after 9/11.

Why do they hate us? We mean you no harm. We caused them to attack us. Good lord the crap runs deep for such short sighted morons.

These numbnuts don't realize they will be the first ones to have their pointy intellectual heads sawed off with a rusty knife.

The democrats, Lenin's, "useful idiots" are at it again. Last time was Vietnam.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.