Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Saturday, September 09, 2006
Nick Nichols :: Townhall.com Columnist
It's time to hoist the black flag and start kicking some butts
by Nick Nichols
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
With unemployment at 10.2%, what will happen by the end of Obama's first term?



While waiting for the wind called Ernesto to make its way up the East Coast - bent on flooding our basement for the second time this year - a Google Alert blew into my inbox from the website www.worldchanging.com. I expected to be accosted by yet another diatribe on how Ernesto was caused by global warming, which in turn was caused by evil doer corporate polluters and their leader - the devil incarnate - George W. Bush. I was wrong.

The headline on the posted article caught my eye: “Is Capitalism Growing More Socially Conscious?” The article opined that “recent trends suggest that both corporations and investors are taking socially responsible investing more seriously.” As proof, the author cited a recent study revealing that 34 companies listed on the S&P 100 had issued Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports based on a third-party standard - the Global Reporting Initiative’s Sustainability Reporting Guidelines.

As an investor and a long-time critic of corporate socialism, my curiosity was piqued. Surely, 34 blue-chip companies would not embrace these so-called Sustainability Reporting Guidelines without first determining with whom they were getting in bed. Was this Global Reporting Initiative a counter-balance to the whacky, anti-free enterprise dogma preached by the kill-kapitalism crowd that launched the CSR movement in the first place? Was industry finally getting its act together? I fired up my turbo-charged laptop to find the truth.

Truth be told, the 34 companies that have adopted the reporting guidelines advanced by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) are either blissfully ignorant or they have joined the ranks of corporate appeasers and capitulators in the Neville Chamberlain Club.

It turns out that GRI is run by Ernst Ligteringen, a former Executive Director of Oxfam International and a past consultant to the International Labor Organization. The U.S. representatives on GRI’s board are Sean Harrigan, who previously served as an official with the United Food and Commercial Workers Union, and Joan Bavaria, who has served as President and CEO of the Trillium Asset Management Corporation, a social investment firm. For the record, Ms. Bavaria also sits on the boards of Earthjustice and the Earth Day Network. She is on the advisory boards of the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Greening of Industry Network.

Of particular note is that Ms. Bavaria is also the Founding Chair of CERES, a national network of investment funds, environmental organizations and other activist groups. Why is this noteworthy? Well, according to its website, GRI started as a project of CERES. So, who runs CERES? Does its governing board include representatives from the blue chippers of the S&P 100? No. Not one. Zero. Zip. Nada. The CERES board is a who’s who of the anti-free enterprise lobby, including the executive director of Friends of the Earth, and officials from the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, World Wildlife Fund, AFL-CIO, AFSCME and, yes, the Screen Actors Guild.

H.L. Mencken once observed that, “Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.” As an investor and unapologetic cheerleader for free enterprise, I must admit that when American companies jump under the sheets with activists that have dedicated their lives to undermining the very foundations of our economic system, Mencken’s words take on new meaning. More than 100 million Americans have invested their hard-earned dollars in the stock market. They have a right to expect that the companies they invest in will focus their resources on maximizing the return on their investments. Corporate resources diverted for the purpose of playing footsie with the Far Left represent a hidden tax on investors and a drain on the economy.

The time has arrived when individual investors must take names and demand sanctions when corporate executives join the Neville Chamberlain Club. This is advocacy of the kind employed by the Free Enterprise Action Fund (ticker symbol FEAOX), which uses its status as an institutional shareholder to persuade companies to focus on increasing shareholder value and profits rather than vainly trying to appease outside activists. It’s time to hoist the black flag and start kicking some butts.

With over three decades in the communications business, Nick Nichols specializes in crisis management and risk communications. He teaches graduate-level crisis management at the Johns Hopkins University.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Nick currently develops and teaches graduate-level crisis management courses at the Johns Hopkins University and co-author of Rules for Corporate Warriors: How to Fight and Survive Attack Group Shakedown.

Be the first to read Nick Nichols' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

true ethics and Christian Charity
"Christian values have declined in recent decades, yet you attack this which is following the principles of Christian charity"

The problem with this is there's a distinction between what people call "social responsibility" and what is properly called "ethics", and "Christian charity".

Ethics is based upon the fundamental truth that human life is of intrinsic value superior to any other creature and is the foundation of moral values. Ethics does not permit anyone to commit an immoral act, or to commit even a moral act that has a desired and unjustified bad effect on another person. Corporations like individuals are obligated to act within the bounds of ethics, lest we fall into a state of anarchy without regard to others. This does entail a due regard for what we would call "good stewardship" of the earth's resources, but that is not of primary concern. Corporations should only be concerned with the ethics of their own actions, and perhaps their business partners.

Christian Charity is the act of unselfishly loving another out of a love for Christ. It has little to do with this concept of "social responsibility" as proposed by the subject of the article. The principles of Christian charity are primarily the corporal and spiritual works of mercy. None of which address the environment. While it may be a good thing for corporations to support Christian Charity, it is the responsibility of individuals and voluntary groups, not corporations to execute.

Corporal Works of Mercy
=======================
Feed the hungry
Give drink to the thirsty
Clothe the naked
Shelter the homeless
Visit the imprisoned
Visit the sick
Bury the dead

Spiritual Works of Mercy
========================
Admonish the sinner
Instruct the ignorant
Counsel the doubtful
Comfort the sorrowful
Bear wrongs patiently
Forgive all injuries
Pray for the living and the dead



CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Anyone who has made it through Economics 101 knows that a society where comperition is the rule, and corporations don't waste resources on frivolous feel-good activities is a richer society, with richer stockholders, who are free to spend their increased earnings on whatever, even supporting Greenpeace, or PETA, if that's their bag. Corporations don't do Social Responsibility any better than governments do

And anyone who knows Europe understands that the only reason that they support Kyoto is that they have NO intention of meeting their goals, but they know that the US, once committed will meet its goals, sharply reducing our ability to compete in the world marketplace. Europeans are motivated by envy, that's the only way they will equal or surpass us in the foreseeable future.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.